Fukushima-type disaster inevitable in U.S.?
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission was to meet Tuesday to discuss sweeping new safety recommendations, after having just finished inspecting all 104 U.S. nuclear plants in the wake of Japan's Fukushima disaster.
On "The Early Show," CBS News Chief Investigative Correspondent Armen Keteyian spotlighted one of those facilities' post-Fukushima inspection reports.
Watts Bar, in Spring City, Tenn., is the last nuclear plant to be licensed in the U.S., and a textbook study of the pros and cons of nuclear power. It provides electricity to some 9 million people in seven states, yet is dogged with a long history of safety issues and whistle-blower lawsuits -- including six by a 71-year-old great-grandmother named Ann Harris.
If you walk through the front door of Harris's house in rural Tennessee, you'll meet one of the most unlikely and feared advocates of nuclear safety.
Harris said she "began as a clerk in instrumentation engineering at Watts Bar in construction on Unit 1. And I could barely spell 'nuclear' when I went to work."
What was the turning point in her work? "Basically," she replied, "the books are being cooked. People are saying things, they swear under oath it's been done, and it hadn't been done."
When Harris refused to sign a multimillion-dollar construction contract riddled with errors, she said, Tennessee Valley Authority executives told her that her career was over. Instead, it sparked a 28-year crusade devoted to preventing a nuclear accident.
Harris said, "You can see a Fukushima happening here in the U.S."
So it's not a matter of 'if,' it's a matter of -
"When," Harris finished the sentence.
CBS News has obtained a copy of a National Regulatory Commission (NRC) "Post Fukushima" Watts Bar report, dated May 2011. CBS News had two nuclear engineers look at the report. One gave Watts Bar a "D-" and called it "appalling." The other cited what he called more than 40 "disturbing findings" during a 40-hour inspection, including:
- A lack of emergency responder training
- Faulty control panels
- Malfunctioning communications equipment
- Issues with portable backup diesel generators
We asked David Lochbaum, a member of the Union of Concerned Scientists why the NRC isn't pounding on the door of Watts Bar, saying, "Look we need these problems fixed?"
"I think the fact that there hasn't been a major reactor accident in the United States for over three decades allows the industry and the NRC to become complacent," Lochbaum said.
Are they just gambling, taking one huge risk with people's lives with these reactors, particularly Watts Bar?
Lochbaum replied, "In some respects, it's the biggest poker game in the country. You're playing high-stakes poker with American lives."
But Bill McCollum, chief operating officer of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), the government-owned electricity corporation, said of Lochbaum's conclusion, "I think that's absurd."
McCollum says the NRC's findings are far-outweighed by safeguards built into Watts Bar.
McCollum said, "We're certainly gonna take those seriously, correct those issues. And then, even beyond that, our own reviews of the events in Japan have shown us that we have opportunities to bring in additional backup equipment that will make our response even more robust."
Tucked into the foothills of Eastern Tennessee, Watts Bar took 23 years to build, at a cost of nearly $8 billion. It was shut down in the mid-1980s over an avalanche of safety issues. In 1986, one independent report alone documented 5,081 "concerns."
Roger Hannah, senior public affairs officer for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, told CBS News, "The NRC treats every single allegation very seriously. It doesn't matter what the source. It doesn't matter what the subject. We look at it, we screen those allegations. We have done that for years. All the allegations that were provided over the years at Watts Bar have been addressed in one way or another. If we had doubts about the ability of TVA to operate the Watts Bar plant safely, we would not allow that plant to operate."
So he'd shut it down?
Hannah replied, "Absolutely."
To that end, TVA executives gave CBS News an extensive tour of Watts Bar's reactor and its twin, Watts Bar 2, scheduled to go online next fall.
They showed us diesel-powered generators -- one of four critical back-up systems to keep water flowing to the reactor, preventing a meltdown. They also showed CBS News the main control room, said to be able to shut down the reactor in less than three seconds.
You'll have to pardon Ann Harris if she's heard it all before. She's won a record six whistle-blower lawsuits against Watts Bar over issues like millions of feet of faulty electrical cable, and says she's paid a price for speaking out.
There have certainly been attempts at intimidation, recrimination and really, threats on your life?
Harris responded, "Yes. They ran me off the road. They wired my car for firebombing. They dropped the universal joint out of my car."
Harris left the TVA in 1997, but she's still taking late-night calls from whistle-blowers, still driven to hold the TVA and NRC accountable, standing square in the cross-hairs of the nuclear power debate.
In Part Two of our report, we'll take a close look at the very personal impact of a culture war at Watts Bar.
- Online Scam Targets Pet Lovers Play Video
- Sword-Wielding Porn Star Falls Off Cliff Play Video
- How to stop junk mail - forever
- Dad Punishes Daughter with Free Babysitter Ad Play Video
- Work-At-Home Scams Play Video
- Most of Forbes' most powerful women are moms
- Legit Work-from-Home Websites - and the Scams
- Terms to Never Use in Your Resume














Please don't drop your standards to those of the rag newspapers. I realize that bad news sells better than good news but sensationalism loses the more educated viewers over time.
Most of the opinions expressed in the media are based on ill informed data from lower level people ( like a dismissed clerk, in this case) who either have made some loose talks with the media or they have some grudge with the authorities concerned.
No media report is based on real scientific / engineering basis. They will quote " some experts", " some sources", etc. The very fact that they are not willing to talk to the nuclear experts and listen to the real technical matters speaks volumes of their biased mind set.
They all view from the "perceived risk" - something like fear for ghost, fear for darkness, fear for height, fear for water, etc. For these people no amount of explanation or technical reasoning is going to help. We need to buldozz them or ignore them.
If we go by the general public opinion on this kind of highly technical matters, it is like beleiving that the Earth is Flat, as almost every one was beleiving so for thousands of years !
By listening to the ignorant public who go by media hype which is against nuclear power, we are going to ruin the environment by resorting to more and more fossil fuels. It is going to be a major issue for India and China, which need huge energy for their development. If developed countries are ignoring Nuclear Energy, there will be clamour from the public for doing so in developing countries. After all they copy what happens in the developed countries, whether it is good or bad.
Only India had been able to tread a different path on the nuclear front. But, now there also it is becoming difficult day by day.
See what this MacAurther genius award winner and top scientist at a world known energy lab thinks of nuclear power (spoiler alert: he thinks nuclear does not work economically or as climate protection) see www.*******.com/forgetnuclear
So, please listen to the engineers and allow the nuclear power if you want to live longer and of you want your children, grand children to inherit this planet worthy of living.
Otherwise, the governments will be forced to build more coal fired plants which will dump all the carbon burried in the earth as Carbon Dioxide into the atmosphere.
Or foolishly, the politicians will be forced to invest in the so called "Non Conventional Energy Sources". Solar which consumes so much energy that it needs about 5 years to get back that energy and which has a life of just 25 years.
Wind power, though economical, will surely have climate change effect, which will be known after about 15 years, as we are facing from coal fired plants.
If you have a statement to make, then make it. Writing this headline with a question mark is nothing but unabashed sensationalism. Go back to journalism school.
yes, nothing happened. The deaths were all caused by the tsunami and the "meltdown" was a big nothing
Ahhhh, another stupid person. Those people may have not died YET, but they will.......after years of suffering.
YES
In the case of Fukushima, the Earthquake was a contributing factor.
Also, the Tsunami was a contributing factor.
What caused the disaster was "The Design."
I was under the misapprehension that once one SCRAMed one's nuclear reactor - it was safe. The only issue for safety was getting it shut off. Once the dampening rods were down, the critical reaction stops, then all is well.
NOT SO.
The design of the Westinghouse Mark I's is such that a shutdown must be followed by days of actively supported cool-down. Without a dynamic cool-down, the core melts down.
Our aged, thoroughly depreciated, Mark I's are just waiting to loose their cooling systems. It may not be due to an earthquake. It probably won't be due to a tsunami. Whatever happens, it will be new and different. And, of course, as in the case of Fukushima, according to the experts, totally un-anticipated - therefore, they (the experts) should not be held accountable.
Be advised:
The experts already have their excuses printed out.
They have put far more effort into obfuscating their complicity, than they have put into remedying their design.
But the real reason will be that our reactor's AREN'T up to code - not by a long stretch. They're old and outdated, and there's widespread coverup because we'd rather be ostriches with our heads in the sand than face the monetary facts of what it will cost to ensure they won't meltdown. We'll just make excuses for the personal costs, the number of lives lost and the environmental damage afterward.
Your comment is all fear and conjecture. Where are your facts? What are your credentials? In sum your anti nuclear arguement is nothing more than what an uneducated person would say to provoke more uneducated people into beliving a lie.
Jfarmer9
Source?
I don't think we really need a source. We all know that there is incompetence in almost everything. There doesn't have to be an earthquake. No matter what business it is, there are people that don't do their jobs. There are slack ass es.
And it is a FACT that these nuclear plants are old and outdated, and that there are coverups. Did you not see the story about it, on here, not too long ago? About the leaks and people not doing their jobs?
One thing for sure, is that the U.S. will be no less incompetent than Japan. Count on it. Now you might be able to get away with incompetence with other jobs, but this is one that can cost thousands of lives.
Just think of how many people, right now, that are drinking nuclear waste, on top of the jet fuel and other chemicals, in your water. MMMMMMMM yummy!