June 30, 2011 10:11 AM

Stephen Colbert OK to launch Super PAC, FEC says

Updated at 1:50 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON - No joke.

The Federal Election Commission said Thursday that comedian Stephen Colbert can use his TV show's resources to boost his political action committee, but he must disclose some major expenses as in-kind contributions from the show's corporate owners.

Colbert played it straight during his appearance before the commission, letting his attorney do most of the talking while saving his trademark quips for a crowd that gathered outside the commission building after the meeting.

"I don't accept the status quo," he told the crowd, brandishing a portable credit card processing machine. "I do accept Visa, Mastercard or American Express."

Colbert seeks "megaphone made of cash"

Many in the crowd handed Colbert their credit cards or dollar bills as contributions.

Asked what point he was trying to make about corporate America, Colbert did not miss a beat.

"None," he quipped. "I want their money."

Colbert, who plays a conservative TV pundit on "The Colbert Report," is forming Colbert Super PAC, a type of political action committee which will allow him to raise unlimited amounts of money from corporations, unions and individuals. The money will be used to support or oppose candidates in the 2012 elections through independent expenditures such as TV ads.

The FEC decision comes amid a broader erosion of campaign finance regulations in the wake of recent court rulings and with Republicans on the Federal Election Commission and elsewhere pushing for a rollback to give corporations and other wealthy donors stronger sway in financing campaigns.

Colbert had asked the commission for a so-called "media exemption" to allow him to use his show's airtime, staff and other resources for his political action committee without having to publicly disclose them as in-kind contributions from Comedy Central's parent company, Viacom Inc.

Colbert has said those undisclosed contributions could include the use of his show's staff to create TV advertisements about candidates that would air as paid commercials on other shows and networks.

The commission ruled 5-1 that he would have to publicly disclose as in-kind contributions from Viacom any ads produced by the show for Colbert Super PAC that air on other shows or networks. He would also have to disclose administrative costs that his show covers for Colbert Super PAC.

The Colbert ruling eclipsed a lesser-noticed decision by the Federal Election Commission Thursday that could also have a significant impact on the 2012 elections.

The commission said that candidates and party officials may solicit contributions for super PACs, but those contributions could not exceed the $5,000 limit for donations that applies to traditional political action committees.

Some campaign watchdog groups had feared that the commission might permit candidates and party officials to solicit unlimited contributions, opening yet another door to big-ticket donations.

While Colbert delights in lampooning politicians on his Comedy Central show, he raised some serious issues about public disclosure of corporate campaign contributions before the Federal Election Commission.

"Stephen Colbert is a funny man, but he asked a legitimate question and received a serious answer," said Federal Election Commission chair Cynthia Bauerly. "The opinion adopted today does not give him everything he asked for, but it appropriately applies the press exemption consistent with past Commission and court precedent."

Some campaign finance watchdog groups had warned that a favorable ruling for Colbert could spur many more undisclosed contributions to political figures who are TV hosts or commentators and who could opt to create their own super PACs to take advantage of any new loopholes.

The groups cited politicians such Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum who already have traditional political action committees and are either working now, or have worked, as TV hosts or commentators.

Bachmann: Media want "mud wrestling" with Palin
Bristol Palin: Michele Bachmann copied my mom's style
Palin blasts Hollywood stars at movie premiere

"The Colbert Report" has used satire to shine a light on campaign finance rules following the Citizens United ruling by the Supreme Court that helped pave the way for super PACs. Campaign finance reform advocates complained the ruling gave wealthy donors, particularly companies and unions, considerably more sway in politics.

Super PACs can accept unlimited contributions from corporations, labor unions or individuals, unlike candidates or traditional political action committees. Super PACs cannot contribute directly to candidates, however.

Colbert has said any ads for Colbert Super PAC would not be coordinated with any candidate or party.

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 21 Comments
by kansas1946 June 30, 2011 6:17 PM EDT
The FEC decision comes amid a broader erosion of campaign finance regulations in the wake of recent court rulings and with Republicans on the Federal Election Commission and elsewhere pushing for a rollback to give corporations and other wealthy donors stronger sway in financing campaigns.
************************************

LMAO. Poor Republicans never figured out to reap what you sew. They were so nuts about getting any kind of rules abolished that would prevent them from getting as much money as possible without any one having to know from who, that they got their way. Well it cuts both ways and now maybe the Democrats will learn to play as dirty as the Republicans and even things up a bit. Love it.
Reply to this comment
by ianlou June 30, 2011 4:56 PM EDT
Too Funny, I wonder if this is what the Supreme Court had in mind.

Tina Fey swayed the last election with her Sarah Palin impressions.
Let see what damage Steven Colbert can do to the GOP this time around.

It's also interesting that Tom Pety has told Michele Bachmann to stop playing his song "American Girl" at her Campaign stops.
This has happened to a number of GOP candidate in the past which offers the question: Can a GOP candidate find a decent Rock song to use with the blessing of the artist?
Reply to this comment
by aintfakin July 1, 2011 11:44 PM EDT
I love it how right wing cement heads have to resort to personal attacks and typos when they have absolutely nothing of substance to say or any clue about an intelligent rebuttal. 100 percent intellectually bankrupt.
by YourRearViewMirror1 June 30, 2011 3:43 PM EDT
by One--American June 30, 2011 2:58 PM EDT
When the Liberals lost ACORN, they had to think of another way to scam Americans for money to fund Liberal candidates.

******************************

Hey One--American,

Conservatives like Karl Rove with his 'Super PAC', the American Crossroads, would be stupid, if not idiots, not to do the same now that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled this Corruption is perfectly Legal like in Mexico.

Goodbye Democracy....Hello Oligarchy State!!!
Reply to this comment
by YourRearViewMirror1 June 30, 2011 1:58 PM EDT
by retiredgustav June 30, 2011 1:42 PM EDT
We need a constitutional amendment that would allow ONLY registered voter to make campaign contributions.

*************************

Hey retiredgustav,

Statistical FactS:

For the last 35 years, 23% of Americans over the age of 18 are Registered to Vote.

If this number, 53% of Americans actually go out and vote in the General Election. The numbers are much worst in the other Primaries, Mid-Term, Special, etc. elections.

In other words, 12% of Americans over the age of 18 determines our Leaders every 4 years.

Who do you Blame? The robber who just sucessfully robbed the Bank or the Bank for the Lack of Security?

I blame the Lazy, Low IQ and UnPatriotic WE THE PEOPLE for leaving it up to the 'haves' to take complete control of our political system.
Reply to this comment
by Bigheader June 30, 2011 2:13 PM EDT
Excellent comment. We vote for the government we get. We The People have nobody else to blame.
by forsanity1 June 30, 2011 6:39 PM EDT
Excellent.

Thomas Jefferson weeps, not only the apathy of "we the people" but at the certain absence of the informed electorate he envisioned!

Just read comment boards and wipe your eyes with Tom!
by retiredgustav June 30, 2011 1:42 PM EDT
We need a constitutional amendment that would allow ONLY registered voter to make campaign contributions.
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 June 30, 2011 12:55 PM EDT
They say the ship is sinking.

I say it sunk.
Reply to this comment
by YourRearViewMirror1 June 30, 2011 12:52 PM EDT
Only in a Democracy can a Great Marketing Political Campaign make Real Fools.
Reply to this comment
by freeamerica31 June 30, 2011 12:42 PM EDT
Corporations, Comedy Talk Shows, etc. etc....what's going on in this country? This guy is smart...not only does he not have to disclose every dime he receives, he also can use it for advertisment on his show to make him richer than he already is now. Poor folks you can do the same thing you just need to throw in more bodies to reach the same numbers. Everyone needs to start their own personal PAC committees. A scam waiting for you...just watch what happens...this deregulation of election campaign contributions is like what happened on Wall St to bring the country down...just another political, judicial screw up. Thanks Supreme Court Justices!
Reply to this comment
by YourRearViewMirror1 June 30, 2011 12:56 PM EDT
Hey freeamerica31,

...and this story is nothing and absolutely nothing. Just wait and see. It will take at least 30 years to get another U.S. Supreme Court makeup to reverse this Jan 21, 2010 decision.
by YourRearViewMirror1 June 30, 2011 12:42 PM EDT
-Knock Knock Knock
-What can I do for you?
-Good Afternoon, my name is Mr. Sam Rich and I am the CEO of the Greed Corporation. Here is a box with about $10 Millions in Cash for your upcoming Re-Election Campaign. I want you to always favor Walls Street over Main Street on all upcoming legislations.
-Please give it to my staff. Ask them for the Bank Routing and Account numbers so that next time you do not have to carry another heavy box.
-Oh No! C-SPAN and the BBC are filming us right now and taking a lot of pictures.
-Do not worry, the 5 Conservative Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Jan 21, 2010 that this Corruption is perfectly Legal and Constitutional like in Mexico. I nolonger have to knock on so many doors in my district begging the idiot fools for a contribution and for their votes.
-Wow great! I have to go now. I have about 100 more boxes with cash for other key political leaders. I need as many friends in Capital Hill as I can afford. I hope you win over your 'Retarded Liberal' opponent. Please feel free to let me know directly if you need more $$$.

-Thank you for your wishes and kind donation and may God help the Greed Corporation earn even more profits without working harder.

Goodbye Democracy...Hello Oligarchy State!!!!
Reply to this comment
by RealWorldNow June 30, 2011 5:19 PM EDT
And your telling me no democrat is going abuse the system? Hahahaha.. yeah.
Both parties are corrupt.
by YourRearViewMirror1 June 30, 2011 12:39 PM EDT
As of Jan 21, 2010, the 5 Conservative Justices in this U.S. Supreme Court switched America from a Democracy to an Oligarchy state.

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-205.pdf

The basis for the Court Decision was the redefinition of a Corporation as an Individual. Corporations are also made of and run by Foreign People like Osama Bin Ladin.

If you were mad, angry, sick and tired of Washington not listening to WE THE PEOPLE, then you have seen absolutely nothing yet.

If you were mad, angry, sick and tired of Absolute Corruption in Washington, then you have seen absolutely nothing yet.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/02/08/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry6186381.shtml

According to retired Conservative Justice Ms. Sandra Day O'Conner, if you can Legally Corrupt any Politician by Financing his Re-Election Campaign with $Millions, then what will stop anyone from Legally Corrupting any Elected Judge for Courts under the U.S. Supreme Court?

Why should our legislators and judges favor WE THE PEOPLE when Corporations can now Legally finance their political campaigns without limits?

Goodbye Democracy, Hello Oligarchy State!!!
Reply to this comment
by RealWorldNow June 30, 2011 5:22 PM EDT
WHo is the man that broke all records for fund raising and wants to raise 1 billion for his campaign?
See all 21 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook