Floodwater seeps into Neb. nuke plant building

Floodwaters from the Missouri River surround the Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station in this June 17, 2011 photo. / AP Photo/Robert Ray
OMAHA Missouri River floodwater seeped into the turbine building at a nuclear power plant near Omaha on Monday, but plant officials said the seepage was expected and posed no safety risk because the building contains no nuclear material.
An 8-foot-tall, water-filled temporary berm protecting the plant collapsed early Sunday. Vendor workers were at the plant Monday to determine whether the 2,000 foot berm can be repaired.
Omaha Public Power District spokesman Jeff Hanson said pumps were handling the problem at the Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station and that "everything is secure and safe." The plant, about 20 miles north of Omaha, has been closed for refueling since April. Hanson said the berm's collapse didn't affect the shutdown or the spent fuel pool cooling.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission spokesman Victor Dricks described the situation as stable. NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko plans to inspect the Fort Calhoun plant on Monday as part of a pre-arranged visit to Nebraska.
Feds: No danger at flooded Neb. nuke plant
In fight against floodwater, sand running out
Nuke plant averts shutdown from swelled Missouri
Hanson said OPPD fired up generators and cut the power supply after water surrounded the main electrical transformers on Sunday. The generators powered the plant until an off-site power supply was connected later in the day.
Officials said the berm wasn't critical to protecting the plant, which sits across the river from Iowa.
"There are other structures and systems in place that can ensure they will continue operating safely," Jaczko said Sunday.
The river was not expected to rise higher than the level the plant is designed to handle.
Jackzo inspected the Cooper Nuclear Station, which sits on the Missouri River about 75 miles south of Omaha, on Sunday. He asked plant officials and the NRC's local inspectors questions about the plant and this year's flooding.
The plant, which is owned by Nebraska Public Power District, remains dry because it sits at an elevation above the river and continues to operate at full capacity. The base of Cooper and its storage area for used nuclear fuel is 903 feet above sea level. The river was 900.2 feet above sea level early Monday.
Both nuclear plants issued flooding alerts earlier this month, although they were routine as the river's rise has been expected.
Flooding remains a concern all along the Missouri because of massive amounts of water the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has released from upstream reservoirs. The river is expected to rise as much as 5 to 7 feet above flood stage in much of Nebraska and Iowa and as much as 10 feet over flood stage in parts of Missouri.
The corps expects the river to remain high at least into August because of heavy spring rains in the upper Plains and substantial Rocky Mountain snowpack melting into the river basin.
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Reporter Michael Hastings dies at 33
- Google asks FISA court to lift gag order on NSA requests
- Taliban: We killed 4 U.S. troops at Afghan air base
- Scientists say shipwreck timber in Lake Michigan centuries old
- Tornado briefly touches down on Denver airport runways
- Girl who lost feet in lawnmower gets prosthetics
- TWA Flight 800 gets another look 17 years later
- FAA approval sought for 650-foot-tall Vegas thrill ride
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- They were lucky it was down for refueling. If the flooding caused the cooling pumps to fail, we would be facing a bigger situation.
- reply
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- I guess we should have taken the Japan disaster as a more serious warning.
- reply
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- No problem here. Use the flood water to cool the reactor core. Call the radioactive effluent 'augmented' farm/range soil hydration. Just say it will increase crop yields and they'll start calling you up saying they want some too.
- reply
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- We need to close any plants like this that are on floodplains immediately. Global climate change will cause more and more floods that will continue to threaten these plants that should never have been built in the first place.
- reply













