AP/ June 15, 2011, 9:32 AM

"Snake house" turns dream to nightmare in Idaho

In this Fall 2009 picture provided by Amber Sessions, snakes that the Sessions family caught are seen at the home they purchased near Rexberg, Idaho.

In this Fall 2009 picture provided by Amber Sessions, snakes that the Sessions family caught are seen at the home they purchased near Rexberg, Idaho. / AP Photo/Amber Sessions

REXBURG, Idaho - The five-bedroom house sits on pastoral acreage in the rural U.S. countryside. At a price less than $180,000, it seemed a steal.

But a bargain it wasn't. Ben and Amber Sessions soon realized the dream home they'd purchased in Idaho for their growing family in 2009 was infested with hundreds upon hundreds of garter snakes.

The ground surrounding the home appeared to move at times, it was so thick with snakes.

Throngs of snakes crawled beneath the home's siding. At night, the young couple said they would lie awake and listen to slithering inside the walls.

"It was like living in one of those horror movies," said Ben Sessions, 31.

The family would frequently eat out because their well water carried the foul smelling musk that the snakes release as a warning to predators.

Each day, before his pregnant wife and two small boys got out of bed, Sessions said he would do a "morning sweep" through the house to make sure none of the snakes had made it inside. That didn't always work. One day, he heard his wife scream from the laundry room, where she had almost stepped on a snake. He rushed into the room to find that she'd jumped onto a counter.

"I was terrified she was going to miscarry," he said.

They invited family as witnesses and snapped pictures.

At the height of the infestation, Sessions said he killed 42 snakes in one day before he decided he couldn't do it anymore. He had waged war against the snakes and "they won."

He and his wife had little recourse, though, when they decided to flee the home.

They had signed a document that noted the snake infestation. They said they had been assured by their real estate agent that the snakes were was just a story invented by the previous owners to leave their mortgage behind.

But the so-called Idaho snake house was no myth, according to the Sessionses, their neighbors, and the videos and photographs taken by them and past residents of the house. The couple said it seemed like almost everyone else in this tiny southeastern Idaho college town knew about it.

"I felt bad," said Dustin Chambers, a neighbor. "By the time we knew someone had bought it, they were already moving in. It was too late."

All of Rexburg, Chambers said, pretty much knows the property as the "snake house."

The Sessionses filed for bankruptcy. The house was foreclosed. They left in December 2009, the day after their daughter was born and just three months after moving in.

"We're not going to pay for house full of snakes," Ben Sessions said.

His wife, Amber, 27, said she felt like their family was starting to fall apart.

"It was just so stressful," she said. "It felt like we were living in Satan's lair, that's the only way to really explain it."

Several months ago, the house briefly went back on the market.

Now owned by JP Morgan Chase, it was listed at $114,900 in December 2010, according to Zillow.com, a real estate data firm. The price was reduced to $109,200 in early January, which was more than $60,000 below its estimated value. Then, Discovery Channel's "Animal Planet" featured the Sessionses' story in its "Infested" series.

The listing was removed and the home has stayed off the market while Chase decides what to do with it.

A Rexburg real estate company that was hired to sell the house referred all questions to a Chase spokeswoman in Seattle.

Darcy Donahoe-Wilmot did not return repeated phone calls from The Associated Press. But she did tell a business columnist for Dow Jones Newswires that the bank had contracted to have the snakes at the home trapped and released elsewhere.

Ben Sessions said that he has been diagnosed with snake-related post-traumatic stress disorder and that the house should be condemned.

"It's not right to continue to sell this home," Sessions said. He and his wife said they still have nightmares and haven't recovered financially.

The home was most likely built on a winter snake sanctuary, likely a snake den or hibernaculum, where snakes gather in large numbers to hibernate for the winter, said Rob Cavallaro, a wildlife biologist with the Idaho Department of Fish and Game.

In the spring and summer the snakes fan out across the wilds of southeastern Idaho, but as the days get shorter and cooler, the snakes return to the den in order to ball up for heat and to be accessible to each other for spring breeding.

Cavallaro has heard only of one other eastern Idaho home that was likely located on a snake den. There was also a bridge-widening project where workers ran into a hibernaculum, he said.

"It is an important site for the snakes," Cavallaro said. "Every now and then we build on them and it becomes a conflict."

Neal and Denise Ard previously lived in the home, and in 2006 they invited the local news station to come and film the buckets of snakes they had collected on the property. The video, which has 2.4 million views on YouTube, was taken before the Ards abandoned the home.

In March 2007, the Ards sued the couple who had sold them the home for $189,900 and the real estate agent who negotiated the sale, according to court documents. The complaint was dismissed a year later.

There have been some people who have looked at the house since the Sessionses moved out, neighbor Chambers said. One day, when a real estate agent was showing the property, a farmer who lives down the road stopped by to warn them, he said.

"Now, if anybody sees anybody, they kind of will let them know," Chambers said. "Just so that somebody else doesn't get caught in the same trap."

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
35 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MsInformation says:
READ people. The Sessions were informed of the snake infestation AND "signed a document that noted the snake infestation." It's not fraud when the person signs that they are aware of the issue. Now that they are bankrupt, the rest of us will be paying for their mistake. I don't feel sorry for them that they didn't check out the house for themselves or ask neighbors before purchasing it. They were TOLD of the infestation! They chose to believe that the previous owners were "liars" instead of doing a little sleuth work. I think the court should make them pay for at least part of the house. It's too easy to shirk responsibility onto "someone else" (re: the rest of us) via bankruptcy. Maybe the original builder should shoulder some blame too, for going ahead with construction.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
WTFNo says:
"They had signed a document that noted the snake infestation. They said they had been assured by their real estate agent that the snakes were was just a story invented by the previous owners to leave their mortgage behind."

Why don't they have a lawyer and why aren't they suing the real estate agent for selling them this contract/mortgage under false pretenses?
reply
MsInformation replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Because any judge would throw it out. It doesn't matter what the agent "said." That is he-said-she-said, unless they have some witnesses. The Sessions SIGNED A LEGAL DOCUMENT that they were aware of the snakes and were buying the house anyway. That was a pretty stupid thing to do without checking out the property for snakes. Courts don't hear cases where people were just plain stupid.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
knobcore says:
Till the yard, rent some concert subs and a flamethrower.

End of problem. ;)
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
abby_del_abbey says:
I would wager the previous owners knew about the situation and managed to ditch the house on unsuspecting buyers. However, if a property is a "steal" usually something is wrong.
reply
MsInformation replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
READING COMPREHENSION? You don't need to "wager" because the article says the previous owners not only knew, but said the snake infestation was their reason for leaving. The Sessions were told this BEFORE they bought the house, and they SIGNED A LEGAL DOCUMENT stating they knew of the snakes. It's really not okay with me that the Sessions want to blame everyone BUT themselves.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Proj-Coord says:
Money has no conscience. Why is the bank still selling this house to unsuspecting citizens. A venomous snake bite can kill. Knowing fully well that this is a potential outcome and selling it to people could be construed as "Premeditated Act to Kill Someone". I hope when someone gets bitten by a snake inside there, the Idaho courts would charge the Bank with Homicide and the Realtor as an accomplice to Homicide!!
reply
MsInformation replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
(1) The house is no longer for sale (2) The bank supplied a disclosure statement that states the house is infested with snakes. Any buyer must sign that he/she is fully aware of the infestation (3) Garter snakes are not poisonous (4) "Premeditated Act to Kill Someone"??? You are really nuts!!! I'm glad you clearly aren't part of our legal system!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TheLostTruckDriver says:
Snakes living in walls, making noises, most likely causing damage and leaving weird smells...sounds like a pre-existing condition that should have been noted just like water/fire & smoke damage, etc. Wouldn't this have some kind of natural disaster coverage if reported to insurance? There has to be some damage in the walls if they opened them up. Snake slime/waste, etc; can't be good for the walls and outlets. Sounds like a fire hazard or at least a health department issue. Now that everyone knows, there's no excuse. Seems to be stuck in red tape land, due to laws that are poorly written or a court run by people that could give two craps about making exceptions for obvious hardships brought on by negligence. It definitely should not be resold, it's not like you can spray the area and they will go away. The house needs to be condemned/removed/or an extensive and expensive relocation of the snakes which is probably not a good idea since it seems more part of their natural habitat to reside there.
reply
MsInformation replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
IT WAS DISCLOSED TO THE BUYERS! THEY SIGNED A DOCUMENT STATING THEY KNEW ABOUT THE SNAKES! Read the darn article!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
itgranny says:
I have an unreasonable phobia of snakes. I tell myself it's just a garter snake but even then I freak out when i see one. Living in a house like this would not be an option. Saying it's just a harmless garter snake makes no difference. People are often afraid of rats, mice, bats, spiders, worms, maybe even dogs. All in all though, i can't figure out why they don't just kill them all. I would imagine finding the actual den and filling it with CO2 would take care of it. Also, as someone else had mentioned on here, ducks and snakes don't mix and the snakes go away.

They didn't say when the house was looked at and sold. If it was Jan. or Feb. The snakes would be hibernating so wouldn't be seen. If the real estate agent made it a point to not say anything or mention it but not explain the huge extent that this property is, then they need to be sued.
reply
jack_sprat2 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Beyond the phobia is another problem. All of those snakes slithering through the house's walls will attract rodents. The snakes scales and discarded skins will attract insects. Happy! Happy! Joy! Joy!
DrKnowe replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
large garters may eat rodents. all sizes definitely eat insects. they'd be a deterrent. they'd attract snake eating snakes, ophidiophages, like kingsnakes, most of which also eat rodents.
don't scare people with old wives tales Sprat.
that's why on a farm, you never kill the snakes. keeps the rats out of the grain.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AngryOldWhiteGuy says:
I see this on wildlife shows all the time they "release" the snakes back into the wild?! Why?! Kill the ugly poisonous things they serve no purpose here on this earth other than killing a few rodents which we can get rid of in other ways.
reply
royrogers1948 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Garter Snakes are not poisonous.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wlhoppers says:
The couple may not have done their homework, but I would definitely sue the real estate agent who sold it to them for intent to defraud and for outright fraud. I'd include the state's Dept. of Insurance as well, since they had to be aware of the problem via the previous legal complaint.

It's an unfortunate situation but the snakes are just doing what they do naturally. Now the real estate agent...there's a REAL snake.
reply
displeased2 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You people need to read the article before commenting. They did try to sue, but the complaint was dismissed.
AngryOldWhiteGuy replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
the friggin judge dismissed a previous case! Kill all the darn snakes why must they be allowed to live? They serve no purpose to man on this earth!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
onefeather2 says:
I would sue the person who owns the house and the people who list it. They know the problem i am sure but when it comes to money they do not care. And how can you sell a house that has snakes in the walls. The people who are showing this house, but their name in the paper and on the web. Give this couple their money back, as it seems they[the ones who sold it to them] withheld imformation Knowing what was wrong with the house and said nothing.
reply
MsInformation replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
They can sell is because they told the Sessions about the snakes, and the Sessions signed a legal document that they knew about the snakes. There was no fraud here, just stupid people who dismissed the disclosure statement as a "story the previous owners made up." The previous owners ARE NOT AT FAULT. They not only informed the bank of the snakes, but they also cited the snakes as their reason for leaving.
See all 35 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right