CBS News/ May 31, 2011, 8:13 AM

John Edwards to be indicted this week?

The Justice Department reportedly is ready to file charges against former Sen. John Edwards for allegedly using campaign money to hide his mistress.

After a two-year investigation, federal prosecutors could charge Edwards this week - possibly as early as Wednesday - with violating federal campaign laws when he ran for president in 2008, reports CBS News correspondent Jan Crawford.

A federal grand jury has been investigating whether Edwards misused up to $1 million in presidential campaign contributions to cover up his long-term affair with former aide, Rielle Hunter.

Edwards' team denies he violated campaign finance laws, but prosecutors are closing in.

"They could conclude that that was a misuse of campaign money for personal purposes, which would violate the campaign finance laws," campaign finance expert Fred Wertheimer told CBS News

Edwards has not commented publicly about the investigation. However, the federal grand jury in Raleigh has spent the past two years listening to testimony from key players. That indictment could come this week unless a plea deal is put in place.

"There's behind-the-scenes stuff going on quite frantically about a plea deal," Crawford said. "I mean, is he going to be able to try to reach some kind of an agreement with the Justice Department? It might mean lesser charges. I think the Justice Department, based on what my sources are telling me, are standing on a pretty hard line, which would make a plea deal pretty difficult. So either way, not a lot of great options for John Edwards. Plea deal, indictment. He's looking at some tough, tough times ahead."

Crawford noted, however, that "this is not an easy case" to make against Edwards, which is why the Justice Department has moved methodically.

Meanwhile, CBS News has learned that last week Edwards secretly met with reclusive heiress Rachel "Bunny" Mellon, the donor to the former presidential candidate. Prosecutors suspect Mellon helped finance attempts to keep the affair quiet.

Crawford reported sources close to Edwards say there was nothing nefarious about their meeting.

Crawford explained, "(They say) she was one of his most loyal supporters. And so it was this lunch between two old friends. But, it also could play to Edwards' legal strategy, and here's why: Prosecutors say her money was used to support his campaign. And so, therefore, it was a campaign contribution and you can't do that. But Edwards says, no, that's not true. All that money, which they call the 'Bunny money' ... was a gift from a friend. If he wasn't running for president, she would have given him that money anyway. That is his defense. And (Edwards' defense) says that lunch supports that. He's not running now and they're still getting together."

An indictment would mark a steep fall for a man once so near the pinnacle of power.

Edwards lived on a public stage: a multimillionaire trial lawyer who was elected U.S. senator in his first campaign for office; the democratic nominee for vice president in 2004; and then a contender for the White House in the 2008 election. And all the while, he was seen as a devoted father and loving husband of wife Elizabeth Edwards.

Pictures: Elizabeth Edwards

But in 2006, while his wife was battling a recurrence of breast cancer, Edwards began an affair Rielle Hunter, who produced videos for his campaign. A year later, the National Enquirer reported the two were having an affair. And then the bombshell: Hunter was pregnant with his child.

Edwards first denied the child was his and concocted a story that a top aide was the baby's father. But it was all a lie. Edwards eventually acknowledged he was the father of Hunter's baby. He and his wife Elizabeth separated. She died of cancer last December.

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
12 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
josephp5 says:
Dick Cheney used his position as Vice President to release classified information that revealed the identity of a CIA agent. Cheney did this simply because he is annoyed at the CIA agent's husband. That husband wrote an article that (correctly) said the President was wrong when he claimed in his State of the Union speech that Iraq was getting yellowcake uranium from Niger.

We can be sure that Cheney did this in anger because he wrote a note, in his own handwriting, on the actual newspaper article written by the husband. Cheney even speculated that the CIA agent wife may have "sent him on a junket" in that very actual handwritten note! (Try googling "Cheney handwritten note" if you want to see it for yourself).

Release the name of a CIA agent---not a whiff from Attorney General Eric Holder.

However, if some friends of a former Democratic Senator use their private funds to cover up the fact that the Senator was having an embarrassing affair with a bimbo, Eric Holder is on the case! Even though this seems arguable that the private funds being used could be considered campaign funds, and it is a big stretch to consider it fraudulent to use the money in this manner.

Way to set your priorities, Obama Justice Department.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Molly-Pchr says:
snake
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mostlyindignant says:
But beyond all this..."still friends with Bunny?" haha if he made a quick trip up to visit Bunny last week, does that prove they are still friends? I would contest that they were never friends. She was never in his life before all this stuff. At all. And I am not sure she would recognize herself in the mirror at this point... I am surprised her family allowed such a little advantageous visit to occur...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mostlyindignant says:
The issue is: did he use the Bunny Money and Fred money to advance the cause of the campaign? He claims no, that it went to other parties, did not cross through campaign coffers and was instead designed to hide the affair from his wife, rather than the voting American public. I think it could just as easily be argues that if this million plus was not spent, the campaign would have been in the toilet a lot sooner than it actually was, that he could have brought his wife into his confidence (fessed up), perhaps resolved his differences with Elizabeth and made himself whole on that front. But he could NOT have made himself whole with respect to the American public, therefore, the big payola to hide RIelle accompanied by the hapless Young family was actually largely, if not singularly, to hide the affair and pregnancy from potential voters. Therefore, was the money used in furtherance of the campaign? I say, yes. Would it have been necessary to solicit this money from Bunny and Fred ( I hear Bunny actually thought he was JFK) were it not for the fact of his candidacy? I say no.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cherubimii says:
"I stilll believe in the policies and issues John Edwards ran on for the Presidency of the United States. I thank him and his family for being my voice. I'm am truly sorry it was at such a great cost to his family.
I am praying that God grants John Edwards peace and freedom."
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
samXXkiley says:
coucou,
utiliser l'argent allou? ? la campagne ?lectorale ? des fins personnelles, s'appelle d?tournement,
c'est une pratique courante
autrement dit, John Edwards n'est s?rement pas le seul dans ce cas
mais il faut le prouver

.........................
use the money allocated to the campaign for personal reasons, is called diversion,
this is a common practice
in other words, John Edwards is certainly not alone in this case
but you have to prove it
"au revoir"
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jusfall1 says:
Sorry, left off the d on involved.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jusfall1 says:
There has got to be more to this than just campaign funds, maybe trust funds and securities involve?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
credibility2 says:
This major sleaze needs to get his just rewards.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bobsrule99 says:
Could not happen to a more deserving person!
reply
See all 12 Comments