CBS News/ May 19, 2011, 10:01 AM

No diplomatic immunity for Strauss-Kahn

Diplomatic immunity is off the table for the now-former head of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), CBS News Correspondent Michelle Miller reports. The State Department has wrapped up its legal review of the case and decided Dominique Strauss-Kahn doesn't have diplomatic immunity because, when he was arrested, he was not on official business for the IMF.

Strauss-Kahn, who is accused of sexually assaulting a maid at a New York hotel over the weekend, is in "a funny situation," according to CBS News Legal Analyst Jack Ford.

N.Y. hotel carpet checked for DNA evidence
IMF's Strass-Kahn resigns to fight sex charges

Ford explained on "The Early Show" that there are "treaties out there in some countries, somebody like him, in his position, would have almost absolute immunity -- get away with almost anything. The U.S. isn't part of that. The U.S. has said, 'Unless it's part of your official job, we're not going to protect you."'

Strass-Kahn resigned late Wednesday from the IMF, saying he wanted to devote "all his energy" to battling the sexual assault charges.

Strass-Kahn's bail hearing for is set for today in a Manhattan court.

In documents obtained by CBS News, Strauss-Kahn agrees to post a $1 million cash bail, wear an electronic monitoring bracelet, and to be confined to a home address in Manhattan for 24 hours a day, Miller reported. He would also surrender the diplomatic passport issued to him by the United Nations.

French appalled by Strauss-Kahn's treatment in U.S.
Maid's lawyer: Strauss-Kahn case no setup

Ford said there's a lot of scrambling going on behind closed doors in this case.

"Here's what you have to understand about bail," Ford said. "A lot of people think it's a head-start on punishment. It isn't. We have presumption of innocence. There is a presumption, most cases, that there should be some bail. Bail is designed to guarantee that you show up. It's not to start punishing you early."

Ford continued, "Here what's happening is the prosecution, we know, has said, you know, he was in the act of fleeing. This is a serious offense. He has no ties to this community. He's a French citizen, we don't want to give him any bail. The defense is saying right now, 'Let's come up with a combination of things that will satisfy everybody. So the defense is saying to the prosecutor and the judge, 'How about this? Big number for bail. So that if he leaves, that gets forfeited.' They're saying we'll give him, essentially house arrest, we'll put a bracelet on him, monitor him 24/7, everybody will know where he is. He'll agree he's going to give his passport. He's not going to leave. And if for any reason he leaves, he will agree to come back."

Ford added, "It's a lot of horse trading going on. I think the prosecution is still going to argue we don't want to let him go, because they have to take that position. You know, it will be interesting to see what the judge does."

Co-anchor Chris Wragge noted, "Because the judge, even the other day, did say, 'Hey, he was two minutes away from departing for a foreign country.'"

Ford said that's a compelling angle for the prosecution.

"The defense are trying to argue, 'no, no, no, it's not what it looks like here.' They're saying this is a flight that was prearranged. He talked with people, told them where he was. So you're going to see a lot of factual arguments going on in this hearing," Ford explained.

Strauss-Kahn, Ford said, has a "good possibility" of getting bail.

"As long as they come up with this combination of circumstances that let the judge say, 'I'm confident he's not going to go anywhere,'... something will work out," he explained.

With each passing day, Wragge pointed out, more and more reports have surfaced overseas about Strass-Kahn's allegedly checkered past. Other women have come forward, saying that he had made unwanted advances against them. Additionally, French president Nicolas Sarkozy - Strauss-Kahn's political opponent - said he was warned years ago of these reports. But will those reports be factored in to this case?

Ford said, "Generally speaking prior bad acts don't come into a criminal case - some circumstances. Here I think the judge might mention it a little bit. It won't be the major compelling factor. But it's in the picture a little bit."

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
12 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
uktena says:
NO DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY? Since when did the IMF, one of the world's dirtiest organizations, get diplomatic immunity anyway? Many believe that the entire organization should be in jail.
reply
Elizabeth_de_vigier replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Strauss Khan holds a diplomatic passport and would have had immunity except that he truthfully declared that he wasn't in NY on official business for the IMF.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Elizabeth_de_vigier says:
I was just wondering, given the inordinate speed by police officers rushing to the airport after they compelled the hotel receptionist to ask Strauss Khan where he was after he called up to find out if one of his cell phones had been found, if, when they asked him to get off the plane and he complied, if they had a warrant of arrest or not?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
theskeptical1 says:
>>"He's a French citizen, we don't want to give him any bail."

That's understandable - nobody in the world can play 'run away and hide' like the French.
reply
vielmann replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You mean, those same people who helped the US gain their independence?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jhihmoac says:
No immunity? That pretty much knocks the "consensual" thing out...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ericwvb says:
Maybe in his defense he can argue that screwing poor Africans is actually his official job as head of the IMF, so he WAS doing official IMF business and therefore he should get diplomatic immunity.
reply
you_MAY_be_right replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
That is what I would argue.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bobbynorwich says:
It's not a great narrative for a powerful, well-educated, wealthy, white, married, male, Jewish politician who claims having consensual quickie sex with a powerless, uneducated, poor, African, widowed, female, immigrant, devout Muslim maid. Good luck getting a sympathetic jury, DSK.
reply
jgg000101 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
you left out "self-admitted socialist", and "why would a guy who is paying $3,000/night for a hotel room not be able to afford a hooker"?
Theowyn1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If they argue consensual sex, I really think the jury won't buy it.

As to hiring a prostitute, maybe he did that, too, but needed a quickie before dashing off to the airport. Seriously though, sexual assault isn't just about having sex. It's about the sexual rush from the power of using force. A prostitute doesn't provide that.
See all 12 Comments