AP/ May 9, 2011, 12:17 AM

Millionaire's heirs get inheritance after 92 yrs

An undated photo of Wellington R. Burt.

An undated photo of Wellington R. Burt. / AP Photo/The Saginaw News

SAGINAW, Mich. — Ninety-two years after his death, Saginaw lumber baron Wellington R. Burt is finally parting with the fortune he withheld from his descendants until 21 years after the death of the last grandchild born in his lifetime.

The estate is now valued at $100 million to $110 million. It will be shared among 12 of his heirs later this month.

According to The Saginaw News, Burt once was among the eight wealthiest Americans. He made millions of dollars in the harvesting of the Saginaw Valley's timber and then another fortune in Minnesota's iron mines. He served as mayor of Saginaw and later as a Michigan state senator.

But when it came time to divide his fortune, he gave his children and grandchildren small allowances comparable to the one he gave his cook. He died March 2, 1919, and his remains rest in a 15-foot-tall white mausoleum in Forest Lawn Cemetery.

Under terms of Burt's will, the bulk of the estate was to be distributed 21 years after the death of his last surviving grandchild.

At 19 years old, Christina Cameron of Lexington, Ky., is the youngest of the 12 and is in line to receive $2.6 million to $2.9 million.

She said one thing is pretty clear: Her great-great-great grandfather didn't have much use for his relatives.

"I'm pretty sure he didn't like his family back then," Cameron said.

Cameron is the great-granddaughter of Marion Landsill. She was the last survivor among Burt's grandchildren who were born in his lifetime. She died Nov. 21, 1989.

Saginaw County Chief Probate Judge Patrick McGraw said the estate is "one of the most complicated research projects" he's faced in his 12-year career in Saginaw.

When McGraw arrived in 1999, the estate had long been a part of courthouse lore.

"It's a case everyone talked about," McGraw said. "It was definitely interesting. I didn't think in 1999 that, in 2011, I would be the one to distribute it."

Burt's six children, seven grandchildren, six great-grandchildren and 11 great-great grandchildren missed out on the inheritance, either because they weren't eligible for it or because they didn't live long enough.

Those who will inherit are three great-grandchildren, seven great-great grandchildren and two great-great-great grandchildren, among them Cameron and her 20-year-old sister. The heirs range in age from 19 to 94.

In April, about 20 attorneys representing the heirs met in Michigan State University's Kellogg Hotel and Conference Center and struck a deal on division of the estate. It gives larger amounts to those farther up in the family tree who have fewer siblings. The trust is scheduled to open by May 31.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
46 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Alexisnexus says:
Find out more about his legacy and the ancestral history of the family at:
http://familyforest.wordpress.com/2011/05/16/100-million-legacy-released-a-century-later/
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Aword101 says:
Live is the journey not the final destination. Sounds like this man left his money to no one, just so he could torture is family. He died a lonely isolated man from his loved ones..in reality he died broke.
They win!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
oldnassau67 says:
Read Mr. Burt's Wikipedia article: fascinating, detailed, vindictive. Quite a man.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TheCelt19 says:
Had Burt invested his 100 million in gold rather than keeping it in stupid dollars then the fortune would now be worth like 8 billion and climbing... most likely a lot, lot, lot higher.
reply
marcawodey replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
not necessarily- in 1933 roosevelt banned the private ownership of gold.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TomMariner says:
If I'm one of the heirs, the first thing I'm going to use the money for is to go after those lawyers and executors who during the past 92 years turned the eighth greatest fortune into what a kid with a great Internet idea can earn in two years. You know all of those folks who were supposed to be earning a pittance for safeguarding a 100 year investment ended up with billions for them and their families.

Well, the heirs should possibly be glad that they didn't get the news that their "inheritance" had been totally depleted by last year. Actually what are those entrusted with the trust going to do now that their golden goose has been cooked, divided up, and out of their control?
reply
marco_luxe replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Blame your ancestor-benefactor for hating his family over a concern for the preservation of his wealth. It was his choice to show such largess to the trustees over his heirs. BTW, how did family members turn out on their own?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DantheGreyII says:
Way to go Burt.......

It does seem that money can buy just about anything you want, just ask Big Business and the Politicians. Only problem with that, it's our money that they're buying it with.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
presclayiii says:
True Someone like the one of twenty that's Hers should explain the Law But, She Should Do Like He Wanted Take Care Of Herself.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
buckfush500 says:
20 Laywers? On that money like flies on _______. I guess if I was an heir, I would hire a lawyer too, but some of the heirs must have hired more than one.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Zann-Zel says:
Its interesting to me how people decide that someone else that inherits money - "squanders" it. Its THEIR money! So what if they give 1/2 of it away and spend the other half on small things - they spread it around! Good for the Economy! Not everyone is comfortable with a rich lifestyle. Getting rid of it quick is sometimes the best thing for some people.
reply
netjunkie1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I dont view economics the same way as you do.
If I had been a member of the disqualified group, I'd had a lawyer work on it's legitimacy.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jsilver2th says:
What's going on here is an application of law known as "the Rule Against Perpetuities." It reflects the idea that property should be controlled by the living, not by the "dead hand." It's complicated to explain but you can look it up on Wikipedia or somewhere if you are interested.

What Burt did was construct a will thay gave his children and grandchildren a set income of life - pretty smart (maybe he liked his cook-). He stretched that out as long as the law would allow because of the rule against perpetuities and they at the end of the period of time that the "dead hand" could control the estate the remainder goes to the heirs.

I'd say he was smart old bird that took care of his heirs very well.
reply
jsilver2th replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Meaning: THEN at the end of the period of time that the "dead hand" could control the estate the remainder goes to the heirs.
feistyjourn replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yes, jsilver, that is the situation in my own family. My husband's ancestor constructed his will like Mr. Burt did, albeit on a smaller scale. This arrangement has worked marvelously. What a generous soul Mr. Burt was. Someone should explain probate law to his 19yo heir so she doesn't continue to blame him for not caring.
See all 46 Comments