AP/ May 3, 2011, 1:04 PM

Congress may cut $1.3B in Pakistan aid

WASHINGTON - Congress may consider cutting the almost $1.3 billion in annual aid to Pakistan if it turns out the Islamabad government knew where Osama bin Laden was hiding, the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee said Tuesday.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said she wants more details from CIA director Leon Panetta and others about the Pakistani government's role. Feinstein spoke to reporters about the raid that killed bin Laden early Monday and the questions raised by his hiding place deep inside Pakistan.

The No. 2 House Democratic leader, Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland, said if Pakistan doesn't ease doubts about its dedication to fighting terrorists, Congress should explore whether it makes sense to reduce U.S. aid to that country.

To the bottom of the sea: Bin Laden's last day
Obama's remarkable 72-hour poker face

"I don't know whether it would be effective or counterproductive, we'll have to look at that," he told reporters, adding, "It needs to be looked into."

Incredulous lawmakers are pressing Pakistan for answers to two simple questions: What did its army and intelligence agents know of bin Laden's whereabouts and when did they know it?

The al Qaeda terrorist leader behind the Sept. 11 attacks lived and died in a massive, fortified compound built in 2005 and located on the outskirts of Abbottabad, miles from the capital of Islamabad. It stood just a half-mile from the Kakul Military Academy, Pakistan's equivalent of West Point, and close to various army regiments.

White House: We would have taken bin Laden alive
Obama's move "one of the gutsiest," adviser says
Obama monitored Osama bin Laden attack in real time

Amid the high praise for the successful U.S. military operation, congressional Republicans and Democrats questioned whether bin Laden was hiding in plain sight, with Pakistani military and intelligence operatives either totally unaware of his location or willfully ignoring his presence to protect him.

"I think this tells us once again that, unfortunately, Pakistan at times is playing a double game," said Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, a Senate Armed Services Committee member who indicated that Congress could put limits on funds for Pakistan.

But another GOP member of the panel dismissed that idea.

Special Report: The killing of Osama bin Laden

"For those who want to cut off aid to Pakistan, I understand your frustration," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. "But at the end of the day, if you want to create a failed state in Pakistan, one of the best things to do is sever relationships. It is not in our national security interest to let this one event destroy what is a difficult partnership but a partnership nonetheless."

Bin Laden's death and questions about Pakistan's eagerness in the fight against terrorism come as the tenuous U.S.-Pakistan relationship seems even more fragile. In recent weeks, CIA contractor Raymond Davis' killing of two Pakistanis and stepped-up drone attacks have further strained ties between the two countries.

Different factions within Pakistan itself complicate its role as a U.S. ally. What state officials and those in the military may have known about bin Laden could be quite different from what tribes and even families in the region knew or, more to the point, were willing to say about the Abbottabad compound and its occupants.

A frustrated Pakistan called the U.S. raid to get bin Laden an "unauthorized unilateral action" that "cannot be taken as a rule."

Early last month, CIA Director Leon Panetta met with Pakistan's intelligence chief, Gen. Ahmed Shuja Pasha, a meeting Washington officials saw as make or break. The Obama administration said it was negotiating a possible reduction in U.S. intelligence operatives and special operations officers in Pakistan as they sought to ease Pakistani concerns about spy activity.

Osama bin Laden's hard drive being examined
One phone call led U.S. to bin Laden doorstep

Prior to the raid on the compound, U.S. officials say, they didn't inform Pakistan of its plans. Unaware and unnerved Pakistanis scrambled their aircraft in the wake of the U.S. military intervention.

Publicly, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton thanked Pakistan for its cooperation and said the country "has contributed greatly to our efforts to dismantle al Qaeda." She said that "in fact, cooperation with Pakistan helped lead us to bin Laden and the compound in which he was hiding."

John Brennan, White House counterterrorism adviser, said the administration was looking at whether bin Laden had a support system in Pakistan that allowed him to remain in the country.

Pictures: Osama's hideaway
Pictures: Osama bin Laden
Pictures: Osama bin Laden killed - America reacts

"We know that the people at the compound there were working on his behalf, and that's how we ultimately found our way to that compound," Brennan told reporters at the White House. "We are talking with the Pakistanis on a regular basis now, and we're going to pursue all leads to find out exactly what type of support system and benefactors that bin Laden might have had."

Interviewed Tuesday morning on NBC's "Today" show, Brennan said that "clearly there was some kind of support network that provided him assistance."

"Whether or not those were individuals inside the Pakistani government is unknown at this point," he said. Brennan called Pakistan "a strong counterterrorism partner" and said there have been more terrorists arrested and killed there in recent years than in any other country. He said "brave Pakistanis have given their lives" in the effort.

Based on the location of the compound and its proximity to army regiments, Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich., said Pakistan's intelligence and army has "got a lot of explaining to do."

He cited the size of the compound compared with surrounding buildings and the fact that residents took the unusual step of burning all their garbage and avoiding any collection.

"It's hard to imagine that the military or police did not have any ideas what was going on inside of that," Levin told reporters Monday in a conference call.

Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, sent a letter to Clinton seeking details on the level of cooperation from Pakistan, saying the fact that bin Laden lived in comfortable surroundings near Islamabad "calls into question whether or not the Pakistanis had knowledge that he was there and did not share that knowledge."

In an essay published Tuesday by The Washington Post, Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari denied suggestions his country's security forces may have sheltered Osama bin Laden, and said their cooperation with the United States helped pinpoint bin Laden.

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry, D-Mass., who has traveled extensively to Pakistan and even worked as an intermediary to get Davis released, said candid conversations with the Pakistanis were necessary.

However, Kerry said it would be a mistake to forget "we've had people on the ground tracking this. There's some degree of assistance and cooperation of the Pakistanis."

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, cautioned against pushing Pakistan away. Pakistan's nuclear arms would be a direct threat to U.S. national security, he said, if those weapons fell into the wrong hands.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
53 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
uktena says:
Lobbyist and aid to Pakistan should both just go away. Lobbying should be made illegal. This would go a long way to stop one of the many evil influences on Congress
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gtb1948 says:
As long as we have troops in Afganistan, Pakistan will get whatever money they want. The map says it all.

Pakistan is no more a friend of the U.S. than your local pimp. They're both smiling at you as long as you're giving them money. So, everybody keep smiling and pay the bucks, we need their access to the front lines.

Congress is just blowing smoke (still). Solution? Remove the troops, give Pakistan our "regards" and use the savings to pay down our debt.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mr-simmons says:
I will make this simple and brief.... You cannot buy friends, comrades or loyalty.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tmn says:
Cut off their aid!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
skittles1233 says:
OMG !!! Yes WE NOT THEY should cut off their aid....and we should cut the aid to all foreign countries it is not their money really to decide what happens to it.. the tax payers should get the say in that and thats why I say we not they...the USA is going broke borrowing money from China and etc. and sending it to other countries to aid broken homes and starving children there ..HEY take a look around we have starving AMERICANS here and homes being foreclosed and people living on the streets or shelters people stealing,killing and comitting suicide, and killing there own families to get them out of this broken society... all the while THEY send the money away to foreign countries..and what just a few weeks back THEY wanted to cut the salaries of the ARMED FORCES that are protecting them and they are setting in their air conditioned/heated offices making hundreds of thousands of dollars a year mind you off the tax payers and the Armed Forces indure such terriable conditions fighting for our country.. I say the USA should cut all ties with the foreign countries and bring the Armed Forces home we have lost enough of them on FOREIGN soil bring them home and protect the USA let them foreign countries fend for themselves...OH and BRING OUR JOBS BACK HERE..!! GOD BLESS THE USA AND THE ARMED FORCES!!!!!!!!
reply
cattiej replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I agree with everything in your excellant comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Will1956 says:
The U.S. should not only cut all funding to Pakistan but also consider trimming if not eliminating all funding worldwide. Help United States citizens and fix American's problems before lending a helping hand to the rest of the world.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pasha128 says:
Congress needs to cut this money because Boehner nees some additional money to pay for his personal earmark -- the JSF additional engine is back in the budget again.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fedup12 says:
I would think that a string attached to the 1.3 billion we gave them in 2010 would have been if we find Bin Laden hiding in your country in plain site all funding stops.

This was the most wanted man in the WORLD. Within 30 miles of their capital and in the same city as a military institution.

They knew he was there.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fedup12 says:
Its kind of funny in a very sad way.

We dont trust our politicians to spend our money in an intelligent way. Then we give it to foreign politicians to do with it what they want. No strings attached evidently.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fedup12 says:
yes yes yes yes YES!!!!!

Cut their freakin aid...

Some of it probably helps us hunt terrorists. Some of it funds them so it is a wash anyway. And we are just out 1.3 Billion dollars. Put it in SS or Medicaid. Or pay some teachers.
reply
See all 53 Comments