Drug-resistant bacteria found in half of U.S. meat

Welcome to the staph aisle? A study published April 15, 2011 found drug-resistant bacteria in nearly half of all samples of beef, pork, and poultry from U.S. supermarkets. / AP
A new study finds that much of meat and poultry sold in supermarkets is contaminated with drug-resistant staph bacteria.
Researchers bought beef, chicken, pork, and turkey in five U.S. cities and found that nearly half of the meat sampled -- 47 percent -- contained drug resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus.
The "staph" bacteria is linked to a range of health problems from rashes and respiratory ailments to potentially fatal illnesses such as sepsis and endocarditis. Due to overexposure, staph bacteria have grown resistant to an ever-widening range of the antibiotic drugs used to fight them; Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA has become a deadly scourge in U.S. hospitals.
But there is perhaps no greater contributor to the rise of drug-resistant staphs than the meat industry, where animals are preemptively treated with a range of antibiotics.
The April 15 study in the medical journal "Clinical Infectious Diseases" was conducted by Translational Genomics Research Institute.
Among the staph-contaminated samples, more than half were resistant to at least three types of antibiotics.
Experts note that staph bacteria can be killed by thoroughly cooking meat, but improper handling and cross-contamination -- such as by reusing a cutting board or knife that has come in contact with the raw meat -- can still lead to infections.
Popular in Health
- CDC: HPV vaccine reduced disease rates in teen girls 56%
- Obesity's "disease" risk no secret despite new classification
- Natura Pet Products recalls dry foods over salmonella
- Skin cancer self-exam: What to look for (PHOTOS)
- Deep vein thrombosis: Don't ignore these silent symptoms
- Limit food stamps for sodas, 18 mayors ask government
- A test for throat cancer caused by HPV?
- Which state is the thinnest? Fattest?















If a picture is worth a thousand words, then the news media should not be accompanying this story with images showing whole muscle cuts of beef. There were no steaks in this study. These "scientists" bought 38 samples of GROUND BEEF. No steaks. No roasts. No whole muscle cuts. Another straightforward fact: 24 of the 38 ground beef samples tested free of the bacteria.
Woop dee doo.
Here's a straight forward fact for you: Just about all our food is contaminated with bacteria, toxic chemicals, insect parts, glass....the list is long. People close their eyes and ears to it because they just don't want to know. For a lot of people, if they can't see it, it doesn't exist.
In other words, you used what gives every appearance of corporate farming rather than small farming to point a finger at the guilty and innocent alike.
Also, how about irradiation of meat products after handling, and video monitoring all lines of the packaging process, with all of it watched before the sale, by quality control experts and cultures obtained before they're sent to stores.
Stop the screams of protest! - irradiation is harmless! Compared to illnesses caused by staph and "carrier" formation, with disease potential rampant, especially to those with impaired immunity, it should be welcomed!! Since "carriers" don't always have positive cultures, it's impossible to keep them off the meat processing line, or working in operating rooms, etc. It's human error that transmutes the diseases caused by staphylococcus aureus and other disease causing microbes.
Articles such as this one add to hysteria of consumers, without giving the measures meantioned in the comments above. That's irresponsible reporting!
Much the same thing happens with vaccine phobic parents who don't innoculate their children.