1995 shutdown v. 2011: Economy a key difference
As negotiations continue in an effort to avert a federal government shutdown, pundits are pointing to the many similarities between this go-round and the shutdowns in 1995.
"It's kind of deja vu all over again," CBS News Senior White House Correspondent, Bill Plante observed on "The Early Show" Friday.
Plante covered the 1995 events.
"You have both sides standing on principle," Plante pointed out. "You have a clash between the president and the speaker. Back then, it was Democrat Bill Clinton in the White House, and Republican Newt Gingrich, the Speaker of the House.
Time's almost up: No deal yet as shutdown looms"But, just like today's speaker, John Boehner, Gingrich was determined to cut money out of the budget. The money issues are very similar, too. Congress had passed a budget that cut Medicare, Medicaid, education, environmental controls, and President Clinton refused to sign that budget. He said the Republicans were putting ideology ahead of common sense. Sound familiar?"
Democrats are making the same charges against the GOP today.
"And, of course," Plante continued, "just as today in 1995, an election year, a presidential year, was just around the corner."
But, he stressed, there's a striking difference this time around from last time - a difference that's very much a wildcard: The economy was on a very sound footing in '95.
"Also," Planted added, "there were no social issues like abortion clouding the debate. But the economy was the big thing.
"Back then, the economy was growing. Credit was easy. Consumers were spending. And Gingrich thought that Clinton would fold.
"But Clinton didn't fold, and there were two shutdowns - one for about a week in November, and then for three weeks over the Christmas/New Year holiday.
"And believe me, by the beginning of that third week, people were really, really angry. They blamed both the president and Congress, but Clinton rode it out and, in the end, Congress wound up getting most of the blame, and specifically, Speaker Gingrich.
"But this time, of course, the economy is in much worse shape, and the White House is not at all certain that things would turn out the same way.
"But neither side wants to blink first."
- How to stop junk mail - forever
- Dad Punishes Daughter with Free Babysitter Ad Play Video
- Lorena Bobbitt, 15 Years Later
- New tornadoes hit Midwest Play Video
- Bret Michaels Brings Daughters On-Stage Play Video
- Legit Work-from-Home Websites - and the Scams
- Most of Forbes' most powerful women are moms
- Helen Mirren named "Body of the Year" Play Video
No Dem president has came close to increasing the federal deficit as much as both Bush's have. Clinton decreased the the deficit substantially.
This idea that DEMS spend recklessly is ridiculous. They keep saying and we keep letting them say it. The truth is, the GOP is just as happy spending tax dollars but only on their priorities -- corporate subsidies and spending money on foreign wars to benefit the likes of oil mongers.
Dems have this attitude that other people's money actually belongs to them to give away as they please.
Remember the terrorist actions called "Stimulus" and "Obamacare"???
Since 47% of Americans don't pay federal income tax, it's hard to give the 'lower'classes a genuine tax cut.
As far as what Obama / Pelosi / Reed have given the middle and lower classes - sustained high unemployment, record deficits, record gas prices and no economic or energy plan.