Obama summons Boehner for budget talks
Last Updated 10:35 a.m. ET
WASHINGTON - President Barack Obama summoned the top Republican in Congress to the White House on Tuesday for talks aimed at averting a government shutdown this weekend as talks on a bill that would both fund federal agencies through the end of September and impose immediate spending cuts have stalled.
House Speaker John Boehner is meeting this morning with Mr. Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters the president is still confident Republicans and Democrats can reach an agreement to fund the government through the end of the year, even as a Friday deadline nears.
Carney sidestepped questions about whether Mr. Obama would support a Republican-backed week-long stopgap bill to prevent a shutdown. Boehner's temporary measure includes $12 billion in immediate spending cuts, but also enough money to operate the Pentagon through the end of September.
Carney says the White House believes continuing to fund the government with short-term spending bills (as has happened twice this year when Congress could not agree to a 2011 budget) is not good for the economy.
President Obama has warned that without a deal the ensuing government shutdown would "jeopardize our economic recovery" just as jobs are finally being created.
As they left a strategy session late Monday night, House Republicans said talks with Democrats had stalled.
Rep. Hal Roger, R-Ky., Chair of the House Appropriations Committee, said, "We made good progress Saturday, but come Sunday things just stopped."
It is unclear which side would absorb public blame and anger for such a dramatic turn of events - each side says the other would be the cause - but there was likely to be political damage, and mainstream members of both parties say they want to avoid a shutdown.
CBS News Congressional correspondent Nancy Cordes reports Republican leaders angrily accused Democratic negotiators Monday of "gimmicks" and "phony accounting" full of "smoke and mirrors," after they refused to discuss Republican priorities - like stripping funding for EPA enforcement, federal money for Planned Parenthood, and for the president's healthcare law.
"Liberals are clearly responsible for a possible government shutdown," according to Rep. Joe Wilson, R-S.C.
Democrats accuse the Republicans of pushing spending cuts that are harmful, and of pressing their own social agenda to the must-pass spending bill.
Democrats insist the talks are progressing normally - and that Republicans are simply posturing for Tea Party members demanding big cuts.
"Tea Party Republicans refuse to recognize that their budget is simply an appalling proposal," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.
Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., told the National Review, "We take it for granted that because of the intense political pressure being applied by the Tea Party, the Speaker needs to play an outside game as well as an inside game. As long as he continues to negotiate, it's OK by us if he needs to strike a different pose publicly."
Failure to reach a deal for the rest of this budget year (which ends on Sept. 30) could lead to a partial shutdown of the government when spending authority expires at midnight on Friday.
Appearing on CBS' "The Early Show" this morning, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., insisted that the GOP-run House was prepared to pass a budget bill for the rest of the year, and that it was the Democratic-run Senate that was holding things up: "We will pass it out of the House; the question is whether the Harry Reid Senate will pass it or not.
Nearly six weeks ago, the House passed a bill calling for $61 billion in cuts in discretionary spending for the remainder of the year. Senate Democrats balked and never took up the measure.
Instead both houses of Congress have passed two short-term spending laws to keep government running, while cutting $10 billion out of this year's budget. That appropriation runs out Friday.
"We're not looking for a shutdown," Ryan told anchor Erica Hill. "We're looking for a down payment on budget reduction. The Senate is yet to pass a single bill to prevent a government shutdown."
On a separate matter - but one looming over this week's negotiations for the 2011 budget - is the Republican plan being unveiled Tuesday that mixes spending cuts in virtually all areas with tax breaks for corporations and a fundamental restructuring of Medicare and Medicaid.
In a new Wall Street Journal op-ed, Ryan claims his plan would slash $6.5 trillion from the president's budget over the next ten years.
Part of his plan is to overhaul Medicare by slowly replacing the government health plan for seniors with government subsidies for private health care plans - what Ryan says are not vouchers but "Medicare premium-support payments" - that may not cover the full cost.
Republicans also propose to sharply cut projected spending on the Medicaid state-federal health program for the poor and disabled and transform it into a block grant program that gives governors far less money than under current estimates but considerably more flexibility.
On "The Early Show: Ryan said governors are requesting the change: "We're getting letters from dozens about this," he said. "Medicaid is breaking right now. It's going insolvent. ... It's unsustainable and it ends up giving people second class health care, not getting good access to good care."
The budget proposal would also lower the corporate tax rate.
Citing a study by the conservative Heritage Center for Data Analysis, Ryan says the GOP plan will create more than a million private-sector jobs next year and lower the unemployment rate to 4 percent by 2015.
Spending on domestic programs would be returned to levels at or below 2008 levels. Despite the proposed cuts, Ryan's plan would not balance the budget by the end of the decade, as it promises not to raise taxes and not to change federal retirement benefits for people age 55 and older.
- How to stop junk mail - forever
- Dad Punishes Daughter with Free Babysitter Ad Play Video
- Best Low-Tech Cell Phones Suitable for Seniors
- Legit Work-from-Home Websites - and the Scams
- Terms to Never Use in Your Resume
- Best Wheeled-Luggage for Your Budget
- Bill Nye's Withered Romance
- Boy in pink nail polish sparks online outrage














I think Boehner is more inclined to at least compromise on doing what is best overall, but sounds like the Tea Party has him in a tug of war. Bet the Repubs wish now they had never had tea and crumpets with the Tea Party.
Texas A&M women win the national championship!!
The House has passed several budgets already and none have been approved by the senate. Obviously the senate is the problem in not getting a budget to the president.
A great example was the fiasco last February over funding for more than $3 billion for an alternative engine for the F-35 fighter jet that the military did not want, President Obama did not want, and a majority of democrats and republicans did not want. However, Speaker John Boehner and other House GOP leaders fought for the funding because it was a pet project in Boehner's district. Thank goodness it was defeated by a House vote of 223-198. What should bother us, however, is the number of representatives that voted FOR it, despite the military and other leaders saying they did not want it.
It's this kind of politics that keeps us in the mess we are in today. John Boehner should be ashamed to even demand anything of anyone when he plays such games. He doesn't even deserve to be Speaker of the House.
The Kenyan did not summon "the top Republican in Congress" for talks.
Boehner was "summoned" for an "I TALK, U Listen".
The GOP agreed to a CR for a 3-week delay to "resolve" the 2011 budget issues under an implied CONTRACT that our President ( excuse me, He's NOT my President ) would work towards a solution.
As with [ nearly ] everything else, the Kenyan had no intention of keeping his word. Instead, he went to Brazil, a children's sporting event [ is it true that his daughter wasn't even there? ], spoke again without thinking << re: political unrest/rebellion in Libya >> and made a few speeches to raise $$$ for his campaign chest in the forthcoming 2012 election.
As an independent voter with more knowledge of our Constitution than this "alleged" Constitutional Law lecturer, I question WHY no one has yet filed a petition to IMPEACH this Impersonator of an American.
He did NOTHING "NADA" to create jobs ... contrary to his assertion that "this is my top priority".
Let's understand ONE THING.
Obama and the Dumb-ocrats have only one priority and THAT IS to re-elect the worst president this Nation has ever had.
BTW, I twice voted for Jimmy Carter, who has been displaced as "the worst president this Nation has ever had".
Sorry Jimmy, you're NOW in 2nd place. Hooda thunk he'd be replaced by another ultra-liberal Dumb-ocrat.
Hood thunk America would be STUPID ENOUGH to elect another ultra-liberal Dumb-ocrat.
If it were up to me, I would "shut down the government" until Congress votes itself a 15% decrease IN PAY and WAM, including office allocations. Every Congressman and Senator and their respective "staff"'s should have the "OPPORTUNITY" to feel our pain.
Solutions to other collateral financial issues with "public sector" workers, and I use that term liberally, have already been published. Sample: Eliminate "retirement" benefits for elected public officers.
We must stop spending.
And I understand that the left pays people to post on news sites all over the country to misrepresent the paltry support for what have been repeatedly proven to be bad ideas. But the majority of Americans continue to describe themselves as conservatives and moderates, because God only knows how, our common sense and love of country has survived the hard left media (91% of whom voted for Obama) and the various false mechanisms that we are faced with daily including large groups of paid employees of the Democratic Party and major unions who call the radio shows repeating the talking points and who pester every political blog with their illiterate rants, all of it designed to fool the public into believing that there is widespread support for the left's bad ideas. There isn't.
There is no more money. We have to stop spending.
The reality is that "American corporate tax burdens (Fed, state and local) are the 2nd highest in the world. Costs of complying with the dense web of government regulations in America are higher than in 99% of the rest of the world - and both cost burdens are "skyrocketing" upward under this administration and Congress.
American companies have to deal with a viciously competitive global marketplace and they start from an increasingly uncompetitive position due to our government's overwhelming desire to control them - usually for political (not economic) reasons.
The "incentives" and "tax breaks" Democrats keep mentioning are not so much aiming at creating obscene profit (with the notable exception of the Hollywood entertainment industry), but are aimed at survival in a ruthless global economy.
But don't worry, foreign governments are increasingly wooing American corporations to move the headquarters out of America and away from the increasingly anti-capitalist, anti-business forces at play here. Soon, you will begin to see the effects of far fewer corporations taking incentives and tax breaks - and paying taxes. And much less corporate contribution to Gross National Product as well as corporate earnings and the investment that comes from those earnings.
Obama just cannot stop strangling the goose that laid the golden egg, capitalism, the free market system, democracy.