How to avoid scammers this tax season
Identity theft tops the list of problems reported to the Federal Trade Commission last year, with more than 250,000 complaints. Among identity theft issues is a growing scam that becomes more prevalent as tax day rolls around. According to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), around 23,000 people have been flagged for tax-related identity theft in 2009.
How can you protect your identity this year - and your tax refund?
On "The Early Show" Monday, CBS News Business and Economics Correspondent Rebecca Jarvis discussed ways you can get scammed, how to protect yourself, and what to do if you fall victim to a scam.
How does it happen in the first place?
Jarvis explained someone can get your Social Security number and file a return on your behalf.
It might not be immediately obvious you've been scammed, Jarvis said. She said that's often the scariest part of this type of scam.
She explained, "The IRS isn't necessarily going to flag you if this happens. They may send you a letter that says, 'You made more than what you reported on your taxes.' That's one sign. Or when you go to e-file, when you file your tax return on the Internet, you may get rejected and you might get a message that says you've already filed - someone with that Social Security number has already filed."
So what should tax-payers be on the look-out for when they pay their taxes?
You'll never get an e-mail from the IRS, Jarvis said.
"That is a dead giveaway," she said.
But if you think you are a victim, you shouldn't rush to the IRS right away, because you might face a tax audit right off the bat.
"It's an arduous process to have to go through. What you can do is wait for that refund to come," Jarvis said. "It should take about six weeks, if you file by paper. Three weeks if you file electronically."
If you find out that that refund has already been cashed and you didn't receive it, Jarvis said that's a giveaway you are a victim.
She recommended contacting the IRS Identity Protection Specialized Unit to get an investigation started.
"This is a unit that's set up specifically to deal with this issue," she said. "... An investigation - if you're looking for the amount of time to wait - it can take up to six months before you get an answer on whether or not you've been a victim and what the IRS has to say."
Jarvis recommended these tips to fight tax-related identity theft:
1. Do not ever respond to an e-mail that looks like it came from the IRS.
2. Check a tax preparer's background. You want to know the background on that tax preparer before you hand over all that personal information. Vet them with friends, family, people who've used them in the past.
3. Keep those tax files secure. Have a safe internet connection. Hackers can actually hack in to your internet connection if you're not using a secure line.
4. Dispose of files carefully. Those old tax returns, if you are getting rid of anything, those W-2 forms, make sure that you shred them, also hold onto them for a handful of years because obviously the IRS can come back and ask for that information for up to three years.
- Lorena Bobbitt, 15 Years Later
- Most of Forbes' most powerful women are moms
- How to stop junk mail - forever
- Dad Punishes Daughter with Free Babysitter Ad Play Video
- New tornadoes hit Midwest Play Video
- Legit Work-from-Home Websites - and the Scams
- Bret Michaels Brings Daughters On-Stage Play Video
- Terms to Never Use in Your Resume















________________________________________
http://www.articlemonster.com/busine...-offering.html
So many questions and not enough answers. In a world fighting for customers and companies watching over their reputations like a hawk, what do these companies all have in common? I am referring to major Fortune 100 icons like General Electric, DuPont, Time, Verizon Wireless and AT&T as well as some smaller ones like Travelocity, Peter Lamas and BSP Rewards Mall.
The answer is simple, somehow over the past 10 years and probably unbeknownst to them, they became aligned with a Multi-Level Marketing company known as Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing (FHTM). This was mainly accomplished because Fortune Hi-Tech does business with some of their authorized dealers and 3rd party affiliates. Fortune's attempt to prove it's legal by association has backfired, as it normally does. It is very difficult to build your reputation at the expense of someone bigger, when they have no idea who you are.
Should these companies have a say in who gets to use their brand in the pursuit of the almighty dollar? For the first time in FHTM's history the number of companies represented by it on the menu board at fhtm.net is shrinking. How can that be good?
According to court documents and a major USA Today expose, last September, none of these companies had direct relationships with FHTM.
In March 2010, Monica Lindeen, the Securities Commissioner for the State of Montana, issued a cease and desist against Fortune HI-Tech Marketing for operating an illegal endless recruiting pyramid scheme. Since then Texas has demanded documents in an investigation, South Carolina AG Roy Cooper, has opened an investigation into Fortune's business practices, as part of the FTC's "Operation Empty Promises", and its own home state of Kentucky has done the same.
Two blistering heart pounding class-action lawsuits have pummeled FHTM in 2010 as well. The first was filed in Federal Court in Kentucky in September 2010 and the other in Federal Court in Southern California two days before Christmas last year too. Neither of these lawsuits have been certified as a class yet, and mainly due to some extensive manipulation of the legal system by the Fortune legal team.
So the important question now remains, why did these huge conglomerates allow their names and reputations to potentially be smeared by a company like FHTM? The answer is simple - they didn't know what was happening.
According to ex-representative, Joseph Isaacs from Tampa, Florida, "When these companies find out that their trademarks, names, logos and reputations are being used by FHTM in order to aide FHTM in proving its' legitimacy they will issue a cease or desist, insist on the actions to stop or not allow FHTM to market their products". Which others will walk when they find out the real business model and litigation history of Fortune Hi-Tech?
As of March 2011 every one of the companies listed above has either issued a cease and desist or no longer allows itself to be aligned with Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing. How has this affected their aura of legitimacy? How do they explain all of this to new and even existing independent representatives?
In reviewing some FHTM business presentations on YouTube, it was apparent that the logos of GE, DuPont, Verizon and AT&T were there for one reason. What are the repercussions of only being legal by association? According to Joseph Isaacs, "Top leaders would tell prospects during the business presentation that they must be legal because no iconic Fortune 100 company would affiliate with a scam". "All of these major companies sent their CEO's and legal teams to meet with founder Paul Orberson to evaluate FHTM and check out their books. This cannot be so and was nothing more than a lie used to recruit", he added. What rhetoric do these leaders use today to explain the loss of such major brands? Only time will tell.
Will FHTM leaders and owners blame the latest Verizon fiasco on the reps like they did in their announcement pertaining to DuPont only a few weeks ago? How long will this saga continue? Which other company will research the true business model of Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing and un-align themselves next? It is too early to tell but this story is far from over.
If the massacre continues then Fortune will be nothing more than a vitamin and dog food MLM. That is not very hi-tech and not too many fortunes will be made by affiliation. How much representative revenue has been lost as a result of these major companies walking away? How many current representatives are scrambling to replace so many customer points? How many Regional and Executive managers won't get bonuses because their team points are greatly depleted because of the latest loss? We searched high and low for the answers but didn't find any.
I agree with you that difficulties with the IRS are not easy to straighten out, as I discovered once (only once, fortunately, in close to 50 years), and the mistake was theirs, as they admitted, not mine; they did send an apology, however.
Candadai Tirumalai