March 29, 2011 12:38 PM

NATO: Signs of Qaeda presence in Libyan rebels

The Arab Spring

Adm. James G. Stavridis, NATO's supreme allied commander in Europe

Adm. James G. Stavridis, NATO's supreme allied commander in Europe, left, and Air Force Gen. C. Robert Kehler, commander of the U.S. Strategic Command, testify on Capitol Hill in Washington, March 29, 2011. (AP)

(CBS/AP) 

WASHINGTON - As the United States and other nations build ties with Libyan rebels and leaders of the political opposition trying to oust Libyan strongman Muammar Qaddafi, intelligence suggests al Qaeda and other terrorists have a small presence within the opposition group, a top military commander said Tuesday.

Adm. James Stavridis, the NATO Supreme Allied Commander in Europe, told Congress that officials have seen "flickers" of possible al Qaeda and Hezbollah among the rebel forces, but at this point no evidence there are significant numbers within the group's leadership.

Questions about who the rebels are have escalated as the U.S.-led coalition moved into its second week of attacks against Qaddafi forces, halting their progress and paving the way for the ragtag opposition to regain lost ground. At this point, Stavridis said, there is "more than a reasonable chance of Qaddafi leaving."

Complete coverage: Anger in the Arab world

In London, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton met with Mahmoud Jibril, a representative of the Libyan political opposition fighting Qaddafi, "to talk about the path forward." And she implored an international conference meeting on the Libya's future to band together to free the North African nation from Qaddafi's grip and convince his loyalists to abandon the regime.

And a senior administration official said the U.S. will soon send an envoy to Libya to deepen relations with leaders of the rebels.

Eleven days into a military assault that has cost the Pentagon roughly $550 million so far, the U.S. was in the process of turning over control of the mission to NATO in the next day or two. The U.S. military, however, is likely to continue to play a significant role in the operation, including continued airstrikes, intelligence gathering, electronic warfare and aerial refueling.

The military has insisted that it is not coordinating attacks with the rebels to help advance their offensive, but simply working to protect the people. But the strikes paved the way for the rebels to regain a key city over the weekend, and begin again their march west toward Qaddafi strongholds.

President Barack Obama told the American people Monday night that U.S. intervention in Libya was necessary to prevent a slaughter of civilians. But he also said that ousting Qaddafi militarily would be a mistake, and suggested that the diplomatic road to his removal was the path to take.

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice said Tuesday there are plenty of "non-military means at our disposal" to oust the Libyan leader.

"We are using sanctions. We've imposed an arms embargo. We are cutting off all of Qaddafi's sources and funds to his regime, cutting off the flow of mercenaries. We are providing assistance and will continue to provide assistance to the opposition. We are working in London on a political solution. All of these are important elements," Rice said on "The Early Show."

The $550 million figure on the initial U.S. costs is not complete because it does not include such money as pay for U.S. sailors, airmen and other forces who would have been deployed somewhere in the world anyway. But it is the first official figure released on the cost of setting up the no-fly zone in Libya and protecting civilians.

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 16 Comments
by alexander029 March 29, 2011 10:37 PM EDT
with this now in the open, its time the west tells the rebels that "the west will not aid the rebels wih al qaeda in the fight" this is a fight that the west is best staying out of. we need just sit back and watch the drama unfold.
Reply to this comment
by samael2014 March 29, 2011 3:42 PM EDT
"Eleven days into a military assault that has cost the Pentagon roughly $550 million so far, the U.S. was in the process of turning over control of the mission to NATO in the next day or two. The U.S. military, however, is likely to continue to play a significant role in the operation, including continued airstrikes, intelligence gathering, electronic warfare and aerial refueling."

beautiful... just simply deep-$hit beautiful.
Reply to this comment
by DidHeSayThat March 29, 2011 3:39 PM EDT
And the Red Dragon sits back and smiles as all the Western democracies spend their blood and treasure, borrow their grandchildren's futures to play folly in another 2000-year-old strife.

The Red Dragon waits, passively, patiently as the West bankrupts it dollar. The dollar will become worthless.

The Red Dragon only needs to wait. Without ever declaring war, China will rule an entire Earth as its kingdom one day. I hope you neo-cons and moralist liberals are happy then. Learn Chinese. Teach your children's children Chinese. They are going to need it.
Reply to this comment
by Poeopy March 29, 2011 3:29 PM EDT
With Obama's high inteligence, he knew all these signs & the presence of AlQaeda just as Qaddafi earlier also blamed & warned the west & the entire world from the very onset. He is quite right being very cautious in his decisions & actions. But the Reps thinks that he's being too coward & timid to "act their way".
Anyhow, Obama isn't all that a BLOOD SUCKER & WAR HUNGRY like McCain !!!
Reply to this comment
by billpl-2009 March 29, 2011 3:16 PM EDT
a lot more al qaeda and hezbollah on qaddafi's side than the rebels
Reply to this comment
by mask2697 March 29, 2011 2:56 PM EDT
by Paul_I March 29, 2011 2:25 PM EDT

Spin is a wonderful source of entertainment. Now we can say Obama is supporting Al Quaeda. And we can say Palin said Obama took too long to support Al Quaeda. And we can say McCain said we should act decisively to support Al Quaeda. And so on with Pawlenty, Gingrich, Clinton, Huckabee, NATO, the UN...
-----------------------------
are you a moron!? it said "flickers" of possible terrorists, and it even says if any there aren't many Al quada, besides in case you forgot, Quadaffi directly payed for terrorism, he actually gave them money to plant a bomb on a plane, which blew up killing 300+ people, so no if there are terrorists, they are very isolated...
Reply to this comment
by Paul_I March 29, 2011 2:25 PM EDT
Spin is a wonderful source of entertainment. Now we can say Obama is supporting Al Quaeda. And we can say Palin said Obama took too long to support Al Quaeda. And we can say McCain said we should act decisively to support Al Quaeda. And so on with Pawlenty, Gingrich, Clinton, Huckabee, NATO, the UN...
Reply to this comment
by Mortarman429 March 29, 2011 2:35 PM EDT
Probably all correct.
by ddaryl March 29, 2011 2:14 PM EDT
LMAO at the tea baggers.... amongst the rebels there is a flicker of Al Qaeda... it's the middle east there is a flicker of terrorists around every corner.

not happy with more war in the middle east, but the tea baggers are extremely sad excuses for humans
Reply to this comment
by Mortarman429 March 29, 2011 2:35 PM EDT
So are liberals!
by ddaryl March 29, 2011 2:14 PM EDT
LMAO at the tea baggers.... amongst the rebels there is a flicker of Al Qaeda... it's the middle east there is a flicker of terrorists around every corner.

not happy with more war in the middle east, but the tea baggers are extremely sad excuses for humans
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 March 29, 2011 1:54 PM EDT
by TeaPartyPatriot March 29, 2011 1:25 PM EDT


Obama is not doing a thing to America that you "TEA PARTY" anarchists don't want to do. You just 'spin' it to look like he is as "Un-American" as you are.
Reply to this comment
by Mortarman429 March 29, 2011 2:36 PM EDT
Uh...no.
See all 16 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook