March 27, 2011 1:10 PM

SS recipients brace for stagnant income

The government is projecting a slight cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security benefits next year, the first increase since 2009. But for most beneficiaries, rising Medicare premiums threaten to wipe out any increase in payments, leaving them without a raise for a third straight year.

The government is projecting a slight cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security benefits next year, the first increase since 2009. But for most beneficiaries, rising Medicare premiums threaten to wipe out any increase in payments, leaving them without a raise for a third straight year. (AP Photo/Bradly C. Bower)

WASHINGTON - Millions of retired and disabled people in the United States had better brace for another year with no increase in Social Security payments.

The government is projecting a slight cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security benefits next year, the first increase since 2009. But for most beneficiaries, rising Medicare premiums threaten to wipe out any increase in payments, leaving them without a raise for a third straight year.

About 45 million people - one in seven in the country - receive both Medicare and Social Security. By law, beneficiaries have their Medicare Part B premiums, which cover doctor visits, deducted from their Social Security payments each month.

When Medicare premiums rise more than Social Security payments, millions of people living on fixed incomes don't get raises. On the other hand, most don't get pay cuts, either, because a hold-harmless provision prevents higher Part B premiums from reducing Social Security payments for most people.

David Certner of AARP estimates that as many as three-fourths of beneficiaries will have their entire Social Security increase swallowed by rising Medicare premiums next year.

It's a tough development for retirees who lost much of their savings when the stock market collapsed, who lost value in their homes when the housing market crashed and who can't find work because the job market is weak or they are in poor health.

"You just don't have the words to say how much this impacts a person," said Joyce Trebilcock, a retired legal secretary from Belle, Mo., a small town about 100 miles west of St. Louis.

Like most U.S. retirees, Trebilcock, 65, said Social Security is her primary source of income. She said a back injury about 15 years ago left her unable to work, so she applied for disability benefits. Now, she lives on a $1,262 Social Security payment each month, with more than $500 going to pay the mortgage.

"I've cut back on about everything I can, and I take the rest out of my savings," Trebilcock said. "Thank God I've got that. That's going to run out before long, at the rate I'm going. ... I have no idea what I'm going to do then."

Medicare premiums are absorbing a growing share of Social Security benefits, leaving retired and disabled people with less money for other expenses, according to a report by the Congressional Research Service.

Social Security recipients spend, on average, 9 percent of their benefits on Medicare Part B premiums, plus 3 percent on premiums for the Medicare prescription drug program. By the time someone retires in 2078, he or she will spend nearly one-third of their benefits on premiums for both Medicare programs, the report said.

Also, when premiums for the prescription drug program increase, as they do almost every year, they can result in a pay cut for Social Security recipients.

"We could very well be entering a period where we're all stuck with flat benefits because of the growth in health care costs," said Mary Johnson, a policy analyst at The Senior Citizens League.

By law, Social Security cost-of-living adjustments, or COLAs, are determined each year by a government measure of inflation. When consumer prices go up, payments go up. When consumer prices fall, payments stay flat until prices rebound.

There had been a COLA every year from 1975 through 2009, when a spike in energy prices resulted in a 5.8 percent increase, the largest in 27 years. Since then, the recession has depressed consumer prices, resulting in no COLA in 2010 or 2011.

Older people might feel they are falling behind because they haven't had a raise since 2009, but many are benefiting, said Andrew Biggs, a former deputy commissioner of the Social Security Administration who is now a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.

Consumer prices dropped, but Social Security benefits didn't drop, Biggs said. At the same time, health care costs went up, but Part B premiums stayed the same for most beneficiaries.

"They are better off because of that," Biggs said. "Somebody else is paying for a greater share of their health care. This will get me hate mail, obviously. But it is what it is."

Next year, the trustees who oversee the Social Security project a 1.2 percent COLA. President Barack Obama, in his spending proposal for the budget year that begins Oct. 1, projects a COLA of 0.9 percent. The average monthly payment is $1,077, so either way, the typical increase is projected to be between $10 and $13.

The current spike in energy prices could boost next year's COLA, if it lasts through September, when the increase for 2012 will be calculated. The COLA will be announced in mid-October.

Medicare Part B premiums must be set each year to cover 25 percent of program costs. By law, they have been frozen at 2009 levels for about 75 percent of beneficiaries because there has been no increase in Social Security. That means the entire premium hike has been borne by the remaining 25 percent, which includes new enrollees, high-income families and low-income beneficiaries who have their premiums paid by Medicaid, the federal-state health care program for the poor.

The 2009 premium levels, which are still paid by about three-fourths of beneficiaries, are $96.40 a month. Most of those who enrolled in the program in 2010 pay $110.50 a month and most of those who enrolled in 2011 pay $115.40.

The Medicare trustees project a Part B premium of $113.80 a month for next year. Obama's budget projects a monthly premium of $108.20, said Donald McLeod, a spokesman for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. McLeod cautioned that the projections could change significantly by September, when 2012 premiums are calculated.

Under either projection, a small share of beneficiaries would get lower premiums. The vast majority would get higher premiums that could swallow their Social Security COLA.

"That little raise helps us," said Estelle Jones, 66, of St. Paul, Minn. "Food, heating bills, water bill, all that stuff has gone up. ... All my medicines are very expensive, and every month I have to figure out how I am going to pay for them."

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 84 Comments
by infantryman1968 March 29, 2011 8:43 AM EDT
SS recipients brace for stagnant income

Rising Medicare premiums will eat up COLA raises, leaving millions of retired, disabled Americans without increases for 3rd year in row

LOL!

There are more people collecting now than paying into it.

Everyone saw this coming except for Obama and his followers.

The Irony.
Reply to this comment
by Riverjump March 28, 2011 10:22 AM EDT
Anybody really SURPRISED over this? I mean, who always gets tagged from our various levels of guvment?
Reply to this comment
by meboard March 28, 2011 8:48 AM EDT
You gotta wonder why retired folks vote repub? I mean really, what has a repub ever done for anyone in the middle class or anyone over 55?
Reply to this comment
by omnibus66 March 28, 2011 8:05 AM EDT
If the COLA adjustments were based on what seniors actually spend their money on, instead of some weird economic index, the result would be completely different. Who do they think they are fooling with their voodoo economics?
Reply to this comment
by tmittelstaed March 28, 2011 2:57 AM EDT
I think the COLA fudges the numbers. What I'm seeing at the grocery store is the prices are staying the same - but the portions are getting smaller whenever the manufacturers can manage it. A few things - soda pop, milk, etc. - the container sizes are so recognizable that they can't get away with making them smaller. But, stuff like ice cream is a joke - it used to be half gallons now it's a 1.5 quart. More and more of the regular eggs are sold and fewer jumbos, the list goes on and on.
Reply to this comment
by nearl451 March 27, 2011 10:25 PM EDT
We already knew on whose backs that budget is to be balanced and wars to be paid for......

It is no surprise. No incomce tax increases or estate tax increases; the burden is on those will ever diminishing voice (as money = free speech).
Reply to this comment
by Jaylah54 March 27, 2011 9:46 PM EDT
Yeah, as a veteran on a veterans disability pension, I haven't gotten a COLA in two years because prices haven't gone up. Uh huh. I have my heating bills from two years ago and I can tell you that it cost me more to heat my house this winter than it did 2 years ago, even after replacing my old furnace with a new high-efficiency furnace.

Somehow my food bills have spiked even though I'm eating a lot more potatoes, rice, pasta, and very little meat.

I've actually had to cancel doctor's appointments because my car was sitting on empty and I didn't have the money to put more gas in it. But I guess, according to the government, gas prices are still what they were in 2009 too, huh?

The city I live in just instituted a 10% increase in water bills, in order to finance a badly needed new water treatment plant. But I guess the government isn't too concerned about that, either.

I have central air conditioning in my house, but I can't afford to run it because electricity has gotten so much more expensive in the last two years.

But, remember, prices haven't increased since 2009.
Reply to this comment
by askagain March 28, 2011 12:35 AM EDT
It makes you wonder if the government fudges on the numbers. As you point out, it feels as if everything has gone up over the last few years. In my state, the governor instituted a one dollar per pack tax increase and our local property taxes have been going up each year even though housing valus have plummeted. Perhaps the price of luxouy items isn't going up but the cost of the basics certain;y has.
by gruven13777 March 27, 2011 9:38 PM EDT
But hey...look on the bright side...all the big bank execs at Goldman, JP Morgan, Citi, BofA and AIG are still getting their million dollar bonuses every month with your taxpayer bailout money.
Reply to this comment
by thanksgreed March 27, 2011 9:40 PM EDT
they don't need ss...but I'm sure they collect it anyway...
by Slyladysheri March 27, 2011 9:08 PM EDT
Since the democrats took control of congress in 2007 the national debt has risen from 8.6 trillion to 14 trillion. They have managed to spend 6 trillion in 4 and 1/2 years. They lost 9.7 million jobs. Caused the greatest economic meltdown since the great depression and have spent the last 4 and 1/2 years blaming the GOP who were not even in power when the collapse occurred. They know they can lie because most Americans do not care enough to read the truth. They blame it on BUSH who is the one that actually tried to prevent the meltdown that the DEMOS caused to happen.
Americans are truly to stupid and lazy to continue to be a super power for much longer. That is sad because America was a great country. The very best.

http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2010/04/20/remembering-who-caused-the-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac-meltdown/
Reply to this comment
by thanksgreed March 27, 2011 9:11 PM EDT
hey wade...how's it goin' bro?

I see you've been busy all day with all your names hatin' on libs...
by rwsmith29456 March 27, 2011 9:03 PM EDT
I don't know anybody except for executives whose income is NOT stagnated. It's hard enough just find a job, much less a decent one.
Reply to this comment
See all 84 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook