CBS News/ March 26, 2011, 11:56 AM

"Kennedys" mini-series dubbed "strange" effort

Greg Kinnear and Katie Holmes as JFK and Jackie in the mini-series 'The Kennedys.'

Greg Kinnear and Katie Holmes as JFK and Jackie in the mini-series 'The Kennedys.' / The Kennedys

"The Kennedys," the much-discussed new mini-series starring Greg Kinnear as JFK and Katie Holmes as Jacquie Kennedy begins airing next weekend.

The eight-part drama will be shown on the little-known network ReelzChannel, after the History Channel tossed it and several others passed on it.

Some reports say members of the Kennedy family, particularly Caroline Kennedy and Maria Shriver, pressured the History Channel not to air it, while others say historians had too many issues with the accuracy of the series. But at least one pundit says its quality - or lack thereof - may have played a role.

The ReelzChannel paid $7 million to air the $25 million production, Newsweek Senior Writer Ramin Setoodeh told "Early Show on Saturday Morning" co-anchor Russ Mitchell.

"The History Channel," Setoodeh said, "kills it because they say, suddenly, out of the blue, they say it's not part of their brand, having watched it. They didn't really criticize the acting or the production or the directing. But you know, kind of implied that there's something wrong with the movie, and it goes from network-to-network-to-network, and everyone (rejected) it."

Setoodeh says he doesn't think "we're gonna really know" whether the reports of pressure from the Kennedy family are true, "and even the producer of the mini-series says he's not gonna really know what led them not to air it. But I think if the quality was great, I think if it was well-done, well-acted, and they thought they could make money off of it, I don't think they would have pulled it."

Casting Holmes, whom Mitchell called a Jackie lookalike, "sort of added this tabloid element to the entire production," Setoodeh observed. "Every time Katie Holmes would come out in a Jackie Kennedy outfit, all the tabloids would run pictures of it. And then, it sort of became a little bit of a punch line. It looked like she was playing dress-up. And on-screen, she doesn't really have -- it's a very difficult thing to play a real person, a real, living person that we all know. But she doesn't really have the gravitas to pull off the role. And the accent, it's a little silly -- for eight hours, it's a long time to be, you know, watching her play this character in the way that she does."

Setoodeh confirmed that historians looked at the script, adding that producers have "toned down the more controversial elements when you watch it now. But, you know, it's still -- Joe Kennedy kind of comes off as a caricature. Sort of like a Karl Rove figure. And you know, I don't -- I mean, I only watched the first five hours. I have three hours left to go. But I don't really think people are going to tune in until the very end."

The first five hours, Setoodeh said, were "not very good. It's not very, you know, it's sort of -- it's a strange production. The characters are kind of over-the-top. There's not a lot of characters. It's not very believable. And you kind of roll your eyes at some parts, because it's really cheesy."

So many channels passed on "The Kennedys" there was some thought, Setoodeh noted, it would go straight to DVD. But, he said, "It's a lot of free advertising for (ReelzChannel). I don't think most people were watching the ReelzChannel. They say their viewership went up from about 3 million to about 5-and-a-half million just since they acquired the movie in January. And they're hoping about 12 million people will watch it."

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
11 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cktirumalai says:
There are occasions when the background of a movie and where it is to be screened becomes more important than the movie itself. Poeple will watch out of curiosity, even if historical accuracy is slighted.
The Kennedys and JFK in particular can be seen from many angles: an inexhaustible subject.
Candadai Tirumalai
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
samXXkiley says:
coucou,
les am?ricains appr?cient JFK, il fait partie de l'histoire des USA,
raconter l'histoire de JFK au cin?ma ou ? la t?l?, doit ?tre faite d'une mani?re correcte, "cr?dible" surtout.
...........
Americans appreciate JFK, he is part of U.S. history,
tell the story of JFK to the movies or on TV, must be done in a correct manner, "credible" especially.
avoid the judge through the mini-series.
" au revoir"
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RAYSGIRL65 says:
I'm sick of the bull about them being american royalty!! They were a common trash soap opera made famous by unfortunate death. Teddy was a dispicable human being. John was a weak immoral man and Jackie a pathetic woman who put up with the humiliation he heaped upon her. Enough already! We have had far better first families than this lot. (Decent, God fearing, law abiding people I might add)
reply
retm-w replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Can't think of any better first families, they all have skeletons in their closets.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
enaid3 says:
I'm looking forward to watching this series to see if it's "strange". I'll be the judge of whether or not it was presented well. And so will millions of other viewers.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
SUZAMBA says:
Can't these people create a movie without raking the old over coals!
Give it a break people, move on and deal with it. You can the bet, this movie will be about the same, BORING and then some! Enough with the Kennedys, give it a rest and quit digging it up. Give us something better.
reply
biasedcbs replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Who's "raking over old coals"??? Every November 22nd we get to see the same ultra liberal crap from the MSM glorifying an American family that used proven dirty money to buy the presidency, Senate seat(s) and powerful ambassadorship(s). And where was the "impartial press" like Time and Newsweek to inform the American people? Sucking on the Kennedy money teat because their liberal bias wouldn't allow them to tell the truth!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
usunus says:
HBO would of course produce a brand new Kennedy movie showing all the members of the royal family in a divine light and trashing Palin and Cheney here and there as part of the far seeing vision of JFK.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jimhass says:
The creators of this series were none other than the same bunch who gave us "24" and the attempt to blame 9/11 on Bill Clinton by massaging history until that made sense, too. Method: put out a show where the brainless meme makes the Kennedys look like the worst nightmare Glenn Beck ever had. Then scream "bias" as the screams begin.

Leave it to the historians, and, it seems, the purveyors of camp.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jeanne0256 says:
I would love to see a mini series about the Bush family. I'll never forget watching former President George H, cry while discussing the accomplishments of his son, Jeb. It was during "W's" administration when the Iraq war started going bad. Makes me wonder if George H wanted Jeb in office, and not "W".....
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
GeWay says:
Neither the media or Hollywood would ever think of permitting a series about what really went on in Kennedy's woman chasing life to hit the air. Isn't it strange that with all of Bill Clinton's sexual escapades Hollywood hasn't chosen to film something on that? Hmmm.
reply
See all 11 Comments