March 22, 2011 8:24 AM

Many Americans history, civics-challenged: poll

(CBS News) 

Before immigrants can become U.S. citizens, they have to pass an official test.

Recently, Newsweek magazine gave that same test to 1,000 Americans - and only 62 percent of them passed.

Read the Newsweek story

Twenty-nine percent of them didn't know the vice-president's name (Joe Biden) and 73 percent had no idea what the U.S. was fighting against during the Cold War (communism).

Newsweek Senior Writer Andrew Romano discussed the results on "The Early Show."

Co-anchor Erica Hill noted 23 percent of respondents didn't know what Martin Luther King Jr. did (fought for civil rights). Thirty-three percent, she said, didn't know when the Declaration of Independence was adopted (July 4, 1776). And only 37 percent knew there are nine justices on the Supreme Court.

Why don't people know these facts about their country?

Romano said, "There are a couple reasons when you talk to experts. One of the big ones is income inequality. We're one of the most unequal societies in the developed world. And when people don't have a lot of money, there is a difficulty getting a good education, there's a lack of opportunity and a lack of knowledge. That's one of the reasons why we don't do as well as northern European countries."

Hill asked, "So it's really a question of access?"

"It is," Romano said. "It's a big problem. We also have a very complicated system of government, much more complicated than some of these European countries. You have elections constantly for every imaginable office, you've got overlapping federal and state bureaucracies, and people kind of give up. They can't get their head around the whole thing."

Hill pointed out, "This isn't really a problem of -- or an issue, rather, a stupidity, it's more an issue of ignorance."

"That's exactly correct," Romano said. "There's a thing called deliberative polling that a professor at Stanford does. He gets people together in the room, polls them blind on a big issue, they have their opinions, they have their differences, but then they're confronted with the facts and they're forced to come up with a policy response to it. And almost every time, they come up with a rational reasonable policy response. So again, it's not stupidity, it's just a lack of knowledge on some of these issues."

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
Add a Comment See all 43 Comments
by CivicsQuiz March 25, 2011 7:30 AM EDT
This is a failure of our public education system and a failure of parents to promote civic knowledge and understanding. The Founding Fathers repeatedly warned us about this. http://CivicsQuiz.com
Reply to this comment
by jaek1 March 22, 2011 11:27 PM EDT
The US gov't and states are consumed with "testing"--reading, writing, math and now science to prove teachers are doing their job.....none of that is really in the citizenship test--no social studies, geography, civic education, history--it has been left out. However, an uneducated populous is easily led by our elected leaders to accept whatever they wish to accomplish.
Reply to this comment
by jt92202 March 22, 2011 7:47 PM EDT
People first learn what they are taught but the school system. Then they either choose to research things for themselves or believe everything they hear on TV, Media and those around them. I myself research every vote I cast be it for a person or raising taxes or...... I will not follow blindly just because! Those questions, I knew all the answers and what really proves it's not money vs no money is that I was low income for most of my adult life and had to get help from welfare and HUD. But yet I know a lot more than some with money and I will research my choices to find the best choice for me!

AND I AM NOT A LIBERAL!! Shock shock a person that came from low income not a Liberal!! I guess I didn't get indoctorized (not a word I know) well enough by the Media!
Reply to this comment
by skithebumps March 22, 2011 5:52 PM EDT
Jay Walking.
Reply to this comment
by brian_norwood March 22, 2011 3:14 PM EDT
I wonder what the results would be if we ran the same poll against the current crop of teabagging Presidential wannabe's? (e.g. Palin, Bachmann, Huckabee).
Reply to this comment
by WeHappyFew March 22, 2011 1:32 PM EDT
Mortarman,

If intent is only "partially written" then it is only acceptable to observe it only insofar as it has been specified. Any further 'interpretation' has no constitutional legitimacy.

Them's the rules, Big Guy
Reply to this comment
by Mortarman429 March 22, 2011 1:57 PM EDT
No...you poor thing.

The written law only gives you a partial understanding of what it means. Without the intent, you can make many things mean almost anything you want.

Which is certainly NOT the rules!
by WeHappyFew March 22, 2011 2:04 PM EDT
Thats my point dunderhead. You have a tired little reputation for being a Rules Lawyer regarding the Constitution, on this site.
by starving1968-3 March 22, 2011 12:42 PM EDT
by Mortarman429 March 22, 2011 12:37 PM EDT
You again havent looked at the intent. Intent is only PARTIALLY found in the wording. Please read what those who wrote it intended for it, and why they were doing it.







AGAIN: It's intent was to prevent the states from discriminating against their citizens.

Perhaps READING it will help you understand:

"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. "
Reply to this comment
by Mortarman429 March 22, 2011 12:45 PM EDT
Have you bothered to read what those who wrote it said it means? And what their intent of putting it in there was for?

Of course not!
by starving1968-3 March 22, 2011 1:00 PM EDT
If your claim is that it ONLY applies to "race", then please point out the words "race" in that amendment.

I'm still waiting from when we had this conversation MONTHS AGO.
by jeffinpa1234 March 22, 2011 12:38 PM EDT
I think we should take this a step further - apply this test before being allowed to vote!

I also think that we should require all voters to actually have paid taxes and to own land as well.

If they are female and pass all the above tests - that is fine they get a vote.

We have too many people voting that don't understand the issues and have no stake in the outcome!
Reply to this comment
by starving1968-3 March 22, 2011 12:28 PM EDT
by Mortarman429 March 22, 2011 12:18 PM EDT
Nope. The 14th Amendment had nothing to do with gay marriage.

Try actually reading it, and read what its intent was.






It's intent was to prevent the states from discriminating against their citizens.

Per the wording of the amendment!
Reply to this comment
by Mortarman429 March 22, 2011 12:37 PM EDT
You again havent looked at the intent. Intent is only PARTIALLY found in the wording. Please read what those who wrote it intended for it, and why they were doing it.
by WeHappyFew March 22, 2011 12:50 PM EDT
Wow. Thats quite a 180, Rules as Written.

One can't read intent, merely interpret it, Mr gaming the system..............................
by cktirumalai March 22, 2011 12:20 PM EDT
In addition to the reasons given in the article, many Americans concentrate on the present and future. This attitude led Henry Ford to dismiss history, the past, as bunk. In this view history is a European cathedral. Emerson distinguished between the party of memory and the party of hope. Even in these difficult times and apart from politics, many Americans belong to the party of hope.
Candadai Tirumalai
Reply to this comment
by element51 March 22, 2011 12:23 PM EDT
This may be true but please remember that it is impossible to know where you are going if you do not know where you have been.
See all 43 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook