March 20, 2011 8:23 AM

Qaddafi fires back with promise of "a long war"

TRIPOLI - The U.S. and its allies may have fired missiles and bombs at Libya, but Muammar Qaddafi has fired back with defiance and threats.

Both sides are evaluating where they stand after a night of destruction.

When the weapons coming at you are cruise missiles fired from hundreds of miles out at sea, and when the only real defense is antiquated anti-aircraft artillery shooting at an enemy it can't see - let alone hit - you resort to the only weapons you have, says CBS News correspondent Mark Phillips.

For the Qaddafi regime, that is people and words.

The leader himself hasn't been seen in days, but Muammar Qaddafi did call in to the state TV channel: "So the Mediterranean and North Africa will become now a real war zone because of this aggression and irresponsible act. And now all countries' interests in the region will be in danger starting from now."

His threatening words were run over a shot of the monument in front of a building destroyed during the 1986 U.S. bombing of Tripoli.

"Interference in our affairs has no justification," he said. "We are better than you because of our will. We are going to fight, we are going to fight for every square of our land. We will go as martyrs. We are dreamers, we will not give the land away."

Muammar Qaddafi: Everything is a target now
U.S. fires missiles on Libyan air defenses
Video: U.S., British ships launch Operation Odyssey Dawn
Complete coverage; Anger in the Arab World

Although the military operations bore the colors of a coalition, Qaddafi singled out the U.S. as the aggressor, rebel forces in Benghazi as traitors, and Libya as a target of "foreign colonialism."

"Benghazi will not let them take their honor," he said. "We will not allow them to come and take over Benghazi like you dream. People of Benghazi will rise and will wave the green flag. The conflict is between the Libyan people and the United States."

Vowing that Libyans will fight to the death as martyrs but ultimately be victorious, Qaddafi proclaimed, "This is the best moment in our life. We are going to be victorious in every town in Libya. We will fight, we will target any traitor who is co-operating with the Americans or Christian crusade."

He called the international coalition serving to enforce United Nations Resolution 1973 the "New Crusade."

"All nations are against this foreign intervention," he said. "If you want a long war, we will be ready.

"You were defeated in Somalia, you were defeated in Vietnam, you were defeated in Iraq, Iran and so on. You will be defeated, and there is no way back for you."

"You can't do anything in Afghanistan. Bin Laden defeated you - this weak man - you have used all your resources and now you are ready to leave. The same in Libya. You will not leave victorious."

The people also assembled - or were assembled - at potential target sites, including the fortified Qaddafi family compound in Tripoli.

Call them human shields; call them enthusiastic supporters come to be with their leader. The effect is the same.

Their presence would make targeting Qaddafi himself politically extremely difficult. And there is no indication that was the intention.

The Libyans admitted military targets were hit - but claimed about 50 civilians were killed as well. They showed wounded people in hospitals who they said were victims of the attack, but whose support for the regime was remarkably undiminished.

A government minister supplied an early official response: "Honestly I cannot give you names of the locations, but they hit civilian buildings and all inhabitants of them are civilians."

The bombing has reshaped the battlefield here. IF it has eliminated Qaddafi's air defenses - and that is not clear yet - then it has begun to take the military advantage away from his forces.

IF attacks also are successful against his tanks and troops on the ground, then the balance starts to shift more toward the anti-Qaddafi, rebel forces.

It is still far from clear, though, whether they are in a position to take advantage of the support they're getting from their new-found allies.

And, it's been said before about Muammar Qaddafi - that which doesn't kill him makes him stronger.

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
Add a Comment See all 66 Comments
by xocpalli March 21, 2011 2:24 PM EDT
porque el seņor kadafi quiere sumir a su pueblo en uuna guerra inutil que es para el como presidente deun pais petrolero una guerra sin sentido lo unico que le va a pasar es que lo metan en un agujero como a husein porque a la larga asi va a hacer...lo raro es que cuando los americanos invadieron irak este seņor les entrego las armas nucleares??!! seguramente para disminuir el grados de riesgo en una confrotntacion por demas planeada con no se que obscuro fin es enajenante y torpe pero en fin asi las cosas ...es cuestion de tiempo ver a este seņor kadafi en el banquillo de los acusados o en la orca su pueblo agradecera dehacerse de esta lacra que para nada a beneficiado a su pueblo.....
Reply to this comment
by brian_norwood March 21, 2011 1:09 PM EDT
Look. I am no neocon, but everyone agrees that Qadaffi is a lunatic. And, when the international community agrees that a lunatic like this is a danger to his own people, don't we have a moral obligation to join in?

This situation is different than Iraq. I think in this case, we are justified in our actions.
Reply to this comment
by facelessdrone2005 March 21, 2011 8:48 AM EDT
Before we got involved, he was okay with the U.S. and leaving us alone. Not now. Dead or alive, he is going to inspire a whole new generation of terrorists against the U.S. It only takes a handful of terrorists to kill thousands of Americans. Didn't Lockerbie and 9/11 teach us that? Loss of neutrality here is going to cost us dearly in the long run -- not to mention running up the deficit right now. I support Obama generally, but this is a really fool move.
Reply to this comment
by jgg000101 March 21, 2011 12:57 PM EDT
saddam was even worse than qaddafi. How did that go?
by greco99-2009 March 21, 2011 7:29 AM EDT
Btw, a few notes on the topic of Libya.

1. Bahrain is shooting unarmed protesters -- but not not much action from the US. Why not? What about the Saudis - not very democratic and plenty of human rights abuses?

2. Who supplied Ghadaffi with the guns, planes and other equipment -- look at the actions of Tony Blair and Prince Andrew in establishing commercial relations and arms deals with Ghadaffi.

3. A variety of American and European companies have been paying Ghadaffi bribes while profiting very well.

4. Who is supplying Ghadaffi with mercenaries on contract -- check out Global CST (I don't know if these rumors are true, but interesting to find out).

5. It is not so clear that 'the rebels' will create a fair or friendly government.

6. The population of Libya is less than NYC, and they do not actually produce a large percentage of American oil. We are spending almost 100 million dollars just for one day of missile attacks. The US government is facing a shutdown because of the budget crises. One of seven US children live in poverty, maybe we should help these kids too?

Does anyone know if we are using Depleted Uranium warheads (or 'ballasts') on the missiles. If so, the Libyan people will not be pleased if these are used near civilian areas.

We were supporting Ghadaffi not that long ago, maybe we should stop supporting dictators in the first place...
Reply to this comment
by greco99-2009 March 21, 2011 8:59 AM EDT
More details on the arms deals brokered by Blair and Andrew.

Blair and Andrew were both key in 're-opening' Libya. And, were pivotal in major arms and aircraft supply deals to the Libyans.

BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/3566545.stm

I assume that the aircraft supply deals also include ongoing maintenance...

To be sure, these deals with Ghadaffi were widely criticized at the time:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1361638/Libya-Tony-Blairs-dodgy-deal-arm-Gaddafi-leaked-paper-shows.html
by greco99-2009 March 21, 2011 9:04 AM EDT
More details on the arms deals brokered by Blair and Andrew.

Blair and Andrew were both key in 're-opening' Libya. And, were pivotal in major arms and aircraft supply deals to the Libyans.

BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/3566545.stm

I assume that the aircraft supply deals also include ongoing maintenance...

To be sure, these deals with Ghadaffi were widely criticized at the time:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1361638/Libya-Tony-Blairs-dodgy-deal-arm-Gaddafi-leaked-paper-shows.html

My somewhat tongue-in-cheek point is that, if you want to look at Libya's airpower and military capabilities you will see Blair and Andrew.

And, that rather than arm dictators on Tuesday only to fight them on Wednesday - don't provide the weapons that wind up point right back at you.

While I am fairly certain that the supply contracts facilitated by Blair and Andrew are no longer being honored - it is these very same contracts and the materials provided under these contracts that are key elements of Gadaffi's military and air power.
by greco99-2009 March 21, 2011 7:16 AM EDT
Btw, a few notes on the topic of Libya.

1. Bahrain is shooting unarmed protesters -- but not not much action from the US. Why not? What about the Saudis, who are not at all democratic?

2. Who supplied Ghadaffi with the guns, planes and other equipment -- look at the actions of Tony Blair and Prince Andrew in establishing commercial relations and arms deals with Ghadaffi.

3. A variety of American and European companies have been paying Ghadaffi bribes while profiting very well.

4. Who is supplying Ghadaffi with mercenaries on contract -- check out Global CST (I don't know if these rumors are true, but interesting to find out).

5. It is not so clear that 'the rebels' will create a fair or friendly government.

6. The population of Libya is less than NYC, and they do not actually produce a large percentage of American oil. We are spending almost 100 million dollars just for one day of missile attacks. The US government is facing a shutdown because of the budget crises. One of seven US children live in poverty, maybe we should help these kids too?

We were supporting Ghadaffi not that long ago, maybe we should stop supporting dictators in the first place...
Reply to this comment
by redbeachvn March 21, 2011 12:16 AM EDT
O Moammar, the Great Head of Cockroaches and Rats, I'm filled with dread and fear because of your threats. I want to tell you about the recent dream I had: I saw you and your Brilliant and Enlightened Sons attempt a Miracle, 3 of you went sky diving from a C-130 without parachutes over the Med. Three of you screamed for a long time.
Reply to this comment
by jeanne0256 March 20, 2011 11:56 PM EDT
drop a few MOAB's and get the job done. no more LONG TERM wars.... damn we spend enough on defense and high tech military toys.. USE THEM...
Reply to this comment
by Rocksman March 20, 2011 10:10 PM EDT
Geeze, Obama does have nuts.
Reply to this comment
by daffy64 March 21, 2011 11:26 AM EDT
How so? Any President can call in the brute force of the US military without risking HIS OWN SKIN. It's like having a hulking body guard and "ordering" him to beat someone up. Does that really take "nuts"?

Remember, chickenhawk Bushie was pretty fast on the trigger too.
by MissMeYetAbdullah March 20, 2011 9:50 PM EDT
Republicans whine if Obama does nothing.
Republicans whine when Obama takes decisive action.
Therefore, I conclude that Republicans whine, QED.
Reply to this comment
by MissMeYetAbdullah March 20, 2011 9:41 PM EDT
Poor desert8lizard, and all the rest of the America-haters. You want to see America fail, don't you? Now you're watching how a President with a pair operates, not a weak suck closet-case. Now you see what happens when a President actually solicits advice from the military instead of firing military leaders who disagree with his ideology.

Here's some insight into what it means to act like a man, instead of a weakling trying to prove to Daddy that all those stories about him and his college roommate are lies, lies lies: in these famous words of Bertrand Russell,

"Real gangstas never flex nuts
Because real gangstas know they got 'em."

BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA..............
Reply to this comment
See all 66 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook