AP/ March 7, 2011, 4:40 AM

Gates: U.S. should stay in Afghanistan past 2014

Updated at 12:09 p.m. ET.

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Monday that both the U.S. and Afghan governments agree the American military should remain involved in Afghanistan after the planned 2014 end of combat operations to help train and advise Afghan forces.

"Obviously it would be a small fraction of the presence that we have today, but I think we're willing to do that," Gates told a group of U.S. troops at Bagram air field, which is headquarters for U.S. and NATO forces in eastern Afghanistan. "My sense is, they (Afghan officials) are interested in having us do that."

CBSNews.com Special Report: Afghanistan

Gates said the United States has no interest is setting up permanent military bases in Afghanistan and is in Afghanistan for talks with President Hamid Karzai and a look at battlefields where his commanders say the U.S. and NATO are gaining the edge against the Taliban.

Karzai is worried about what happens then, and wants more durable signs of U.S. support.

Gates also apologized for the accidental deaths of Afghan children in an airstrike last week, and Karzai accepted the apology.

On Sunday, the Afghan National Security Council discussed the matter of a long-term security accord with the U.S., according to a statement issued by Karzai's office. The statement said Karzai told the council that the U.S. wants the deal worked out as soon as possible. And he said that on the Afghan side it was matter not just for the government but for the Afghan people to decide.

The U.S. has said it wants a long-term relationship with Afghanistan, in part to ensure the country does not again become a haven for al Qaeda or affiliated terrorist groups. Karzai's interest is rooted in his desire for U.S. security guarantees and commitments that could help bring stability and prosperity.

Intel reports reveal grim Afghan war outlook
Afghan war review cements withdrawal plan

Gates is at the start of a two-day visit with U.S. troops, allied commanders and Afghan leaders to gauge war progress as the Obama administration moves toward crucial decisions on reducing troop levels.

A planned visit to a combat outpost south of Kabul was scratched due to poor weather, and instead Gates made a brief flight north to Bagram, headquarters for the U.S.-led command that is responsible for eastern Afghanistan. The Pentagon chief visited a combat hospital, where Maj. Gen. John Campbell told reporters three soldiers had been admitted earlier in the day with wounds from a roadside bomb blast.

In his remarks to troops assembled inside a cavernous building on the air field, Gates offered encouragement.

"I know you've had a tough winter, and it's going to be a tougher spring and summer, but you've made a lot of headway," he said. "I think you've proven, with your Afghan partners, that this thing is going to work and that we'll be able to prevail."

Defense Department spokesman Geoff Morrell told reporters flying with the Pentagon chief from Washington that Gates wants to get a first-hand feel for changes on the ground since he last was in Afghanistan in December.

The U.S. is committed to beginning a troop withdrawal in July. But the size and scope of the pullback will depend on the degree of progress toward handing off full control to the shaky Afghan government.

Morrell said Gates expects to hear from troops and commanders that U.S. and NATO strategy is making important progress against the relentless Taliban, who are thought to be gearing up for a spring offensive.

U.S. commanders have been saying for weeks that the Taliban are suffering big losses in territory and personnel, while being denied the funding and infiltration routes they have relied on in the past to ramp up guerrilla operations each spring.

Marine Maj. Gen. Richard Mills, top commander in the southwestern province of Helmand, told reporters last week that a Taliban counteroffensive is anticipated.

Mills said he expects the Taliban to try "to regain very, very valuable territory ... lost over the past six to eight months." He added that U.S. and allied forces are intercepting "as many of the foreign fighters as we can" who come from Pakistan to attack U.S. and Afghan troops.

Gates sees the spring as a potentially decisive period for President Barack Obama's war strategy, which includes beginning to withdraw U.S. forces in July.

This week's visit is Gates' 13th trip to Afghanistan, and probably one of his last as defense secretary. He has said he will retire this year but has not given a date.

After Afghanistan, Gates planned to fly to the Stuttgart, Germany, headquarters of U.S. Africa Command to attend a ceremony Wednesday marking the arrival of a new commander, Army Gen. Carter Ham.

Gates will attend a NATO defense ministers meeting in Brussels on Thursday and Friday.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
25 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
choiceshaveconsequences says:
At some point in time, Karzai and Gates will reach an agreement on how much more American blood needs to hemorrhage trying to establish Bush's not-so-enduring freedom in Afghanistan. Then Gates will let us know what a sharp trader he is. I forget. What exactly have we gained from this war?
reply
formrusmcsgt replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Well, Halliburton is doing real well, I understand....
linkicon reporticon emailicon
documemts says:
.............only if Gates stays there too.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
larlinc says:
NO!!!!!! Let Gates and his family stay there!! No more of our youth and our money for Afghanistan. If the people cannot fight for their freedom then Americans will not do it for them! ENOUGH!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rock0223 says:
In this case the Secretary is defenseless.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rock0223 says:
In this case the Secretary is defenseless.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sjc_1 says:
Afghanistan is where empires go to die, we should have learned this from the past.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
The oil corporations who run US foreign policy have no intention of ever leaving this area. Why should they? The frightened a bunch of ignorant, paranoid, gullible fools about a bunch of third workd Muslims and get to use our tax money and the lives of our poor soldiers and their familiers for THEIR insane profits. A Republican Corporation Tea Bag Klan wet dream come true.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
formrusmcsgt says:
by nottblu March 7, 2011 12:35 PM EST
Why is it people like you ignore the evil known as radical Islam? Why is it trolls like you never blame there savage acts for the modern worlds unrest?
---
You never see any support from me for radical Islamists. You don't even see support from me for Christians or any other cults, either.

And, unlike yourself, I comprehend that hegemonic policies carry a cost.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
formrusmcsgt says:
If dubya had finished the job instead of bailing to go head-hunting in Iraq, we'd have been out before his second term expired.

dubya, the gift that keeps on giving......
reply
amerilatino replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I framed the picture of the Pope holding his head when he was meeting with Shrub, put a thought cloud above the Pontifice's head saying, "Holy Sh*t, he's more stupid than Bernie Law..."
formrusmcsgt replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Nice.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
GAYRIGHTatTWITTER says:
Ummmm...where are Code Pink, Stinky Sheehan and all the other anti-war trolls who were screaming bloody murder when Bush was President and presiding over two wars? I guess they crawled back under their rocks. Rolls Royces of hypocrites. @GAYRIGHT
reply
See all 25 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right