
Army Pfc. Bradley Manning / AP/Grpahics Bank
Updated at 6:39 p.m. ET
WASHINGTON - The Army said Wednesday it has filed 22 additional charges against Pfc. Bradley E. Manning, the soldier suspected of providing classified government documents published by the WikiLeaks anti-secrecy group.
Special Section: WikiLeaks
Spielberg gets rights to WikiLeaks book for film
CBS News national security correspondent David Martin reports that the new charges for the first time formally accuse Manning of aiding the enemy.
Army officials said the charges accuse Manning of using unauthorized software on government computers to extract classified information, illegally download it and transmit the data for public release by what the Army termed "the enemy."
The charge sheets against Manning make clear that the 22 new counts against him involve the leaking of the Afghan and Iraq war logs as well as the quarter million State Department cables disseminated last year, Martin reports.
The charge sheets do not make any mention of either WikiLeaks or its founder, Julian Assange, Martin reports. All told, the charges accuse Manning of leaking more than half a million documents plus two videos, Martin reports.
"60 Minutes" Coverage of Julian Assange
Assange: WikiLeaks Played "Inside the Rules"
Julian Assange, The Man Behind WikiLeaks
Segment: Julian Assange, Part 1
Segment: Julian Assange, Part 2
Julian Assange: The "60 Minutes" Interview
CBS Radio News chief legal analyst Andrew Cohen reports that military officials look like they want to throw the book at Manning, not just to punish him, but also to send a message to other service members who may be tempted to do what Manning allegedly did.
The charges follow seven months of Army investigation.
"The new charges more accurately reflect the broad scope of the crimes that Pvt. 1st Class Manning is accused of committing," said Capt. John Haberland, a legal spokesman for the Military District of Washington.
The charge of aiding the enemy under the Uniform Code of Military Justice is a capital offense, but the Army's prosecution team has notified the Manning defense team that it will not recommend the death penalty to the two-star general who is in charge of proceeding with legal action.
Cohen reports that military officials aren't giving up much when they promise not to seek the death penalty against Manning, a sentence that would have been unlikely anyway even if he is ultimately convicted. One big question now is whether Manning or the government will be open to some sort of a deal that precludes trial, Cohen reports.
In a written statement detailing the new charges, the Army said that if Manning were convicted of all charges he would face life in prison, plus reduction in rank to the lowest enlisted pay grade, a dishonorable discharge and loss of all pay and allowances.
Manning's civilian attorney, David Coombs, said any charges that Manning may face at trial will be determined by an Article 32 investigation, the military equivalent of a preliminary hearing or grand jury proceeding, possibly beginning in late May or early June.
Trial proceedings against Manning have been on hold since July, pending the results of a medical inquiry into Manning's mental capacity and responsibility.
The Army said Manning was notified in person of the additional charges on Wednesday. He is confined at the Marine Corps base in Quantico, Va.
http://news.change.org/stories/wikileaks-reveals-us-tax-dollars-fund-child-sex-slavery-in-afghanistan
In any case, these guards have set themselves up to be judge, jury, and executioner.
This young man is INNOCENT unless PROVEN guilty.
And as such should be treated no worse than an innocent detainee.
He should not be deprived of normal uninterrupted sleep during the night, and normal food and water and contact with other human beings.
I thought we were better than that.
This guy is a traitor. He broke the law and put lives at risk. And he should suffer the consequences of his actions.
By breaking that oath he committed treason against the united states (U.S. Constitution article 3)and should have his punishment decided by congress.
Maybe you should read the Constitution before sharing your your subjective point of view.
Our forefathers did far more than we have to to gain freedom from this corruption. What we need to do is so very small, it does not need to be violent...but everyone has to speak up, stop the system and say enough. America will only keep getting worse if we let these people rob us blind, and we can either sink in it like mud or let it burn with our passion and rekindle it like the flames of a phoenix. It's time for revolution, it doesn't have to be violent, but it has to be now.