AP/ January 19, 2011, 8:39 PM

China to Buy $45 Billion in U.S. Exports

WASHINGTON - Seeking to build ties with an economic rival, the White House said Wednesday that China would purchase $45 billion in U.S. exports, including a highly sought-after $19 billion deal for 200 Boeing airplanes.

The announcement came as Chinese President Hu Jintao arrived at the White House for a state visit with President Barack Obama. The deals could soothe some concerns from the U.S. government and corporate America, both of which contend that China keeps its currency artificially low in order to make Chinese products cheaper in the U.S. and U.S. products costlier in China.

Obama, Hu Jintao Seek to Bridge Big Gaps

Mr. Obama and Hu met Wednesday with U.S. and Chinese business leaders, including some involved in the new export deals. Mr. Obama said the economic relationship between the two countries is "more complex" than it appears.

"Our goal here today was to make sure that we break out of the old stereotypes that somehow China is simply taking manufacturing jobs and taking advantage of low wages, the U.S. is importing cheap goods and thereby having cheaper products, but also putting strains on our employment base," Mr. Obama said.

Hu told the executives that he welcomed U.S. companies to do business in China, and said his country is speeding up its economic restructuring and trying to increase domestic consumption. Increased Chinese demand for goods is a prime U.S. concern because it could help reduce a U.S.-China trade gap.

Obama Has Broad Agenda for Hu's State Visit

In addition to the Boeing deal, China will also invest in U.S. exports from agriculture, telecommunications and technology companies, including General Electric, Honeywell and Navistar. The White House said the deals will support up to 235,000 jobs in the U.S. Executives from Boeing and General Electric were among the business leaders who will meet with Mr. Obama and Hu at the White House.

The White House said China also agreed to strengthen its intellectual property rights enforcement and ease its indigenous innovation policies - both practices that have irked U.S. businesses.

The indigenous innovation policy China adopted in 2009 limits Beijing's purchase of foreign products to those designed in China. U.S. businesses see the policy as a ploy to force them to turn over their technology to China or be locked out of business with the government.

The White House said Wednesday that China agreed that it would not make government procurement decisions based on where the intellectual property rights for goods or services are developed or maintained. Officials said China also agreed that it would not discriminate against innovative products made by foreign suppliers operating in China.

U.S. software companies have also said they're cheated out of billions in sales because Chinese companies, and even government agencies, illegally copy their programs instead of buying them. China agreed in December to allocate funds in its budget for legal software purchases, and on Wednesday, the White House said China agreed to audit the use of legal software and publish the results of those audits. U.S. officials hailed the move as a significant step forward in transparency for the often secretive Chinese government.Among the companies the U.S. and China reached export deals with are:

- Boeing: China agreed to approve airline contracts for 200 aircraft to be delivered over a three-year period, starting this year. The $19 billion package will support more than 100,000 American jobs, according to the White House.

- General Electric: The White House says GE reached a deal with China Shenhua Energy Company Limited. The joint venture will use GE's cleaner power generation technologies to advance cleaner coal solutions for industrial chemicals, fuels and power generation. GE estimates the deal has the potential to generate up to $2.5 billion in U.S. exports.

- Honeywell International, Inc: Honeywell will work with China's Haier Group to develop and promote low-emission, high energy-efficiency products and solutions. Honeywell estimates the total value of the U.S. export content in the five-year deal is $210 million.
© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
25 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tsigili says:
Oh wow. Just how many hundreds of billions are we buying from them????

This one sided deal is killing America.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stupa5 says:
News Flash.."China buys 45 billion dollars of melamine from US"...
They ran out or their own inventory...to feed the radicals & get mind right..
"You will assimilate or Else" you get sweet & sour Meow Chow.. Hunuan style with hot pepper & melamine! Ha Ha Ha!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RealiteBites says:
From the article:

Increased Chinese demand for goods is a prime U.S. concern because it could help reduce a U.S.-China trade gap.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Any country that manipulates currency is obviously more interested in maximizing their profit, even if it's at the expense of somebody else. Does Pres. Obama not agree with that?

That's what makes the 'Caterpillar' argument so misleading ... if China will never allow trade to be balanced out, then loss of money that would otherwise stay within the domestic income stream leaks out to pump out foreign economies. And the US economy will continue to need to run deficits to stay afloat.

I mean like what Pres. Obama is essentially saying is that if China would adapt free market principles, then the US could possibly balance out trade. I don't know if he knows that that's effectively his guiding philosophy though. Because when it's phrased that way, it seems kind of futile, does it not?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RedWings_ninety_one says:
So our national debt will be under $14 trillion?...for tonight
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
decotoguy says:
I love this stuff,I suspect the cost of OIL will go through the roof now.
All this time I thought the Great Honorable War Hero George W.Bush went
to WAR in Iraq to control the Marketing of OIL,and Avoid China's
Influence on IRAN,INDIA,Pakistan,Iraq,and Afghanistan.
Now I see the real BUSH "Doctrine"is to control the Marketing of The Military-Industrial Complex.
Well go figure,all this time I thought the
Great Honorable War Hero George W.Bush was just a KNUCKE-HEAD,NUMB-SKULL NINCOMPOOP.Boy am I going to eat crow now,I hope it taste like chicken.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RealiteBites says:
From the article:

Mr. Obama said the economic relationship between the two countries is "more complex" than it appears. "Our goal here today was to make sure that we break out of the old stereotypes that somehow China is simply taking manufacturing jobs and taking advantage of low wages, the U.S. is importing cheap goods and thereby having cheaper products, but also putting strains on our employment base," Mr. Obama said.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh please ... I think it's Barack that doesn't understand the complexity.

There's so much variance of competency even at the level of the 150++IQ and graduate degree level. That Austan Goolsbee seems like a very nice guy, but I honestly don't think he has a head to make sense of the new global world order and formulate a plan to usher in prosperity. For example he keeps confusing exports and net trade - he doesn't seem to understand that trade deficits negatively affect GDP and therefore jobs.

And Barack is always looking to others to do is analysis for him, so that he's always got somebody to point the finger at.

I think these two are WAAAAYYYYY out of their league. He's still better than McCain/Palin ever would have been. But he's not the wonk he made himself out to be on the campaign trail either. What a disappointment.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Reality-Checker says:
45 billion in exports to a country we owe trillions in national debt, is a good start. A free market economy promotes consumerism and the Chinese are as capable as anyone else of consuming.

As for the rights of Chinese, I have always admired their way of keeping a large population behaving in an orderly way, and know that rights will have to increased in a gradual and orderly way. As things are today, many Chinese are finding the bad parts of capitalism in huge numbers.

The Chinese see that capitalism create winners and losers when opportunity is created and pursued - especially when interest rates are charged for loans from an uncertain future.
reply
YrWrongAgain replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
East Germany made a transition from National Socialism to International Socialism. China is making a transition the other way.
afloatinasea replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Reality
Yea don't you just love how they keep their population behaving. Why don't we give it a try? Nothing like having communism as the means to end all of our problems. Does anyone have a copy of Mao's "Little Red Book" for all of us to read?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
afloatinasea says:
let's see that covers about 6 months of interest we pay for the money we owe China. Maybe it's 3 months.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wyodutch says:
$45 Billion? that's chickenfeed.
.
We blow $45 Billion on our wars of occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan every 3 months.
reply
YrWrongAgain replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I'm sure you'd spend half that much just to nuke Tel Aviv.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
YrWrongAgain says:
The workers' paradise can afford to do this because they don't have labor unions.
reply
wyodutch replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yes. You're a clear genius.

We need to do like red china did... line the union leaders up against the wall and execute them. Once the workers see that... they don't mind working for slave labor.
YrWrongAgain replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Well, that's what your friend Demjanjuk was hoping.
See all 25 Comments