By

CBSNews /

CBS/ January 10, 2011, 4:39 PM

Prof. Called 911 on Loughner after Class "Rant"

TUSCON -- Debbie Scheidemantel got to know Jared Loughner when he was a student in her biology class at Tucson's Pima Community College last summer.

The adjunct professor says she once had to call police and have Loughner removed from her class.

Scheidemantel shared her story exclusively on "The Early Show" with co-anchor Erica Hill.

Scheidemantel said on September 23, Loughner was "very destructive" in class.

Special Section: Tragedy in Tucson
Gallery: Tuscon Shooting Victims

She explained, "I was collecting papers that were due at the beginning of class. A different student had realized he forgot his paper and asked if he could turn it in late, and I said he could, but it would be half-credit. Then Jared realized that he didn't have his assignment. He raised his hand, and asked if he could turn it in late. And I said, yes, but for half-credit. At that point, he was upset, he said, 'No, I want full credit.' And I said, 'No, it's half-credit, it's part of the policy, it's spelled out in the syllabus.'



"Students understand this," Scheidemantel said. "But he didn't seem to, and he pointed at the flag, and the Constitution up at the front of the room and said that I was taking away his freedom of speech, I was taking away his individual rights, that it was unconstitutional. He was saying that, you know, he's paying me, and therefore I'm taking away his freedom of speech if I don't give him full credit. Well, I did calm him down. And I told him, you know, at that point, we couldn't resolve it real quick, so I said, you know, talk to me at the break. And he seemed to calm down. And class started."

But Loughner's disruptive behavior, Scheidemantel said, didn't end there.

"Class started and, five minutes later, he raised his hand. I guess he got the idea. He asked, 'Could I go to the library and do the assignment and come back before class is over and turn it in for full credit?' And I said, 'No, that it would be half-credit, because it was due at the beginning.' And again, he started his rant about the Constitution, pointing to the flag, pointing to the Constitution up at the front of the room, and at that point, he wouldn't stop, so I asked the students to be calm and wait, and at that point I went to the next room, and alerted my lab staff that there was a situation, and I called 911."

Hill asked, "Were you fearful for your safety or for the safety of your other students at that point? Did he seem that he was violent in any way?"

Scheidemantel answered, "He was not violent in any way, and he did not threaten anyone directly. But I did feel uneasy. I know the students were feeling uneasy. And so we called 911, and two officers came out. They removed him from the room and talked to him for awhile, and then one of the officers came to talk to me."

Scheidemantel said the school and police backed her up appropriately.
"Pima, I have to commend them. Backed me up and was right there. One officer talked to him for about a half-hour outside the classroom, and I think they realized that he was not thinking rationally, and the other officer mentioned something about maybe special ed or whatever. I didn't know, I had no indication if just was in a special program or something like that."

That was the last Scheidemantel heard of Loughner -- until Saturday.

Hill said, "You're watching coverage of this event, and as I understand, you heard that the alleged shooter was 22, that's it -- just the age of the alleged shooter."

Scheidemantel said, "His name and picture immediately came to my mind. And then they gave the name, and I recognized the name, of course, and a little bit later in the newscast, they were showing the YouTube videos, and especially the one that had the black background with the writing on it. As I was reading it on the TV, I recognized the syntax and the unique way of writing and the convoluted illogic logic that he used to make his points."

Loughner, who's been described as a social outcast with wild beliefs steeped in mistrust, faces a federal court hearing Monday on charges he tried to assassinate Rep. Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona and killed others in the Tucson shooting rampage on Saturday.
Copyright 2011 CBS. All rights reserved.
81 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Sid235 says:
Jared Loughner had a run-in with the police last summer (2010) for disrupting a class at his community college; and police had been called to his home twice. It is clear he had issues of mental stability. A thorough background check instead of an instant check could have uncovered this problem behavior, and perhaps prevented the sale of a 9mm handgun to him. A good case can be made for strickter control and licensing of handguns in Arizona. Without concrete measures of handgun control (as against hunting rifles), all this debate is so much hot air!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Tusec says:
Flag burners like Loughner are always ready to rant about their first amendment rights. So this isn't unexpected.

Loughner is an atheist 9/11 Truther pothead who believed Bush's wars violated international law.

Not exactly the Tea Party profile, you might say. In fact, there are other profiles that are a much better fit.
reply
DavidB2009 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
what profile is that? lets see...he also hates government, specially the current government, is gun-crazy and shot a democratic representative...so what say you?
prometheus77 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Actually, I don't even follow what the Tea Party is doing, but I' pretty damn positive that I've seen Tea Party types waving Confederate flags and CONSTANTLY refer to their first amendment rights. They are VERY STEEPED in distrust of the government. And I know I've seen libertarian flag burners. And many libertarians who are potheads -- in fact they are driving influence being decriminalization of marijuana. And definitely many people across the spectrum who have doubts about 9/11 -- it's been ten years and the federal government can't even put enough evidence together to convict anybody for direct involvement.

Bush's wars DID violate international law -- that is a FACT based on reality, U.N. doctrine and U.N. Security Council REFUSAL to even consider any argument yet alone allow a pre-emptive strike on a sovereign nation, particularly while the U.N. still had inspectors on the ground in Iraq looking for weapons of mass destruction as claimed. I think you're confusing a lack of due process to prosecute as being the same as not guilty of violating international law. These are not the same.

So this isn't really a belief, but a fact.

But anyway, I'm not even sure where you heard Loughner's opinions on that, but rule of law is kind of a big thing for a lot of people across the political spectrum.

With regard to being an atheist, I also had no freaking idea that there weren't any atheists in the Tea Party, and I'm quite sure there are some.

So you're fantasy about Loughner not fitting the Tea Party profile isn't actually REAL based on what you're saying. And you really need to refrain from assuming that certain opinions and expressions -- like flag burning -- always represent the same or even remotely related idealogical point of view to different people.

But if you include a lot of the other known details about Loughner like his concerns about currency not being backed by gold, distrust of government in general, and depending on which report you believe, being registered as either a Republican or an Independent -- the vast majority of these have been Tea Party advocates, I mean that was their driving message during the 2008 election -- but never a Democrat, in past elections.

And then you have statements like "I can't trust the current government because of fabrications. The government is implying mind control and brainwash on the people by controlling grammar.", which are not actually rambling as it turns out, but ideology from right-wing conspiracy buffs.

It's actually IMPOSSIBLE to not create a Tea Party and/or right-wing libertarian profile from all of this
linkicon reporticon emailicon
LIBERALS-lie says:
Did the "system work" ?


I work in education and I see "potentially dangerous" people daily, yet nothing is done about them. Nobody wants to step in and deal with it. Everything is minimized and pushed away or swept under the carpet.
reply
Danielmountain replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Other societies do allow such things -- for people to report on each other in such way -- and those societies gradually turn into dictatorships.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
illcountryboy says:
This allegedly part irritates the heck out of me. I know the rules - I wrote for newspapers - but this CYA 'allegedly' kills me when that many people saw him commit the act. Allegedly means we aren't certain he did it.
reply
Danielmountain replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
No, Saint_Frankenstein, he's right. The news stations overuse the word "allegedly".

Even long after a person has been convicted and imprisoned -- they could be talking about a story that happend ten, twenty years ago -- there's a stubborn insistence on their use of the word "allegedy".
linkicon reporticon emailicon
newsterl says:
Scheidemantel shared her story exclusively on "The Early Show" with co-anchor Erica Hill."

That means they PAID her for the interview...
reply
daffy64 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
So?
documemts replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
So what? Should she have paid them. Are you a ditz?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
esq777 says:
Gee, ranting about the "Constitution" and "taking away his freedom" and "invidual rights." Sound familiar? If not, check out any Tea Freak rally.
reply
palmflood replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Them's Beck words.
Truth-Sayer replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
So are you suggesting that anyone who invokes the "Constitution" is a potential killer, or that people outside the tea party movement don't need the US Constitution? Or could it be this woman just wanted to make her interview more interesting.
See all 4 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
consh8theusa says:
Hey, they aren't known as "Zonies" for nothing. I've spent a lot of time in Arizona in the past years and those people have serious mental issues, they're hateful to everybody including each other, the act like they have a chip on their shoulders at all time, they're mean spirited, they're always angry, the last week I spent in Prescott I'm not sure I ever saw person smile.
reply
bajajohn1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Must be the extreme heat in the summertime.
documemts replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You obviously don't know what you're talking about.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
marklar1 says:
Please don't blame the family and friends. My guess is they are aware of and upset by the changes in him over time but have no recourse for getting him help. Under the law you can't force treatment on anyone unless they are deemed an imminent threat to themselves or someone else. Fear, hunches, and gut reactions don't count. Its a shame. I'm sure they have been watching him deteriorate helpless to do anything because the law won't allow it unless his diseased mind makes the (unlikely) decision to seek treatment. Please have compassion for the family because they are probably have had a number of agonizing years (maybe even fearing for their own safely at times) and are probably horrified at what happened and that they couldn't have done anything to prevent it.
reply
ashrafg replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yes you are so right. Plus the family did not do anything wrong and they must be divestated now.
Grampyto4 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
No one should hold a family responsible for the actions of a grown man. In the above article, it states that this man had five different encounters with campus police. Shouldn't someone have noticed he was emotionally & mentally troubled? All that I have seen & heard has been hindsight. It's a shame that a person has to get to that point before any action can be taken.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
YrWrongAgain says:
He was yelling something about the Constitution. If the Constitution drove him to kill, then let's repeal that, whatever that is.
reply
YrWrongAgain replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
"If ignorance is bliss, this must be Eden."
YrWrongAgain replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The nation has nothing to fear with Beavis and Butthead near.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
buckfush500 says:
With a population of 300 million people, it is certain that some of them will be nut cases. Also it is impossible to screen for them all. Some nuts will always be lurking in the shadows. The problem begins when we make guns easily accessible to these nuts. But the right wing, gun hugging fanatics will never stand for any restrictions on guns. The remaining sane people among us will have to suffer. I can say this since I amm not running for office.
reply
Robin081564 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I share your disdain for guns, however that is not where the problem starts at all. It may be where it often ends. They problems starts when the mental illness begins to manifest and goes unnoticed by family and friends. Typically, rather than help the individual, people will tend to shun them or isolate them which only serves to make the problem progress faster. In today's world isolation in ones bedroom offers up a furtile mind to all of the many conspriacy theorists and polical extremists that plague the internet.

A paranoid schizophrenic has a limited capacity for reasoning and logic. So it is easy to mislead them. For example: Where a normal person would recognize a the statements; Some animals are dogs and some animals are cats but no dogs are cats... A schizophrenic migh argue something more like; ALL dogs are animals and ALL cats are animals therfore, ALL cats are dogs. The problem is that their resoning always starts with absolutes much like a child's would (You NEVER let me do this or, you ALWAYS make me do that...). So their logic starts and ends with absolutes. But that is not in line with reality. So, they tend to get into arguements with people and become confused and alienated.
lucifersshadow replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I consider myself to be far left politically, but I think that gun ownership is NOT the problem. . . . the problem is, we live in a society were materialism takes precedence over people's social well-being, and as a result, we have this problem with people exploding . . . Both parties claim to support "family values, but to them, family values is looking out for number one, not the other people in society.
See all 81 Comments