December 26, 2010 8:18 PM

Kodachrome: The Legendary Film's Last Days

By
Jim Axelrod
They are fast becoming a memory of Christmas past - photographs taken the old way, with film. And the most famous film of all -- Kodachrome -- is itself about to become a memory, as CBS News correspondent Jim Axelrod reports.

Professional photographer Kent Miller is up before sunrise making sure everything's perfect for his photo shoot. He wants to capture a triathlete named Carlos Lema at the foot of the George Washington Bridge just across the river from Manhattan in just the right light at dawn.

His film of choice, as it has been for millions of others, is Kodachrome.

"Kodachrome is probably the first professional film I ever really shot," Miller said.

A professional photographer for more than 20 years, Miller shoots mostly digital now. But this is a job for film, and not just any film - Kodachrome.

"It just reproduces colors in a way that most other films never did, and it lasts forever," Miller said. "It's something that is difficult to do with just shooting digital until you bring it in to Photoshop and resaturate and do all your work in there. But just straight out the camera it doesn't have that density and dynamic ranges as the Kodachrome does just naturally."

Satisfied as he is with the pictures he's taken this morning, it's a poignant day for Kent Miller because these rolls of Kodachrome are the last rolls of Kodachrome he will ever shoot.

"I have just been saving it for a special time and this is a special time," he said.

For 75 years, Kodachrome has given millions of us those "nice bright colors" referred to in Paul Simon's 1973 hit.

The first mass-marketed color film, it was popular enough not just to inspire its own song, but to have a state park in Utah - Kodachrome Basin - named after it as well.

It was the film of choice for professionals documenting history as well as generations of amateurs preserving their summer vacations and holiday memories on Kodachrome slides.

Todd Gustavson is the curator of technology at the Eastman House - Kodak's museum in Rochester, N.Y.

"It's a baby boom product," he said. "After World War II - availability of new automobiles, national parks were open - and people were able to have some time to travel and of course now there is a this new color film which you could use to document your family vacations and then of course come back and show your friends and neighbors your slides on your carousel or Kodak slide projector."

But eventually technology caught up to Kodachrome. In a digital world, there was not enough demand for Kodak to keep making the film. And even if you have a roll or two squirreled away in your fridge, after this coming Friday - December 30 -you, or Kent Miller or anyone else - won't be able to get it developed.

Because on December 30th, Dwayne's Photo in Parsons, Kan. will stop processing Kodachrome. "So what," you say? You'll just send yours somewhere else? No you won't.

Maybe the best person to explain is Dwayne Steinle himself, who started the business 56 years ago.

"There is not going to be any place to process it?"

"No place left in the world to process it; we are the very last in the world in the entire planet," Steinle says.

And Kodachrome isn't a do-it-yourself kind of film. Those long-lasting brilliant colors are the result of a unique developing process involving special chemicals only Kodak makes - or made to be more precise.

It isn't something you can develop in your basement darkroom.

"The real difference between Kodachrome and all the other color films is that the dyes that make up the image you see in the film, in Kodachrome, don't get incorporated into the film until it is actually developed," explained Grant Steinle, who now runs the business his father started .

They're sad at Dwayne's, but not at all surprised. They've been watching their Kodachrome business shrink, even as other labs stopped processing Kodachrome and Dwayne's became the only place people from around the world could send their film to be developed.

They're still doing 700 rolls a day, but that's not nearly enough demand to convince Kodak to make more chemicals. They've got just enough for another week.

"It's going to be really sad day, it was an important part of our business and Kodachrome was an important part of the history of all of photography," Grant Steinle said. "To know it was the first consumer color film that was available. Lots of really iconic images of the 20th century were captured on Kodachrome."

Steve McCurry captured one - the 12-year Afghan girl on the cover of National Geographic in 1984. Actually, he captured two, when he returned to Afghanistan and found her 17 years later.

"Kodachrome was my mainstay film, this was the main film I used for 30 year," McCurry said. "I have about 800,000 Kodachrome transparencies in my archive, maybe more, and this was probably the greatest film ever made."

When Kodak announced it was discontinuing Kodachrome last year, he had an idea.

"I called my contacts, my friends at Kodak and said you know I'd really like to get the last roll and do a project with it to kind of honor this passing of this iconic film," he said.

He picked a region in India where he'd come across the perfect subjects.

"I decided to pick a community which was disappearing," he said. "It was a nomadic community which I spent a week with and traveled with them and photographed their way of live because again, like Kodachrome their way of life is vanishing."

He used most of the last roll of Kodachrome ever made, but saved just a couple of frames, which he shot in parsons just before dropping the film off at Dwayne's.

The very last image ever made with Kodachrome is a civil war cemetery in Parsons, Kan.

"I was going to the lab in the next 15 or 20 minutes and I drove past the cemetery and I thought this would be a sort of perfect ending to the roll of Kodachrome - a cemetery," McCurry said. "It's a passing of an era."

"Progress" is defined as an advancement or improvement, but in some ways it's hard to see how a world without Kodachrome qualifies as either.

But that's the world Steve McCurry will soon live in, whatever hope his wishful thinking allows him to preserve. He says he still has a few rolls in his fridge.

"Just open the fridge and there's the film and I'll know its safe and sound," he says. "If they ever bring it back I'm ready to roll."

Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 17 Comments
by rsusser February 5, 2012 10:20 PM EST
You might be interested in a mini documentary on Kodachrome by Xander Robin. http://www.petapixel.com/2012/01/13/mini-documentary-about-kodachrome-and-the-last-lab-that-processed-it/

It also can be seen at http://vimeo.com/22543258

He really brought Kodachrome final days. There is some good research here.
Reply to this comment
by Intrepid_Iconoclast December 31, 2010 6:44 PM EST
Fuji is apparently discontinuing Astia as well. They will be the next to thin out the slide offerings
Reply to this comment
by triharder December 31, 2010 10:55 AM EST
Kodak has had to reinvent itself. Sad? In a way, I'll miss easy to look at film.
Reply to this comment
by PA_Voter December 29, 2010 9:10 PM EST
Eastman House is not a Kodak museum. It is an independent institution. The house was built by George Eastman, founder of Eastman Kodak and willed to the University of Rochester. Also, besides this factual error, the article needs some serious proofing. It's a mess.
Reply to this comment
by jmeert December 27, 2010 8:52 PM EST
No E-6 is Ektachrome process, not Kodachrome. the chemicals for Kodachrome were never available to the amateur photographer.
Reply to this comment
by renegaston December 27, 2010 12:22 AM EST
correct me if I am wrong !!!

Doesen?t Kodachrome was developed on E 6 Process ???

as far as I know ... There?s still Professional Custom Color Labs in Many US cities .

They process "reverse" film for slides from manufacturers such as
FUJI (Velvia,Provia etc)

What is now gone is the camera film , right ???

anyone out there to further the knowledge?

Rene Gaston. AMC.
Director of Photography.
Reply to this comment
by lbrazil88 December 27, 2010 12:56 PM EST
kodachrome has or should I say had it's own process and chemicals needed to develop it. E-6 was for ektachrome, fujichrome etc and was much more user friendly to develop either at many local labs or even do it yourself
by larsilva01 December 26, 2010 9:35 PM EST
I have become as lazy as most Americans and have embraced my digital camera. It's easy, quick and I can take lots of mediocre photos for little or no cost. For my artistic side, this is not a good thing.

I will mourn the loss of one more link to our manual, analog past. Twitter, Facebook, and email do not replace handwritten letters. Texting is not a phone call. MP3s and CDs cannot duplicate the richness of vinyl. The internet is not a newspaper. A blog is not a diary. And digital photography does not reproduce film's qualities.

Easier is definitely not always better and I fear these small losses of reality as we digitize ourselves are lessening us in some intangible way.
Reply to this comment
by AlexLOGIC December 30, 2010 4:58 PM EST
Great comments larsilva01, In the Los Angeles area I will be offering home studio classes that attempt to bridge the gap between the old and the new, and I'll be using lots of analog gear to show what is still missing from computers. http://www.myalexlogic.com (site won't be complete until the second week in January, 2011).
by newsterI December 26, 2010 9:32 PM EST
And Kodachrome isn't a do-it-yourself kind of film. Those long-lasting brilliant colors are the result of a unique developing process involving special chemicals only Kodak makes - or made to be more precise."


Oh of course, leave it to them to make it a proprietary system no one else can use and then just discontinue it. The way of corporate mo fo's these days.
Kodakchrome was one of many films, it was only used to make slides as I remember, but in any case it was the digital camera that is killing off the roll film cameras.
Who wants to spend up to $10 for a 36 exposure roll of film, shoot 36 shots, have to drop the roll off at a developer, and wait several days for it to be processed and prints returned to the store and pay maybe $15 a roll for that?

Digital cameras take unlimited shots, you can upload them right to your machine, edit as needed, and if you want hard paper Kodak quality prints you can upload the files to a printer who prints them on Kodak paper for under a dime each usually, and then you have only what you WANT.

Digital cameras and camcorders were the best invention around, the cost for about 10 rolls of film PAYS for a digital camera. I paid maybe $135 for my Canon a few years ago and have shot about 2,000 photos with it.
Reply to this comment
by denoferth December 27, 2010 5:55 PM EST
and in a few hundred years nobody will know we existed at all.
by capacbs December 26, 2010 8:18 PM EST
"Kodachrome is gone because pros dumped it to upgrade to Fuji around 1990." -- Ken Rockwell, http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/filmgoingaway.htm

There's still a lot of non-Kodachrome 35mm-format slide film available. See:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?ci=2545&N=4277998830+4289268857

There's even more non-Kodachrome 35mm-format color negative film available:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?ci=2545&N=4277998830+4289268858+4294949439
Reply to this comment
by AlexLOGIC December 30, 2010 5:03 PM EST
Rockwell is not exactly right about that. Kodak supported same day or overnight kodachrome processing up until the early 90's, and even though it was still in demand, Kodak regionalized their kodachrome processing which really upset a lot of customers. What could be processed in 24 hours or less now took 3 to 5 days. Yes, the fuji was/is very good, but each film had it's own strengths that were different from each other.
by barbaram99 December 26, 2010 4:05 PM EST
That is not it..The digital camera is to blame. I member the Paul Simon song about it. It is true the digital camema may take good photos yet the the item we grew up with are passing on. The light bulb is here but will be gone..
Reply to this comment
See all 17 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook