GOP Senators Reject Tax Cuts for Middle Class
State Sen. Gloria Negrette McLeod, D-Chino, urges lawmakers to approve bill she was carrying that would allow offenders sentenced to jail to get work release credit for participating in education, vocational, and drug treatment programs during the Senate session at the Capitol in Sacramento, Calif., Thursday June, 14, 2012. The measure intended to help sheriffs' deal with a new state law that sends less serious offenders to local jails instead of state prisons, was passed by a 21-14 vote and sent to the Assembly for a final vote. The bill was introduced by Assemblyman Roger Hernandez, D-West Covina, who was later charged with drunken driving himself.(AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli) / Rich Pedroncelli
Last Updated 12:32 p.m. ET
Republicans in the Senate shot down two Democratic plans to extend Bush-era tax cuts to the middle-class, because the proposals did not also extend them for the wealthiest two percent of Americans.
After two hours of debate, cloture vote failed to gain the 60 votes necessary to bypass a filibuster.
For a proposal to extend all expiring tax cuts on individuals with incomes of less than $200,000 a year and married couples making less than $250,000, the vote was 53-36.
On a plan to renew tax cuts for all filers with incomes of less than $1 million, the vote was 53-37.
Both plans would let tax rates for high-income Americans return to tax rate levels that were in place during the Clinton administration.
Republicans, pushing for making tax cuts for the rich permanent, had vowed to defeat both bills.
President Barack Obama, having returned to Washington from a surprise trip to Afghanistan, said he was "very disappointed" by the Senate's failure
to agree to legislation passed in the House that would make middle-class tax cuts permanent.
The Senate debate was a showdown over whether the wealthy should be excluded from an extension of the Bush-era tax cuts.
"These votes today are not going to settle anything," says CBS News Capitol Hill correspondent Bob Fuss, "but Democrats want to make a political point: Republicans are so determined to preserve tax cuts for the wealthy, they'll block them for everyone else."
Democrats already eyeing the 2012 elections are using the debate to depict Republicans as guardians of the rich who are willing to jeopardize middle class families in order to further fatten the accounts of the wealthiest Americans.
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., called out Republicans for pushing tax breaks for the wealthy after "time and time again coming down to the floor of the Senate and saying, 'We have a huge deficit! We have a huge national debt!'
"And today what they want to do is drive that national debt up by $700 billion over the next ten years.
"Isn't it enough for you that the top one percent earns more income than the bottom 50%?" Sanders said. "Isn't it enough for you that in the last 25 years almost all new income has gone to the top one percent? Do you really think that the CEOs of Wall Street who will make hundreds of millions of dollars a year really need a tax break?"
"Let's not give tax breaks to millionaires who in many ways have never had it so good," he said.
Sen. John Kyl, R-Ariz., responded by saying Sanders' comments were indicative of why bipartisan compromise was not possible in Washington.
"It's not Republicans' fault that these things take time and we still haven't resolved the tax issue," Kyl added.
CBS News Poll: Most Oppose GOP Tax Plan
Sen. Mark Begich, D-Aka., said neither side should blame the other for the tax impasse, but said Republicans were throwing confusing numbers about the impact on small business.
Ninety-five percent of small businesses, he said, gross a million dollars and year and under, and would not face a tax hike under the Democrats' plans.
"If you support the efforts of small business," he said, "don't be confused by their one-liners."
Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky labeled today's session as "show votes" and a waste of time and money.
Sen. Byron Dorgen, D-N.D., said under a Republican plan, the average American would get a tax break of $900 a year, while someone who makes $1 million a year would get a tax break of $109,000.
"They're demanding that the wealthiest Americans will get a tax cut that is one thousand times the size of the average American's," Dorgen said.
"There is no level the minority will accept," said Dorgen, if it does not also include "Bill Gates, Donald Trump, everyone."
And the point that the tax breaks for the rich would have to be paid for by borrowing billions of dollars he called "preposterous."
On Friday Sen. Claire McCaskill., D-Mo., said Republican lawmakers were ignoring he fiscal concerns of their own Tea Party advocates. "All those people out there in the Tea Party that are angry about the economics of Washington, they really need to look at this," she said.
"They need to pull back the curtain and realize that you've got a Republican Party that's not worried about the people in the Tea Party - they're worried about people that can't decide which home to go to over the Christmas holidays."
Republicans dismissed the attacks.
"All of this finger-pointing is doing nothing to create jobs," said McConnell. "It's a total waste of time."
Noting that unemployment had risen to 9.8 percent, he added: "Democrats are responding with a vote to slam job creators with a massive tax increase. Millions of out-of-work Americans don't want show-votes or finger-pointing contests. They want jobs."
The White House has been negotiating privately with Republicans on a broader bill that would include both tax cuts for the wealthy and Democratic priorities, such as an extension of jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed and an extension of additional expiring tax breaks for lower- and middle-income workers even if they don't make enough to owe the IRS money. College students would also benefit under the White House's proposals, as would companies that hire the unemployed.
Also part of the discussions is a possible increase in the federal debt limit, which allows the government to continue to borrow to meet its financial obligations.
President Barack Obama has come under attack from progressives who are demanding that he not "cave" in the Republicans' demands, after having said that the U.S. could not afford to extend tax cuts for the rich.
In the weekly White House radio and Internet address, Vice President Joe Biden, skipped lightly over Mr. Obama's willingness to negotiate with the GOP on the Bush-era tax breaks.
"We've got to extend the tax cuts for the middle class that are set to expire at the end of the month," he said. "If we don't, millions of middle-class families will see a big bite out of their paychecks starting January 1. And that's the last thing we should let happen."
"And the second thing we've got to do is extend unemployment insurance for Americans who have lost their jobs in a tough economy," Biden said.
Delivering the Republican address, Sen. Mark Kirk of Illinois, who was sworn into office this week, said voters in the midterm elections demonstrated their distaste for any tax increases.
"The current leaders of Congress should not move forward with plans that were just rejected by the American people," he said. "These leaders should not raise taxes and risk another recession. Instead, Congress should reduce spending and prevent another tax hike on American taxpayers."
© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report. Republicans in the Senate shot down two Democratic plans to extend Bush-era tax cuts to the middle-class, because the proposals did not also extend them for the wealthiest two percent of Americans.
After two hours of debate, cloture vote failed to gain the 60 votes necessary to bypass a filibuster.
For a proposal to extend all expiring tax cuts on individuals with incomes of less than $200,000 a year and married couples making less than $250,000, the vote was 53-36.
On a plan to renew tax cuts for all filers with incomes of less than $1 million, the vote was 53-37.
Both plans would let tax rates for high-income Americans return to tax rate levels that were in place during the Clinton administration.
Republicans, pushing for making tax cuts for the rich permanent, had vowed to defeat both bills.
President Barack Obama, having returned to Washington from a surprise trip to Afghanistan, said he was "very disappointed" by the Senate's failure
to agree to legislation passed in the House that would make middle-class tax cuts permanent.
The Senate debate was a showdown over whether the wealthy should be excluded from an extension of the Bush-era tax cuts.
"These votes today are not going to settle anything," says CBS News Capitol Hill correspondent Bob Fuss, "but Democrats want to make a political point: Republicans are so determined to preserve tax cuts for the wealthy, they'll block them for everyone else."
Democrats already eyeing the 2012 elections are using the debate to depict Republicans as guardians of the rich who are willing to jeopardize middle class families in order to further fatten the accounts of the wealthiest Americans.
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., called out Republicans for pushing tax breaks for the wealthy after "time and time again coming down to the floor of the Senate and saying, 'We have a huge deficit! We have a huge national debt!'
"And today what they want to do is drive that national debt up by $700 billion over the next ten years.
"Isn't it enough for you that the top one percent earns more income than the bottom 50%?" Sanders said. "Isn't it enough for you that in the last 25 years almost all new income has gone to the top one percent? Do you really think that the CEOs of Wall Street who will make hundreds of millions of dollars a year really need a tax break?"
"Let's not give tax breaks to millionaires who in many ways have never had it so good," he said.
Sen. John Kyl, R-Ariz., responded by saying Sanders' comments were indicative of why bipartisan compromise was not possible in Washington.
"It's not Republicans' fault that these things take time and we still haven't resolved the tax issue," Kyl added.
CBS News Poll: Most Oppose GOP Tax Plan
Sen. Mark Begich, D-Aka., said neither side should blame the other for the tax impasse, but said Republicans were throwing confusing numbers about the impact on small business.
Ninety-five percent of small businesses, he said, gross a million dollars and year and under, and would not face a tax hike under the Democrats' plans.
"If you support the efforts of small business," he said, "don't be confused by their one-liners."
Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky labeled today's session as "show votes" and a waste of time and money.
Sen. Byron Dorgen, D-N.D., said under a Republican plan, the average American would get a tax break of $900 a year, while someone who makes $1 million a year would get a tax break of $109,000.
"They're demanding that the wealthiest Americans will get a tax cut that is one thousand times the size of the average American's," Dorgen said.
"There is no level the minority will accept," said Dorgen, if it does not also include "Bill Gates, Donald Trump, everyone."
And the point that the tax breaks for the rich would have to be paid for by borrowing billions of dollars he called "preposterous."
On Friday Sen. Claire McCaskill., D-Mo., said Republican lawmakers were ignoring he fiscal concerns of their own Tea Party advocates. "All those people out there in the Tea Party that are angry about the economics of Washington, they really need to look at this," she said.
"They need to pull back the curtain and realize that you've got a Republican Party that's not worried about the people in the Tea Party - they're worried about people that can't decide which home to go to over the Christmas holidays."
Republicans dismissed the attacks.
"All of this finger-pointing is doing nothing to create jobs," said McConnell. "It's a total waste of time."
Noting that unemployment had risen to 9.8 percent, he added: "Democrats are responding with a vote to slam job creators with a massive tax increase. Millions of out-of-work Americans don't want show-votes or finger-pointing contests. They want jobs."
The White House has been negotiating privately with Republicans on a broader bill that would include both tax cuts for the wealthy and Democratic priorities, such as an extension of jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed and an extension of additional expiring tax breaks for lower- and middle-income workers even if they don't make enough to owe the IRS money. College students would also benefit under the White House's proposals, as would companies that hire the unemployed.
Also part of the discussions is a possible increase in the federal debt limit, which allows the government to continue to borrow to meet its financial obligations.
President Barack Obama has come under attack from progressives who are demanding that he not "cave" in the Republicans' demands, after having said that the U.S. could not afford to extend tax cuts for the rich.
In the weekly White House radio and Internet address, Vice President Joe Biden, skipped lightly over Mr. Obama's willingness to negotiate with the GOP on the Bush-era tax breaks.
"We've got to extend the tax cuts for the middle class that are set to expire at the end of the month," he said. "If we don't, millions of middle-class families will see a big bite out of their paychecks starting January 1. And that's the last thing we should let happen."
"And the second thing we've got to do is extend unemployment insurance for Americans who have lost their jobs in a tough economy," Biden said.
Delivering the Republican address, Sen. Mark Kirk of Illinois, who was sworn into office this week, said voters in the midterm elections demonstrated their distaste for any tax increases.
"The current leaders of Congress should not move forward with plans that were just rejected by the American people," he said. "These leaders should not raise taxes and risk another recession. Instead, Congress should reduce spending and prevent another tax hike on American taxpayers."
Popular in Politics
- Obama prom pictures surface 129 Comments
- Is President Obama ending the war on terror? 263 Comments
- IRS' Lerner was asked to resign, refused: GOP Sen. 126 Comments
- Now, some unions upset over Obamacare
- Obama forgets to salute while boarding Marine One Play Video
- IRS official Lois Lerner placed on leave 130 Comments
- GOP Rep.: Obama elected because of Reagan's immigration reforms
- Rand Paul uses 2016 bully pulpit to push Obama on drones
2 y extension all tax cuts
13 month unemp ext.
Prez has saiz
Here's how I see it. Small and medium businesses create jobs. Large corporations cut jobs so they can make larger profits. Small businesses get purchased by larger corporations and then the layoffs begin, it is simply the purpose of corporations to make more profits. They are actually legally bound by their corporate status granted by the Federal Government to put profits above any other purpose. So, there are no moral corporations. It is not how they are designed. There may be moral people running a company, but they are legally obligated to ignore their own morality for the sake of money. As I see it, small and medium businesses create jobs, but they are the enemy of larger companies, so if we want jobs, we should try to help small and medium businesses expand. Most smaller companies don't make a whole lot of net profit, so their taxes aren't really all that high. While large companies profits are very high, and they pay a bit in taxes. Why don't we implement a progressive tax system for corporate taxes instead of a flat rate? This would encourage small and medium businesses to grow, creating more jobs, while the ultra-rich corporations would be hit hard and would be forced to break up into smaller companies, and thus bringing more jobs.
See, when you give businesses a tax break, it actually benefits the bigger companies and hurts the smaller businesses, as their competitors have gained a capital advantage. What the Rep's followers don't seem to understand is that the Rep's are actually anti-small and medium business, and anti-jobs. They are all about large corporations, which create profit from growth and cutting jobs. How many employees does your local WalMart have? Compare that to having a single business for each of the array of products WalMart carries, and you would see that WalMart actually takes jobs out of the local community, all supported by the fact that we want more cheap crap from China. But what is the real cost of this low price? WalMart teaches its employees how to get Medical insurance from their state instead of paying for any benefits. So, the states that have WalMarts may have cheap crap, but they end up paying for the medical expenses of all the WalMart employees. Sort of a smoke and mirrors deal.
And you wonder why we progressives who have to use our brains are bitter?
He was the one who led us down the failed and tragic path of "free-trade", trickle down and de-regulation. The Supreme Court fiasco giving rich corporations human rights can be traced DIRECTLY to Reagan's assault on unions and thus the Middle Class. And of course the poor.
Keynesian economics do not work!!! Instead of doing the things that have been proven to work for an economic downturn, Obama has done the exact opposite... He has done the things that have historically not worked...
Reagan saw a government that was by the people and for the people... He got the economy moving again without an undue burden on our achievers and paved the way for a quarter of a century of posperity...
Obama sees a government in which the people serve it... You punish success, take away more of the peoples money and then the government will decide what they do with your money!!!
++++++++++++++++++
I agree, "Keynesian economics do not work!!!" Unfortunately, your Rep goons insist on using it as a talking point.