prev
next
WikiLeaks Defies U.S., Releases Embassy Cables
Last Updated 4:10 p.m. ET
More than a quarter-million U.S. State Department documents obtained by the whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks were leaked to The New York Times and other international news organizations, in defiance of demands by the U.S. government to stop the release.
The documents - communications between the State Department and its embassies and diplomats around the world - include candid assessments of foreign leaders and governments.
The White House , saying it endangers U.S. diplomats, intelligence agents and democratic activists who seek America's help.
The White House called the release "reckless and dangerous" and counter to President Barack Obama's goal of open and accountable government at home and around the world. It also said such initial reporting and directives found in the "stolen" documents is "often incomplete information" and doesn't always shape final policy decisions.
Worldwatch: Embarrassing Revelations Abound
By mid-Sunday afternoon, the leaked documents appeared on the websites of the New York Times, the Guardian (U.K.), Spain's El Pais, France's Le Monde, and in a preview article on the site of the German magazine Der Spiegel.
CBS News correspondent Ines Ferre reports some reveal that Saudi donors remain chief financiers of militant groups like al Qaeda, and that Chinese government operatives have waged a coordinated campaign of computer sabotage targeting the United States and its allies.
The group's founder, Julian Assange, told the U.S. ambassador to Britain that WikiLeaks would not bow to Washington's demands.
The WikiLeaks website appeared to be inaccessible, and WikiLeaks said in its Twitter feed that it was experiencing a denial of service attack.
WikiLeaks said that publications in the U.S. and Europe would print the leaked diplomatic cables even if it could not.
Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels (NYT)
The US Embassy Cable (Guardian)
A Superpower's View of the World (Spiegel, in English)
Los papeles del Departamento de Estado (El Pais)
Wikileaks: Dans les coulisses de la diplomatie am?ricaine (Le Monde)
The Obama administration has been bracing for the release for the past week. Top officials have notified allies that the contents of the diplomatic cables could prove embarrassing because they contain candid assessments of foreign leaders and their governments, as well as details of American policy.
Lawrence Korb, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, told CBS News the release will compromise future information sent by embassies to the State Department.
"It makes it much for difficult for the United States to protect its interests in the international system, if the leaders in Washington can't get access to very honest advice," Kolb said.
The Times writes that most of the cables date from the past three years, with some as recent as February.
In an online article previewing the magazine's Monday publication of the cables, Der Spiegel wrote that the WikiLeaks release represents 243,270 diplomatic cables filed by American embassies to the State Department, and 8,017 directives that the State Department sent to its diplomatic outposts around the world.
According to The Times, none of the cables provided to it were marked "Top Secret." Approximately 11,000 were marked "Secret."
Nine thousand were labeled "NOFORN" (NOT TO BE SHARED WITH ANY FOREIGN GOV'T).
"Never before in history has a superpower lost control of such vast amounts of such sensitive information - data that can help paint a picture of the foundation upon which US foreign policy is built," the editors wrote. "Never before has the trust America's partners have in the country been as badly shaken."
CBS News correspondent Cami McCormick reports that some of the cables disclose diplomatic communications between U.S. and South Korean officials on the North's economic troubles; and bargaining with other countries to empty the Guantanamo Bay prison of terror detainees.
Shortly before, WikiLeaks said its website was "currently under a mass distributed denial of service attack."
There was no way to immediately confirm the cyberattack, although the WikiLeaks website was not available online.
The State Department's top lawyer warned Assange late Saturday that lives and military operations would be put at risk if the cables were released. Legal adviser Harold Koh said WikiLeaks would be breaking the law if it went ahead and he also rejected a request from Assange to cooperate in removing sensitive details from the documents.
Assange, in a response released Sunday by his London lawyer, said he had no intention of halting the release. He claimed the administration was trying to cover up alleged evidence of serious "human rights abuse and other criminal behavior" by the U.S. government.
The letter to the U.S. ambassador, Louis Sussman, also said WikiLeaks had no desire to harm either "individual persons" or "the national security of the United States." But he said the administration's refusal to cooperate showed that the risks were "fanciful."
"I understand that the United States government would prefer not to have the information that will be published in the public domain and is not in favor of openness," Assange wrote. "That said, either there is a risk or there is not."
"You have chosen to respond in a manner which leads me to conclude that the supposed risks are entirely fanciful and you are instead concerned to suppress evidence of human rights abuse and other criminal behavior," he said.
"We will now proceed to release the material subject to our checks and the checks of our media partners unless you get back to me," Assange wrote.
© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report. More than a quarter-million U.S. State Department documents obtained by the whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks were leaked to The New York Times and other international news organizations, in defiance of demands by the U.S. government to stop the release.
The documents - communications between the State Department and its embassies and diplomats around the world - include candid assessments of foreign leaders and governments.
The White House , saying it endangers U.S. diplomats, intelligence agents and democratic activists who seek America's help.
The White House called the release "reckless and dangerous" and counter to President Barack Obama's goal of open and accountable government at home and around the world. It also said such initial reporting and directives found in the "stolen" documents is "often incomplete information" and doesn't always shape final policy decisions.
Worldwatch: Embarrassing Revelations Abound
By mid-Sunday afternoon, the leaked documents appeared on the websites of the New York Times, the Guardian (U.K.), Spain's El Pais, France's Le Monde, and in a preview article on the site of the German magazine Der Spiegel.
CBS News correspondent Ines Ferre reports some reveal that Saudi donors remain chief financiers of militant groups like al Qaeda, and that Chinese government operatives have waged a coordinated campaign of computer sabotage targeting the United States and its allies.
The group's founder, Julian Assange, told the U.S. ambassador to Britain that WikiLeaks would not bow to Washington's demands.
The WikiLeaks website appeared to be inaccessible, and WikiLeaks said in its Twitter feed that it was experiencing a denial of service attack.
WikiLeaks said that publications in the U.S. and Europe would print the leaked diplomatic cables even if it could not.
Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels (NYT)
The US Embassy Cable (Guardian)
A Superpower's View of the World (Spiegel, in English)
Los papeles del Departamento de Estado (El Pais)
Wikileaks: Dans les coulisses de la diplomatie am?ricaine (Le Monde)
The Obama administration has been bracing for the release for the past week. Top officials have notified allies that the contents of the diplomatic cables could prove embarrassing because they contain candid assessments of foreign leaders and their governments, as well as details of American policy.
Lawrence Korb, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, told CBS News the release will compromise future information sent by embassies to the State Department.
"It makes it much for difficult for the United States to protect its interests in the international system, if the leaders in Washington can't get access to very honest advice," Kolb said.
The Times writes that most of the cables date from the past three years, with some as recent as February.
In an online article previewing the magazine's Monday publication of the cables, Der Spiegel wrote that the WikiLeaks release represents 243,270 diplomatic cables filed by American embassies to the State Department, and 8,017 directives that the State Department sent to its diplomatic outposts around the world.
According to The Times, none of the cables provided to it were marked "Top Secret." Approximately 11,000 were marked "Secret."
Nine thousand were labeled "NOFORN" (NOT TO BE SHARED WITH ANY FOREIGN GOV'T).
"Never before in history has a superpower lost control of such vast amounts of such sensitive information - data that can help paint a picture of the foundation upon which US foreign policy is built," the editors wrote. "Never before has the trust America's partners have in the country been as badly shaken."
CBS News correspondent Cami McCormick reports that some of the cables disclose diplomatic communications between U.S. and South Korean officials on the North's economic troubles; and bargaining with other countries to empty the Guantanamo Bay prison of terror detainees.
Shortly before, WikiLeaks said its website was "currently under a mass distributed denial of service attack."
There was no way to immediately confirm the cyberattack, although the WikiLeaks website was not available online.
The State Department's top lawyer warned Assange late Saturday that lives and military operations would be put at risk if the cables were released. Legal adviser Harold Koh said WikiLeaks would be breaking the law if it went ahead and he also rejected a request from Assange to cooperate in removing sensitive details from the documents.
Assange, in a response released Sunday by his London lawyer, said he had no intention of halting the release. He claimed the administration was trying to cover up alleged evidence of serious "human rights abuse and other criminal behavior" by the U.S. government.
The letter to the U.S. ambassador, Louis Sussman, also said WikiLeaks had no desire to harm either "individual persons" or "the national security of the United States." But he said the administration's refusal to cooperate showed that the risks were "fanciful."
"I understand that the United States government would prefer not to have the information that will be published in the public domain and is not in favor of openness," Assange wrote. "That said, either there is a risk or there is not."
"You have chosen to respond in a manner which leads me to conclude that the supposed risks are entirely fanciful and you are instead concerned to suppress evidence of human rights abuse and other criminal behavior," he said.
"We will now proceed to release the material subject to our checks and the checks of our media partners unless you get back to me," Assange wrote.
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Photos of the Week 21 Photos
- U.K. police announce new leads in missing girl case
- Russia strikes back after expelling alleged U.S. spy
- U.N. panel: Sanctions delaying NKorea nuke program
- Canadian earthquake jolts cities, felt in U.S.
- Drone technology myths, facts and future feats
- $1 million in jewelry stolen near Cannes film festival
- Woman describes Berlusconi's "bunga bunga" parties
Most Popular
-
01
-
02
-
03
-
04
-
05
Most Shared
Most Discussed
WikiLeaks is not a US based organization and its founder isn't a US citizen. They are no more defying the US than are the Guardina, Der Speigal or for that matter the New York Times. They didn't do the crimes pr embarass anyone, the US government is the perp.
Obama has no shame. An honest man would see there are problems with his State Department and begin to take measures to address them.
Action MUST BE taken - since words and diplomacy have been a waste - against the gravest danger that we are facing since Hitler and The Nazis some 70 years ago.
Specifically, thorough military action MUST BE initiated to totally take out Iran's nuclear weapons' production capabilities and its entire nuclear program, by which Ahmadinejad and his savage ayatollas who are filled with primitive, religious hate, will soon attempt to hold the entire world hostage.
We MUST make every effort to avoid entering the darkest era in mankind's history, by PREVENTATIVE MILITARY ACTION against the current, APOCALYPTIC-MINDED, Islamofascist Iranian regime!
Honesty and openness after all, is the best policy. Shine light on the cockroachs and they will either scurry for a hole in the wall or they will morph into truly amazing public servants always being honest with the world. No more games, no more slight of hand, no more guessing what horrors are being cooked up that are going to harm me and my family.
Do you hear this Mr. Obama? You promised transparecy when you ran for office so walk the walk! Such honesty between governments by the way will certainly force you to park AF-1 and stop having to travel for high level secret meetings, since we won't need secrets anymore. Got it.
Wow. I never in a million years would have thought that. What a scoop! Everyone supposed the used book store smelled that way because of the books.
Shame on the NY times for releasing this ILLEGALLY obtained information.
The Wikileaks guy is probably an Iranian agent.
And who owns the NY times? China maybe....
Pourquoi menacer et en vouloir ? Wikileaks, et pas ? ceux qui ont fourni les informations ? ce site.
comme quoi on a beau cacher les sales magouilles,
mais elle finissent par emerger
le crime parfait n'existe pas.
=========================================
Why threaten and be angry with Wikileaks, and not to those who provided information on this site.
Like what, it was nice to hide the dirty shenanigans,
but she eventually emerge
There is no perfect crime. au revoir