November 30, 2010 5:23 PM

U.S. Asks WikiLeaks to Halt Document Release

 

The Obama administration has told whistleblower WikiLeaks that its expected imminent release of classified State Department cables will put "countless" lives at risk, threaten global counterterrorism operations and jeopardize U.S. relations with its allies.

In a highly unusual step reflecting the administration's grave concerns about the ramifications of the move, the State Department late Saturday released a letter from its top lawyer to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and his attorney telling them that publication of the documents would be illegal and demanding that they stop it.

It also said the U.S. government would not cooperate with WikiLeaks in trying to scrub the cables of information that might put sources and methods of intelligence gathering and diplomatic reporting at risk.

The letter from State Department legal adviser Harold Koh was released as U.S. diplomats around the world are scrambling to warn foreign governments about what might be in the secret documents that are believed to contain highly sensitive assessments about world leaders, their policies and America's attempts to lobby them.

In the letter, Koh said the publication of some 250,000 secret diplomatic cables by WikiLeaks, which is expected on Sunday, will "place at risk the lives of countless innocent individuals," "place at risk on-going military operations," and "place at risk on-going cooperation between countries."

"They were provided in violation of U.S. law and without regard for the grave consequences of this action," he said. Koh said WikiLeaks should not publish the documents, return them to the U.S. government and destroy any copies it may have in its possession or in computer databases.

The State Department said Koh's message was a response to a letter received on Friday by the U.S. ambassador to Britain, Louis Susman, from Assange and his lawyer, Jennifer Robinson. The department said that letter asked for information "regarding individuals who may be 'at significant risk of harm' because of" the release of the documents.

"Despite your stated desire to protect those lives, you have done the opposite and endangered the lives of countless individuals," Koh wrote in reply. "You have undermined your stated objective by disseminating this material widely, without redaction, and without regard to the security and sanctity of the lives your actions endanger."

He said the U.S government would not deal with WikiLeaks at all in determining what may or may not released.

"We will not engage in a negotiation regarding the further release or dissemination of illegally obtained U.S. government classified materials," wrote Koh, who is considered to be one of the world's top experts in international law and was reportedly considered for a seat on the Supreme Court.

WikiLeaks is expected to post the documents online on Sunday and Koh said the U.S. government had been told that The New York Times, the British newspaper the Guardian and the German news magazine Der Spiegel had prior access to them.

The release of Koh's letter comes as Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and other top U.S. officials are reaching out to numerous countries about the expected WikiLeaks release.

Clinton spoke to leaders in China, Germany, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Britain, France and Afghanistan on Friday, according to State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley. Canada, Denmark, Norway and Poland have also been warned.

The cables are thought to include candid assessments of foreign leaders and governments and could erode trust in the U.S. as a diplomatic partner.

Crowley said the release will place "lives and interests at risk. We are all bracing for what may be coming and condemn WikiLeaks for the release of classified material. It will place lives and interests at risk. It is irresponsible."

Diplomatic cables are internal documents that would include a range of secret communications between U.S. diplomatic outposts and State Department headquarters in Washington.

WikiLeaks has said the release will be seven times the size of its October leak of 400,000 Iraq war documents, already the biggest leak in U.S. intelligence history.

The U.S. says it has known for some time that WikiLeaks held the diplomatic cables. No one has been charged with passing them to the website, but suspicion focuses on U.S. Army Pfc. Bradley Manning, an intelligence analyst arrested in Iraq in June and charged over an earlier leak.

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 113 Comments
by abhorlibs November 28, 2010 6:53 PM EST
More damage than this leak has been caused by obamao's insults to Great Britain, bowing to leaders in Japan and Arabia, and his apologies around the world for U.S. success, not to mention the economic havoc his policies are wreaking in this country. Global leaders realize what a buffoon America elected two years ago and are shunning his presence and policies.
Reply to this comment
by jamesbabb--2008 November 28, 2010 2:53 PM EST
Exposing the crimes of the US Government puts no one at risk except the murderous, lying, plundering scumbags. Those that reveal the truth are true heros.
Reply to this comment
by YrWrongAgain November 28, 2010 3:04 PM EST
Let's shame the Obama administration and replace it with Republicans? Because somewhere in your righteousness is a political naif.
by yrbloglosers November 28, 2010 4:51 PM EST
From time to time, I'll check out these comments following a story. It's so funny, silly and ultimately sad for the bitter, frustrated little people, sitting in their undies pecking away feverishly, incognito, pretending that they are people of import. Ha!
by YrWrongAgain November 28, 2010 1:45 PM EST
How many of you are caught in the right/left error? The 19th Century roots of National Socialism and International Socialism are the same. The one-party state which is your cure for the evil corporation is itself an evil corporation. Meanwhile Obama's failing welfare society is in a world war with mindless religious fanatics and you cheer for his government to be embarrassed and to collapse. Look in the mirror if you dare.
Reply to this comment
by bradspangler November 28, 2010 1:52 PM EST
So why are you defending a centrally planned state monopoly of defense services? Radical free market economists have been attacking that nonsense since 1849. http://praxeology.net/GM-PS.htm
by YrWrongAgain November 28, 2010 1:57 PM EST
A monopoly on force is one of the government's few legitimate functions. Better than private armies to follow each of the Medicis around mediaeval Europe. A secular republic is better than everything else on the world map. One cannot let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
See all 10 Replies
by YrWrongAgain November 28, 2010 1:31 PM EST
Some of you will be disappointed when the Mothership doesn't land this evening. You're not going home. Nothing Earth-shaking will happen. The US government will not collapse. The Democratic Party and the current administration will be embarrassed but will endure. And you will go back to working in the mail room, waiting for a utopia that mocks you.
Reply to this comment
by bradspangler November 28, 2010 1:33 PM EST
I've been doing this sort of thing for 20 years, kid. It's all about the long haul.
by YrWrongAgain November 28, 2010 1:34 PM EST
What do you mean "kid"? I'm your real father.
See all 4 Replies
by YrWrongAgain November 28, 2010 1:21 PM EST
Hegel wrote of the unreality of this world. Marx wrote of the drones that live here, sacrificed to history. Gil Scott Heron wrote that the revolution will not be televised. But I tell you that the revolution will not be. Period. All of your agit prop cannot make it so. Go back to your own lives and grieve at what you find there.
Reply to this comment
by bradspangler November 28, 2010 1:24 PM EST
The revolution will be published in Der Spiegel in approximately three hours and six minutes.
by YrWrongAgain November 28, 2010 1:25 PM EST
What's minimum wage, brad?
by YrWrongAgain November 28, 2010 1:10 PM EST
Another news item said that tragic outcasts in the Phillipines trade in garbage. I wonder if that is related to WikiLeaks or to your posts?
Reply to this comment
by bradspangler November 28, 2010 1:15 PM EST
So you're saying all you can do is make personal attacks and pro-Wikileaks arguments win by default? Thank you for your admission of irrelevancy.
by YrWrongAgain November 28, 2010 1:23 PM EST
brad, you are a desperate sad little man. Che is dead. And he was a murderer. You may now go away.
See all 7 Replies
by Steve_Lee November 28, 2010 1:10 PM EST
How did one man gain access to so much information?
It seems that the sysadmin with GOD access to the filesystem is able to do whatever he wants.

This would never have happened if the Military used Trusted Solaris Operating system rather than Microsoft. You have to build hierarchical layers of access privileges i.e. Public, Internal, Need-to-Know, Confidential, Top Secret. Buy Trusted Solaris and save the WORLD.
Reply to this comment
by munseym1 November 28, 2010 2:40 PM EST
Sun/Oracle has used the term Solaris Trusted Extensions since 2006, they no longer call it Trusted Solaris. It has also changed a lot.

The government actually favors SELinux, which has the backing of the NSA.
by GTR5 November 28, 2010 1:08 PM EST
The U.S. State Dept. deserves this.
Reply to this comment
by gueballer November 28, 2010 12:48 PM EST
Maybe the owner of wikileaks and his BUDDIES will turn up DEAD and all this garbage will stop.
Reply to this comment
by rightbehind November 28, 2010 12:53 PM EST
Your post sounds like the same mentality the anthrax letter sender had. He wanted to stop the so called biased media. Ironic that his work started around the same time as 9/11. He represented the American Taliban.
by YrWrongAgain November 28, 2010 1:03 PM EST
Oh, so this guy is bad and the WikiLeaks guy is good? BeLow me.
See all 6 Replies
by Slomoven November 28, 2010 12:33 PM EST
Most comments I'm reading here are pure crap. The issue is not the release of information. Our goverment seems to not have the power to stop the leaks and is begging one man to not make it public. Does this make you proud to be an American? It is no wonder our comander and chief is not taken seriously. We appear to be without balls.
Reply to this comment
by rightbehind November 28, 2010 12:49 PM EST
What would have made me proud is wars that were just. Not these corporate wars.
by bradspangler November 28, 2010 12:50 PM EST
Not having the power to stop disclosure of one's own wrongdoing is a good thing. Stop taking perverse pride in the perceived might of a band of murderous thugs and create some personal accomplishments of your own that you can legitimately be produ of without anybody having to get murdered in the name of "defense".
See all 4 Replies
See all 113 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook