AP/ November 28, 2010, 11:51 AM

Obama: GOP Inaction Threatens Nuke Treaty

Campaign posters supporting Egyptian presidential candidate Ahmed Shafiq, the last prime minister of deposed president Hosni Mubarak, hang above a popular market in Cairo, Egypt, Tuesday, June 12, 2012. Arabic on the banners reads: "Ahmed Shafiq for Egyptian presidency", and "Egypt for all."(AP Photo/Amr Nabil)

Campaign posters supporting Egyptian presidential candidate Ahmed Shafiq, the last prime minister of deposed president Hosni Mubarak, hang above a popular market in Cairo, Egypt, Tuesday, June 12, 2012. Arabic on the banners reads: "Ahmed Shafiq for Egyptian presidency", and "Egypt for all."(AP Photo/Amr Nabil) / Amr Nabil

Last Updated 12:57 p.m. ET

President Barack Obama said it's time for the U.S. Senate to ratify a new nuclear arms treaty with Russia - and there's no good reason for Republicans to delay it.

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates also said that if Senate Republicans continue to stall a ratification vote, the national security interests of the United States will be compromised.

The president said that U.S. allies in Europe want the pact approved - for their protection, not just America's.

Mr. Obama, who is attending the NATO summit in Portugal, said there is no verification system in place now regarding Russian nuclear arsenals, but that would change if the treaty were ratified.

Taking aim at Republican senators standing in the way of the nuclear arms reduction pact, the president said they were abandoning Ronald Reagan's lesson of nuclear diplomacy: "Trust but verify."

Meanwhile, the Senate's top Republican accused his Democratic counterparts of wasting Congress' lame-duck session on issues from gays in the military to environment regulations. Sen. Mitch McConnell didn't mention Mr. Obama's push to ratify the new START weapons treaty with Russia, but said extending expiring Bush-era tax cuts needed to be the top priority.

Republicans led by Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona say they won't consider the treaty until the administration budgets adequate money for the nation's nuclear arsenal and the laboratories that oversee them. The treaty would reduce the limits on U.S. and Russian warheads, and Kyl says he needs assurances that the remaining nuclear arsenal is modernized and effective.

The administration has pledged $85 billion to maintain the nuclear arsenal over the next 10 years, in an attempt to address Kyl's concerns. Democrats might be less willing to go along with that plan if Republicans stall the treaty.

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Saturday that if the Senate doesn't pass START, momentum for modernizing and overhauling the U.S. nuclear weapons program would be lost, and Russian cooperation on U.S. priorities — from the Afghan war to the diplomatic squeeze on Iran — would be at risk.

"There would be significant consequences" beyond the specifics of the U.S. and Russian nuclear stockpiles, Gates said while in Chile for defense meetings.

Gates also pointed out today that if the treaty is not ratified, the U.S. would lose firsthand knowledge it now gets from onsite inspections in Russia. The wider political fallout is hard to predict, Gates said, but could mean less Russian cooperation with overland supply routes for the war in Afghanistan.

He noted that Russia recently approved his request to allow special mine-resistant troop carriers to cross Russia on their way to the Afghanistan front lines.

"The reality is, despite what anybody says, I as Secretary of Defense and the entire uniformed leadership of the American military, believe this treaty is in our national security interests."

Gates also said Russia had voted with the U.S. and other allies to impose the latest round of U.N. penalties against Iran over its nuclear program. Russia is a partner with Iran in a civilian nuclear power project and generally has been less concerned than the U.S. that Iran may be hiding a bomb program.

The Pentagon chief gave a forceful defense of the treaty against Republican complaints that it limits U.S. options for future missile defense plans.

"Anything that we have in mind now or in the years to come that ... we have even thought about is not prohibited," Gates said with frustration.

President Obama also used his weekly radio and Internet address to focus on international affairs at a time of increased political gridlock at home as the GOP prepares to take control of the House in the new Congress next year.

Describing his nuclear efforts as part of a five-administration continuum, President Obama said the treaty to cut the permitted number of U.S. and Russian long-range nuclear warheads by a third was "fundamental to America's national security."

The president went to great length listing the prominent Republicans from previous administrations who back the deal, including former secretaries of state Colin Powell, George Shultz, Jim Baker and Henry Kissinger. He cited GOP Sen. Dick Lugar's support, but suggested that other Republican senators were playing politics with national security.

"Some make no argument against the treaty - they just ask for more time," President Obama said. "If the Senate doesn't act this year - after six months, 18 hearings, and nearly a thousand questions answered - it would have to start over from scratch in January."

And it would face tougher odds as the Democratic majority loses six seats.

Without ratification, Russia may be less cooperative in enforcing strong sanctions on Iran, securing loose nuclear material from terrorists or helping the U.S. equip troops in Afghanistan, Obama said. He said no agreement with Russia meant no U.S. inspectors watching over one of the world's biggest nuclear arsenals.

"Those who would block this treaty are breaking President Reagan's rule - they want to trust, but not verify," President Obama said.

McConnell, in the GOP radio and Internet address, focused on the stubbornly high unemployment rate and Democrats' failure to alleviate joblessness. The Kentucky senator said Democrats had exploded the national debt with the stimulus and other spending programs, and were now asking Americans for more money. He said it was imperative that the Bush-era tax cuts that expire this year be extended.

"Americans don't think we should be raising taxes on anybody, especially in the middle of a recession," McConnell said. "But instead of giving Americans what they want, Democratic leaders plan to use the last few days that lawmakers expect to spend in Washington this year focusing on everything except preventing this tax hike, which will cost us even more jobs: immigration; a repeal of the 'don't ask, don't tell'; a reorganization of the FDA; more environmental regulations."

President Obama appears ready to compromise with Republicans on temporarily extending the tax cuts passed under President George W. Bush, despite previous opposition to continuing them for couples making over $250,000. Republicans have sought permanent cuts for all, and McConnell said that the blame for inaction would fall on the Democrats when the hikes "hit every taxpayer and hundreds of thousands of small businesses at the stroke of midnight on December 31st."

Still, he suggested that Republicans could compromise on the tax issue.
President Barack Obama took aim Saturday at Republican senators standing in the way of a nuclear arms reduction pact with Russia, saying they were abandoning Ronald Reagan's lesson of nuclear diplomacy: "Trust but verify."
© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
280 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
oldbasicgal says:
The "new" Republicans haven't taken over yet, not even been sworn in. Why can't Obama pass the Treaty ratification like he did the HCA - by ramming it down our throats. He is just being critical of the "enemy". Just another Democratic ploy to stir up his fellow Democrats. If truth be known, Democrats aren't together in their act to pass the Treaty.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Brian5013MS says:
We need Sarah Palin in there for some honest governing. This current administrations back room dealing and under the table approach is scary.
reply
glidescube replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
But she's a brainless quitter ...
John_Rational replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The press would get on her nerves and she would resign in a year or so.
See all 4 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jayrh says:
This is just another attempt by Obama to ram more legislation down the throat of the American public... This time, during a lame duck session... He has used this strategy time and again... Somehow, we will have a crisis of epic proportions if this isn't passed now!!!

Russia saw a missile defense shield over Europe as a threat to them, so Obama took that off the table in order to get them to sign this treaty, leaving our allies feeling as though they had been abandoned... Now, Obama asks Russia to join in a missile defense shield over Europe when they are not only perceived as one of the threats to our allies but are actually helping countries such as Iran... Kind of sounds like enlisting the help of the fox to guard the henhouse...

Now we find out that some senators have asked to see the paper trail of negotiations, in order to determine what kind of side agreements have been reached... The administration has refused to release this information... Instead they would ask members of the Senate to embrace the Pelosi approach: Vote for the treaty first, figure out what it means later.
reply
John_Rational replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Hello jayrh, You don't seem to understand that WE are still in charge until Jan. 1st, 2011. We'll do whatever WE think best until then. After that President Obama will veto any attempt to repeal health care. In fact he will veto any attempt to change anything he and the Democrat Congress did. Oh he might let you change some little something if you give him some political concession in return. Enjoy your "victory". We've...Still...got...you! Cue maniacal laugh!
retm-w replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
John_Rational You don't understand, that the GOP can hold up any legislation until after the lame duck session. And understand Jan. 2011 the GOP is in charge of the purse strings, the dems can pass it but that doesn't mean it will get get funded.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pokey5735 says:
If the START does not "contain any constraints on testing, development, or deployment of current or planned U.S. missile defense programs." then the WH should not be shy about sharing the information with the Senate. WHAT ARE THE DETAILS IN THE SIDE AGREEMENT?
Thankfully, the GOP isn't buying the "take my word" business. It is the duty of the Senate NOT to support or vote until and unless they are fully informed. VERIFY, VERIFY, VERIFY!
reply
jayrh replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Excellent point pokey... I'm sure the blame America first crowd doesn't care about this though...
John_Rational replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
This is the same treaty Reagan and Bush supported. I swear if President Obama came out in favor of breast feeding you clowns would find some way to claim it was a communist plot! Just take your freeking medication, go home and stop causing trouble.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
brewhafunk says:
The republican party is not held accountable for ANYTHING they do or do not do! They don't have to ratify this treaty because if the worst were to happen (somehow a terrorist organization detonates loose Russian nuclear material in the U.S. killing thousands) the headline would read: "Republicans say democrats soft on terrorism, kill thousands of Americans", and they would win the next election.
reply
Mortarman429 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You dont have a clue about what you are writing.
John_Rational replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
That's correct brewhafunk, 20 years from now the Republicons will be condemning Democrats for being soft on global warming and blaming them for the permanent flooding of Manhattan and Washington. If Republicons weren't so memory challenged Republicorp would have gone bankrupt years ago.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
robintoledo says:
Leave it to the GOP to screw everything up.
reply
Mortarman429 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Leave it to the Democrats to screw everything up.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
James93x says:
Hitler begged the Americans and British to ally with his Third Reich in the production of missiles armed with atomic warheads for an attack on Russia. He proposed Western Nations organize for military action against the Soviet Union (like NATO). In 1944, Der Fuhrer insisted that the Coalition would move into Poland and repel the Red Army. He said, "Together, a Western Alliance could defeat Russia and expel them from Eastern Europe. Our Nazi Scientists have created rockets capable of delivering nuclear explosions developed by the Americans".
reply
jimbom121 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You should actually read history. Hitler never asked the US or Britain to join his side...he did think they would and was suprpised when they did not.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
raflin1 says:
There is only ONE REASON for the Republicans to block approval of this treaty: It's to PLAY POLITICS and work on McConnell's VILE PRIORITY:

"Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, has said his top priority is to deny Mr. Obama a second term."

So THIS is YOUR top priorityt? How SICK is THAT, when you look at the other important issues our contry faces? There is simply NO OTHER REASON to block this treaty other than to play politics. Other leading Republicans support it, as do international arms experts. There has been hearing AFTER hearing, and the proposal has been out for MONTHS. Yet Kyl says "it needs to be studied MORE?" What has HE BEEN DOING for the past 12 months????

Mr. Samore described the impact in more dire terms. "If we fail to act," he said, "I think it will damage the U.S. reputation as a country that's willing to lead."

For one whole year, there have been NO WEAPONS INSPECTIONS to protect the U.S. Yet NOW, Kyl and the Republicans want to PROLONG the danger to Americans, PURELY for political reasons. If This is an indication of the Republican priorities, it's a SAD day for America.

Simply DISGUSTING............
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bamio says:
Obamie is the Rodney Dangerfield of Politics. No respect.
reply
jimbom121 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Only by the GOP, who bankrupted the country
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Reality-Checker says:
Before 9-11, only European nations had their airport security upgraded and it was the USA who was the weakest link in the security chain against terrorist attacks. We paid dearly for that error. Today, the Republicans are leading in duplicating that same error with their hesitance to ratify a missile defense shield. It stands to reason, if only the European nations build a shield, then terrorist will find the un-defended USA a prime target - again. This is exactly why the Republican way to manage foreign and defense policy in the Post Cold War era, has produced disasters and created grave economic conditions, since they like to be attacked and then go hunt around for scapegoat countries to invade without resolution. The Iragi-Afghanistan wars are still incrementing costs that have exceeded 3 trillion dollars and counting. I don't know where Republicans can find another 3 trillion dollars if they decide against the missile shield and we become victims of another attack.
reply
jayrh replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Against the missile shield??? When have Republicans ever been against missile defense??? The START treaty is not a missile defense shield... Obama would invite a country that exports their nuclear technology, to our enemies, into a missile shield though... Is this what you mean?
See all 280 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right