By

CBSNews /

CBS/AP/ December 28, 2010, 1:54 AM

Gitmo Detainee Acquitted of Most Terror Charges

Updated at 7:45 p.m. ET

The first Guantanamo detainee to face a civilian trial was acquitted Wednesday of most charges he helped unleash death and destruction on two U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998 - an opening salvo in al Qaeda's campaign to kill Americans.

(Scroll down to watch a video of this report)

A federal jury convicted Ahmed Ghailani of one count of conspiracy and acquitted him of all other counts, including murder and murder conspiracy, in the embassy bombings. The anonymous federal jury deliberated over seven days, with a juror writing a note to the judge saying she felt threatened by other jurors.

Ghailani faces a statutory minimum of 20 years in prison but could also receive a life sentence, CBS News producer Phil Hirschkorn reports. U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan has scheduled sentencing for Jan. 25, 2011.

Photos: Ghailani Terror Trial
Defense Attorney: Al Qaeda Suspect is Innocent
Prosecutors: Ahmed Ghailani a Mass Murderer
Alleged Embassy Bomber Aimed to "Kill Americans"
Key Witness Barred from NYC Gitmo Detainee Trial

Ghailani, 36, rubbed his face, smiled and hugged his lawyers after the jury left the courtroom.

Justice Department spokesman Matthew Miller said in a written statement: "We respect the jury's verdict and are pleased that Ahmed Ghailani now faces a minimum of 20 years in prison and a potential life sentence for his role in the embassy bombings."

The verdict can fairly be characterized as a surprise and a disappointment for the government, which barely secured a conviction, Hirschkorn reports. CBS News National Security Analyst Juan Zarate described the verdict as "a disaster" for the government. Still, Ghailani is going to be incarcerated for a long time.

Prosecutors had branded Ghailani a cold-blooded terrorist. The defense portrayed him as a clueless errand boy, exploited by senior al Qaeda operatives and framed by evidence from contaminated crime scenes.

The trial at a lower Manhattan courthouse had been viewed as a possible test case for President Obama administration's aim of putting other terror detainees - including self-professed Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed and four other terrorism suspects held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba - on trial on U.S. soil.

CBS Radio News reporter Irene Cornell reports that there was a tense atmosphere in the courtroom as the verdict was read.

"You could have heard a pin drop in that courtroom," said Cornell. "All the prosecutors had come over from the U.S. attorney's office, packing the courtroom, and it seemed they were just holding their breath as all those not-guilty verdicts were read out."

Ghailani's prosecution also demonstrated some of the constitutional challenges the government would face if that happens. On the eve of his trial last month, the judge barred the government from calling a key witness because the witness had been identified while Ghailani was being held at a secret CIA camp where harsh interrogation techniques were used.

After briefly considering an appeal of that ruling, prosecutors forged ahead with a case honed a decade ago in the prosecution of four other men charged in the same attacks in Tanzania and Kenya. All were convicted in the same courthouse and sentenced to life terms.

CBS Radio News Senior Legal Analyst Andrew Cohen reports that Ghailani's conviction means the Justice Department doesn't have to resort to its backup plan of detaining him indefinitely if the jury had acquitted him on all counts.

"Ghailani's going to basically enter the federal prison system, likely spend his time at the Supermax facility in Colorado with people like Zacarias Moussaoui and Ramzi Yousef, the first World Trade Center bomber," Cohen said.

Prosecutors had alleged Ghailani helped an al Qaeda cell buy a truck and components for explosives used in a suicide bombing in his native Tanzania on Aug. 7, 1998. The attack in Dar es Salaam and a nearly simultaneous bombing in Nairobi, Kenya, killed 224 people, including 12 Americans.

The day before the bombings, Ghailani boarded a one-way flight to Pakistan under an alias, prosecutors said. While on the run, he spent time in Afghanistan as a cook and bodyguard for Osama bin Laden and later as a document forger for al Qaeda, authorities said.



He was captured in 2004 in Pakistan and held by the CIA at a secret overseas camp. In 2006, he was transferred to Guantanamo and held until the decision last year to bring him to New York.

Despite losing its key witness, the government was given broad latitude to reference al Qaeda and bin Laden. It did - again and again.

"This is Ahmed Ghailani. This is al Qaeda. This is a terrorist. This is a killer," Assistant U.S. Attorney Harry Chernoff said in closing arguments.

The jury heard a former al Qaeda member who has cooperated with the government describe how bin Laden took the group in a more radical direction with a 1998 fatwa, or religious edict, against Americans.

Bin Laden accused the United States of killing innocent women and children in the Middle East and decided "we should do the same," L'Houssaine Kherchtou said on the witness stand.

A prosecutor read aloud the fatwa, which called on Muslims to rise up and "kill the Americans and plunder their money wherever and whenever they can find it."

Other witnesses described how Ghailani bought gas tanks used in the truck bomb with cash supplied by the terror group, how the FBI found a blasting cap stashed in his room at a cell hideout and how he lied to family members about his escape, telling them he was going to Yemen to start a new life.

The defense never contested that Ghailani knew some of the plotters. But it claimed he was in the dark about their sinister intentions.

"Call him a fall guy. Call him a pawn," lawyer Peter Quijano said in his closing argument. "But don't call him guilty."

Quijano argued the investigation in Africa was too chaotic to produce reliable evidence. He said local authorities and the FBI "trampled all over" unsecured crime scenes during searches in Tanzania.
CBS/AP
40 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jayrh says:
The whole notion that a war should be fought in the courtroom is even worse than pre-9-11 thinking... But then, this administration has shown time and time again that they either do not know who radical Islam is, or if they do, that they want to help them...

Learn for yourself though... There are many good books and other resources about this subject...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wyodutch says:
It was a JURY TRIAL!!! For God's sakes people, quit whining about the verdict.

That's how things work in a free society. If you prefer summary executions.. then go to red china or join the Taliban.
reply
jayrh replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Evidence was overwhelming in this case... This is what everyone is upset about. Not only did the judge throw out evidence but one of the jurists was evidently a terrorist sympathizer and was able to thwart justice...

Liberals seem to miss the isidious nature of radical Islam altogether though... The Muslim Brotherhood controls every large Muslim group in this country... One of their main goals is to destroy our Western society from within... Instead of fighting radicals at every turn, liberals help them???
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ET4321 says:
So the terrorists are laughing at us now and giving Obama a thumbs up.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
trosendal says:
These stories about the failure of the government on every news source are so dumb. You don't judge the effectiveness of our judicial system based on the fact that our preconceived notion of guilt does not agree with the verdict of a single trial. That is exactly what we complain about when Americans are imprisoned in Iran or China; their systems seem to be controlled by political interests. I think this case is a nice example of an effective separation between the judicial system and the white house. That's just the way it should be.
reply
wyodutch replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Well said... Well said.
jayrh replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Evidence was overwhelming in this case! In this case, justice was not served because one juror was able to thwart it.... You're comparison to Iran and China only show your complete ineptitude in understanding anything about these issues...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
crazyname says:
Did this guy have better lawyers, if so where did they come from? Or are our government lawyers that bad? 1 of 288 charges. this guy goes away for 20 years, and the clown in NY will probably get a letter and a slap onthe wrist and go back to work screwing the taxpayers. Our government justice in action.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wyodutch says:
And another lynch mob is defeated by that most glorious of all documents created by man... The United States Constitution.
reply
jayrh replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The evidence was overwhelming...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fcs25 says:
What more can you expect from a Congress controlled by liberal progressive Dems?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
guyfrompa46 says:
Nice work Obama... This is a travesty. Just the begiining.. You get bleeding heart libs on these juries and this is the outcome.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bradkt1 says:
As a practical matter, if the guy still gets sentenced to life in prison with no parole, I don't exactly see that as a miscarriage of justice. All we needed to do was to nail him on one of the charges.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
KeithDrippingSprings says:
Finally some sanity in the whole Gitmo debacle. It is time to send them all home and admit that we are idiots for not following international law.
reply
Brian5013MS replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Muslim terrorists kill and maim against international law, but when we prosecute them you want them to be tried by international law? I would say that when the terrorists decided to abandon international law and kill many innocents through terror, that they have "LEFT THER INTERNATIONAL LAW" and have put themselves in another category of criminal, such as enemy combatant. This would allow trial by military tribunal. Terrorism has nothing to do with civility or international law.
jayrh replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Send them all home? So they can kill more Americans???

Maybe you smile when you think of the images of people jumping off the twin towers because they were being buned alive... I don't!!! I don't like seeing the world new and seeing violence in the name of Allah every single day either... Beheadings, stonings, honor killings... Maybe you've missed these things... I don't like seeing every major Muslim group in this country controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood and having the same ultimate goals as these terrorists either!!!

International law??? I would say that you're a good leftist and don't know who the good guys are and who the enemies are... You make a strong case for the argument that liberalism is indeed a mental disorder!
See all 4 Replies
See all 40 Comments