By

CBSNews /

CBS/ November 9, 2010, 6:14 PM

Conn. Home Invasion Jurors, Kin Speak Out

The Connecticut man convicted last month of the brutal murders of Jennifer Hawke-Petit and her two daughters, Michaela, 11, and Hayley, 17, in a Home invasion was sentenced to death by a jury Monday.

Conn. Man Condemned To Die For Fatal Home Invasion

Steven Hayes, 47, and Joshua Komisarjefsky broke into the Petits' home in July 2007, tying up Dr. William Petit's daughters, sexually assaulting Michaela and, raping and strangling Jennifer before dousing all three with gasoline and setting the house on fire.

The jury deliberated 17 hours over four days before deciding on death.

On "The Early Show," six of the jurors -- Maico Cardona, Diane Keim, Herbert Gram, Paula Calzetta, Joel Zemke, and Jennifer Turner -- reaffirmed their decision, each saying "yes" when asked by co-anchor Maggie Rodriguez if Hayes should die by lethal injection.

Cardona described the deliberation process, saying, "I think everybody went in with their own thoughts, their own ideas, and we all wanted to hear the evidence and we wanted to weigh everything properly. We definitely took our time. We wanted to make sure that we followed the laws of the state of Connecticut, and we followed the instructions that the judge gave us. So we took our time and we did it."

Rodriguez asked Calzetta, "What do you see when you look at Steven Hayes?"

She replied, "A vacant man. A shell. And that was -- that was pervasive from the beginning. I kept looking to see if there is some form of life within. Just a constant shell. So it was hard to see -- to get a read on him, really."

Rodriguez remarked, "I have no involvement in this case, other than reporting it. And yet I find myself sometimes so affected by it, I can't get it out of my head. You are in it, having to look at these photographs day after day of these girls that were burned while tied to their beds. Having to sit face-to-face from Dr. Petit -- how do you keep it, Diane, from consuming you?"

Keim said, "I think that was a challenge for all of us. To keep our emotions in check the best we could. We were given the task to work within -- work in concert with the law, and in doing that, that's why it has taken us four days to make the decisions and reach a consensus. Because that was a battle within all of us. We have a man's life, you know. We were looking at his life, we were looking at, 'Should we give him death,' and it was difficult for all of us. And it took courage for us to reach a consensus."

But in the end, they did agree, a decision that Dr. William Petit, the father and husband of the slain women, had hoped for.

Gram said the jury had the opportunity to meet with Petit in the basement of the courthouse after the proceedings.

Gram said, "Probably, that was one of the most touching moments, to actually shake his hand, and feel with him a feeling of having come to a conclusion, or come to a sensible end to this -- this horrible thing that he went through. There's no question the man has strength. If any one of us could follow this man's strength, you would have walked a good road."

Calzetta added, "And his whole family, having lived through this for however many weeks, we've come to feel like we know the girls, and know the family, and his mom, especially, for me, it was very -- the grandparents were very -- that was very touching for me to see them there day-after-day."

Cardona said, "He thanked us. It kind of threw us back. Why are you thanking us? We just followed the letter of the law. It was what we were supposed to do and we did it."

But Cynthia Renn, Jennifer's sister, said of the jury on "The Early Show," "I'm very moved by what they speak of, and how difficult it was for them."

How is the family dealing with the decision?

Renn said when she heard the jury had returned the death penalty, she "had a huge sense of relief."

She said, "I don't think it ever sounds good that you're thinking about taking another person's life, but in the events of what happened, and the things that this man caused, I feel that it calls for what they decided upon."

Rev. Richard Hawke and his wife, Marybelle Hawke, the parents of murder victim Jennifer Hawke-Petit, agreed.

Hawke, an ordained minister, said on "The Early Show" he's come to feel the death penalty is justified in the death of his daughter and granddaughters.

He said, "Well, we entered into the whole situation confronted -- confronting our lives with that very question. We really felt like we were between a rock and a hard place, for we value life so much. But, we have become aware, over these three plus years of the terrible killing that took place on that July day back in 2007. That we have come to realize that there are some people who just do not deserve to live in God's world. And we feel that Steven was one of those. He has spent the largest part of his life in crime activities, being in and out of jails and prison, and lying and conniving and alibi-ing in order to be paroled. And every time he would go out, after saying that he wanted to be a changed person, he never changed at all, and went right back to those same activities and that led him up to that experience on July 23, when he took the lives, in such a heinous way, of our family."

Marybelle said she was very touched by the fact that her granddaughters' pictures were kept with the jurors during their deliberations.

"I can understand them doing that," she said. "I know that they put themselves into this responsibility, and really took a lot of courage for them to face, day after day, of the situation in court. And while we were sitting there, going through all the agony of the repeated messages that came through, we still could understand that they were giving a large part of their lives to the efforts that they had, so we were proud that they were the people they were, and so thoughtful and caring forth so well in their task."
Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
19 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wlkelly says:
Under the circumstances, this proves to me, once again, what an absolute farce the U. S. jury system is. these people sit here on TV thinking what a wonderful deed they fulfilled by taking so long to convict this mad animal. How the hell could it have taken longer than four minutes to vote the death penalty let alone four days? What the hell would be necessary for these people to get off their feel-good soap boxes and make a decisive vote in short order? This animal and his cohort should actually be burned at the stake-----in a public square. Isn't it wonderful that we have evolved into such a civilized society. Inject this piece of crap with poison tonight----not 30 years from now.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Farver4girls says:
I have mixed feelings about the death penalty. But I think that Steven Hayes and his partner, Joshua Komisarjefsky, deserve to be executed for what they did to the Petit family.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
idiotforreading says:
I agree with the penalty, but can't help think more could have been done to save these poeple by the police on the scene. It must have been an horrible call to be on and be helpless to stop the deaths, but after that initial 911 call more action should have been taken by authorities to save them. I hope a review of hostage procedures will result from this. They never should have been allowed to complete this crime.
reply
pay88dirt replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I think more could have been done too. Mrs. Petit told the bank teller what was going on at her house. I don't how much time expired. But the police should have been at the house within moments.
defense44 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
- Friends, looking to the authorities (911, police, EMT's) or bank tellers to come help you in a situation like this is suicidal. They are simply too far away to do anything but come recover the bodies. At the moment the invasion occurred, what Mrs. Petit would have given for a simple hand gun to defend herself and her children...
linkicon reporticon emailicon
coolafella says:
So what took them so long? 2 minutes to agree on the death penalty and 4 days of backgammon to make it look like they thought about it. What was to think about?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mynospinzone says:
I hate the fact that I have to type the hatred i have to this man who did this horrific act against these innocent people. I hate the fact that people reading this can only type their thoughts and yet feeling helpless at nothing could be done to prevent this or do something to give MORE justice to the innocent.
Yet God teaches us not to life with hatred, but to live with love for ourselves and each other. We are all family, all citizens of this world, citizens of humanity. When a demon comes from the ground and takes possession of a man to commit these acts, the rest of us are left in shock. Helpless and anger. These three innocent women are in heaven, and this evil man will go to hell. As for the people who read this, do not live with hatred for this man of evil. He will get what he deserves. Pray for the families of the victims. Everyday we see these acts of violence and we feel helpess but take care of your families, your children, your friends and each other. Yet we cannot do anything to give MORE justice to the families, we can help by creating a safer world by helping tomorrow's leaders, today's children be better citizens of this world. Anything.. just reach out for each other... if you can before its too late.
reply
porcine_aviator replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Demons don't exist, it is just an excuse for humans to try and avoid responsibility for their own behavior. As for God, either he/she/it is impotent and moral, or is amoral and omnipotent - or doesn't exist at all. I cannot see how a moral God could allow themselves to tolerate so much evil. In all three cases, there is no reason for humanity to restrain itself from quickly and efficiently dispatching those who are enamored with harming the larger community. Rapists, murders, and molestors don't need rehabilitation, only lightening fast euthanasia.
Reggie7777 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
To porcine,

That is certainly one view, that I have often struggled with myself painfully. I have to realize though, that you (we) judging God is part of the problem of our blindness. God's gift to us is free agency. It is sacrosanct, more so than anyone really realizes. In situations where outrageous evil meets free agency it is clear he permits us to be free, even in doing horrific acts. Intervention would only reduce us to the goverened. And, your error is believing that God doesn't exist or care. If that were true, than why would you be revolted in the first place? Morality wouldn't exist, and murdering someone like this is as valid as helping the poor. But inside, you know this NOT to be true. You may curse God for the evil here but we cause a lot of it and without him, evil would be as justified as good. What a horrible existence that would be. In fact, some live that. Ironically, what you beleive has a big impact on where you spend time after you die - self-fulfilling prophecies.

But God gives us the knowledge that this earth - whether eden or toilet - is a spiritual training ground.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jnostromo says:
The jury made the right decision, however this piece of garbage will never be executed...His lawyers will appeal endlessly and the newly elected governor is a death penalty opponent.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
idiotforreading says:
He should have been killed the day it happened by the police and not given the opportunity to scar these jurors with the horrors of this trial and the graphic evidence. Home invasion should be grounds for killing whoever is invading your home, armed or not, you have no clue how it will escalate. I am conflicted though, as i think the death penalty is too good for this scum, make him live a long healthy life of misery.
reply
porcine_aviator replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Don't feel conflicted. The need is for society to keep itself safe, and a SWIFT death penalty would do just that. When you get an infection, do you feel conflicted about taking an antibiotic, knowing it will kill bacteria? There is no need to cause the murderer pain - that's just the satisfaction of feelings of revenge. But to kill a dangerous sociopath is only societal self defense, and it is best done swiftly and efficiently (meaning that endless appeals should be disallowed). As a society filled with sociopath parasites, we can no longer afford the luxury of death sentences that take 30 years to go into effect - at most it should be 30 days.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cvenable39 says:
Dr. Petit and the extended family are in my prayers. I pray they will find some comfort and strength in knowing that people all over the country are lifting them up.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mick7744 says:
It would seem that this jury proceeded in a most deliberate and cautious manner, careful not to provide any pretext for an appeal for Hayes, just as Dr Petit was probably wise not to make a Survivors Impact Statement, due to some ambiguous Conn. laws.

What could Dr Petit have said that anyone connected to this case has not already thought and imagined for themselves? He could only have made those images so much more excruciatingly painful, so unbearably personal for the rest of us to hear

I have some reservations about the death penalty...but not here...and not for his partner.

I commend these jurors for not saving themselves 16 hours 45 minutes.

My heartfelt prayers go out to Dr Petit and his family.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Molly-Pchr says:
Well done.
reply
See all 19 Comments

Most Discussed