CBS/AP/ November 9, 2010, 8:28 AM

Obama Backs India Seat on U.N. Security Council

FILE - In this June 10, 2012, file photo, supporters of the extreme right-wing Golden Dawn party, attend a pre-election rally at the northern port city of Thessaloniki Greece. Bankers, governments and investors are starting to prepare for Greece to drop the euro currency, a move that could spread turmoil throughout the global financial system. A Greek election on Sunday, June 12, 2012, will go a long way toward determining whether it happens. (AP Photo/Nicolas Giakoumidis, File)

FILE - In this June 10, 2012, file photo, supporters of the extreme right-wing Golden Dawn party, attend a pre-election rally at the northern port city of Thessaloniki Greece. Bankers, governments and investors are starting to prepare for Greece to drop the euro currency, a move that could spread turmoil throughout the global financial system. A Greek election on Sunday, June 12, 2012, will go a long way toward determining whether it happens. (AP Photo/Nicolas Giakoumidis, File) / Nikolas Giakoumidis

Last Updated 2:42 p.m. ET

President Barack Obama backed India for a permanent seat on the U.N. Security Council Monday, a dramatic diplomatic gesture to his hosts as he wrapped up his first visit to this burgeoning nation.

Mr. Obama made the announcement in a speech to India's parliament on the third and final day of his visit. In doing so, he fulfilled what was perhaps India's dearest wish for the president's trip here. India has been pushing for permanent Security Council membership for years.

"The just and sustainable international order that America seeks includes a United Nations that is efficient, effective, credible and legitimate," President Obama said. "That is why I can say today - in the years ahead, I look forward to a reformed U.N. Security Council that includes India as a permanent member."

Pictures: The Obamas in India

The announcement brought the loudest applause of Mr. Obama's speech. But it does not mean that India will join the five permanent Security Council members anytime soon.

"President Obama's support for India to become a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council is largely symbolic since it would involve a revision to the Charter," said CBS News foreign affairs analyst Pamela Falk from the U.N. Such reforms could take years to bring about.

That makes Mr. Obama's announcement more a diplomatic gesture than a concrete step. Nonetheless, it underscores the importance the U.S. places on fostering ties with this nation of 1.2 billion people, something the president has been seeking to accomplish throughout his time here.

But the pronouncement also creates bigger diplomatic wrangling, says Falk, "since Germany, Japan, South Africa, Brazil and Nigeria - in addition to the Arab League - are looking for an overhaul that would be more in line with world powers today."

"The President's call for India's new role in the U.N. Security Council appears to be part of a larger package of better relations, in line with the Obama administration's interest in creating new U.S. jobs," Falk added, "but it may complicate relations with other allies at a particularly difficult time, particularly Pakistan."

Indian Media Goes All-Out Obama
Obama Talks Politics With Indian Students

The president was also pointed in his remarks, alluding to unrest over recent elections in Burma. "When peaceful democratic movements are suppressed, as in Burma, then the democracies of the world cannot remain silent," he said.

"For it is unacceptable to gun down peaceful protestors and incarcerate political prisoners decade after decade. It is unacceptable to hold the aspirations of an entire people hostage to the greed and paranoia of a bankrupt regime. It is unacceptable to steal an election, as the regime in Burma has done again for all the world to see.

"Faced with such gross violations of human rights, it is the responsibility of the international community - especially leaders like the United States and India - to condemn it. If I can be frank, in international fora, India has often avoided these issues. But speaking up for those who cannot do so for themselves is not interfering in the affairs of other countries. It's not violating the rights of sovereign nations. It's staying true to our democratic principles."

Mr. Obama also said today that he was ready to play "any role" requested by India and Pakistan to foster peace between them as he moved delicately to address tensions between the nuclear-armed neighbors.

On the third and final day of his trip to India, Mr. Obama said that while both India and Pakistan have an interest in reducing tensions in the region, the U.S. "cannot impose a solution to these problems."

"We are happy to play any role the parties think is appropriate," President Obama said at a joint news conference with India's Prime Minister Manmoham Singh.

Muslim-dominated Pakistan and Hindu-majority India have gone to war before and still hold deep suspicions. Indian officials accuse Pakistan's intelligence service of helping orchestrate the 2008 Mumbai attacks that killed 166 people and say Islamabad has not done enough to crack down on the Pakistan-based extremists held responsible.

Pakistan views India's ties with the U.S.-backed government in Afghanistan as an effort by its old rival to encircle it.

President Obama treaded carefully when asked about what role the U.S. could play in resolving India and Pakistan's long-standing dispute over Kashmir, a Himalayan region where rebels have sought independence from India or incorporation with Pakistan. The president quickly sought to broaden his answer, saying a reduction in tensions would not only benefit the region, but also the security of the U.S.

Kashmir has been the main source of friction between the nuclear-armed neighbors since they won independence from Britain in 1947. Pakistan has frequently sought outside intervention to resolve it but India vehemently opposes such involvement, and the United States has traditionally stayed above the fray. President Obama declined to veer from that stance.

Singh said that while he believes a strong, moderate Pakistan is in the interest of India and the wider region, India can't engage in talks as long as Pakistan's "terror machine is as active as ever before." However, he deflected a reporter's question about whether he would call Pakistan a terrorist state.

Singh is seen as a driving force behind Indian efforts to make peace with Pakistan. He called off peace talks following the November 2008 Mumbai attacks, carried out by Pakistani militants, but was generally restrained in his reaction and never threatened military retaliation. The two countries have resumed periodic "trust-building" talks between foreign ministers and foreign secretaries in recent months.

After the news conference, Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi reiterated that his country was willing to talk to India and was committed to eliminating terrorism and dismantling any networks operating from his country.

"We condemn terrorism. We do not and will not allow Pakistani soil to be used against anyone and that includes India," he told India's CNN-IBN news channel. "We have taken considerable steps in the last two years to deal with this situation."

President Obama's three-day stop in India is the longest amount of time he's spent in a foreign country since taking office.

The president praised the relationship between the U.S. and India as one of the "defining partnerships of the 21st century." He and Singh said they would co-host an international education summit next year and said the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and India's Ministry of Home Affairs would collaborate to combat terrorism by improving security at airports and seaports.

President Obama also said the U.S. will continue to share intelligence with India. And Singh said his country would establish new centers to focus more attention on the issues of nuclear proliferation and disease.

The leaders also reaffirmed their pledges of newfound economic cooperation, including moves by the United States to ease export controls affecting trade between the world's two largest democracies.

Speaking to the sensitivity about high unemployment in the U.S., Singh said at one point that his country "is not in the business of stealing jobs from America."

President Obama said in response to a question: "I don't think India is emerging. It has emerged."

CBS News chief White House correspondent Chip Reid reports that Mr. Obama stressed his top goal on this visit: Opening the surging Indian economy to U.S. products

"I want to be able to say to the American people, when they ask, 'Why are you spending time with India, aren't they taking our jobs?' I want to be able to say, 'They just created 50,000 jobs" in the U.S. - the result of more than 20 trade deals between India and American corporations announced by the president this weekend.

Mr. Obama's final day in India began with a grand welcome ceremony at Rashtrapati Bhavan, the palatial residence of India's president. Guards on horseback led Obama's limousine up the red clay driveway leading to the residence, where Obama was greeted by Indian dignitaries. He stood with his hand on his heart as a military band played the U.S. national anthem.

Following the arrival ceremony, President Obama and first lady Michelle Obama placed a wreath at Raj Ghat, a memorial to Mohandas Gandhi. As a sign of respect, the Obamas removed their shoes before placing a large white wreath on a flower-covered tablet in front of an eternal flame.

Later Monday, President Obama planned to speak to the Indian Parliament, with announcements expected on counterterrorism, regional security, clean energy, climate change and economic growth.

Hanging over Obama's 10-day trip to Asia are heavy election losses at home. On Sunday, President Obama promised to make "midcourse corrections" to reinvigorate his embattled domestic agenda in the face of a testier American public and more combative Congress.

Domestic politics came up not in response to a question from a Washington reporter but rather an Indian college student, who told Obama: "It seems that the American people have asked for a change."

The president agreed that people vented their frustration about the economy by sacking many incumbents.

A "healthy thing," he said, even though his Democratic Party suffered, losing control of one of the chambers in Congress. He said he would not retreat on spending money for energy and education, and offered no specific policy changes.


More on President Obama's Asia Trip:

Report: Obama Declined Invite to Hiroshima
Obama Hears Child's Lecture on Smoking
Obama Pursues Improved Cooperation with India
Michelle Obama Sings, Dances With Kids In India
Obama Announces $10B in Trade Deals With India
U.S. CEOs Lay Groundwork for Obama India Trip
© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
17 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
crazyname says:
Tell them what they want to hear "Obama"! When do the appologies start?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Cassarit says:
All yu have to do

Why is Obama so interested in satisfying India. How does this benefit the United States? Does mister Obama understand what it means to open this country up to another slave labor intensive country like India? Does Obama like the idea of more and more Americans working for Indian supervisors? Does he like the idea of Indian econmomic clout being felt here in addition to Chinese economic clout? Does he want America to be administered out of Bombay in addition to Bejing. What the hell is wrong with this guy. Create jobs here not there. Increase America's standing not somebody else's
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
im_watching says:
Act like Americans & stop attacking our President while overseas.
Mr.Clintons costs for travel can be found & the numbers surely will be compared to this trip when the numbers are released.
Mr.Bushs costs for overseas travel have never been released. None of you blind haters ever have or will question that as we were losing millions of jobs during his presidency
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pragmatist1 says:
Pay to play Obama style...once again, he's pandering and pleasing his audience and accomplishing nothing....
reply
Just_Wonder replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
WEEZEROFOZ - Not a whole lot of Muslims in India. Now there are quite a few in neighboring Pakistan and I suspect they will not greet this news in a positive vein as they are not exactly friendly with India.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stn_sage says:
Well, we're beginning to see some of what the India Trade Deal is going to cost America! Namely, a recommendation as a permanent member on the Security Council! How would they use that to 'shaft' there neighbor Pakistan, do you suppose?! And, this is suppose to result in a more peaceful world? I doubt that, very much!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
xila654 says:
Indian government official including the president of India are all Illuminati puppets, both president Singh and Obama both went to Harvard (one of the Illuminati universities), it looks like it is just payback for that fake trade deal. What is Obama doing to ensure that Indian workers right are protected and Indian workers recieve fair wages and overtime pay, it is unethical to do business with countries who do not protect their workers from being taken advantage of. Obama is a big time fraud who does not care about the average person.
reply
Just_Wonder replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
So first he is a member of the Church of Christ in Chicago, then he is a Muslim, and now you say he is a Catholic. Next thing you will tell me he is Hindu.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sdemaggie says:
Is this a joke-India a permanet secruity council member? The Presdient of the United States is in favor of granting India a permanet seat on the UN secruity council. What a bone head. Obama is a one term wonder. He panders to whoever is in the room. India as a permanet member of the secruity council-what a joke.
reply
Just_Wonder replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sdemaggie - Let me get this straight, you think it is a joke that the largest democracy on the planet, and one with not only an offensive nuclear force but an Air Force that waxed our own in a Top Gun competition just a few years back shouldn't have a seat on the UNSC? What exactly would you use as a qualification?
abbe91 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
And how do you justify China being a member, then ?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jibendow says:
Now that the president?s domestic legislative power has been diminished substantially the only 1 place president Obama has left to really make a difference is on the world stage through foreign policy. Interesting not a word about Hilary. Edan Aharony The hottest issue on president Obama?s desk right now is Iran. It would be interesting to see how things will map out in the coming months and how India will play a roll in this mess. Edan Aharony
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jibendow says:
Now that the president?s domestic legislative power has been diminished substantially the only 1 place president Obama has left to really make a difference is on the world stage through foreign policy. Interesting not a word about Hilary. The hottest issue on president Obama?s desk right now is Iran. It would be interesting to see how things will map out in the coming months and how India will play a roll in this mess. Edan Aharony
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TheKnowerseeker says:
He may as well support their seating on the UN Security Council. He and all our leaders since Clinton (?) have backed India's economic rise at working Americans' expense by creating legislation that allowed and allows our businesses to off-shore some of our best middle-class jobs to India and China.
reply
See all 17 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right