CBS/AP/ November 3, 2010, 9:44 AM

Boehner Claims Mandate to Nix Health Care Bill

House Republican Leader John Boehner on Wednesday claimed a voter mandate to roll back the Obama administration's health care overhaul, calling it a "monstrosity."

The presumptive next speaker of the House told reporters Wednesday morning the Republican takeover of the House and its success in narrowing the Democratic Senate majority was proof that "the Obama-Pelosi agenda" was rejected by the American people.

"I think that it's a mandate for Washington to reduce the size of government and continue our fight for smaller, less costly and more accountable government," Boehner said.

Complete 2010 Election Coverage

While the Ohio Republican spoke of popular opposition to the health care law, a CBS News exit poll found that voters were split on the issue, with nearly half calling for its repeal and a roughly equal number saying it should either be expanded or left as is.

"We have a big job ahead of us and that's why you'll see us roll up our sleeves and go to work today," Boehner said, adding that Republicans will take the next several months, before the new session begins in January, to map out their agenda.

Boehner is in line to succeed Pelosi, a California Democrat who became the first woman speaker of the House four years ago. Posing for pictures with GOP Whip Eric Cantor, Boehner said, "The American people were concerned about the government takeover of health care." He added, "I think it's important for us to lay the groundwork before we begin to repeal this monstrosity."

Cantor, R-Va., who is in line to become the next majority leader, echoed Boehner. He said voters made clear they thought the Obama administration's agenda over the last 20 months has failed.

"They have rejected that approach," Cantor said, "and they want to see us return to a sense of limited government and that means, as the leader just said, cut spending and get us back to an era in which we can promote opportunity."

On Tuesday night, Cantor told CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric that the health care overhaul should be repealed "right away."

"I hope that we're able to put a repeal bill on the floor right away because that's what the American people want. They understand that this bill is going to bankrupt this country and take away the health care that they -- most people in this country -- know and like," Cantor said.

Couric asked Cantor about the CBS News exit polling showing that 48 percent of the people wanted to repeal health care but 47 percent wanted to leave it as is or in fact expand it. "This is hardly a mandate [to repeal the health care bill] if you listen to our exit polls," she said.

"I just saw the polling that you just showed. It said that 80 percent of Republicans are for repeal and independents are for repeal," Cantor said. "The majority of Americans saying, 'Start over, we don't like the status quo,' and we've got to get costs down and give people a choice and start accentuating the doctor-patient relationship and get government out of the business of deciding the proper care. That's what Republicans are going to be about, Katie. That's what the American people are saying tonight. You know what? This administration's had 20 months, and all the promises that have been made about the most important issue, which is the economy, have been broken, and they are fed up, and they have a reason to be fed up."

Cantor didn't specifically respond to Couric's statement that in the exit poll voters were nearly equally divided on the health care bill. He referenced an earlier poll in which of the 47 percent of respondents who said they wanted to see health care reform overturned 79 percent said they planned to vote Republican in the election. Seventy-five percent of those who said the law should remain in place planned to vote for Democrats. It still remains an issue that falls along party lines.

Full Senate Results
Full House Results
Full Governor Results
GOP House Exactly What Obama Wanted to Avoid
PICTURES: The New Leaders of the House

Couric then asked Cantor about what his party would cut per its pledge to reduce $100 billion in discretionary spending, not including the military or entitlement items.

Cantor talked about fiscal discipline, job creation and capital investment but didn't identify any spending cuts in his response.

"We have put on the table an attempt to put discretionary spending back to 2008 levels, and that means an across-the-board reduction in spending," Cantor said. "If you think about it, Katie, in 2008 the sun rose and set, and we're saying, let's get back to pre-stimulus levels. Let's get back to some fiscal discipline. That's a first step that we can start and bring down the kind of spending that has occurred in Washington. But you know, listen. The American people, they know that they can go about creating jobs. The small-business people are waiting for a signal from Washington that they're going to stop making it more difficult to put capital to work. That's what tonight is about too, Katie. It's about the fact that people are looking at Washington and saying, 'Don't you hear me? We want opportunity. We like success. Stop maligning those who are successful.'"


© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
132 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
steeepe says:
Cantor is just another GOP liar. There's no point debating him because he's simply wrong about the health insurance reform, its costs, and whether or not government bureaucrats instead of insurance company bureaucrats will come between patients and doctors. He doesn't even understand that the CBO estimates large savings in the current bill and that under the GOP proposals, skimpy as they are, costs would rise (and, of course, produce more profit for insurance companies and their executives).
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sftommy says:
Boehner gets great Healthcare at taxpayers expense.

The working poor get minimum wage, no healthcare, suffering and an early death.

The Republicans including Boenher have surrendered the morals to preserve the wealth of the rich. There can be no true Christians, or Moslems for that matter, supporting this evil.

The whole issue puts Obama's position on the Moral High Ground.
How about little less suffering in the world Mr. Boehner?
or is that not on your agenda?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mom25 says:
My bottom line: don't FORCE me to pay for it or pay a fine if I choose not to have it.
reply
ge556 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The problem is that too many people without insurance go to the ER with an emergency, and then we all end up paying for it. And it's even more expensive once an illness becomes an emergency. TruthTeller
sftommy replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
and will you quietly die in the street for lack of health care?

or will you sacrifice your "nobody FORCEs me" position and go cry "poor me!" at some understaffed emergency room to save your life?

That's what I thought...freeloader!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Xenululz says:
Dear Boehner: So if you're all for getting rid of the provision that insurance companies be required to cover those with "preexisting conditions" (read: sick people), then I guess I, as one of those sick people, will just spend my meager savings on out-of-pocket medical expenses, quickly go bankrupt, and then qualify for Medicaid and Social Security Disability. Basically, instead of me paying $6,000 per year in Blue Cross / Blue Shield premiums, plus regular co-pays---paying for my own care, essentially---the American people's TAX DOLLARS will end up paying for my care. Oh, and I should probably add that my medication *alone* is priced at $25,000 per year. So you have a choice: make it illegal for insurance companies to deny me (and the hundreds of thousands of other citizens like me) coverage (which, incidentally, we are willing to pay a reasonable market price for), thus sparing taxpayers the expense of our medical care...or allow insurance companies to refuse to cover us sick people and gee whiz...look how quickly we will go bankrupt! And when we go bankrupt, what will we qualify for? Oh, that's right: Medicaid. Paid for with your tax dollars. :)

Sick people are not just going to magically disappear, you idiots.

One way or another, you will have to deal with us.

The question is: would you rather taxpayers foot the bill...or would you rather the multi-billion dollar, private, for-profit insurance companies foot the bill?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
clemenhagen1 says:
Reality check on budget deficits and surpluses:

George H. Bush & Democrats made a deal, raised taxes - controlled spending, and deficits began to get under control.

Clinton & Republican Congress continued this policy: result - four years of a balanced budget and three years of fiscal surplus.

George W. Bush & Republican Congress plunged country into record and massive debt starting in 2001.

Both parties played role in solving debt issues in late 80's & 90's: both have contributed to the current crisis. If they extend the Bush tax-cuts they will be making a bad situation worse.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
clemenhagen1 says:
The Republicans are rumored to be considering "cut/go" as their bold proposal to cut spending: all proposed new spending must be matched by a proposed cut elsewhere. Fine, if you match that with a reinstitution of "pay/go": all tax-cuts must be "paid for" with attendent cuts in spending. Of course that is a non-starter for Republicans because there is no way they can find the cuts to pay for their proposed permanent extension of the Bush tax-cuts. The Bush cuts added over three trillion to the national debt already, and will add three to four trillion more over the next decade if made permanent. And anyone heard any specifics on what they propose to cut...?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
clemenhagen1 says:
The Republicans are already misreading their "mandate" - an off-year election in which less than 40% vote - by calling for complete repeal of health care. If you break down the numbers further you find that the majority who want repeal are those over 65. Isn't that rich! The crowd that screams SOCIALISM and GOVT TAKEOVER OF HEALTH CARE are the very ones currently receiving the single largest government entitlement - MEDICARE. Perhaps the reason many of these seniors oppose is that the Republicans shamelessly demagogued this issue with lies like "death panels" and "gutting Medicare."
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sacredpie says:
A few times Boehner publicly cried:
Ronald Reagan statue
Bailing out of banks
Funding for war

A few times Boehner didnt cry:
On free health care 4 911 responders
When unemployment rate fell
Every day a soldiers killed

Oh how the wolves are able to invite the sheep to dinner!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ge556 says:
'House Republican Leader John Boehner on Wednesday claimed a voter mandate to roll back the Obama administration's health care overhaul, calling it a "monstrosity." '
===========================================================================================
It wasn't a health care overhaul, it was health insurance reform. TruthTeller
reply
Scott3 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
A point easy to overlook in the current hysteria.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TobyPogi says:
Yes, the Republicans won the house, and then what? go back to the same GOP eight years with Bush/Cheney lies to the American People, scare tactics, embraces big business, and to hell with the middle class, and send jobs oversees. Voters never learn what the Republican
all about. LETS SEE IF CAN DELIVER JOBS,ECONOMY IN 2 YEARS.
reply
See all 132 Comments