By

CBSNews /

AP/ October 13, 2010, 10:11 AM

Judge Orders "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Injunction

A federal judge issued a worldwide injunction Tuesday stopping enforcement of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy, ending the military's 17-year-old ban on openly gay troops.

U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips' landmark ruling was widely cheered by gay rights organizations that credited her with getting accomplished what President Obama and Washington politics could not.

"This order from Judge Phillips is another historic and courageous step in the right direction, a step that Congress has been noticeably slow in taking," said Alexander Nicholson, executive director of Servicemembers United and the sole named veteran plaintiff in the case along with the Log Cabin Republicans.

Servicemembers United is the nation's largest organization of gay and lesbian troops and veterans.

U.S. Department of Justice attorneys have 60 days to appeal. Legal experts say the department is under no legal obligation to do so and could let Phillips' ruling stand.

Gay Rights Activists Protest Obama Fundraiser

Phillips declared the law unconstitutional after a two-week nonjury trial in federal court in Riverside. She said the Log Cabin Republicans "established at trial that the Don't Ask, Don't Tell Act irreparably injures servicemembers by infringing their fundamental rights."

She said the policy violates due process rights, freedom of speech and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances guaranteed by the First Amendment.

"Furthermore, there is no adequate remedy at law to prevent the continued violation of servicemembers' rights or to compensate them for violation of their rights," Phillips said.

She said Department of Justice attorneys did not address these issues in their objection to her expected injunction.

Before issuing her order, Phillips had asked for input from Department of Justice attorneys and the Log Cabin Republicans, the gay rights group that filed the lawsuit in 2004 to stop the ban's enforcement.

The Log Cabin Republicans asked her for an immediate injunction so the policy can no longer be used against any U.S. military personnel anywhere in the world.

"The order represents a complete and total victory for the Log Cabin Republicans and reaffirms the constitutional rights of gays and lesbians in the military who are fighting and dying for our country," said Dan Woods, an attorney for the Log Cabin group.

Government attorneys objected, saying such an abrupt change might harm military operations in a time of war. They had asked Phillips to limit her ruling to the members of the Log Cabin Republicans, a 19,000-member group that includes current and former military service members.

The Department of Justice attorneys also said Congress should decide the issue — not her court.

Phillips disagreed, saying the law doesn't help military readiness and instead has a "direct and deleterious effect" on the armed services by hurting recruiting during wartime and requiring the discharge of service members with critical skills and training.

Legal experts say the Obama administration could choose to not appeal her ruling to end the ban — but Department of Justice attorneys are not likely to stay mum since Obama has made it clear he wants Congress to repeal the policy.

"The president has taken a very consistent position here, and that is: 'Look, I will not use my discretion in any way that will step on Congress' ability to be the sole decider about this policy here," said Diane H. Mazur, legal co-director of the Palm Center, a think tank at the University of California at Santa Barbara that supports a repeal.

Tracy Schmaler, spokeswoman for the Department of Justice, said the government was reviewing Phillips' ruling Tuesday and had no immediate comment.

Gay rights advocates say they worry they lost a crucial opportunity to change the law when Senate Republicans opposed the defense bill earlier this month because of a "don't ask, don't tell" repeal provision.

If Democrats lose seats in the upcoming elections, repealing the ban could prove even more difficult — if not impossible — next year.

Woods said the administration should be seizing the opportunity to let a judge do what politics has been unable to do.

The "don't ask, don't tell" policy prohibits the military from asking about the sexual orientation of service members but bans those who are openly gay. Under the 1993 policy, service men and women who acknowledge being gay or are discovered engaging in homosexual activity, even in the privacy of their own homes off base, are subject to discharge.
AP
154 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tijie2001 says:
I honestly do not understand how America has come to this point on the issue of gay rights. There is no scientific proof that a person is born gay no more than a person is born a drug dealer or a prostitute. If gays are allow to serve openly in the miltary, our soldiers will be demoralize weakened as troops. For a nation that was birth through God's word and was willing to die for that belief, we are far from what our forefathers has set in place. I still believe what the Bible has to say about the issue of homosexuality; it is listed with other abominations that we should not allow as a norm in society.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
BetsyRoss76 says:
Seems the mainstream media and politicos continue to politicize this issue, and all the liberals misrepresenting what truly is the agenda here. Identifying gay individuals most likely, and will work to the detriment of gay individuals mark my words. If abortion is a privacy issue, then your sexual orientation should be also and the military really has no business going there in asking. As far as telling, I would like to see a prosecution that would succeed for any gay individual "caught" doing homosexual acts in their home off base or on. Since that would be a stretch, if and would be a civil rights violation and as such a civilian court, not military one, would be the proper court even for soldiers with such a charge. The military is not a civilian organization and just how many gays want their sexual preferences on their enlistment forms then in federal databases for who knows who to access?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
highsix says:
I believe the Judge didn't really want to pass the destruction of don't ask don't tell law, being low key as she has for so many years, clearly someone had a big favour to submit to her.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
chattyone09 says:
As long as an individual is physically and mentally capable of serving our country they should be allowed, while being held to identical standards without special treatment or provisions. This would include the current codes of conduct for and among soldiers within their particular branch of military. If a soldier's actions are deemed by the military to be unbecoming, inappropriate etc they should be punnished and or courtmaritaled accordingly. And that should include any sexual behavior, advances, activites, or actions that fit under the code. Problem solved.
reply
titanx0313 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
and that is how the UCMJ is used in the military
linkicon reporticon emailicon
titanx0313 says:
one person who said the DUI can't get you in the military. I was in the military and if you have DUI you have a DUI and If you have a felony on your Record that is the same with not getting in. Plus if you are going to be in the military most of them get drunk!!! I do mean this! Ask anyone who has been to Korea for a year tour.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
titanx0313 says:
As a nine year vet in the Air Force. I have worked with people that are and still hiding because of the DADT. They have been the best workers I have have worked with and they do their jobs with great duty. I think the one's that are scared are the one's that have the most to lose is the people that live a double standard like the guys that are married and there is alot of them in the military that like it both ways not to mention that cheat alot on their wife's. The wife's are also at fault because alot of them do the same when the husband/wife are gone. If you are a Christan and you bump into a person who is a Satanist or a budish they have the right of free religion. How do you know the guy/girl is gay next to you? A satanist, budish or mormen? There is alot of people that are straight and act just as gay as any gay guy in San Francisco. It's your life not someone decision for you to act, say, or do in your life. Plus it's not there business. If the person was going for a job and you hire them. Why did you hire them? Because of their merit and personality, or schooling. It would be wrong if you didn't hired the person because of there sex, religion, color or nationalty. If you ask them about their sex partner they prefer it would be sexual harrassment! So if this is so then the US Military is in fact braking a law of sexual harrassment to the people they kicked out because sexual into windows are a form of sexual harrassment.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
documemts says:
The greatest threat to the Republican party: reality.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
miami_don says:
"Mr. Chairman, speaking for myself and myself only, it is my personal belief that allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly would be the right thing to do. No matter how I look at this issue, I cannot escape being troubled by the fact that we have in place a policy which forces young men and women to lie about who they are in order to defend their fellow citizens. For me personally, it comes down to integrity ? theirs as individuals and ours as an institution. I also believe that the great young men and women of our military can and would accommodate such a change. I never underestimate their ability to adapt. " (February 02, 2010, Senate Armed Services Committee Hearing, Washington D.C.)

www.jcs.mil

George, I went to the horse and it said the joint cheifs had reviewed and they agreed with SOD Gates it is a bad law - so they all did and and the whole of the JCS agree it isn't a good law.
reply
miami_don replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
As Delivered by Secretary of Defense, Robert M. Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff , Dirksen Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C. Tuesday, February 02, 2010---"The chiefs and I are in complete support of the approach that Secretary Gates has outlined. We believe that any implementation plan for a policy permitting gays and lesbians to serve openly in the armed forces must be carefully derived, sufficiently through ? sufficiently thorough, and thoughtfully executed. Over these last few months, we have reviewed the fundamental premises behind don?t ask, don?t tell, as well as its application in practice over the last 16 years. We understand perfectly the president?s desire to see the law repealed, and we owe him our best military advice about the impact of such a repeal and the manner in which we would implement a change in policy. " Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (February 02, 2010, Senate Armed Services Committee Hearing , Washington, D.C.) ---- go to:http://www.jcs.mil/quotes.aspx?id=10
suzjustad replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Very well put.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rwsmith29456 says:
Knowing that gays have and do serve in the military, I'd like to hear SOMEBODY explain exactly how having gays in the military hurts morale?? I keep hearing that but nobody has every given any reasonable argument except that it 'hurts morale'. If you exclude gays, how many bi-sexuals are still going to be there? How about if we just judge people on their behavior and the job they do while on duty? If a hetero person spends their duty time neglecting their job while hitting on all the female soldiers them that should reflect negatively on them, too.
reply
dontrepeal replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
UCMJ Articles 125 & 134 cover the negative effects of the examples you refer to, whether gay, bi, or hetero... these are hard truths, with hard consequences, and little tolerance for violators, versus emotional irrationalities. Military life = military law.
sxepopcorn replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I doubt it will hurt morale, but there will be tons of crap that comes along with it. Where will they live...non-gays may not feel comfortable living with a gay roommate, Same with showers, do they get their own. If male soldiers are hitting on female soldiers, more than likely they would get punished under UCMJ. I am not against allowing gays to join the military, but just saying that it has to happen immediately is a bad decision. If she said it had to be implemented within a small time frame, that would make sense. Moreover, if you eventually allow gay marriages, I would bet 30% of the males in the military would just marry each other to get the extra pay/living expenses. There would be no way for anyone to investigate those marrages either, because that would be against their rights.
See all 5 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
taimak001 says:
I am sorry if i offend anyone. But are some of you people reading or thinking about what ou are saying. I am a Alternative lifestyle member (meaning I am gay for the dumb ones) and You guys talk about gay people as if we are just dangerous to the eniviroment. These people are someones, mother, father, sister,brother,aunt, uncle,niece nephew, granddaughter, and grandson. So how can you sit here and try to separate Homosexuals from heterosexuals. If you do that you might as well goback to separates the different races. I cant believe you mentally challenge human being. Homosexuals are the way they are for a different reason. just because we like the same sex does not mean we want everyone in our sex group.We all have our own prefence and you DONT have the right to judge us. But if you have so much of a problem with it, thats a sign you are unsure of your sexuality and you need to find yourself, and scond think about the heart ache you are putting people through because of your evil acts have you even once thought about people in your own family that are gay, Down low, or bi sexual. Would you want them to go through this scrutiny by such a ruthless society. THINK BEFORE YOU OPEN YOUR MOUTH!!!
reply
Terrance99 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
As long as they give the gays their own places to sleep, change, and shower, and the heterosexuals aren't forced to shower, change, and sleep with them, I don't care what their day jobs are. It's no different than keeping women separate from men. For women, for example, it's not a matter of not being sure about their sexuality, it's not wanting to be exposed to a bunch of men while showering.
titanx0313 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
To Terrance99
Its the military not a resort. You might as ask for a separate rooms for mormen, santanish, blacks, mexicans and whites. troops are troops! You want a hanky and a tissue and cry. I don't think the enemy cares if you are getting a room at the 5 star hotel or sleeping with a goat in the ground.
See all 154 Comments