October 11, 2010 1:20 PM

How Speed Traders Are Changing Wall Street

By
CBSNews
It may surprise you to learn that most of the stock trades in the U.S. are no longer being made by human beings, but by robot computers capable of buying and selling thousands of different securities in the time it takes you to blink an eye.

These supercomputers - which actually decide which stocks to buy and sell - are operating on highly secret instructions programmed into them by math wizards who may or may not know anything about the value of the companies that are being traded.

It's known as "high frequency trading," a phenomenon that's swept over much of Wall Street in the past few years and played a supporting role in the mini market crash last spring that saw the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunge 600 points in 15 minutes.

Most people outside of the industry know very little, if anything, about it. But the Securities and Exchange Commission and members of Congress have begun asking some tough questions about its usefulness, potential dangers, and suspicions that some people may be using computers to manipulate the market.



60 Minutes Overtime: Robot Traders
In a secret new building in New Jersey, high-speed computers decide which stocks to buy and sell. Could this kind of automated "trading floor" lead to Wall Street's next "flash crash"?


Extra: How High Frequency Trading Grew
Extra: Computers Better Than Humans?
Extra: Speed Traders Helping Small Investors?

For 150 years, the floor of the New York Stock Exchange was the center of the financial world, the economic engine that helped American business raise capital and create jobs.

Today it is still the public façade of Wall Street, and a television backdrop for reporters relaying financial news. But less than 30 percent of the trading is conducted there now, and the specialists and the noise of the floor is being replaced by the speed and quiet efficiency of computers, and the action has moved elsewhere.

There are now more than 80 alternative trading systems around the country, plus two brand new electronic stock exchanges which most of you have probably never heard of: BATS and Direct Edge.

They're owned by the big banks and by high frequency trading firms, and neither of them would give "60 Minutes" an interview or let us inside to film their operations, but they trade more than a billion shares a day at blinding speed, and most of those bets are being made by machines.

The players range from firms like Goldman Sachs, Barclays, Credit-Suisse and Morgan Stanley to hedge funds and smaller operations like Tradeworx, which is the only high frequency trading firm that would talk to us or let us in.

It's run by Manoj Narang and a small group of mathematicians and scientists called "quants," which is short for quantitative analysts. Their high speed computers trade 40 million shares every day.

Asked if humans are ever involved in the trading, Narang told correspondent Steve Kroft, "Humans are not involved in the trading because humans are way too slow to trade on the kinds of opportunities that we're trying to capture. We're trying to capture opportunities that exist for only fractions of a second."

The Tradeworx computers don't care where a stock is going to be trading next year, next month, next week or even tomorrow, because they are going to be in and out of it on the same day, in a matter of minutes.

"What's the point of buying and selling a stock that you hold for three minutes?" Kroft asked.

"Same objective that all other participants have in the market, is to make money. You buy low, sell high, that's how you make money," Narang said.

"And the computer will know when to buy and when to sell?" Kroft asked.

"Sure, the computer is monitoring real-time data and it knows what to do with that data and how to make decisions based on that," Narang replied.

What Narang and other high frequency traders tell their computers to do is to make a profit of a penny or less, 40 million times day.

They scan the different exchanges, trying to anticipate which direction individual stocks are likely to move in the next fraction of a second based on current market conditions and statistical analysis of past performance. But the computers have no real understanding of who these companies are and what they do.



Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 42 Comments
by justus22 November 4, 2010 2:59 PM EDT
Absolute confirmation by everyone commenting, HFT is purely criminal activity. Here is couple things to consider, imagine some of these algorithms can be used to study individual trading accnts and create perturbances consistent with that causing capitulations by you, load the algorithm and beat your accoung into submission, show of hands who thinks this has happened, indeed ! Now imagine the government leasing some of these servers and running algorithms to take down any citizen with money they dislike, for instance pot smokers, or those that buying stock that goes against their recent purchases, essentially anyone they wish to list as terrorist like, your toast, they summarily take you out via emptying your buying power, see ya, this is truly happening, look into it you see this...timee for class action lawsuite against the coders (all india folks, they don't care about americans, all server companies, all folks leasing these servers to run these algorithms), together is the only way, individually they'll smirk at you like they did to Steve Croft, we are all just weasels in their eyes, suckers for sure !!
Reply to this comment
by MrEdgarPerez October 23, 2010 12:47 AM EDT
For more information about the implementation of a high-frequency trading platforms, Golden Networking is organizing High-Frequency Trading Experts Workshop 2010 (http://www.HFTExpertsWorkshop.com), "Practical Implementation of High-Frequency Trading Strategies", 2-day workshops in Hong Kong, November 22 & 23 and New York, December 9 & 10. It has been recommended for executives in finance and investments who work at Investment Banks, Hedge Funds, Pension Funds, Broker Dealers, Consultancy Groups, Prime Brokers, Solution Providers and Exchanges and wish to gain a thorough understanding and practical knowledge of high-frequency trading.
Reply to this comment
by mrjustice1 October 14, 2010 3:52 AM EDT
MORE NON-PRODUCTIVE PARASITES APPLYING THEIR WAYS...

...to avoid contributing something of essence that would benefit our country and its residents.

Let others do labor, and let others support these phony, unnecessary 'service employees' who refuse to do their fair share of real, needed work.

Put them to work in farming, environment care, or some other productive function!
Reply to this comment
by keithl4 October 13, 2010 1:52 AM EDT
If Joe Saluzzi thinks HFT have an unfair advantage (over him), does he also believe he has an unfair advantage over common folk who are restricted to not trade between mutual funds in their 401K faster than once every 30 days? We should have a level playing field. EVERYONE should be held to the same limitations. Get rid of the high frequency traders, day traders, and all the leaches that get rich at my expense. They add nothing to the market. They only suck.
Reply to this comment
by phil94941 October 12, 2010 1:55 PM EDT
These HFTs came to prominence when the spread (difference between ask and bid) went to pennies. If you want to slow down the HFTs then go back to a 5 cent spread and stop the rebates.
Reply to this comment
by mhw089 October 12, 2010 7:44 AM EDT
There are two words that I did not hear in Steve Kroft's piece on flash trading..."front-running" and "jail". What the quants are doing with their high-speed computers is clearly illegal and does cost the normal trader money. When you or I or some major fund makes a large trade which will inevitably cause a particular stock price to tick up temporarily the quants see it before the trade is executed on the Stock Exchange computer and sneak in an order for that stock just before the normal trader's buy is executed. As soon as the normal trade is completed the quants sell that stock, having captured the instantaneous and temporary uptick in price. That early trade raises the price that the normal trader has to pay for the stock. That is front-running and is plainly illegal. It is a form of electronic insider trading. The quants who practice this secret procedure should all be wearing striped jump suits provided by the state.
Reply to this comment
by josephp5 October 13, 2010 4:02 PM EDT
I didn't understand how HFT could possibly work until I read your comment.

Now I understand---The whole thing is simply an electronic form of front-running!

In other words, suckers like me make trades that execute in hours. These computers see that I and other people are in the process of executing a trade, and can use that information to predict the temporary direction a stock may take. They then make trades that execute much faster---they are in and out before my trade order even goes through.

And you are right---front-running is illegal, and these people belong in jail.
by Commodityone October 12, 2010 7:21 AM EDT
I am a trader who works independently. I can tell you that all the markets are manipulated by the largest traders. The trick to being profitable as a smaller trader is to read that manipulation and understand tendencies in a larger time frame in order to make a profit along with the large traders, not to buy or sell something and hold it forever like so many are taught. However, the market needs losing trades in order to function well, and thanks to so many of you who so willingly provide that function, as I did for a few years, so well! Anybody who really understands trading is surprised at how naive non professional traders are such as the producers of this piece. It truly is gambling or worse for the untrained or uneducated, like anything else. You wouldn't drive a car without training and understanding, yet millions of people throw their hard earned money away every day without real training or understanding of the game that they are in and that is the way the largest players like it.
Reply to this comment
by wangii October 11, 2010 10:06 PM EDT
This report is missing critical elements that don't put the whole story in context.

1) HFT is just another name for program trading that has been around for at least 20 years (ever since the computer has been on Wall St.) - don't believe me, google 'program trading.' Anyone who doesn't know that is ignorant, including 60 minutes, who make this out to be some new phenomenon. Not exactly cutting edge reporting 60 min.

2) Having an edge is, was and always will be the predominant way to make money in the markets -- anything else is just gambling. Fairness in an illusion. The best that small investors can hope for is the "desire" to attain fairness. Unfair people will always be one step ahead because those are the people that run the markets. Everyone else is just following along.

3) Regulation NMS was a designed to help the individual investor, supposedly because market makers and institutional traders were getting better prices for securities than the small guy. So a rule was devised that any investor should always get the best price for any security. Great in theory, but the reality has decentralized trading exchanges and enabled dark pools and black box trading... so that as long as real price discovery is the objective... it doesn't matter if you get your fill on BATS, ARCA, the New York Stock Exchange or from your broker's proprietary stock trading system. The people Reg NMS was supposed to help ended up getting shafted (once again) because the big guns on Wall St have the money to acquire and in some case build their own high speed proprietary computer systems that can trade a hell of a lot faster than your home PC. So if you put in an order that gets filled in one minute, you think that's fast? Some algo went out and bought your order for a penny or two less in 30 milliseconds round trip and sold it to you at the offer price and you didn't even know it happened. The algo makes money on the spread. Not that much different from what market makers were doing manually before decimalization was introduced. So now HFT has put the traditional market makers out of business. The end result is that the game is still the same, the players have changed slightly, but the puppet strings are still being pulled by the big guns. The irony is that the regulation that was supposed to help the small investor and level the playing field has created a brand new uneven playing field -- whether it was intentional or unforeseen is up to you to decide. That's why it's important to remember that the people on Wall St. are more clever than you and will always be one step ahead.

Have you ever walked into a casino? You should always account for the same odds when you gamble in the stock market.
Reply to this comment
by jackas13 October 11, 2010 9:05 PM EDT
As a self-employed person, doing my own investing and failing miserably over the years, i thought the piece about the super computers was very interesting until you interviewed Senator Ted Kaufman, (Dem) Delaware. Him saying the stock market should be fair and transparent was kind of like the kettle calling the pot black. Where was the congress oversight during the billions of dollars that some Wall Street bankers were raking in on Credit Default Swaps and the unraveling of the housing market created by congress removing traditional standards. Both caused millions to lose billions in their credit unions, mutual funds, etc. Senator Kaufman speaking of fairness and transparency in the market made me laugh, remembering the lack of transparency we have had in congress the past 18 months, when we were promised open meetings and transparency during the creation of the healthcare bill. The only ones being hurt with the high speed computers are other market professionals that just can't compete on the same level. I do believe he was right about one thing, that most Americans do feel there is a small number of people swimming in the wealth of America and the bankers aren't alone in this pool and isn't the super computers. I preferred the honest interview with EMINEM.
Reply to this comment
by kkrugerud October 11, 2010 7:29 PM EDT
Why not charge a commission for each and every trade; if a super computer makes millions of trades to profit just a few pennies, a commission/trade will put this tactic out of commission. Seems to me that this is the fair cure all and end all, since any other trader has to pay a commission.
Reply to this comment
See all 42 Comments
.
The Best of Andy Rooney on DVD. Order now! Order Now »
60 Minutes on Facebook