By

CBSNews /

CBS/ October 6, 2010, 11:38 AM

Death Penalty for Conn. Home Invasion Killer?

In Connecticut, a guilty verdict has come in the first of two trials in what's been described as one of the most horrific crimes in recent history.

CBS News National Correspondent Jeff Glor reported from New Haven, Conn., that even though Steven Hayes has been found guilty of all capital charges related to his role in the murder of Jennifer Hawke-Petit and her two daughters, it's still up to the jury to decide if will receive the death penalty or not.

Pictures: Petit Family Murders

Dr. William Petit, the lone survivor of a horrific home invasion, said outside the courthouse Tuesday, "There is some relief, but my family is still gone."

As Petit closed the door on one phase of this case, he prepared himself for what comes next, Glor said. In 12 days, jurors will begin deciding if Hayes will face the death penalty, and Petit will sit through more grueling testimony about the killings of his wife and two daughters. He was asked how he could push on when both defendants agreed to plead guilty in exchange for life in prison, sparing any trials.

Petit answered, "You probably would do the same thing if your family was destroyed by evil."

Beth Karas, former prosecutor and correspondent for CNN's "In Session" told CBS News, "It's mainly going to be the defense putting on evidence of why he should live and there is no limit on what they can put on. The question for the jury will be does what the defense put on outweigh the heinousness of these acts."

The guilt phase of Hayes' trial took nine days, though jurors took only four and a half hours deliberating to find him guilty on 16 counts. Petit was asked if Hayes still matters to him.

Petit said, "What matters to me most is my family and my memories of my family. I don't know over the last couple of weeks, I just kept trying to tell myself that good will overcome evil."

Glor reported Hayes, then 44, and Joshua Komisarjevsky, 26, broke into the Petit home in suburban Connecticut in July 2007 and beat William Petit with a baseball bat, forcing Jennifer Hawke-Petit to withdraw $15,000 from a bank before strangling and raping her back at home.

The couple's daughter, 11-year old Michaela Petit was also raped. All three murder victims, including 17-year-old Hayley Petit, were doused with gasoline before the house was set on fire.

Karas said, "To pour gasoline on them. To light the house on fire. To strangle and rape the mother who begged for her life. ... It's evil incarnate, is all you can say."



Glor added the penalty phase for Hayes begins in two weeks and is expected to last about a week. As for the trial for his co-defendant, Komisarjevsky, that won't begin until next year.

CBS News Legal Analyst Jack Ford, who has defended five death penalty cases, said the penalty phase of the case is "a little different" than most cases.

He explained, "What you get in these cases are two separate trials under the umbrella of one. We know now the first trial focuses on whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty. The jury has said guilty to a number of counts, including ones that make him eligible for the death penalty. What they they're going to do now, is an entirely separate second trial. There will be opening statements by the prosecution and the defense. The prosecution will present evidence here. The defense can, if they want to -- you've got to assume there will some evidence here from the defense -- then closing arguments again by both sides, the judge gives instructions to the jury, and ultimately the jury deliberates, and comes back with a verdict, a second separate trial within the whole case."

"Early Show" co-anchor Maggie Rodriguez said it's the same judge and the same jury in the second trial.

But will the horrific evidence and testimony be reiterated in this trial?

Ford said, "That's always a tough question as the prosecutor. What are you going to present here? I've seen cases where the prosecution has simply stood up and said to the jury, 'You've heard everything already. There's nothing more he can tell you about, so rely on that information.' Sometimes they will say, 'Rely on what you've heard so far, but we also want to provide you with victim impact statements.' Let the father talk about them to what this has done to him and the family members. Not every murder conviction results in a death penalty. There has to be what they call murder plus. Here among other things they are talking about heinous and cruel and vicious manner in which these murders took place. The prosecution may bring more witnesses in. I've got to believe you're going to hear something from the family members."

Rodriguez remarked, "I'm sure. They could have settled this long ago and agreed to the settlement where the defendant went to prison for life but wanted to go for the death penalty, so I'm sure they'll want to speak up."

What about the defense -- will Hayes be on the stand?

Ford said, "That's a tough question. In the cases I tried, I did put the defendant on the stand to essentially say what happened, why I'm so terribly sorry and basically asking to save their lives. You will probably get some testimony about who he is, what his background is, if he had a troubled past. I would suspect, he didn't of it beforehand, I would suspect -- a lot of times lawyers will keep the defendant off the stand even here -- if their defense has been, I didn't do this, you have the wrong person here. They didn't really have that defense. He admitted to what he did here. I would suspect you may well hear him on the stand saying something to these jurors."
Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
19 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mb91764 says:
Seems to me our crime loving nation really love our murderer.Our whole justice system is made to protect these animals.Death penaty ,what a croak of bull,it doen't even worry me.2007 is when this crime happen,its takes this long to put this slim on trail.He confess,how can any slime defend him,money yes no moral value.I was on a jury once in murder case,we had one bleeding heart who could not convict,even atfer seeing what he did to the victim.We are so screw up people,we are so worry about giving these animals what they should get,a slow painful death.That how come it doesn't work anymore,convicts know they will neverface a real excutation,I'm just sick with the whole justice crap.I hope that all you anti-death penalty folks have someone close to you kill by a animal like this man is,it really what you should have happen to you.you support a murderer right to live then die by one.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
maria129 says:
I don't even know why did they give this piece of manure a first trial never mind a second one, but anyway why don't they put him in front of the residents of Connecticut and let us take care of him.He is pure pure evil and needs to go where he belongs in hell. He never gave them girls and there mom a chance to live, they knew exactly what they we're gonna do to that family when they went in there. So they should pay with there lives cause they took the lives of 2 beautiful young ladies with a promising future without even a second thought and also the life of a beautiful woman who did good for her community, he destroyed a whole family just cause they felt like it, I guess they felt we are the judge we decide if they live or die, So let's how it feels now that the shoe is on the other foot.The only difference is that there death is going to be much to easy and nice. I'm telling you with heinous crimes like this they should send them to 3rd world countries where they do justice right away....
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Nichols193710 says:
If I told you how easy it is to get a job in this recession, you wouldn't believe me. But the truth is more employers are going online to find people just like you and me who are ready to work at a good job (one that pays good!). The only thing that makes sense is to stop wasting time driving around all day filling out a dozen applications and going from one boring low paying job to another. I found this site that pretty much matches you up with your dream job that is available in your city right now. I have found it very helpful. Go to FindMeJobNow.com
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Farver4girls says:
I have mixed feelings about the death penalty. I don't think inmates should be executed unless there is DNA evidence proving they are guilty of murder. Since Hayes confessed to the rape, torture and murder of Jennifer Hawkes-Petit and her daughters and was apprehended immediately after leaving the scene of the crime, I believe the prosecutors had DNA evidence to support their case. I don't object to sentencing Hayes and his partner to death.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DennisGreen4280 says:
I know it's easy to want the death penalty for these two scumbags and it's certainly warranted. But the death penalty wouldn't put them through the agony that their victims felt. They would wait until a few days before the execution to really start sweating and then they would lay on a medically sterile bed and administered drugs into their veins. They would go to sleep and die peacefully. And that would be the end of their suffering. With a life sentence without the possibility of parole they would live in hell on earth. Ever watch those programs of prison life on television? I would rather be executed peacefully than live the rest of my life with those (mostly) animals in prison!
reply
mb91764 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TV is a fanasty,most of these crooks enjoy there care by the state.I know of a few that have brag that easy in jail then to have make a living out in the real world.Just think ever basic need tookcare of and you the taxpayer/victims foot the bill.No taxes to pay,no heath bills,free education too.Then can sue the state for what they think is cruel enviroment too.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
djseavy says:
I'm normally not in favor of the death penalty, due to the number of innocent people who've come close to execution. This case, however, shows that the dp is clearly indicated in cases where there is no doubt and abundant evidence. I agree with the majority; these two ought to be burned alive. If we'd stop worrying about humane execution, and dispatch them the same way they murdered their victims - maybe - JUST MAYBE - the death penalty will have some real impact on those who might be thinking about committing such horrific acts. As it stands, murders know that their demise will be nearly painless.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
slatep says:
Don't give the death penalty to either of these pond scum. Put them in jail for life with no possibility of parole and no protective custody. Let them get a dose of their own medicine on a daily basis for as long as they live.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
archemeedees says:
Anyone could agree that they would have been willing to kill these men to stop them from what they were doing. Then why not now? It won't bring back the victims, but it will send the message to every twisted mind that their crimes will not be tolerated by our society. To support their lives in prison for the rest of their lives is to to condone and tolerate their crime.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
consciousnes says:
If its been proven that that comitted the crime, the only thing to decide is what method you use to put them to death. "ANYONE WHO TAKE A LIFE ON PURPOSE MUST BE PUT TO DEATH" If they are not, then there is not real penalty for committing the crime. The punishment MUST fit the crime.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
chatmandu7451 says:
For a justice system to be effective the punishment must fit the crime. The ultimate crime deserves the ultimate penalty.
reply
See all 19 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right