By

CBSNews /

CBS/ September 23, 2010, 12:03 PM

Are Tasers Overused?

Three men in South Florida are facing multiple charges after leading police on a high-speed chase.

Two of the suspects were subdued by officers using tasers, which are becoming more and more popular with police, and more and more controversial with critics.

The chase, in Miami, led police on dangerous pursuit across highways, over sidewalks and through heavy traffic. It ended with a dramatic crash but no injuries, as Broward County officers took down the driver by taser.

CBS News correspondent Don Teague reported on "The Early Show" tasering happens more often than ever -- the taser has become weapon of choice for police.

Teague pointed out more than 12,000 law enforcement agencies have now added tasers to their arsenals. Houston police alone have discharged them 2,500 times since 2004.

But some are questioning just who is getting shocked.

From incapacitating a disruptive student in Florida to a great-grandmother in Texas, you can go online and find one shocking example after another of tasering, Teague said.

Peter McFarland, who was tasered by police in California, told CBS News, "All of a sudden, they just showed up. And they came in here like there was a fire going on or some gunfight was going on."

McFarland, who suffers from a heart condition, is suing Marin County police after he was tased four times in his own home.

In other cases, the device has proved fatal.

A study by Amnesty International says that, in at least 35 states, taserings have led to deaths -- 55 fatalities in California and 52 in Florida, alone.

Thomas Ruskin, a former detective with the New York Police Department, told CBS News, "In most cases, the tasers have been a very good tool. It's a lot better to think of someone possibly being tasered than being shot."

On "The Early Show" co-anchor Maggie Rodriguez spoke with Bill Stanton, a former New York police officer and security expert with Qverity.com.

Rodriguez said, "It is easy for us all to watch the video and make our judgment about the decision at the time. We haven't been there arresting a suspect. You have, many times. Is there any time you wished you would have had a taser?"

He responded, "Good point. It is easy for us when we sit on the couch and watch this stuff go down. Though cop should have to meet a bad guy one on one. They have a fist, you take your nightstick. They take your stick, it will either be a taser, now the taser stops us from using a gun in many cases, and that's a good thing."

Rodriguez, who was tased for research purposes, said it was "the most excruciating pain followed by, literally, paralysis."

She asked, "Could they be more dangerous than people think?"

Stanton replied, "I'll ask you this. You've been tased. Have you been shot?"

Rodriguez responded, "I haven't been shot, it's better than being dead, but if an officer used it on me unjustifiably, as we've seen many instances, it would have been inhumane."

Stanton said, "Right. Those officers should be investigated and locked up, but in many professions there malpractice with doctors, lawyers, et cetera."

John Burton, a civil rights attorney, weighed in on Stanton's remarks, saying the taser is not a substitute for lethal force.

He explained, "Lethal force is used very, very rarely, 95 percent of police officers never fire their sidearm in their entire career. It's only to be used in the most extreme circumstances. When those are present, no rational officer would use a taser because lethal force is used to stop a lethal threat. Tasers are used on people frequently who are doing very little, other than not going along with the program of the police."

"Just making the officers mad?" Rodriguez offered.

Burton replied, "Well, right. And it's, also, and another point you made is that it's much more dangerous than the manufacturer, who provides a training, tells the officers. There have been over 500 fatalities associated with taser use or extreme injuries caused by falling, darts hitting people in the eye, people exploding because of being near flammable liquids, et cetera."

Rodriguez said to both men, "I think that point both of you can agree on that tasers should not be abused."

But is there anything that can be done to prevent abuse?

Stanton said, "A cop tells you to pull over, pull over. Don't ram him three times, don't take a swing at a cop."

"You know full well some people do that and officers, you never know how they will react," Rodriguez said. "Is there anything you can do to teach officers not to do that?"

Stanton said, "Absolutely, more comprehensive training for the officers. Teach them how to use the tools in their tool bag."
Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
8 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
saneObserver says:
I could see how some cops now have a very easy way of beating people up and that it could be abused. Beating someone up takes more effort and leaves evididence. Tasing is temptingly easy. I wonder what controls are in place. Do the tasers record how often they are fired? Is each firing investigated? By whom? Who oversees the the investigations and resulting actions? Are the records public?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
APHRODITE1099 says:
The problem is not that police are using the taser gun on a serious criminals when otherwise a shooting would be justified, but they are using them too much when it is not justified. It is more like they are using the taser gun as a way of beating people into submission, like you would beat a dog to obey. Just yesterday a friend of my sons who is a whole 5'2 and maybe a 100lbs asked the officer arresting her boyfriend what his was being arrested for and the officer replied to her to shut up or he would tases her. That is the problem. There are too many stories where the police are tasering people when their safty or lives are not being threated. Fact is Law Enforcement doesn't know everyone medical condition to taser anyone who is not any immediate threat to an officer, other person or themselves. Police officers are just becoming overzealous using these tasers.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gregjohnsondsm says:
I was really dissapointed with this story. Here they show a man running from the police and the police stopping him. And all the early show can say is how the police maybe used too much whatever. No comments at all about the fact that maybe you shouldn't be running from the police. Every child who watched this got the idea that the running men were ok and the police were bad. I guess the man would prefer the tazer to the older solution of a 9mm. I don't have any idea if the tazer is overused, but this story was a bad one to use to show it.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lokicker says:
First of all, I am disappointed with the Early Show on this one. I don't know anything about the "former police officer" but he was obviously not qualified to answer questions about the Taser or Taser use. Then they pit him against an ACLU-style lawyer. Why not have a Taser rep, or at least one of NYPD's certified instructors, who actually has knowledge to share. First off, to date there has been only 1 civil case involving Taser use where the civil court found some culpability for the use, and it is currently under appeal. There has NEVER been a death directly attributed to use of a Taser. It is the most researched less-lethal instrument in history, with that testing conducted by some of the worlds most respected colleges and medical facilities. Have they been overused? Without doubt. But that is a training and disciplinary issue that should be dealt with (including through civil and criminal courts). In my (and most) departments, officers are required to experience the Taser's effects first hand before being allowed to carry one, and the circumstances under which they can be used is clearly defined. When a suspect resists arrest, we are charged with the responsibility of effecting the arrest using the least force possible. In most instances, the Taser is less likely to injure either the suspect or the officer than physically man-handling him/her. It hurts like hell...for 5 seconds. The recovery is almost immediate. Very easy to be critical while you sit safely in your home. We run toward what you are most afraid of.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tsigili says:
Totally overused, and often resulting in the death of suspects.

Cops have become so reliant on easy arrests, that they always use tasers, even when they aren't needed. The problem is, those tasers can be deadly, if improperly used.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mjlewis6 says:
Tasers as non-lethal response to instances of loss of control...I think I want a taser for maintaining control on my property. I am sure others would rather I NOT fire a weapon at them for their misdeeds, but I would use the taser on anyone who does not conform to lawful behavior, be they a tresspasser, burglar or policeman with an attitude on the wrong property.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kate20061 says:
There is no question that tasers are better than bullets. However, the former police officer did not offer substantive alternatives to taser use. When asked what could be done to minimize the (mis)use of tasers, he answered that the citizen should comply with the police. While this is always the preferred reaction, the question would have been better answered from the point of more judicious use on the part of the officer.
One solution that has not been raised (to my knowledge) is lowering the power of the taser. Does the amperage/voltage need to be that high in order to achieve compliance on the offender's part?
reply
Lokicker replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Technical clarification: Voltage is not dangerous, amperage is. While the Taser produces approx. 50k volts, but only 0.0036 amps. That is less amperage than a Christmas light bulb (approx. 1 amp). Compare that to an average household outlet that has approx. 125 volts, but 15-20 amps. The Taser does not, believe it or not, rely on pain compliance. It works by temporarily disabling the nervous system by interrupting the signals to and from the brain, much like slightly altering the tuner on a radio station produces static.