Expanded Tobacco Sales Ban OK'd in San Francisco
San Francisco supervisors gave preliminary approval Tuesday to expanding a law that restricts drug stores from selling tobacco products to also apply to grocery stores and big box wholesale clubs with pharmacies.
Supervisor Eric Mar, who co-sponsored the legislation, said there was no good reason for stores that sell nicotine patches and drugs to patients with cancer at one counter to offer cigarettes, cigars and chewing tobacco at another.
"Cigarettes and pharmacies don't mix," Mar said. "Pharmacies should promote healing and protect our health."
The ordinance expands an existing ban on drug store sales of tobacco products to cover big box wholesale clubs with pharmacies such as Costco Wholesale Corp. and grocery stores such as Safeway. A similar law is on the books with Boston.
It was opposed by businesses that say it unfairly restricts consumer choice and hurts sales in the competitive grocery retail market.
"For us it's kind of throwing the baby out with the bath water," said Safeway Inc. spokeswoman Susan Houghton. "We do obviously have healthy foods in our stores, and we do sell products that might be less healthy. For us it's about providing an array of products for our customers."
Safeway operates nine of the 14 stores that sell prescription medicine and tobacco products in the city that will now have to stop selling one or the other.
Houghton said customers would now have to go to multiple stores or leave the city in order to buy cigarettes.
The measure passed with a 7-3 vote, but it needs the board's final approval before heading to Mayor Gavin Newsom's desk for his signature. Tony Winnicker, a Newsom spokesman, said the mayor would sign the bill.
Walgreen Co. challenged the law passed in 2008 that only applied to pharmacies, saying it was unfair to discriminate in favor of large retailers.
The First District Court of Appeal agreed that the exemption for big box retailers and grocers was unfair. The new law basically brings the city into compliance with that ruling, Winnicker said.
Deerfield, Ill.-based Walgreen, which operates dozens of stores in San Francisco already affected by the law, said the amended law makes for a fairer marketplace.
"We've always felt that any regulation like this should apply to all retailers with pharmacies equally," spokesman Robert Elfinger said in a statement.
The city's ban is the latest legislative attempt in a state that has seen many efforts to limit the places where tobacco can be purchased and consumed and to increase the cost of doing so. Smoking in many public places, such as restaurants, has been prohibited since the mid-1990s.
Public health advocates say those policies have worked in stemming the life-threatening diseases, such as lung cancer, caused by smoking. A 2007 state health report prepared by professors at the University of California, San Diego found that 15 percent of San Francisco adults smoked, down from 20 percent in 1990.
Winnicker said Newsom planned to veto another law passed Tuesday by the Board of Supervisors and opposed by business groups that would levy new taxes on alcohol sales.
AP Supervisor Eric Mar, who co-sponsored the legislation, said there was no good reason for stores that sell nicotine patches and drugs to patients with cancer at one counter to offer cigarettes, cigars and chewing tobacco at another.
"Cigarettes and pharmacies don't mix," Mar said. "Pharmacies should promote healing and protect our health."
The ordinance expands an existing ban on drug store sales of tobacco products to cover big box wholesale clubs with pharmacies such as Costco Wholesale Corp. and grocery stores such as Safeway. A similar law is on the books with Boston.
It was opposed by businesses that say it unfairly restricts consumer choice and hurts sales in the competitive grocery retail market.
"For us it's kind of throwing the baby out with the bath water," said Safeway Inc. spokeswoman Susan Houghton. "We do obviously have healthy foods in our stores, and we do sell products that might be less healthy. For us it's about providing an array of products for our customers."
Safeway operates nine of the 14 stores that sell prescription medicine and tobacco products in the city that will now have to stop selling one or the other.
Houghton said customers would now have to go to multiple stores or leave the city in order to buy cigarettes.
The measure passed with a 7-3 vote, but it needs the board's final approval before heading to Mayor Gavin Newsom's desk for his signature. Tony Winnicker, a Newsom spokesman, said the mayor would sign the bill.
Walgreen Co. challenged the law passed in 2008 that only applied to pharmacies, saying it was unfair to discriminate in favor of large retailers.
The First District Court of Appeal agreed that the exemption for big box retailers and grocers was unfair. The new law basically brings the city into compliance with that ruling, Winnicker said.
Deerfield, Ill.-based Walgreen, which operates dozens of stores in San Francisco already affected by the law, said the amended law makes for a fairer marketplace.
"We've always felt that any regulation like this should apply to all retailers with pharmacies equally," spokesman Robert Elfinger said in a statement.
The city's ban is the latest legislative attempt in a state that has seen many efforts to limit the places where tobacco can be purchased and consumed and to increase the cost of doing so. Smoking in many public places, such as restaurants, has been prohibited since the mid-1990s.
Public health advocates say those policies have worked in stemming the life-threatening diseases, such as lung cancer, caused by smoking. A 2007 state health report prepared by professors at the University of California, San Diego found that 15 percent of San Francisco adults smoked, down from 20 percent in 1990.
Winnicker said Newsom planned to veto another law passed Tuesday by the Board of Supervisors and opposed by business groups that would levy new taxes on alcohol sales.
Popular on MoneyWatch
- Amy's Baking Company could face legal 'nightmare'
- Reverse cell phone lookup service is free and simple
- Forbes names most powerful women 2013 10 Photos
- Student loan defaults rising despite a way out
- Rent the cake? Unusual tips to cut your wedding bill
- Top 10 professional life coaching myths
- Amy's Baking Company: Post-meltdown PR campaign
- GM recalling 27K Cadillac SUVs; Regulators: Wheels can fall off
5 Comments Add a Comment
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- "Supervisor Eric Mar, who co-sponsored the legislation, said there was no good reason for stores that sell nicotine patches and drugs to patients with cancer at one counter to offer cigarettes, cigars and chewing tobacco at another."...Following that idiotic logic then, grocery stores shouldn't be allowed to sell diet-aides and food in the same place.
- reply
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- boogieluvr - Your point about slim fast and cookies is great. This is what happens when kooks are elected. This foolishness coming from a state where many people find it ok to legalize marijuana. The argument that cigarettes shouldn't be sold where healthy items are sold is bogus. Using that argument, there is an assumption that a heart patient buying medication is also buying tobacco pruducts. What if the person before me is buying heart medicine while I am buying cigarettes? What does one have to do with the other. So much for freedom of choice.
- reply
-
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- The point that two people could be coming in buying separate products is excellent. This ban is simply another attack on personal freedoms and another step in their obvious agenda to punish all the evil smokers in SF. Combine this with the insane taxes that are being placed on cigarettes (in NY is $10 a pack now) and anyone can see this is a challenge against personal freedoms and equality. I don't even smoke and this makes me angry because I recognize it can happen with anything. Next it'll be snack foods to punish the evil overweight people...
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- And you wonder why the Tea Party exists. By what right does our government PRESUME to regulate our private lives? Vote THEM ALL OUT! Local as well as federal. They are all on a power trip. We do not need "THEM" telling us what to do! How dare they? Who elected them Pope? Make Tofu illegal. Make vegan illegal. Make not smoking illegal. See how they like it.
- reply
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- This seems silly. A grocery store is simply providing goods to their patrons, not making health decisions for them. Stores also sell cookies along side Slim-Fast, can they no longer sell cookies because they're unhealthy? For the record I'm a non-smoker.
- reply
