CBS/AP/ September 14, 2010, 8:27 AM

Natural Gas "Fracking" Debate Draws Hundreds

Hundreds of people on both sides gathered Monday for what are expected to be contentious public hearings on a federal environmental study of a natural gas drilling technique aimed at tapping a rich formation beneath much of the Northeast.

Opponents of the process - hydraulic fracturing, or fracking - carried signs saying "Kids can't drink gas" and "Protect our water. Stop fracking America." Supporters, including union workers eager for jobs, carried signs that said "Yes to science, no to paranoia" and chanted "Pass gas now!"

The Environmental Protection Agency is holding four-hour hearings in Binghamton beginning at noon and again at 6 p.m. Two more sessions are scheduled for Wednesday.

The EPA is considering how broadly to construct its study of fracking, ordered last year by Congress after the agency's 2004 study that declared the technology safe was widely criticized as flawed. That study had enabled passage of 2005 energy legislation exempting fracking from federal regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act.

The drilling technique involves blasting millions of gallons of chemical-laced water mixed with sand into the ground and then horizontally to release natural gas from rock formations thousands of feet underground. Opponents say the process can poison drinking water but the industry, strongly opposed to federal regulation, contends there's no proof that fracking chemicals have contaminated drinking water.

CBS News Chief Investigative Correspondent Armen Keteyian reports the industry isn't required by law to disclose what potentially toxic chemicals are used in the drilling process. But just last week, the EPA asked nine drilling companies for more information about exactly what's being pumped into the ground.

Read Armen Keteyian's CBS News Investigation

The hearings come as a gas rush barely two years old is under way in Pennsylvania and West Virginia, with drilling companies tapping into the vast and lucrative Marcellus Shale region underlying those states, New York and Ohio. Some geologists estimate the Marcellus might contain more than 500 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, of which 50 trillion cubic feet might be recoverable by fracking - enough to supply the entire East Coast for 50 years.

The proximity of the gas stores to the large East Coast energy market makes it particularly valuable. But its location brings drilling to a densely populated region and fears of water contamination of the Delaware River watershed that provides drinking water for 17 million people from Philadelphia to New York City.

"There's no way this can be done safely. It will toxify the air, water and soil," said protester Kathy Shimberg, 73, of Mount Vision, N.Y., wearing a T-shirt that read "Love N.Y.? Don't frack it up."

"Gas is not a clean fuel and the extraction process is massively unclean," she said.

New York's Department of Environmental Conservation has upheld issuing drilling permits until it draws regulations to govern the process. Complaints of wellwater contamination and surface spills of post-fracking water have forced revision of state rules in Pennsylvania, where more than 1,600 wells have already been drilled in the Marcellus Shale and more than 4,000 permits have been granted.

Drilling companies have used fracking to release natural gas from other shale reserves around the country. EPA earlier held hearings in Colorado, Texas and Pennsylvania.

The two sides gathered for the Binghamton hearings were kept at either end of a street on Monday, separated by a long neutral zone and observed by a heavy police presence.

Alex Parillo, representing about 1,000 workers at Laborers Local 785, said allowing the drilling would bring much needed jobs to the economically struggling region.

"It's a big jobs issue for us," Parillo said. "We see industries coming into New York with their hands out, looking for tax abatements and bringing in out of state workers. Here we have an industry, they don't have their hands out. They embrace the local work force. They just want guidelines to do it right. The DEC will have the strictest regulations in the world."

Parillo said local laborers have a stake in safeguarding the environment.

"We're going to be on the front lines and make sure it's done right," he said.

Claude Crispell of Burdette has been working on pipelines all his life and said it's one of the safest jobs he's ever had.

"I don't see a problem with drilling here," he said. "The DEC has studied it for three years and says it's safe."

Watch: A Burning Debate

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
30 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
frackedoverinOhio says:
Hey Chucky, Why dont you come over to my well waterhead and suck all the FREE gas out you what. And I'll lite a fire under your A_ _ and whatch you blowup! What a Party that would be! Hell I might not even mind so much, to what those Greedy Bastards did to me!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pleasestoptheinsanity says:
Tell Mayor Bloomberg and Gov. Cuomo WE DON'T WANT FRACKING IN UPSTATE NEW YORK- THE RISKS ARE TOO GREAT-

Mayor Bloomberg- NYC: 212.639.9675
email- http://www.nyc.gov/html/mail/html/mayor.html

Gov. Cuomo- NYC: 212-681-4580 Albany: 518-474-8390
email- http://www.governor.ny.gov/contact/GovernorContactForm.php

Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/8618-500251_162-6836255.html?assetTypeId=58&messageId=11049810&tag=contentMain;contentBody#ixzz1SfkNIBoX
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dimegirl72 says:
When someone can LIGHT THERE HOME SINK WATER ON FIRE there is a problem!!!
No matter what you believe!
If you don't believe it watch GASLAND documentary!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CutRedTape says:
Safe? Unsafe? Both sides should agree to remove the hydraulic fracturing exemptions from the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and a host of other environmental rules. If it is safe, the industry has nothing to fear from the rules. If it is dangerous, we need protection.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pilgrimfeet says:
Well, it appears that you really have No idea what you are talking about. Perhaps you should conduct due diligence before assuming you know what you are talking about. The website you have made reference to does not even exist.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
chemicalfree says:
ZERO NO NONE ABSOLUTLY NO CHEMICAL PROCESS EXISTS right now and has been a commercial patented on going operation fracking gas wells over 1 yr now.
called ozonix process, patented by a stuart florida based company called echosphere technologies, Inc www.echospheretech.com

Why doesn't the EPA or impacted residence even know that this process is here right now, clean, uses no chemicals, no pollution even cleans up back flow water from such wells. THIS IS A GREEN COMPANY with the A N S W E R. Why is it such a well kept secret???????
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mitch0927 says:
A few months ago, HBO did a special on this exact thing. Called "GASLAND", it shows what the government did during the Bush administration allowing this. people were actually turning on their focets and lighting the fumes coming out of their so called safe drinking water. oil companies were even trucking in water for these people. I say don't do it, and go wind and solar power instead of natural gas. yeah, the oil companies will say it is a "clean" fuel, but what they do to get it is real DIRTY. Destroying the water table for hundreds if not thousands of years.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
thanksgreed says:
Let's see, mine explosions due to lack of concern for regulations, oil rig explosions due to short cuts, incineration of neighborhoods because of decaying pipes, useless wars for oil, Wall Street collapse from cheating, now burning water because of fracking.

isn't greed great?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bradkt1 says:
When you inject this stuff into the ground, common sense should tell you that gravity is going to cause it to go down...down...down...

...until you hit the water table.

This is not rocket science. This isn't just a little bit of chemically-laced water that is going to be injected into the ground and evaporate. It is going to be thousands of gallons! It is going to pollute the water table...

...and then what will you do? I have had enough experience on my job with hazardous chemicals leeching into the ground from the surface and gradually making their way to the water table years later to know that this is going to happen...as surely as the sun is going to rise tomorrow.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pilgrimfeet says:
Perhaps there is a solution to the frackwater debate. This is what I found while researching what new technology is available:

Instead of Disposing Fracture Water and Other Wastewater, We need to
Treat It and Reuse It For Less Money.
Until now, energy producers had limited acquisition and disposal options for water used in the fracturing process and other industrial applications. However, a portable, efficient solution to the fracturing wastewater dilemma is available.

In partnership with Solverdi Worldwide Ltd., Ridgeline Water brings you the ability to turn wastewater into freshwater, on site and without interrupting production or incurring additional cost.

Advantages of the Ridgeline-Solverdi Fracture Water Treatment Option:
Water recycling / re-use versus contamination / transportation and disposal
System is portable, or can be fixed on site
100% self powered
No additional water consumption
No byproducts other than from influent
Lower installation and production costs
Individual customer installations and custom design
Enjoy the added assurance that your company is staying ahead of the competition, leading the way toward more sustainable water use practices in energy production.

Anybody else hear of this?
reply
frackedoverinOhio replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You drink frist!
See all 30 Comments