By

David Morgan /

CBS/ September 13, 2010, 8:34 AM

White House Hopes Boehner Serious About Tax Cuts

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said today the Obama administration hopes a top House Republican was serious when he suggested the GOP might accept an extension of Bush-era tax cuts for the middle class without also extending those reductions for the richest Americans.

CBS News chief White House correspondent Chip Reid reports Republicans had been insisting they be extended for everybody, including the wealthy, but now the door has been cracked open to compromise.

On CBS' "Face the Nation" Sunday, House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, said he would support extending tax cuts for the middle class even if those for the wealthy were allowed to expire.

"If the only option I have is to vote for some of those tax reductions. I'll vote for them," Boehner told Bob Schieffer.

Boehner added that he still believed letting the tax breaks for the wealthy expire was "bad policy" in terms of rebuilding the economy.

"The president argued pretty vociferously that we ought to extend the tax cuts that affect the middle class in this economy right now - that's what the president believes," Gibbs told "Early Show" anchor Harry Smith this morning. "I hope that Congressman Boehner's comments suggest a willingness to agree to the president's position.

"We ought not use the middle class as a political football; we ought to extend those tax cuts for the middle class, we ought to do it fairly quickly, give them certainty and make sure they know they will get help in tough economic times," Gibbs said.

"Let's be clear, Harry: the tax cuts for the upper end, the wealthy, mostly millionaires, that's a $700 billion proposition the next ten years. The president does not believe that we should be borrowing $700 billion, most likely from overseas, to extend tax cuts for folks, quite frankly, that weren't asking for them and don't particularly need them."

On Sunday Boehner bristled at accusations made by President Obama that Republicans were holding tax cuts for the middle class hostage in order to maintain them for the top 3% of earners.

"I want to do something for all Americans who pay taxes," Boehner said.

Reid says that if Boehner and the Republicans are forced to compromise, that would be a big victory for President Obama, who insists the cuts should be extended only for couples making less than $250,000 a year and individuals making less than $200,000.

Anyone making more than would see their taxes rise.

"There's no question we've got to get our economy even more strengthened than what we're seeing now," Gibbs said, when asked how the debate over whether or not to let the lower tax rates lapse would lead to increased employment.

"We've seen eight straight months of job creation but, look, for the middle class this economic recession didn't start two years ago, or two-and-a-half years ago. It's been going on for ten years. They've watched their wages decrease. They've wondered how they're going to pay bills and send their kids to college. The president believes for the middle class it's not time to raise their taxes, it's time to cut their taxes."

"Boehner also said, basically, why not just bring the budget back to about 2008 [spending] levels and you wouldn't even have to be having that conversation,'" said Smith. "Any way possible to shrink the government down to 2008 size and move on from there?"

"Well, look, the president has proposed freezing non-security discretionary spending for the next three years," Gibbs said. "But understand the argument John Boehner makes: John Boehner wants to cut spending in one breath and then without breathing, quite frankly, he wants to borrow $700 billion - paid for by the middle class - to give tax breaks to millionaires. The average tax break for that millionaire is $100,000. That's not what we should be doing. That's doesn't make any economic sense and it certainly lacks common sense."
Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
  • David Morgan

    David Morgan is a senior producer at CBSNews.com, and editor of cbssundaymorning.com.

26 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
therunningcrocus says:
I submitted a comment earlier on this story which does not appear to have been posted, so I'll restate: This story itself could have been ripped from a White House letterhead press release with a few minutes of mic work from Rabbie Gibbs. This was not reporting: this was the fourth estate as a megaphone for this administration and congressional majority with little to no original reporting or critical thinking. I imagine the players here as teenagers thumbing text messages, "Well, HE said,...and then this OTHER guy said....And that's the NEWS." We're doomed.
reply
therunningcrocus replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The point may be too oblique for those who choose to yell as they type: in plain speak, reporting is one thing -not- going on in this article.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cardinaldog says:
Here we have a liberal democrat President, bent on bailing-out Corporate buddies, while ignoring small business and the American middle class, and you say it is the Republicans who are anti-American/small business. Where do you idiots come from. In the last 30 years, Republicans owned only 12 years, if that. You Liberal Democrats own this mess and conservatives are going to clean it up!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cardinaldog says:
What a bunch of BS. Where was this administrations concern for middle class Americans during the past 2 years? It is a bit late now (Nov. 2) to show concern for middle class taxpayers and real job creators. Oh! I forgot! Investors just take advantage of workers and are greedy. Obama and his liberal cohorts are for the people. They have no self-interests. Gibbs, as usual, is lying about the 97%. Do these idiots really think the 'common' people are that stupid? I am sick of this liberal propaganda!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
phuyay says:
I wouldn't mind if the tax cuts expire for the very wealthy, even though the top 1% pay 40% of the taxes, if the congress doesn't waste the money. An extra 700 billion is like chump change for congress. Unless that money can be directed to deficit reduction, forget it. Fat chance of that happening.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ktgilb1 says:
Just so that I understand, All of you who are for extending the bush era tax cuts are ok with supplementing the rich. I mean, who covers the shortfall for the money not taken in from the rich paying their share? some one has to cover it right? And another question, if the tax cut for the rich were to inspire job creation, why are we still losing jobs, didn't they have 2 tax cuts under bush? both were to aid in job creation, so we shoud be doing just fine employment wise right?
We should have jobs popping up all over the place right? Trick down economics works right?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kevjustice says:
CLASS WARFARE IN AMERICA IS FROM THE TOP DOWN NOT FROM THE BOTTOM UP.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pragmatist1 says:
This is more gasping by the desperate Democrats as thy fear the Republicans regaining the majority. This is such entertaining political theater.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rightbehind says:
by Mortar_29 September 13, 2010 11:41 AM EDT
Subsizing? Come on, please educate yourself!

People keeping their own property is not subsidizing. Subsidizing is when you take other people's property and give to someone else.

------------------

More Tar is right! It's like when the state hands over huge sums of cash to bring businesses in. New start up businesses are typically given 3000 dollars for every employee they hire. Some have roads and property improvements given to them at the tax payers expense. It's called corporate welfare.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rightbehind says:
by ALBrainTrust11 September 13, 2010 12:26 PM EDT
YOU DON'T HAVE TO BORROW $700 BILLION OVER 10 YEARS TO COVER THE TOP BRACKET STAYING AS IS.....AS IS.....UNLESS YOU REFUSE TO CUT THE BUDGET.

IT'S BARRY, HARRY & SCARRY'S BUDGET. THEY WON'T CUT IT. THEY WON'T EVEN FREEZE SPENDING. THEY JUST WANT TO RAISE TAXES ON "THE RICH."

MY WIFE AND I ARE "RICH." SHE IS A DOCTOR. SHE HAD TO GRADUATE HIGH SCHOOL. GET A COLLEGE DEGREE. GO THROUGH 4 YEARS OF MEDICAL SCHOOL. GO THROUGH 3 HELLISH YEARS OF TRAINING.

NOW SHE WORKS 12-14 HOUR SHIFTS (NO UNION RULES OR BREAKS.)

HER REWARD???? HIGHER TAXES ON HER HARD EARNED INCOME!!!!

(PS...A QUARTER OF HER BILLINGS GO UNPAID, SO SHE ALREADY "CONTRIBUTES AT THE OFFICE.")


----------------------------------------------------------



How much of her income is paid with medicare?? More than 80% of the
patients are the elderly in hospitals. You are the perfect example of someone who likes to ride the boat but doesn't like to be handed an oar. PS sounds like your riding her coat tales. Enjoy her wealth!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rightbehind says:
by WEEZEROFOZ September 13, 2010 10:16 AM EDT
There is no doubt who is going down in history as the WORST president ever!


--------------------------

Ronny raygun! I voted for him. A decision I deeply regret. He started the race to the bottom. Had I of known what was working against sitting President Carter I would have never voted for raygun.
reply
See all 26 Comments