September 9, 2010 5:59 PM

NYC Islamic Center Backers Facing Divisions

By
CBSNews
(AP)  The group of Muslims planning to build a 13-story Islamic center and mosque near ground zero appears plagued by divisions that raise questions about the future of the project, with one major investor saying he is prepared to sell some or all of the site if the price is right.

Hisham Elzanaty, an Egyptian-born businessman who says he provided a majority of the financing to gain control over the two buildings where the center would be built, told The Associated Press this week that while he supports the concept, he needs to turn a profit.

He said one of the buildings is worth millions if it is redeveloped, and he intends to seize the opportunity. He said he would like to see the other building turned into a mosque, but if his community doesn't come forward with enough cash for him to break even, he will turn it over to someone else.

"I'm a businessman. This was a mere business transaction for me," said Elzanaty, a U.S. citizen who has lived on Long Island for decades, owns medical clinics in New York City and invests in real estate on the side.

Representatives of some of the project's backers said they have just started trying to raise the estimated $100 million needed to build the center and the millions more required to run it.

Elzanaty said his real estate partnership, which paid $4.8 million for half the site last year, has already received offers three times that much to sell that parcel.

"Develop it, raze it, sell it," he said. "If someone wants to give me 18 or 20 million dollars today, it's all theirs."

A spokesman for the developer leading the investment team declined to confirm Elzanaty's claim that he has a majority stake in the partnership, or comment on whether he needs approval from the rest of the group to decide the fate of the two buildings.

Dealing with potential conflicts among investors is but one of the challenges facing the group trying to organize the center.

The concept was first broached publicly late last year by a group of backers that included Feisal Abdul Rauf, an imam who leads a small Manhattan mosque not far from the World Trade Center, his wife, Daisy Khan, who heads a Muslim nonprofit group, and a real estate investor who is a member of Rauf's congregation, Sharif El-Gamal.

Together, they outlined a plan to demolish a pair of linked buildings and replace them with a tower that would hold a theater, a health club, a performing arts center, a culinary school and a mosque.

Since then, though, it has been difficult to determine who is in control. The key players in the development are represented by different publicity firms and different lawyers, and have varying agendas and no consistent message.

Rauf left the U.S. just as controversy over the plan was becoming explosive. His first significant public comments in months came in a letter published Wednesday in The New York Times in which he referred to the center as the Cordoba House - a name that had been abandoned by other backers weeks ago in favor of the moniker Park51, which reflects the project's address.

Rauf also said for the first time that the center would also include separate prayer spaces for Christians, Jews and people of other faiths.

"I do not underestimate the challenges that will be involved in bringing our work to completion," he wrote, adding that construction has yet to begin. "I know there will be interest in our financing, and so we will clearly identify all of our financial backers."

Sharif El-Gamal, who had emerged as the public face of the project in Rauf's absence, has declined most interview requests, leaving critics free to speculate about who is behind the center.

In his few public statements over the past few weeks, he has portrayed himself, rather than Rauf, as the key force behind the proposed center, and created a new nonprofit group to raise the estimated $100 million needed for construction.

Yet it is unclear how much authority he has to set the project's agenda.

In one typical episode in late August, a guest imam scheduled to oversee Friday prayers at the site of the planned center invited reporters throughout New York City to come hear him speak. When they arrived, they were met by an exasperated El-Gamal, who instructed police to keep the media out, saying the invitation was unauthorized.

Until late last week, El-Gamal had declined to identify any of the eight investors involved in his real estate partnership, or say whether any had a controlling interest. Real estate partnerships in New York are generally not required to disclose their membership to the public. On Friday, he acknowledged for the first time in response to media inquiries that Elzanaty was a major contributor.

After speaking with Elzanaty on Tuesday, the AP contacted El-Gamal's spokesman, Larry Kopp, to see if he could confirm Elzanaty's statements that he is the principal investor in the project and has the final say over what happens to the real estate. Kopp said El-Gamal wouldn't comment on the ownership issues.

The business transactions surrounding the project are complicated.

Half the site is owned by the real estate partnership that includes Elzanaty and is managed by El-Gamal, according to city property records. The other half is owned by the utility Consolidated Edison, but controlled through a long-term lease that another real estate entity purchased for $700,000 last year. Elzanaty said he put up all of that money and thus controls the lease, which allows its holder to tear down the building and construct something new.

Elzanaty said that while he would love to see the entire site become a center that would replace the sometimes shabby places downtown where Muslims pray now, the project can't come at the expense of his investment.

As for the criticism that it would be inappropriate to build any Muslim house of worship so close to the trade center site, where victims of Islamic terrorists died, Elzanaty said he strongly disagreed.

"There is a public opinion that says no, but if you say no, you are defeated by the fanatics," he said.

Elzanaty added that he believed that his own parents were victims of terrorism.

His mother and father were passengers on an EgyptAir flight that crashed in the Atlantic Ocean in 1999. U.S. officials ruled that the co-pilot deliberately steered the plane into the sea. No group claimed responsibility for the crash, and investigators have discounted the possibility of terrorism. Egypt has claimed that mechanical failure caused the crash.

Still, Elzanaty said it is hurtful that some critics of the mosque project have accused him of secretly sympathizing with terrorists, given his personal loss.

Some of those detractors have pointed to a donation that he made in 1999 to the Holy Land Foundation, which was later indicted on charges of contributing money to the Palestinian militant group Hamas. Five leaders of the foundation were recently convicted of illegally supporting Hamas.

Elzanaty said he believed his donation was being used to support Palestinian orphans, and noted that the U.S. government had the foundation on its list of IRS-approved charities until 2001.

"America is my country," he said, "and I will never do anything to hurt it."

AP
Add a Comment See all 13 Comments
by r_r_k September 9, 2010 6:20 PM EDT
Because the US is at war in Iraq and Afghanistan, so is using the common tactic of demonising and dehumanising the enemy. This may have worked to advantage in previous wars; however, to do so today is insensitive and foolish. Are Americans that ignorant that they believe the nonsense being spouted and sent around on the Internet against Islam? The problem on both sides has to do with religious fanatics. These fanatics are who are creating the problems. Then again, if the US was not so "generous" with "sharing" their culture, many of these fanatics wouldn't have a leg to stand on.
Reply to this comment
by tankmansquare September 10, 2010 2:19 AM EDT
This is true, and one would wonder why we would cause such hate and hostility by invading two countries, and killing civilians. The only reason I can come up with, other than GOD (gold, oil, and drugs) is to destabilize the region, requiring our eternal presence. If there were only a few terrorist before 911, there are thousands since the invasion of Iraq, to help us continue this never-ending war on terror. Using the presidential "preemptive strike," we now can attack, invade, and occupy any country deemed to contain "unlawful enemy combatants." This means the U.S. as well as any of the Asian "Stans"! How long NATO and the UN will continue to want to participate in this is anyone?s guess. However, I have a feeling we are going to be left alone out on this limb we are sawing off behind us.
by ochavez1974 September 9, 2010 12:09 PM EDT
Terrorists are dangerous, they kill their own brothers n sisters and they kill innocent people. All this is against any religion on earth. In any religion there are people who follow and do the opposite of their religion's teachings.......so why this ignorant pastor have to take their anger out on the Quran. We can't blame the Quran, Bible(etc..). This pastor is a terrorist of his own religion because I believe if he reads the book of his own religion, his actions will definitely be against it.
Reply to this comment
by ochavez1974 September 9, 2010 12:09 PM EDT
Terrorists are dangerous, they kill their own brothers n sisters and they kill innocent people. All this is against any religion on earth. In any religion there are people who follow and do the opposite of their religion's teachings.......so why this ignorant pastor have to take their anger out on the Quran. We can't blame the Quran, Bible(etc..). This pastor is a terrorist of his own religion because I believe if he reads the book of his own religion, his actions will definitely be against it.
Reply to this comment
by newsterI September 9, 2010 9:54 AM EDT
by September 9,
READ THIS: Islam is not a peaceful religion. Is dangerous when dealing with a religion whose foundational so call Holy Book, the Koran, calls for subjecting the Non-Muslim world to Allah by FORCE."

Sort of, well, exactly like CHRISTIANS did eh? they slaughtered entire villages, men, women, children who refused to convert.
Dont overlook the CHRISTIAN crusades in the past, those bloody times when the CHRISTIANS did the very same things.
Reply to this comment
by 2010forum September 9, 2010 9:36 PM EDT
you wrote that Muslim is"sort of ...exactly like Christian did eh?"
you also wrote,"they slaughtered entire villages,.."etc. And you further stated about Christian crusaders.

Let me tell you the facts from myths. While it is true that some people claiming to be Christians have committed atrocities, this does not mean that Bible teaches that. Evil done in the name of Christianity in the past or present is done by misguided people, and sometimes they are the acts of "cultural" Christians who not truly follow God's rules for living.
Evil done in the name of Christianity is not in line with the teaching of Jesus Christ.
Friend, you cannot take the example of Pastor Terry Jones and compare Christianity to his actions. I do not judge your religion, Islam, by Al Quida,Hamas, Hasabollah, PLA, Khomeni of Iran, Ottoman Turks who massacred millions of Hindus and Buddhists and turned Indonesia to a Muslim country, also turned Buddhist-Afghanistan to a Muslim country. Warfare, bloodshed, hate, force, and punishment are not misread or mistaken in the teachings of Islam. You may talk some kind of peace here in the USA, but once you crossed the gulf the Islam is a difference story. you cannot carry a Bible publicly, let alone religious freedom for none Muslims.
If everyone followed the teachings of Jesus Christ correctly, no evil would be done in the name of Christianity.
Jesus taught people to love God and their neighbors (Matthew 22:37-40),
as well as what has become known as the GOLDEN RULE,"So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you."(Matt7:22)
The evil done in the name of Christianity does not represent true Christianity based on the Holy Bible.
by Borisabroso September 9, 2010 9:25 AM EDT
READ THIS: Islam is not a peaceful religion. Is dangerous when dealing with a religion whose foundational so call Holy Book, the Koran, calls for subjecting the Non-Muslim world to Allah by FORCE. Please rent the Documentary: The Third Jihad. <<< --- <<< I promise you, you will never be the same after seeing it.

It?s a well known Islamic tradition to build on top on an area that you?ve already conquer. This is what they call a Soft Jihad. This is something where there are not doing it in our face, but they are doing it very quietly, very stealthy. There?s something called: Taquia (lie to the infidels for the sake of promoting Islam) in Islamic culture, that says that you are allowed to lie to further the muslim religion. I strongly believe these people are engaging in Taquia, to promote their cause in building this mosque.
Reply to this comment
by tankmansquare September 9, 2010 4:47 AM EDT
Anyone who doesn?t believe that the Christian extreme right wing of the Republican Party is fascist, better think again! ?When books are burned in the end people will be burned too.? Heinrich Heine German critic & poet (1797 - 1856). Remember that the Nazi?s burned books in the 1930?s, and went on to burn people as well.

Books are meant to be read, even if you don?t agree with the contents. If the Christian fascists think that the Islamic fascists are their enemy, then they should read the Koran to better understand their enemy. Instead, they decide to burn it! If the Islamic community over-reacts to this, they will be playing right into the hands of the Christian right wing, and making a case in their favor.

A more moderate approach might be to burn a hundred Bibles. Why not? Like Islamic extremists using the Koran to justify mistreatment of women, the Christian right take extreme quotes from the Bible (especially the Old Testament), and use them to justify persecuting gays, bomb abortion clinics, and burn crosses.

These fundamentalist evangelical born-again Christians with guns believe in the literal interpretation of the Bible, ignoring carbon 14 dating and the fossil record. Many believe that the Earth is only about 6000 years old since it was created by God. The fact is that man has been here only a fraction of time compared with the dinosaurs, which existed for millennia in comparison. What did God do during this time while the T-Rex was eating other dinosaurs and making babies? He must have enjoyed the show to have let it last so long.

It is obvious that these extremist Christians are selective about what they take out of the Bible to justify their actions, ignoring the teachings of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount. They protest the building of an Islamic center near ground zero, even though 911 was never thoroughly investigated to begin with. The 911 Commission was controlled from the White House, and completely ignored the collapse of Building 7, as well as the money trail to Pakistan?s ISI.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross."
- Sinclair Lewis
It Can't Happen Here
1935
Reply to this comment
by louiville35 September 9, 2010 9:27 AM EDT
When fascism comes to America, it will not be in brown and black shirts. It will not be with jack-boots. It will be Nike sneakers and Smiley shirts ? George Carlin
by pragmatist1 September 9, 2010 10:13 AM EDT
Sinclair Lewis was an atheist and a drunkard. Interesting, too, that the media is giving very little coverage to the recent destruction and murder in a predominantly Christian area of Russia, by radical Muslim infiltrators, and their action hasn't anything to do with either the NYC or FL controversies. I guess it's easier to only focus on the anti-Muslim sentiment especially in our country.
by wdh3007 September 9, 2010 4:18 AM EDT
This guy looks evil even when he smiles...
Reply to this comment
See all 13 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook