September 9, 2010 10:03 AM

The Sooner Rahm Leaves, the Better for Obama

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  Ari Berman's new book, Herding Donkeys: The Fight to Rebuild the Democratic Party and Reshape American Politics, will be published in October by Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Chicago Mayor Richard Daley's announcement that he will not seek a seventh term has prompted widespread speculation that White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel will run as Daley's successor. "I'd be shocked if he doesn't run," a senior administration official told the Washington Post.

The sooner Rahm leaves Washington, the better for Barack Obama. His White House is desperately in need of a serious shakeup, especially with Democrats facing a tidal wave of losses in the midterms. Replacing Rahm is the best place to start.

I’ll never quite understand why a transformational candidate who ran under the banner of a new style of politics chose the ultimate old-school inside operator to control his administration. Rahm isn’t solely to blame for diluting Obama’s unique outsider brand, but he’s a major reason why. After all, in the Clinton White House and in Congress, Rahm was often at odds with the very grassroots activists who powered Obama’s presidential campaign.

As head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in ‘06, he famously clashed with party chair Howard Dean and recruited conservative Blue Dog candidates at the expense of legitimate progressive challengers. Rahm brought his corporate centrism to the White House, pushing for a smaller-than-needed stimulus bill, urging Obama not to pursue healthcare reform, watering down the bill when he did and calling progressive activists who wanted to pressure obstructionist Democrats “fucking retarded.” He later apologized to Sarah Palin but not to the Democratic activists he insulted.

Rahm’s alleged biggest asset—his ties to Capitol Hill and intricate knowledge of Beltway politics—paid few dividends for Obama. The president’s legislative agenda has hit a brick wall in the Senate and the dysfunction of the Democratic Congress, which Emanuel has done little to tame, helps explain why voters are set to punish the party in power this November. “If picking the leading practitioner of the dark arts of the capital was a Faustian bargain for Obama in the name of getting things done, why haven’t things got done?” asked Peter Baker of the New York Times in a profile titled “The Limits of Rahmism.” In other words, if you sell your soul, you better get something good for it in return. Instead, Obama is facing the prospect of a Republican Congress and an uphill re-election bid.

No wonder Rahm is so eager to get out of town.  

In a series of articles last spring, Emanuel or those close to him sought to blame others in the Obama White House for the president’s problems. That was cowardly, irresponsible and beside the point. If Emanuel really is the most powerful chief of staff in modern history, then obviously he deserves his share of the blame when things don’t go according to plan. Especially since he devised the plan. 

In just a few years, Rahm’s gone from the architect of the Democratic takeover of the House to a major political liability. So what, exactly, qualifies him to run America’s third largest city? That’s what the Progressive Campaign Change Committee and other critics of Emanuel are asking. “ I will not support Rahm Emanuel in any future election for Congress, Mayor of Chicago, Governor, or other office,” says a petition drafted yesterday by the PCCC. “He sold us out on the public option and is a weak Democrat who caves instead of fighting conservatives and corporate power.”

It’s not too late for Obama to turn his presidency around, reconnect with the supporters who propelled him to the White House, attack the gridlock in Washington and reclaim his ambitious legislative agenda. But to do so, he’ll need fewer Rahm’s in the building.

By Ari Berman
Reprinted with permission from The Nation

Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 19 Comments
by PatriotMike2 September 13, 2010 2:35 PM EDT
Another ultra-rabid left wing nutcase "progressive." Ari seems unable to consider the idea that Rahm's approach has kept Obama's approval ratings out of the teens. Ari, save this drivel for the Worker's Daily.
Reply to this comment
by either1or September 13, 2010 2:30 PM EDT
America. The best politicians money can buy.
You can change your underware
and you can change your tickets,
but you can't change government.
Like it or not, there's no going back to being the mighty industrial giant. Our government and our corporate executives sold us out for their version of the olympic GOLD.
Reply to this comment
by GTR5 September 11, 2010 3:13 PM EDT
The sooner the both leaves, the better.
Reply to this comment
by RatPackSixGun September 10, 2010 10:24 PM EDT
So what the author is saying is that Emmanuel is not far enough left? And that's bad to who?

Mainstream America doesn't want whack-job radical lefty ideology swirling around any more than whack-job radical far right ideology. It's unfortunate that either party still panders to radicalism even if only to win elections.

And in further sad news for the progressive left...Tamany hall does not now nor has ever required the PCCC for anything. If the PCCC is naive enough to tangle with the Chicago machine, then better just save their lottery ticket money for cab fare because their luck has run out.
Reply to this comment
by tsigili September 10, 2010 11:44 AM EDT
I doubt anyone is concerned with making anything better for Obama. We just look forward to seeing him out of office.
Reply to this comment
by shippg September 10, 2010 9:29 AM EDT
I did not know it, but it sounds like Rahm has held the Admin back from making us total Marxists by now! Obama has set the stage in most all other ways. Three cheers for Rahm!
Reply to this comment
by thy-one-king September 9, 2010 9:27 PM EDT
With the media working overtime, helping Obama's ratings.
His approval rating is only 41%, soon to be in the 30's.
Reply to this comment
by j40405 September 9, 2010 6:42 PM EDT
Chicago has issues with Daily anyway. Rahm would be like going from Hell to fires of hell. How could it get any worse for taxpayers of Chicago?
Reply to this comment
by jimmyc1955 September 9, 2010 10:15 PM EDT
In a city that has raised corruption and crude politics to an art form Rahm is a perfect fit. Chicago has had their schools taken over by the state because they were so badly mismanaged, inept, corrupt and bleeding money.

Chicago needs to elect something besides more corrupt Democrats. Try some corrupt republicans for a change of pace!!

I live in Pittsburgh and we have the same problem. Almost 70 years of one party rule and the city has been in receivership. Costs for the city continue to rise at double digits while the population has dropped by 40% in 30 years. That makes zero sense to anybody. But who do people elect?? Democrats - without even thinking about what they are doing.

Chicago deserves Rahm - because they choose not to think.
by dogsoul September 9, 2010 5:45 PM EDT
...as a resident of the great city of Chicago - please.... PLEASE keep this guy away! Daley may have had his issues & certainly some major lapses of judgement - but Chicago is a world class city in large part because of what he was able to get done... Honestly, I see absolutely NOBODY but crooks & idiots lining up for this job. I think it'll come down to which crook or idiot - ugh...
Reply to this comment
by Quantrill13 September 9, 2010 4:20 PM EDT
LOL...Yes, the sooner the Imam, Barry H. Obama leaves the W.H. the better for America. It can't be too soon.
Reply to this comment
See all 19 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook