September 7, 2010 8:11 AM

U.N. Nuke Agency: Iran Hampers Monitoring

(AP)  Updated at 11:58 p.m.

The U.N. atomic agency expressed alarm Monday about Iran's decision to bar some of its inspectors, suggesting that its efforts to monitor the country's nuclear program were suffering as a result.

The unusually blunt International Atomic Energy Agency warning was voiced in a restricted report on Iran made available to The Associated Press that otherwise contained few surprises. It followed Iran's recent decision to strip two experienced inspectors of the right to monitor its nuclear activities after the two reported what they said were undeclared nuclear experiments.

The Islamic Republic says the reporting by the two was inaccurate, but the IAEA stands by the findings. And the 11-page IAEA document issued Monday devoted a special section to the complaint, reflecting the importance attached to it by IAEA chief Yukiya Amano.

Such a section was included in only one previous report, after Iran stripped the right of dozens of inspectors in 2006 and 2007 - most of them in order to show displeasure over recently passed U.N. Security Council sanctions on the Islamic Republic.

Monday's report said that objections by Iran to some experienced inspectors "hampers the inspection process and thereby detracts from the Agency's capability to implement effective and efficient safeguards in Iran."

Diplomats from three countries accredited to the agency echoed the IAEA's concerns in comments to the AP, saying Iran appeared keen to ban seasoned inspectors - particularly those from nuclear weapons countries with special skills that could help detect attempts to make nuclear arms.

And a U.N. official who was a former IAEA inspector in Iran spoke of intense scrutiny while on such missions and the fear among inspectors that they would be banned from returning if they reported something the Iranians did not like.

"If you opened your eyes too much you ran the risk of being de-designated" by the Iranians said the official who - like the diplomats - asked for anonymity because his information was confidential.

He said he agreed with the concerns that Iran was weeding out experts most likely to discover secret programs designed to make weapons.

"The IAEA doesn't teach you about weaponization," he said. "Only experts from weapons countries are good at that kind of thing."

Iran rejected allegations of selective bans and intimidation of IAEA inspectors, with Ali Asghar Soltanieh, Tehran's chief delegate to the agency calling them "absolutely unjustified."

Soltanieh told the AP that the IAEA currently has 150 inspectors able to work in Iran and noted that the report mentioned the country's approval of five additional inspectors.

That, he said, "is a clear indication that we have cooperated with the agency."

The quarterly report, which was being circulated to the IAEA's 35-nation board and to the U.N. Security Council, also confirmed public statements by Iranian officials that the country continues to enrich uranium in contravention of U.N. Security Council demands.

Iran insists it only wants to enrich uranium to create energy. But international concerns are high because enrichment can also create the fissile core of nuclear warheads - low enriched uranium is used as nuclear fuel but the same process can produce high enriched, weapons-grade material.

The report noted that while the scope of enrichment had not significantly increased over the past year, output had been steady, with Iran now accumulating about 2.8 tons of low-enriched material - nearly enough for three nuclear bombs - since its program was revealed seven years ago. That translates to about 15 percent more such material than in May, when the last IAEA report was published.

Separate enrichment for what Iran says will be fuel for its research reactor had produced about 22 kilograms - more than 45 pounds - of 20-percent enriched uranium.

While still substantially less than the 90 percent needed to make weapons, production of 20 percent enriched material is of concern because it can be turned into weapons grade material more quickly than the low enriched uranium turned out by Iran's main enrichment facility.

The report also said that Iran continued to stonewall the agency in its efforts to follow up on U.S. and other intelligence indicating past experiments meant to develop a nuclear weapons program and warned that chances of establishing the accuracy of such information were diminishing.

With Iran refusing to engage on the issue for over two years, "the possible deterioration in the availability of some relevant information increase the urgency of this matter," said the report.

In a separate report, the agency expressed similar concerns about Syria's refusal allow the IAEA to probe U.S. assertions that a facility destroyed three years ago by Israeli warplanes was a secretly built reactor meant to produce plutonium.

"After two years of investigations constrained by Syria's lack of cooperation, it is critical that Syria positively engage with the Agency ... without further delay," said that report.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 26 Comments
by PatriotMike2 September 9, 2010 12:16 PM EDT
Does Iran get to send monitors to watch US nuclear power plants or US nuclear warhead production? Where do you people get off thinking you have the right to monitor Iran's nuclear program? I don't see any peace-loving, turban-wearing Muslim fanatics checking on America's nuclear facilities. So what makes Western countries so ethnocentric that they deem themselves demi-gods when Iran wants to develop nuclear power? So, it's okay for France, China and Russia to develop nuclear power but not Iran?? Aren't all the eco-nutjobs and environmentalists pleased with this non-petroleum based power development?
Reply to this comment
by sing-with-rapture September 9, 2010 12:16 PM EDT
Oh no the Jewish controlled mighty great Satan is on the prowl again...

Nothing you can do American stooges IAEA.

Come and get your Zionist glory you mighty great Satan.

Now you know who you are fighting.
Reply to this comment
by ffoulkes-2009 September 7, 2010 1:01 AM EDT
Isn't this how the run-up to Iraq started?
Reply to this comment
by Brian5013MS September 7, 2010 1:36 AM EDT
ffoulkes-2009
Yes, history may be repeating itself.
by Rlnews September 6, 2010 9:21 PM EDT
I don't understand why the president has not meet with Iran yet. I was expecting him to do this as he promised in the campaign. He said he would talk and fix this relationship.
Reply to this comment
by Brian5013MS September 6, 2010 9:23 PM EDT
RInews
Yes that was a campaign promise.....I remember.
by Brian5013MS September 9, 2010 12:14 PM EDT
RInews
Yes that was a campaign promise.....I remember.
by sgotrl September 6, 2010 6:29 PM EDT
IRAN???!!! Blocking Nuclear Inspectors???!!! REALLY???!!!! Noooooooooooo!
I'm SHOCKED!!!! And this is news WHY exactly????
Reply to this comment
by kcits September 9, 2010 12:14 PM EDT
Because (SHOCK!) the government of the USA is full of crooks that have learned a trick from a magician. They seek to distract you from what they are (not)doing by pointing to what may be happening over in a different part of the world.
by Brian5013MS September 6, 2010 4:01 PM EDT
Nukes to Iran under Obama's watch. Just helping his muslim brothers out.
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 September 6, 2010 4:42 PM EDT
You are black, why aren't 'you' muslim also......
by Brian5013MS September 6, 2010 4:58 PM EDT
ToolMangler1
I am white and darned proud of it. If me and my KKK friends could only find you....
See all 10 Replies
by lucifersshadow September 6, 2010 3:05 PM EDT
When are the UN inspectors going to be allowed into Israel? Isn't this a double standard?
Reply to this comment
by rafaeldrc September 6, 2010 2:55 PM EDT
I wonder if other countries are allowed in Hanford, Lawrence Radiation or Los Alamos, to conduct surveys to determine the extent of our nuclear weapons programs? Are we in compliance, or do other nations just take our word for it? What do we do - better worded - what have we done with our nuclear waste (from power plants) bearing plutonium-239 for all these years?

If one nation possesses nuclear weapons, it gives license to all to do the same in self defense and preservation. It's blatantly hypocritical and obvious, even to an idiot observer, that some nations think they are better than the rest, and so, are exceptions to the rules.

When the first nation possessed and used the first atomic weapon in war, it sent the world into a uncontrolled spiraling arms race and the race continues.
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 September 6, 2010 8:18 PM EDT
Actually, they are!!!!
We and Russia, Britain, France, and all other 'Nuclear Nations' realized near the end of the 'cold war' that there will be "NO" winner in a nuclear war. There will only be the 'dead' and the dying (horribly).. For that reason, we and they know that because of 'MAD' (mutually assured destruction) there is no reason to hide our arsenal (more than 9000 Nukes just in America)...
Anything Iran or pakistan or Alky Ada come up with is worthless for anything but starting "The War to end life on Earth".. That is why 'Theistic' Governments are so dangerous. Islam teaches that a 'Holy war' (jihad) is good for them but not for us. They believe that if they can start a war that forces their God (Allah) to defend them, they will get 72 virgins and sit with him in heaven.....
They won't hesitate to destroy the world because they feel they have "everything to gain and nothing to lose". A mindset like that can only be killed, (because they can't be reasoned with)
by bajajohn1 September 6, 2010 2:22 PM EDT
The Iranian government and its right-wing supporters are the scum of the Earth. Obviously, the sanctions are not fully working or fully implemented. It may take military action to force this Islamic theocratic tyrannical government to comply.
Reply to this comment
by retiredgustav September 6, 2010 3:35 PM EDT
Where is the money and manpower coming from to support such a war. We blew it all on Iraq and Afganistan. We also upset the balance of power in the middle east, something bush II didn't understand but his father did. It won't belong before Iran invades Iraq and thanks to us they won't be able to defend themselves. Saddam was in no way a good guy but he kept every thing in check.
See all 26 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook