Dow
     +6.51
12890.46
+0.05%
|
     +1.99
1351.95
+0.15%
|
     +0.00
14109.41
+0.00
|
     +11.37
2927.23
+0.39%
|
     +0.14
54.30
+0.26%
|
     +0.50
115.18
+0.44%
|
     -0.01
2.00
-0.29%
September 6, 2010 7:53 AM

New Jobs of Future May Leave Many Behind

(AP)  Whenever companies start hiring freely again, job-seekers with specialized skills and education will have plenty of good opportunities. Others will face a choice: Take a job with low pay - or none at all.

Job creation will likely remain weak for months or even years. But once employers do step up hiring, some economists expect job openings to fall mainly into two categories of roughly equal numbers:

- Professional fields with higher pay. Think lawyers, research scientists and software engineers.

- Lower-skill and lower-paying jobs, like home health care aides and store clerks.

And those in between? Their outlook is bleaker. Economists foresee fewer moderately paid factory supervisors, postal workers and office administrators.

That's the sobering message American workers face as they celebrate Labor Day at a time of high unemployment, scant hiring and a widespread loss of job security. Not until 2014 or later is the nation expected to have regained all, or nearly all, the 8.4 million jobs lost to the recession. Millions of lost jobs in real estate, for example, aren't likely to be restored this decade, if ever.

On Friday, the government said the August unemployment rate ticked up to 9.6 percent. Not enough jobs were created to absorb the growing number of people seeking work. The unemployment rate has exceeded 9 percent for 16 months, the longest such stretch in nearly 30 years.

Unemployment Gets Worse; 54,000 Jobs Lost
Jobs Report Helps Stocks Extend September Rally

The crisis poses a threat to President Barack Obama and Democrats in Congress, whose hold on the House and Senate appears to be at increasing risk because of voter discontent.

Even when the job market picks up, many people will be left behind. The threat stems, in part, from the economy's continuing shift from one driven by manufacturing to one fueled by service industries.

Pay for future service-sector jobs will tend to vary from very high to very low. At the same time, the number of middle-income service-sector jobs will shrink, according to government projections. Any job that can be automated or outsourced overseas is likely to continue to decline.

The service sector's growth could also magnify the nation's income inequality, with more people either affluent or financially squeezed. The nation isn't educating enough people for the higher-skilled service-sector jobs of the future, economists warn.

"There will be jobs," says Lawrence Katz, a Harvard economist. "The big question is what they are going to pay, and what kind of lives they will allow people to lead? This will be a big issue for how broad a middle class we are going to have."

On one point there's broad agreement: Of 8 million-plus jobs lost to the recession - in fields like manufacturing, real estate and financial services - many, perhaps most, aren't coming back.

In their place will be jobs in health care, information technology and statistical analysis. Some of the new positions will require complex skills or higher education. Others won't - but they won't pay very much, either.

"Our occupational structure is really becoming bifurcated," says Richard Florida, a professor at University of Toronto. "We're becoming more of a divided nation by the work we do."

By 2018, the government forecasts a net total of 15.3 million new jobs. If that proves true, unemployment would drop far closer to a historical norm of 5 percent.

Nearly all the new jobs will be in the service sector, the Labor Department says. The nation's 78 million baby boomers will need more health care services as they age, for example. Demand for medical jobs will rise. And innovations in high technology and alternative energy are likely to spur growth in occupations that don't yet exist.

Hiring can't come fast enough for the 14.9 million unemployed Americans. Counting part-time employees who would prefer full-time jobs, plus out-of-work people who have stopped looking for jobs, the number of "underemployed" is 26.2 million.

Manufacturing has shed 2 million jobs since the recession began. Construction has lost 1.9 million, financial services 651,000.

But the biggest factor has been the bust in real estate.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 69 Comments
by newerdeal September 9, 2010 12:16 PM EDT
Jobs overall suc.

Having a small business is the way to go.

CL is a great help !

I know several people that have a small business and use CL.

The tax code is a real nightmare !

The govt could do a lot to help small business by trimming it down so

that people that want to start a small business don't have to hire a tax

LAWYER to help try and figure it out.
Reply to this comment
by queenmama4664 September 9, 2010 12:15 PM EDT
Posted a comment two hours ago still not showing up
Reply to this comment
by rightbehind September 9, 2010 12:15 PM EDT
You want your jobs back throw the trade barriers up and republicans out of office. If they want to sell it here it has to be made here or it gets taxed. Those rules work for every nation. Don't allow the neocons to feed on ignorance, fear, and desperation. If the products you buy are not made in countries with economies similar to our own do without.
Reply to this comment
by Myopinion046 September 7, 2010 6:59 PM EDT
I'm unemployed and becoming increasingly left behind myself.
Reply to this comment
by get_involved September 7, 2010 5:58 PM EDT
The Democrats are the party of welfare dwellers, illegal aliens, taxes (never met a tax they didn't like), protectors of the rights of criminals instead of their victims, the lazy, druggies, Wall Street, Union thugs, ambulance chasing lawyers, etc.
Reply to this comment
by tsigili September 7, 2010 12:21 PM EDT
I keep hearing about these new jobs of the future.....but most of them look like pipe dreams to me.

I think we are simply being snowed.
Reply to this comment
by huegorgan September 6, 2010 4:41 PM EDT
Get used to high unemployment. Its here to stay. Jobs are a commodity, subject to the wonderful supply and demand economic model. Our economy produces an inventory that is sold. People have less money so they are buying less. Since they buy less, businesses produce less. Fewer employees are needed to produce the goods and services that people will buy. You don't see or hear of surpluses of manufactured items do you. There simply will not be enough jobs for everyone. We have too many people and don't consume enough. We import too much, don't export anything and manual labor jobs that pulled us through the Depression are today filled by non-Americans because we've been indoctrinated with the notion that you can get rich in America by not having to work. Let your money work for you. It's very clear where that road has taken us.

Get used to double digit unemployment. It will never be lower that it is today. Too many people want jobs but our economy is efficient enough to produce what we need with the people who currently have jobs. And we import everything else. Until more American made products leave our shores for other countries or actually consume a greater amount of American made products, this will be 21st century America.
Reply to this comment
by newerdeal September 6, 2010 3:15 PM EDT
Jobs overall suc.

Having a small business is the way to go.

CL is a great help !

I know several people that have a small business and use CL.

The tax code is a real nightmare !

The govt could do a lot to help small business by trimming it down so

that people that want to start a small business don't have to hire a tax

LAWYER to help try and figure it out.
Reply to this comment
by curse914 September 6, 2010 2:02 PM EDT
by Mortar_29 September 6, 2010 1:38 PM EDT
RightBehind, that is plain stupid. Forgive me for using that word...but there is no other one to describe what you just posted.

The government creates an environment where businesses have to look to ways to get around government regulations and taxes. The U.S. is not business-friendly!

I am shipping off 2 of my jobs for my small business to India the first of the year if the "Bush taxcuts" are allowed to expire. Why?

Because my cost to my family, the cost to my business FORCES me to find a way to pass those costs on. We cannot raise prices enough to cover these increased costs and stay profitable. Soooo....

We have to lay off two Americans and then hire two Indians for half the price...and the savings go to pay for the increases taxes.

Now, if the government had not raised my taxes...the two Americans would still be working.

[][][][][][][][]][][][][][][][]

If not given the opportunity to hire outside our nation or hire illegals, you would either go out of business or hire an American at the "Market adjusted" wage... Or would you really go out of business? Is it a matter of survival or expansion?

I however do agree that there are states, and city governments that are very unfriendly to business, but then again, you choose to live where you choose to live. Deny the city its revenue by removing your body, by all means, but I do not think you have the right to find a "scab" in another country, hide your money in Swiss bank accounts or incorporate in the Camen Islands.

It is not a matter of a fair playing field, you want a entirely different field to play on. If you can not stay in business, it begs the question, do you really have a right to be someones boss?
Reply to this comment
by Mortar_29 September 6, 2010 2:12 PM EDT
Why is the US government any different than me escaping a state or city government? If a government is putting undue burdens on my business, I have to do what I have to do to stay profitable.

You see, let me give you an example of what I am talking about. Let's say that my family makes $500,000 a year off my business. That is our profit. Now, with the taxes increasing, let's say by $100,000 a year. So, that increase would mean that my family would make $400,000 a year if I did nothing different.

Now, not wanting my family to do with less, especially since most of the money that goes to Washington is just handed out to people who did nothing to earn that money...I have to look for a way to get that $100,000 back. How to do that?

Well, there are several ways. But the best of them is to, in this example, layoff two workers making $100,000 each...and hiring two Indian workers for $50,000 each. And viola. I have my $100,000 back. My real income stays the same, my business still has the same number of employees and continues to chug along.

The loss is that two Americans arent working, the government starts giving them handouts to keep them afloat...and they arent paying income taxes.

If the government had not of raised my taxes, those two would still be working and still be paying taxes.

Look, it is MY business. To have the government confiscate more of what I make because they want to illegally hand out "benefits" to people that did nothing to earn those benefits, is wrong...it is immoral...and it is evil. To have my family do with less so the government can do this is not something I am prepared to do. I didnt get into business to do with less. I got into business to make more and do better form my family.

You direct your comments at me, when the real problem is the government. They caused the problem. But I am not going to play their game. The real losers are those middle class employees that the government has caused to be unemployed.
by jd2408 September 6, 2010 4:17 PM EDT
Consumer spending is down. It looks as if that trend will continue. If jobs continue to be lost you may have to sell your product to people in India or China. That is if they allow you to sell in their country.
by jd2408 September 6, 2010 1:42 PM EDT
I have been an Independent for 10 years now. We badly need to do away with these political parties. All of you think about this. We need to all become Independent voters. Demand that those who run for office work for us. If they don't VOTE THEM OUT. It is time that we do not settle for the worst of the worst. We have the control and we can change this corrupt government. Get off the couch, put the remote down and lets get involved. Its time you change your thinking that the political parties are different from one another. They are not. Lets let them know what we want and by God they better come through. We can do this. We can save our own country.
Reply to this comment
by curse914 September 6, 2010 2:05 PM EDT
Ralph Nader stated as such on numerous occasions.
by curse914 September 9, 2010 12:14 PM EDT
Ralph Nader stated as such on numerous occasions.
See all 69 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook