September 7, 2010 1:22 PM

Mideast Peace Talks "Productive"; 2nd Round Set

By
CBSNews
Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton (CBS)

(CBS/AP)  Israeli and Palestinian leaders agreed Thursday to produce a framework for a permanent peace deal and to hold a second round of direct talks this month, a modest achievement reached amid deep skepticism about success at their first such session in two years.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas will meet again on Sept. 14 and 15 in the Middle East, likely at the Egyptian Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheik, with an eye toward forging the outline of a pact that could lead to a final agreement in a year's time.

The United States' special Mideast envoy George Mitchell announced the agreement after several hours of talks between Netanyahu and Abbas at the State Department at which the two leaders pledged to work through the region's deeply ingrained mutual hostility and suspicion to resolve the long-running conflict.

"I believe these two leaders — President Abbas and Prime Minister Netanyahu — are committed to doing what it takes to achieve the right results," Mitchell told reporters. He refused to discuss specifics of what the framework agreement would entail but said it would lay out the "fundamental compromises" needed for a final settlement.

Those compromises will involve the thorniest issues that have dogged the parties for decades: the borders of an eventual Palestinian state, the political status of Jerusalem, the fate of Palestinian refugees and security.

Mitchell said both he and Clinton would be at the next round. Diplomats said it will likely also include other officials from the "Quartet" of Mideast peacemakers — the U.S., the U.N., Russia and the European Union.

Earlier, Clinton had opened the talks with an appeal for the two leaders to overcome a long history of failed attempts to resolve the conflict and make the difficult compromises needed for peace.

"I know the decision to sit at this table was not easy," said Clinton, who with Mitchell has been working to relaunch talks stalled for 20 months. "We understand the suspicion and skepticism that so many feel borne out of years of conflict and frustrated hopes."

"But, by being here today, you each have taken an important step toward freeing your peoples from the shackles of a history we cannot change and moving toward a future of peace and dignity that only you can create," she said.

Flanked by Abbas and Netanyahu at the head of a U-shaped table in the State Department's ornate Benjamin Franklin room, Clinton said the Obama administration was committed to a settlement. She stressed, though, that the heavy lifting must be done by Netanyahu and Abbas with support from the international community, particularly the Arab and Israeli publics.

"We will be an active and sustained partner," she said. "But we cannot and we will not impose a solution. Only you can make the decisions necessary to reach an agreement and secure a peaceful future for the Israeli and Palestinian people."

Netanyahu and Abbas vowed to work together but each outlined concessions required from the other.

"I see in you a partner for peace," Netanyahu told Abbas. "Together we can lead our people to a historic future that can put an end to claims and to conflict. Now this will not be easy. A true peace, a lasting peace would be achieved only with mutual and painful concessions from both sides."

Abbas called on Israel to end Jewish settlements in the West Bank and other areas that the Palestinians want to be part off their own state. Netanyahu insisted that any agreement must assure Israel's security as a Jewish state.

"We do know how hard are the hurdles and obstacles we face during these negotiations — negotiations that within a year should result in an agreement that will bring peace," Abbas said.

Thursday's negotiations are the first since the last effort broke down in December 2008. A spate of violence this week in the West Bank and concerns about Israeli settlement activity have cast low expectations.

Underscoring the talks' fragility, gunmen from the militant Palestinian Hamas movement killed four Israeli residents of a West Bank settlement on Tuesday. And, on Wednesday, hours before the leaders ate dinner at the White House, Hamas gunmen wounded two Israelis as they drove in their car in another part of the West Bank.

Hamas rejected the talks and stepped up its rhetoric as the ceremony in Washington began.

"These talks are not legitimate because the Palestinian people did not give any mandate to Mahmoud Abbas and his team to negotiate on behalf of our people," said Sami Abu Zuhri, a Hamas spokesman. "Therefore, any result and outcome of these talks does not commit us and does not commit our people, it only commits Abbas himself."

Further complicating the situation is the fact that the talks will face their first test within weeks, at the end of September, when the Israeli government's declared slowdown in settlement construction is slated to end.

Palestinians have said that a renewal of settlement construction will torpedo the talks. The Israeli government is divided over the future of the slowdown, and a decision to extend it could split Netanyahu's hawkish coalition. Netanyahu has given no indication so far that it will continue beyond the deadline.

CBS/AP
Add a Comment See all 11 Comments
by sgotrl September 3, 2010 6:43 AM EDT
Middle East Peace Agreement is an oxymoron. Here are others:
Honest Jersey Politician
Hard working Trenton Official
Effecient Philadelphia politics
Efficient Philadelphia/New Jersey Government
Reality Show
Government Intelligence
Milatery Intelligence
Can you think of others?
Reply to this comment
by P0ST1ING_AWAY September 2, 2010 6:55 PM EDT
by Myopinion046 September 2, 2010 4:33 PM EDT
The terrorist attacks will continue regardless and that fact makes all of this a gigantic waste of time. Liberals may call it peace, but I call it a waste of time.
========================================================
Failure to make peace will bring death and destruction to all
parties involved. I do not know what "Liberals" might call you ...
but I call you a MORON.
Reply to this comment
by star_ss433 September 2, 2010 6:48 PM EDT
We can't let Israel down.
Reply to this comment
by star_ss433 September 2, 2010 6:51 PM EDT
(i.e. diplomacy must be pursued vigorously)
by bruner10 September 2, 2010 6:46 PM EDT
Subject: Fw: ISRAEL AND PALESTINE A 3 STATE SOLUTION


ISRAEL AND PALESTINE [A 3 STATE SOLUTION] [UNITED ISRAEL OF PALESTINE] BY DEFINITION LETS EVERYONE FEEL AS PART OF SOLUTION AND COUNTRY PRIDE
Subject: RE: THE U.S. HAS THE ISRAEL/PALESTINE SOLUTION ALL WRONG

BOTH PEOPLES HAVE LIVED ON THAT LAND FOR DOZENS OF CENTURIES, AND WILL BE THERE FOR MORE CENTURIES. I BELIEVE THE ANSWER IS TO GIVE RECOGNITION TO BOTH PEOPLE ON AN EQUAL BASIC, NOT TRY TO USE THE NATIVE INDIAN PROFILE AS THE U.S.HAS FOR THE NATIVE AMERICANS OF THE U.S. LOOK WHERE IT IS AFTER A COUPLE OF HUNDRED YEARS.I BELIEVE THE FIRST THING THAT HAS TO HAPPEN IS TO FORM A FEDERATION COMBINING THE WEST BANK AND ISRAEL TOGETHER WITH A NAME CHANGE THE IS INCLUSIVE TO BOTH ISRAEL AND PALESTIANS.[UNITED ISRAEL OF PALESTINE]. I BELIEVE GIVING BACK THE GOLAN HEIGHTS WITH SYRIA'S RECOGNITION OF ISRAEL CLEARING THAT OFF THE TABLE. NOW YOU HAVE A 4 POINT CONFLICT. ISRAEL, WEST BANK, E. JERUSALEM AND GAZA STRIP.RATHER THAN WORK OUT AN AGREEMENT FOR ALL FOUR PROBLEMS, MAKE IT INCLUSIVE. .i.e. WITH THE ENTIRE AREA A FEDERATION, WEST BANK[RENAMED USING A BIBICAL NAME HISTORICAL TO THE AREA], ISRAEL, GAZA STRIP AND E. JERUSALEM AS THE INDEPENDENT CAPITAL OF
THE FEDERATION.[UNITED ISRAEL OF PALESTINE] WITH EQUAL RIGHTS TO ALL CITIZEN IN ALL STATES AND ENCLAVES ETC.ARMED FORCES INTEGRATED, SUPREME COURT AND A FEDERAL AGENCIES.. EACH STATE WOULD HAVE ITS OWN STATE GOVERNMENT, POLICE AND STATE LAWS, COURTS,LOCAL GOVERNMENT ETC. GAZA IS OVER CROWDED AND NEEDS A RELIEF VALVE, THEREFORE I WOULD SUGGEST WORKING WITH EGYPT AND SECURING ENOUGH LAND FOR THE GAZA STATE TO EXPAND. I WOULD SUGGEST PART OF THE 1983 BOUNDARIES THAT ISRAEL GAVE BACK TO EGYPT. MORE OF LESS DOWN THE COAST TO AL-ARISH AND BACK NE USING NATURAL BOUNDARIES RECONNECTING WITH THE ISRAEL STATE .[AS AN ALTERNATIVE, I WOULD SUGGEST GIVING GAZA BACK TO EGYPT AND QUIT MESSING WITH IT.[ LET EGYPT HANDLE THE SECURITY] . IF NOT, GAZA BECOMES A 3RD STATE IN THE FEDERATION WITH NEW BOUNDARIES TO ITS SOUTH. IT SEEMS GAZA AND THE WEST BANK HAVE A SOMEWHAT DIFFERENT CULTURE, THEREFORE 2 SEPARATE STATES FOR THE PALESTINES.WITHIN THE FEDERATION OF [UNITED ISRAEL OF PALESTINE ] THE STATE OF ISRAEL, THE STATE OF GAZA, THE STATE OF WEST BANK[MEDINAT YISRA'EL], THE STATE OF ISRAEL AND EAST JERUSALEM BECOMING THE INDEPENDENT CAPITAL OF UNITED ISRAEL OF PALESTINE. A HIGH SPEED RAIL AND HIGHWAY SYSTEM WOULD BE BUILT BETWEEN ALL 4 ENTITIES. WITH VERY LIMITED EXITS UNTIL THE NEW FEDERATION SETTLES DOWN IN TO A PEACEFUL COUNTRY. SOME TRUST SHOULD RETURN IMMEDIATELY AND FACTORIES AND JOBS SHOULD BEGIN TO APPEAR IN GAZA AND WEST BANK STATES EVEN IF OTHER COUNTRIES NEED TO INVEST IN THESE STATES. THE PRIME MINISTER WOULD BE ELECTED BY ALL 4 ENTITIES AND EACH STATE WOULD ELECT IS OWN PRESIDENT AND LEGISLATORS AND JUDGES. FEDERAL POLICE AND ARMED FORCES TO BE INTEGRATED.ISRAEL SHOULD MAKE SOME RESTITUTION TO PALESTINIANS FOR LAND AND DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY. THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY COULD BE A BIG HELP ALSO. THE SETTLEMENTS SHOULD NOT BE RAZED . THEY SHOULD BE SOLD TO THE PALESTINE AUTHORTY OR JEWISH CITIZENS CONTINUTE TO LIVE IN THEM. e JERUSALEM WHOULD BE A NON ISSUE BECAUSE IT IS THE CAPITOL OF THE FEDERATION. THE GAZA STATE WOULD BE PART OF THE 1982 BORDERS IF EYGPT AGREES. I BELIEVE THIS PURPOSAL SHOULD BE PUT ON THE TABLE AND GET HAMAS INVOLVED IN THE DISCUSSION.
Reply to this comment
by askagain September 2, 2010 6:31 PM EDT
Lets just suppose that Abbas and Netanyahu reach a peace settkement. Will Hamas ever let it happen? And then there is Hezbollah and Iran and other hostile groups throughout the Middle East. What would all of these groups gain from peace? Their incomes are derived from the turmoil. Will they give that up?
Reply to this comment
by Myopinion046 September 2, 2010 4:33 PM EDT
The terrorist attacks will continue regardless and that fact makes all of this a gigantic waste of time. Liberals may call it peace, but I call it a waste of time.
Reply to this comment
by bankersvox September 2, 2010 3:21 PM EDT
Let's all pray for a lasting peace.
Reply to this comment
by BaselessCritique September 2, 2010 4:38 PM EDT
Dear God, please grant these people wisdom and courage so that they may do what is right and let them see the futility and folly of this grievance.
by Dubai_expat September 2, 2010 2:43 PM EDT
The fact that we're trying this again is more reflective of us than it is of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

If a strategy doesn't work the first 50 times, only a moron would try for 51.

I'd rather see Obama try to pull off a beer summit during Ramadan...
Reply to this comment
by tsigili September 2, 2010 1:49 PM EDT
Just pure, plain, BS.
Reply to this comment
See all 11 Comments
.
Popular Now in World
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook