August 31, 2010 4:49 PM

Airline Incident a "Dry Run" for Terror Plot?

By
CBSNews
(CBS/AP)  Updated 10:11 a.m. ET

Two men arrested in Amsterdam may have been conducting a dry run for a potential terrorist attack, U.S. officials said Tuesday after a cell phone taped to a bottle of medicine and a knife and box cutters were found in one of the men's luggage.

U.S. investigators are pursuing leads in three American cities, according to officials speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the investigation.

The arrests come at a time of heightened alert just days before the ninth anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks in the U.S.

On Sunday, authorities found the suspicious items - a cell phone taped to a medicine bottle, multiple cell phones and watches taped together, and a knife and box cutter - in one of the men's checked luggage. The man and his luggage were headed to separate international destinations, which also raised concerns.

None of the items found on the men or in their luggage violated U.S. security rules. But the items and the men's changing travel itinerary may have been a deliberate test of the U.S. aviation security system to determine what would raise red flags.

Neither man was on any U.S. terror watch lists, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs told CNN television Tuesday.

A U.S. law enforcement official identified the men as Ahmed Mohamed Nasser al-Soofi and Hezam al-Murisi. Al-Soofi is of Yemeni descent, one of the law enforcement officials said.

The pair were arrested Monday Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport after getting off a United Airlines flight from Chicago.

RTL Television News broadcast video footage filmed on a passenger's cell phone of armed law enforcement officers escorting two men off the plane, their hands bound behind their backs. The officers' weapons were holstered and there appeared to be no resistance.

They were being held at the airport for questioning, but neither has been charged with any offense in the Netherlands, said Martijn Boelhouwer, spokesman for the national prosecutor's office. Under Dutch law, the men can be held without charges for up to six days. No charges have been filed against the men in the U.S., a law enforcement official said.

Al-Soofi was questioned as he went through security in Birmingham, Alabama, on his way to Chicago, one of the officials said. He told the Transportation Security Administration authorities he was carrying a lot of cash. Screeners found $7,000 on him, but he was not breaking any law by carrying that much money.

Al-Soofi was supposed to fly from Chicago to Washington Dulles International Airport in Virginia and then on to Dubai, one of the officials said. But when he got to Chicago, he changed his travel plans to take a direct flight to Amsterdam, while his luggage went on to Virginia.

On international flights, passengers and their luggage must be headed toward the same destination, according to U.S. policy.

Al-Murisi also changed his travel plans in Chicago to take a direct flight to Amsterdam, raising suspicion among U.S. officials. Federal Air marshals were on the flight from Chicago to Amsterdam, a law enforcement official said.

Inside the luggage, TSA screeners found seven cell phones, one of them taped to a Pepto-Bismol bottle and three others bound together. Screeners also found several watches wrapped in tape, along with a box cutter and three large knives, reports CBS News chief justice correspondent Bob Orr.

Homeland Security spokeswoman Amy Kudwa said once officials found the suspicious items, they notified the Dutch authorities.

Alabama's director of homeland security, Jim Walker, said al-Soofi had been living in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, and working at a convenience store for about the last three months. He said there was nothing that al Soofi had done in Alabama that brought him to the attention of Alabama officials.

Security at Amsterdam's main airport has been boosted this year, after Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, a Nigerian student, flew from Schiphol airport to Detroit on Christmas Day with explosives in his underwear. Abdulmutallab allegedly tried to detonate the explosives over the United States before being grabbed by passengers and crew.

After the Abdulmutallab security lapse, Schiphol ordered 60 new full body scanners to screen passengers flying to the United States. Those who do not pass through the scanners are patted down.

CBS/AP
Add a Comment See all 35 Comments
by enough-already August 31, 2010 11:47 AM EDT
by rafterman1 August 31, 2010 11:24 AM EDT
"Americans are in charge,...I don't care if 99 percent say they don't want a mosque. That means 1 percent still agree with the Constitution and not the mob."

Last time I checked, the U.S. was a representative democracy (a form of government founded on the principle of elected individuals representing the people, as opposed to autocracy and direct democracy). If so, shouldn't the majority rule? If 70 per cent of the people are opposed to this mosque, why should it be built to satisfy the 1% who want it?
Reply to this comment
by democracy5 August 31, 2010 4:41 PM EDT
Go back and look at your comment, (re: Not a "direct democracy") and then look at the Constitution (1st Amendment--you know, that "stupid" part about freedom of religion"?), then tell me where it says that other people are allowed to outvote your Constitutional rights if you are not otherwise breaking the law?


(Flippin' morons, sheesh!)
by noanobamalemming August 31, 2010 10:46 AM EDT
They should be brought back here and hung outside the proposed mosque in NYC
Reply to this comment
by endurorob_5 August 31, 2010 10:55 AM EDT
They havn't been convicted of anything yet and law enforcement still isn't sure what they were doing.
by AlanW21126p August 31, 2010 11:21 AM EDT
Enduro, yes. Heck, doesnt everyone on every flight tape their cell phone to a liquid bottle and carry box cutters? I mean, heck, the jails are FILLED to the brim with people who do this!
Especially Christians!

(ha ha ha ha)
by liberalornot August 31, 2010 10:43 AM EDT
You notice who the real enemy is. Whenever there is a question about Muslims and terrorists, you immediately get Democrats who come to the defense of world wide terrorism and change the subject to the people they really hate, Christian Conservatives. In every poll at least 70% disapprove of the Muslims plans for ground zero. Democrats tell the 70% to GOSCREEWWYOURSELVESS. November will give America back to Americans so we can fight the real enemy.
Reply to this comment
by endurorob_5 August 31, 2010 10:51 AM EDT
Understand first I am not a dem. That being said, the Muslims who want to build this center have every right to build it. Do you want to deny their constitutional rights just because it offends you?
by LaLuchaSevillana August 31, 2010 3:33 PM EDT
If EVERYONE is not allowed inside, this is NOT TRULY a CHURCH. RELIGIONS include EVERYONE. They are ALL allowed inside the place of worship. Yes, they have a right to build an ALL INCLUSIVE, WELCOMING to ALL CHURCH. But if Jewish people or Christian people are not allowed to enjoy this place IT IS NOT FAIR TO BUILD IT.
See all 4 Replies
by JustYourAverageReader August 31, 2010 10:37 AM EDT
Maybe they were looking for places to build mosques.
Reply to this comment
by liberalornot August 31, 2010 10:36 AM EDT
I would be suspicious of anyone with a name like Mohamed or Hussein. Wait.....???
Reply to this comment
by enough-already August 31, 2010 10:30 AM EDT
by rafterman1 August 31, 2010 9:58 AM EDT
No one defends terrorists. We defend the freedom to religion and freedom to not persecute all based on the actions of a few. A concept lost on conservatives.

I beg to differ- Muslims defend terrorists all the time. It's in their book, they're SUPPOSED to kill "infidels". And if you aren't one of them, you're an infidel.
Reply to this comment
by endurorob_5 August 31, 2010 10:48 AM EDT
Different Muslims interpret the Koran differently. The same way different Christians interpret the Bible differently or the the way different Jews interpret the Torah differently. The Bible and the Torah can also be interpreted to demand the killing of no believers or the stoning of adulterers.
by enough-already August 31, 2010 10:27 AM EDT
by jnostromo August 31, 2010 10:13 AM EDT
Perhaps it is time to start keeping muslims off normal flights and create muslims only flights...

That is an EXCELLENT idea! If the people who own and operate the airlines can just eliminate smoking, surely they can create muslim-only flights. I'm sure the muslims would LOVE it, too!
Reply to this comment
by jeannettelj August 31, 2010 10:26 AM EDT
If this was a "dry run" they were pretty fu***** stupid.
Reply to this comment
by enough-already August 31, 2010 10:23 AM EDT
I've seen this quote many times, and feel it is appropriate here:

Not all Muslims are terrorists,
but almost all terrorists
are Muslims...

If I were running the TSA, NO ONE with a name like Abdul, Mustafa, Husein, etc. would be allowed to fly, no way, no how, no where, period, case closed.
Reply to this comment
by jumkey August 31, 2010 10:29 AM EDT
It's just like not all conservatives are stupid but all stupid people are conservatives.
by lloydbest1 August 31, 2010 11:35 AM EDT
But John Walker Lindh would have been able to fly anywhere? Dude, It ain't the name......

As for "....all terrorists are Muslims", Baruch Goldstein wasn't a Muslim, Tim McVeigh was not a Muslim, The Beltran-Leyvas and Guzmans are not Muslims and Kim Jong Il is definitely not a Muslim.

Anyone of any faith can be a "terrorist" - or a "freedom fighter" - depending on your level of sympathy for his goals. It's not the faith but the character than drives acts of horror. Ideological extremism and religion, like patriotism, is a merely refuge for the scoundrel.
by JustYourAverageReader August 31, 2010 10:18 AM EDT
"The White House said Tuesday the men were not on any U.S. terror watch list."

Because they are not on this list means they are incapable of doing what is suggested.
Reply to this comment
See all 35 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook