August 30, 2010 10:17 AM

Tea Party Making It Harder for GOP: Fla. Dem

By
David Morgan
(CBS)  A Democratic Congresswoman said today the potential victory of Alaska Senate candidate Joe Miller and others supported by Tea Party activists as nominees for the Republican Party will pose a difficulty for the GOP going into the November election.

Miller, who is in a tight contest with the incumbent Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski following Tuesday's Republican primary, currently holds a narrow lead as absentee ballots are being counted.

Appearing on CBS' "Face the Nation," Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., described the GOP primaries, and yesterday's rally in Washington led by conservative commentator Glenn Beck, as a sign that "There is a raging battle going on within the Republican Party for the heart and soul of the Republican Party."

Speaking of Tuesday's primary battle in Alaska, which follows Utah Republicans' choosing a Tea Party-backed candidate over an incumbent Senator, she said it was "hard to know where the Republican Party ends and the Tea Party begins. They've struggled to elect, and actually have not been able to successfully elect, their moderate candidates, the mainstream candidates. The Tea Party candidates seem to be winning because the Tea Party Republicans are energized in their primaries.

"I think a pretty difficult problem for them going into the November elections because they have candidates like Miller who are on the extreme right wing fringe who want to end Medicare as we know it, yank the safety net out from under our senior citizens. I mean, Americans are really going to have a very clear choice set up in November, between moderate Democrats who are centrist, where the country is, and Republicans who are really off on the right wing fringe."

Miss. Gov. Haley Barbour, also appearing on the program, dismissed Wasserman Schultz's suggestion that Republican incumbents fear a Tea Party insurgency.

As a past chairman of the Republican National Committee and current chairman of the Republican Governors Association, Barbour said, "We never took sides in primaries. We did not endorse incumbents over challengers.

"Here's why: The Republicans of Alaska have the right and should pick their nominee. They don't need somebody in Mississippi to tell them who ought to be the Senator of Alaska."

Schieffer asked Barbour if in November the GOP would have a hard time selling Miller and other far-right candidates (such as Rand Paul in Kentucky, who said restaurants should be permitted to discriminate against customers based on race, and Joe Buck in Colorado, who warned building bike paths would make Denver subservient to the United Nations). "It seems to me you do have an exotic crew out there this time," Schieffer said.

Barbour instead suggested that the success of far-right candidates was a response to the Democrats making what he termed "the biggest lurch to the left in policy in American history.

"No Congress, no administration . . . has run this far to the left in such a small period of time," he said. "There is a reaction to that. Those hundreds of thousands or hundred thousand, however many there were on the mall yesterday, were reacting to that. They're very concerned about where our country is being driven by the Democratic majority.

"As far as talking about less money [from Washington], look, my budget this year in Mississippi is 13% less than it was two years ago. I cut spending 9.7% last year. Frankly, nobody much noticed the difference. We were able to continue to provide services. People weren't kicked off Medicaid," Barbour said. "The fact is, the country is going to have to spend less money. If Joe miller was trying to say that in a different way, he is right if what he's saying is our country has got to spend less money. We're been on a spending spree that made drunken sailors have a bad name."

Wasserman Schultz said that the overriding concern of voters will be the economy, which she said has been showing signs of slow improvement. She believes Americans do not want a return to the Bush administration policies that boosted the nation's deficit spending.

"The American people are going to make a choice in November between right wing extreme Republican candidates who want to take us back to where we were when President Bush was in office, backslide toward the Bush era, change Social Security to a privatized program that invests the money in the stock market - where would we have been if we had done that in the last few years? Voucherize Medicare and essentially change our tax policies to one that is again focused on the wealthiest 2% of Americans?"

She also argued against Barbour's take on Democratic policies. "We gave 95% of Americans a tax cut, so I don't know how giving the overwhelming majority of Americans a tax break is a 'lurch to the left.' It's certainly been moderate and centrist and focused on trying to make sure that this economy gets a jump start."

When asked by Schieffer if the Bush era tax cuts for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans should be extended, he replied, "We should not have any tax increases. In an economy like this we don't need to be raising anybody's taxes."

Barbour said the issue for voters is "jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs,"

"If you look at the month before President Obama took office we were bleeding 750,000-plus jobs a month," Wasserman Schultz said. "Fast forward a year and a half later and we are adding about 100,000 a month in the private sector. We've made the auto industry profitable, We've turned things around."

She said voters in November will have a choice, they will choose to move forward and not "backslide toward the Bush era."

Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
  • David Morgan

    David Morgan is a senior editor at CBSNews.com and cbssundaymorning.com.

Add a Comment See all 35 Comments
by P0ST1ING_AWAY September 12, 2010 9:19 AM EDT
FINALLY !!!
Bein' DUMB is cool again.
Thanks, Tea-Baggers !!!
Reply to this comment
by strangegg91 September 9, 2010 12:15 PM EDT
Tea Party members want less tax, no social services, more guns, and fewer government regulations on for-profit businesses. The tea-party members think they include patriots. The truth is that they are bullies that believe the weak and poor should be abandoned and intimidated. They use their guns to scare the less fortunate and disabled. The poor are an easy and safe target. The tea-party rejects a government that wants to protect the poor from the intimidation of mean, dishonest and stronger citizens. Our government was created to protect our citizens from bad business practices that could lose their jobs, pollute our homes, destroy our investments, or force our citizens to buy overpriced goods and services. The tea-party is wrong, because we need to have a stronger government in order to protect the poor and meek from being taken advantage of by the bullies in our society.
Reply to this comment
by rlb12755 August 31, 2010 7:37 PM EDT
"As far as talking about less money [from Washington], look, my budget this year in Mississippi is 13% less than it was two years ago. I cut spending 9.7% last year. Frankly, nobody much noticed the difference. We were able to continue to provide services. People weren't kicked off Medicaid," Barbour said. "The fact is, the country is going to have to spend less money. If Joe miller was trying to say that in a different way, he is right if what he's saying is our country has got to spend less money. We're been on a spending spree that made drunken sailors have a bad name."

Dear Gov. Barbour, I guess the faculty and students and USM wont notice the 29 laid off professors, or any of the programs that were cut. Did you read the front page of the Clarion Ledger today?

http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20100831/NEWS/8310354/USM-cuts-29-from-faculty-in-face-of-budget-shortfall
Reply to this comment
by JennyJen40 August 30, 2010 6:57 PM EDT
trust me I live in Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla. district and I do not know ONE person voting for her. Her times of messing up is OVER!
Reply to this comment
by eddee4911 August 30, 2010 5:50 PM EDT
Former U.S. president George H. W. Bush gave a speech in Tokyo on behalf of Global Crossing, for which he was compensated with $50,000 of Global Crossing stock which he sold in 1999 and 2000 for more than $4.5 million.

Imagine that. It must be nice.
Reply to this comment
by 010sonny August 30, 2010 12:14 PM EDT
All three tycoons are the latest incarnation of what the historian Kim Phillips-Fein labeled ?Invisible Hands? in her prescient 2009 book of that title: those corporate players who have financed the far right ever since the du Pont brothers spawned the American Liberty League in 1934 to bring down F.D.R. You can draw a straight line from the Liberty League?s crusade against the New Deal ?socialism? of Social Security, the Securities and Exchange Commission and child labor laws to the John Birch Society-Barry Goldwater assault on J.F.K. and Medicare to the Koch-Murdoch-backed juggernaut against our ?socialist? president.
Only the fat cats change ? not their methods and not their pet bugaboos (taxes, corporate regulation, organized labor, and government ?handouts? to the poor, unemployed, ill and elderly). Even the sources of their fortunes remain fairly constant. Koch Industries began with oil in the 1930s and now also spews an array of industrial products, from Dixie cups to Lycra, not unlike DuPont?s portfolio of paint and plastics. Sometimes the biological DNA persists as well. The Koch brothers? father, Fred, was among the select group chosen to serve on the Birch Society?s top governing body. In a recorded 1963 speech that survives in a University of Michigan archive, he can be heard warning of ?a takeover? of America in which Communists would ?infiltrate the highest offices of government in the U.S. until the president is a Communist, unknown to the rest of us.? That rant could be delivered as is at any Tea Party rally today.
Frank Price
Now does Miller and these candidates of the flavored TEA republicans start to come into vision and their direction of how their polices will be forming. Again redundant past failed polices that have brought shame and disgrace to our Nation. Observe their followers and those that advocate their support. Similar to those of the archive failures that followed these PAST strategies. Weak minded individuals as now. History repeating as is the republicans proposed polices. No forward leadership. Retarded progressive conservative agendas to produce a greater laggard position in the advancing world.
Reply to this comment
by RobAla August 30, 2010 7:06 AM EDT
I am not a member of any political party, including the Tea Party. I am an independent. However, I did look up the Core Values posted on a Tea Party site:

Core Values
? Fiscal Responsibility
? Constitutionally Limited Government
? Free Markets

Every group has a few wackos, but I can't see how anyone could see these core values as being extremist. If we don't reduce the federal government to a manageable size and elect fiscally responsible members of of the House and Senate - we are in very serious trouble. Close to 20% of the national budget goes to paying just the interest on the national debt. This is fiscal insanity.

As for free markets; this is the strong economic engine that has driven this country to prosperity and jobs for over 200 years. I see nothing wrong with these Core Values.
Reply to this comment
by partyofthefirstpart August 30, 2010 8:30 AM EDT
its not the core values we all share its the lunatic fringe we find laughable and as far as the national debt look no farther than your last republican president who spent 100 billion a year in iraq while giving rich people a tax break while republican senators left unemployed americans without unemployment extensions after they sold out all our jobs overseas for a buck. we finally have a president who could run the texas rangers baseball team into a profit and you hate him because you think he is a muslim while going to see glenn beck to find god. talk about pathetic losers. there is no reward or justification to tear down a president 18 months into his term when you gacve bush 8 years to break our economy except that in reality holy rollers hate anyone not like them or of the same color all that religion b.s. is a cover for internal sabotage as hard working people we elected try to right things and are making progress and if you can't see that and want to follow glenn beck to the promised land then its a free country go ahead but i would be very wary of buying gold at its peak when american businesses are starting to recover. boeing, caterpillar, all the car companies, banks, are all bouncing back now and barack has pulled our troops out of iraq after the idiot who got us in there failed miserably to do anything but lead. i wonder how happy you will be with glenn beck when gold crashes thru the floor and he is still making his 35 mil a year? t
by jimbom121 August 30, 2010 9:27 AM EDT
The core values are the same as most Dems, Repubs and Independents. That is not the issue. The issue is how you achieve those values:

-Do you eliminate all oversight? Do you eliminate social security, medicate, dept of education, FDA, medicare.

The issue is how you get there.
by 010sonny August 30, 2010 6:54 AM EDT
Origin of funding will give us all an understanding of who is paying for these proper ganders and their pitiful followers. How easily the weak minded is manipulated to such an extent that they would choose their own destruction when told so to do. Perhaps this will show people why Tea party and republicans do not want disclosures of the origins of funds as Obama has been trying to bring to the floor. Who are pulling your strings;
The other major sponsor of the Tea Party movement is Dick Armey?s FreedomWorks, which, like Americans for Prosperity, is promoting events in Washington this weekend. Under its original name, Citizens for a Sound Economy, FreedomWorks received $12 million of its own from Koch family foundations. Using tax records, Mayer found that Koch-controlled foundations gave out $196 million from 1998 to 2008, much of it to conservative causes and institutions. That figure doesn?t include $50 million in Koch Industries lobbying and $4.8 million in campaign contributions by its political action committee, putting it first among energy company peers like Exxon Mobil and Chevron. Since tax law permits anonymous personal donations to nonprofit political groups, these figures may understate the case. The Kochs surely match the in-kind donations the Tea Party receives in free promotion 24/7 from Murdoch?s Fox News, where both Beck and Palin are on the payroll.
The New Yorker article stirred up the right, too. Some of Mayer?s blogging detractors unwittingly upheld the premise of her article (titled ?Covert Operations?) by conceding that they have been Koch grantees. None of them found any factual errors in her 10,000 words.
By Fra nk Price N.Y.T.
Beck claims civil right support? These funding?s come from an elitist group that goes back to 1934 and from that time to the present have exploitive agendas for the demise of civil liberties. ??
Tax increase on the rich would only make them put workers to work to make them pay for it.....Any one for a spot of TEA??
Reply to this comment
by 010sonny August 30, 2010 6:26 AM EDT
Origin of funding will give us all an understanding of who is paying for these proper ganders and their pitiful followers. How easily the weak minded is manipulated to such an extent that they would choose their own destruction when told so to do. Perhaps this will show people why Tea party and republicans do not want disclosures of the origins of funds as Obama has been trying to bring to the floor. Who are pulling your strings;
The other major sponsor of the Tea Party movement is Dick Armey?s FreedomWorks, which, like Americans for Prosperity, is promoting events in Washington this weekend. Under its original name, Citizens for a Sound Economy, FreedomWorks received $12 million of its own from Koch family foundations. Using tax records, Mayer found that Koch-controlled foundations gave out $196 million from 1998 to 2008, much of it to conservative causes and institutions. That figure doesn?t include $50 million in Koch Industries lobbying and $4.8 million in campaign contributions by its political action committee, putting it first among energy company peers like Exxon Mobil and Chevron. Since tax law permits anonymous personal donations to nonprofit political groups, these figures may understate the case. The Kochs surely match the in-kind donations the Tea Party receives in free promotion 24/7 from Murdoch?s Fox News, where both Beck and Palin are on the payroll.
The New Yorker article stirred up the right, too. Some of Mayer?s blogging detractors unwittingly upheld the premise of her article (titled ?Covert Operations?) by conceding that they have been Koch grantees. None of them found any factual errors in her 10,000 words.
By Fra nk Price N.Y.T.
Beck claims civil right support? These funding?s come from an elitist group that goes back to 1934 and from that time to the present have exploitive agendas for the demise of civil liberties. ??
Tax increase on the rich would only make them put workers to work to make them pay for it.....Any one for a spot of TEA??
Reply to this comment
by broc816-2009 August 30, 2010 4:00 AM EDT
All these politicians do now is go over and over and over a set script. The American people are sick to death of it. We feel spun so bad that we don't have an ounce of respect in us after reading the party line BS. We need to get rid of both parties. One this is for sure - the Democrats and Republicans will not be the only two parties in the future. They have failed the nation's citizens so deeply that the public will vote them into razor thin margins so that neither has power over the other. In the meantime we are going to figure out how to de-fang both these out-of-control beast.

DesertCactus
www.can-you-hear-us-now.com
Reply to this comment
by RunsWithWolves August 30, 2010 4:17 AM EDT
They are already winning by razor thin margins. One can only wish what you say is true, but both parties have created political rules that make it impossible for a third party to ever become viable on the national level. They would have to vote to weaken themselves which I don't see happening. They thrive on the 'us or them' choice given to Americans. They don't want more competition. As much as they dislike each other, they are in cahootz with one another to keep the current system in place. Why on earth doesn't Congress get rid of the Electoral College??? Nobody likes it and it strips individual people of their votes. No other country on our planet has an electoral college. I wonder why?
See all 35 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook