August 17, 2010 5:02 PM

Alternative Energy: Will U.S. Lead or Follow?

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  Imagine a future in which abundant energy could be ours, simply by harnessing the wind, or capturing sunlight, or tapping into the heat of the Earth itself. Seth Doane explores America's alternative energy hopes and challenges:

In the wake of the CBS News. "It's gonna drive the price up. It's gonna have higher risks, environmental risks." Chu sees the Gulf oil spill as a tragedy, of course, but also as something else."I think it's an opportunity to say, 'Look, let's look long term; where do you want to go? Where do you want to be?'" He sees it as an opportunity."The United States has an opportunity to lead in what I consider to be essentially a new industrial revolution."Innovators and entrepreneurs are already pushing the envelope to come up with the energy of the future. Things like torpedo-shaped machines which collect energy from wave motion; turbines placed on the bottom of New York's East River to harvest the energy in the motion of the current; algae farms which convert the fast-growing plant into diesel and jet fuel."It is absolutely an engine for growth, for job creation, for all these things," says Chu.Asked by Doane if the U.S. isn't too far behind already - behind China, behind India -- Chu was honest but optimistic: "We can catch up. But another five years of stalling, I'm a little bit afraid."Increasingly, China is taking the lead. The vast nation is planning to spend $450 billion to develop alternative energy. But the U.S. was once the pioneer.California's Sonoma Valley is world famous for its vineyards, but beneath the picturesque hills, it's hardly tranquil. There's a huge, natural reservoir of steam trapped deep below the surface. "We're using the heat of the Earth, that's what geo-thermal means, heat of the Earth," explains Mike Rogers, of the Calpine Corporation, which runs "The Geysers" -- the largest complex of geothermal energy plants in the world. In the hills north of San Francisco, wells two miles deep are drilled through bedrock, and 90 miles of pipes weave in and out of the mountains, carrying the natural steam to power turbines on the surface."In terms of size, The Geysers provides enough power for a city about the size of San Francisco," says Rogers.And it's clean energy. Calpine claims their plants emit just one twentieth of the pollution of a coal fired plant.While geothermal plants are best suited to unique regions, there are far more accessible options, including wind."When we first started looking at this site, I mean, it was just basically cotton fields, as far as the eye could see," recalls Patrick Woodson, looking over the tiny, West Texas town of Roscoe, where oil rigs once dotted the landscape. Now, there's a new energy boom."This is the biggest wind farm in the world. It encompasses more than 85,000 acres. It's more than 25 miles from north to south and, geographically, it's bigger than the actual city of Manhattan," boasts Woodson, who is in charge of development for E.ON Energy. There are 627 turbines in their wind farm, each one can power between 300 and 650 homes. From a distance, it's hard to appreciate how enormous the turbines are; some 40 stories high with blades that span nearly the length of a football field.The United States is the world leader in wind energy, and while it's still relatively expensive to produce, with new technology, costs are coming down."We're just tapping into the very beginnings of potential with wind," says Woodson. "Texas gets about seven percent of its energy from wind power. Nationally, we're less than three percent.""We need a national policy... to really give us some direction on where we're gonna go," he adds.But agreeing on a national policy won't be easy. Not everyone likes the idea of giant windmills or solar arrays dominating the horizon. Geothermal plants can cause minor earthquakes, and the coal and petroleum lobbies spend millions to protect the status quo."You know, we've passed three energy bills in the last ten years and none of them have done a damn thing to get us a brighter energy future," laments Fred Krupp. "They're all little steps, baby steps. They're all presents for the lobbyists."Krupp heads the Environmental Defense Fund. He hopes this autumn, the Senate will once again consider a landmark climate and energy bill which could finally give alternative energy a fighting chance by setting tough pollution limits on power-plants.

"That simple requirement, that pollution would come down dramatically over the years, would be the biggest boost for renewable energy," says Krupp, "because it creates a level playing field that says, 'however you produce electricity, we're gonna require you to produce it without dumping the smut into the sky.'"

That level playing field is price: forcing coal producers to clean up their plants will drive up costs which, in turn, will bring alternative energy prices more in line.

The bill is a priority for President Obama, who's visited a solar station in Florida, a hi-tech battery facility in Michigan, and recently taken a spin in a new car that has a lot riding on it.

GM's Chevrolet Volt is the first mass-market electric car produced in the United States. Andrew Farah is chief engineer of the Volt, which hits showrooms in November. He hopes this car will finally take the edge off America's appetite for oil.

GM designed the Volt to go 40 miles on a single charge, based on government statistics that show nearly 80 percent of Americans drive fewer than 40 miles per day, and when the battery runs out, it automatically switches to gasoline.

"If you drive less than 40 miles a day, you get unlimited, or infinite miles per gallon," explains Farah.

So what does he say to skeptics who think they've heard of this electric car business before, and it never took off?

"What I'd say, is you've heard about the electric car that was only able to do a very limited thing," he answers. "With the Volt, you're going to hear about an electric car that can be everything you're used to."

Whether it's electric cars, wind, or solar energy - while Washington debates, inventors, and investors, wait for a signal this country is finally getting serious about clean, renewable energy.

For more information:
U.S. Dept of Energy
Calpine
Old Faithful Geyser of California
E.ON U.S.
Environmental Defense Fund
Chevrolet Volt
Pelamis Wave Power
Verdant Power
Sapphire Energy, Inc.

Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 44 Comments
by capeless777 August 19, 2010 11:46 PM EDT
The Solar Roadways project is a solution for weaning ourselves off of fossil fuels entirely with an infrastructure that our governments are already looking for: an intelligent highway system combined with a Smart Grid.

We've entered our project in the Ecomagination Challenge, which could provide up to $200M in funding for the next big idea in renewable energy and Smart Grid technology. We could really use your votes to get the funding that we need to make the Solar Roadways project a reality.

http://www.solarroadways.com/vote.shtml

Thank you very much!
Reply to this comment
by shierp August 19, 2010 12:11 PM EDT
All of the alternative energy is coming. It will just be coming from China and other countries. Just like the Volt is going to go to a limited few but there are already foreign manufacturer electric cars that will be much cheaper and have more range. Anything American is just too expensive for the normal household. look at that "Bloom box" story. They want one in every yard for $3,000 but I bet it would be closer to $30,000. Normal folks just can't afford it. What has been offered so far in America has been only accessible to the wealthy.
Reply to this comment
by thanksgreed August 19, 2010 12:10 PM EDT
We won't do it because those who rape their own country, like "askagain" have bought Congress. New ideas will not be permitted as they might decrease their bottom line.
Reply to this comment
by jbedon August 17, 2010 2:14 PM EDT
Wait...I thought GM produced the EV in the late-90's, early 2000's, and then the Californian gov't apparently killed it? Can anyone please clarify what they're trying to do saying that the Volt is the first electric car out there for the US market?
Reply to this comment
by hljmesa August 30, 2010 1:01 AM EDT
Check out this web site: http://www.whokilledtheelectriccar.com/
And watch the movie, then you will understand what happened.
by JJButts August 16, 2010 2:25 PM EDT
ticobird, notwithstanding you ad hominem attack, I took my PhD in physics and was a practicing scientist for 36 years with many peer reviewed publications.
Reply to this comment
by prohb August 16, 2010 7:43 AM EDT
With your kind of attitude JJButts, we would never have figured out how to cure diseases or flown to the moon.
And the only nonsense here is your analysis - especially your first paragraph. Carbon is a heat trapping substance, and among other elements and compounds, is causing the earth to warm at the present times. We are releasing this carbon, that hasn't been there for millions of years, to the atmosphere thru our use of fossil fuels. And contrary to what you say, there was more carbon in the atmosphere when the earth was warmer and moister (Read the excellent NY Times piece on how oil was formed: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/03/science/03oil.html?_r=1
This EXTRA carbon was sequestered into the abundant plant material and diatoms of the time over millions of years and we are releasing this EXTRA carbon over a mere few hundred years.
And your "vast reserves" argument......Most experts say we are already running out of the easily extracted oil (more oil spills anyone??). And the Arctic Reserve - 6 months supply and one cent decrease in our oil prices IF we get it and not China.
It's sad that you have put your blinders up and only take in data to support your world view.
Reply to this comment
by maintain_integrity August 19, 2010 12:11 PM EDT
"the only nonsense here is your analysis - especially your first paragraph."
***************************



Exactly!

But it's easy to see that first paragraph was copied and pasted from another anti-renewable energy site, just so jj could show us all how the anti-science crowd refuses to 'think' for themselves, and fight the inevitability of the huge growth in the renewable energy industry.

Just another mouthpiece for the usual disinformation campaign by the dirty fossil fuel industry, worried about their record profits and the monopoly they have enjoyed over America's energy policy during the 20th century!
by JJButts August 16, 2010 12:35 AM EDT
This article just repeats the tired old nonsense which has been going around for years.

The notion that fossil fuels are not ?clean? energy is simply false. Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant; it is an absolutely essential component of the atmosphere. It makes plants grow and if it were not in the atmosphere life on earth would cease to exist. And, CO2 does not cause global warming; there have been times in the past when the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere was twenty times what it is today but the earth?s temperature was the same as today. The earth may be warming (I personally hope so ? we would be better off in a slightly warmer world) but if so, it has very little to do with the currently increasing CO2 levels in the atmosphere. So the argument that we must go to ?alternative energy sources? because fossil fuels are not ?clean? is invalid.


The argument that we should be energy independent and not depend on terrorist states for oil is a good one but it does not mean that we need to develop alternative energy sources. We have vast reserves of oil and natural gas in this country which should be exploited but which our government is currently preventing for no good reason. Our current reserves of oil, natural gas, and coal could supply our energy needs for at least 100 years. In the meantime nuclear power plants can be gradually put in place. Also, in 100 years we may not need nearly as much energy as today due to technology developments (just think of what has happened in the last 100 years).

Concerning electric cars ? they make no sense whatsoever without expanding our nuclear reactor capability. More fossil fuel is consumed in generating the electricity to charge the batteries than would have been consumed in an equivalent-sized gasoline powered car.
Reply to this comment
by ticobird August 16, 2010 7:10 AM EDT
JJButts,

You write well but you are not a scientist and have at best a high schoolers understanding of science, the earths's natural resources, world politics and a definite simplistic view of the challenges associated with plugin hybrid vehicles.
by vsmit August 15, 2010 9:14 PM EDT
As long as our master plan is to have the government lead "green", we will fail. Just look at the federal deficit, social security and medicare. The government is poor at running most anything.
We also will fail by not embracing all options, including nuclear. When you have the "not in my back yard" attitude, options quickly disappear. We, as a nation, lack the resolve to do anything, we just sit back, bash options (not in my back yard) and wait for the government to set up yet another program doomed to collapse under its own weight.
Reply to this comment
by thanksgreed August 15, 2010 9:20 PM EDT
but alas, if this were REALLY a capitalistic society, we would not use the government to progress. Unfortunately, our "capitalist" no longer invest, but gamble and will not gamble if it might cost.
by thanksgreed August 15, 2010 8:57 PM EDT
We won't do it because those who rape their own country, like "askagain" have bought Congress. New ideas will not be permitted as they might decrease their bottom line.
Reply to this comment
by prohb August 15, 2010 7:43 PM EDT
The only way we are going to do this is if we unite as a country for an alternative energy future. It will take hard work and shared sacrifice. We must all share in this vision. Our grandparents did it for WW2 and we can do it for the present war against the fossil fuels that control our lives. It's not a war of guns and bombs but one of infrastructure and consumption behavior. We "vote" and join the fight by the products we buy and how much we use them.
For the job situation, while the infrastructure is changing, we have to, as communities, come together and help our neighbors (check out "time-banking" online). Also, towns could invest in energy projects that fit their local area, where people out of work could be retrained to run them (check out the idea of small investments online like the "kiva" loans).
Each area of the country would invest in what is suitable for them. Some areas are better for geothermal, others for wind, others for solar, wave "power" for those near the coast, sustainable and efficient wood energy for others (the carbon here is not new carbon like fossil fuels) and any combinations applicable. We need the leadership and "sustainable enthusiasm" from our government leaders to help facilitate (notice I don't say control) this and make it possible by helping the states and towns with information and resources. Each state or town would make their own decisions on how to accomplish this.
We are all in this together.
Let's be a resilient people again.
Let's be Americans again.
Reply to this comment
See all 44 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook