August 13, 2010 8:40 PM

Surveillance Cameras and the Right to Privacy

By
Erin Moriarty
(CBS)  In its "Where America Stands" series, CBS News is looking at a broad spectrum of issues facing this country in the new decade.



Most law enforcement experts will tell you nothing beats having cops on the beat when it comes to fighting crime. Police officers can't be everywhere. Now, they don't have to be - thanks to some high-tech help.

Every minute a car is stolen. Every day across the country 44 people are murdered and nearly 3,800 are victims of violent crimes. While crime usually rises during a recession, that's not the case now. Nationwide, violent crimes are down 5.5 percent. Crimes like murder declined 7.2 percent, robbery 8.1 percent, motor vehicle theft down 17.2 percent.

Law enforcement officials say the increased use of high-tech tools to fight crime is a big reason why.

From the operations center of the Office of Emergency Communications in Chicago "48 Hours" correspondent Erin Moriarty reports officials keep watch over the 232 square mile urban area with a massive network of cameras, creating a virtual eye in the sky. Officials refuse to give actual figures, but some estimate the number of publicly and privately owned cameras targeting Chicago to be around 15,000.

Nick Benton, a Chicago paramedic assigned to the operation center, said they can "Zoom in up to 32 times optically, and up to 184 times digitally."

"We can get license plates. I'm not going to pull up a specific license plate," he added. "But yes, you can actually zoom in and very clearly see their license plate."

Tell Us What You Think Send us an e-mail.

City officials were keeping a close eye on crowds gathering for a Tea Party protest.

Can you pick out faces of those at the demonstration?

"We are very strict on how we use the cameras," Benton said. "We never zoom in on windows when they are open. We will never look into buildings and we are actually very careful if we zoom in on people's faces specifically."

Jim Harper of the Cato Institutesays the problem with surveillance cameras and technology is they have a spotty record of preventing crime. Instead, he says they are an invasion of privacy.

People in most cities are probably captured on cameras daily, if not multiple times a day," Harper said. "As these cameras network together, and they as they are better capable at recognizing individual faces, people will realize just how they are being watched."

Harper says the danger is when videos are released of individuals who are not actually involved in a crime. Remember the nationally broadcast video of a man changing his shirt - because officials first believed he could be the Times Square bomber.

CBS Reports: Where America Stands

"There are no absolutes here," Harper said. "The cameras are helpful in some instances - harmful in other instances if they've led us all astray."

But there is likely to be a demand for even more surveillance cameras. Officials say the solution then is ever more sophisticated equipment that catches criminals in the act.

911 operators in Chicago can turn on any surveillance camera within 150 feet of an emergency call. So when an operator received a call that a Salvation Army bell ringer was helping himself to the collection bucket - the cops were called in.

The brain of the video surveillance system is computer software called "analytics." It allows operators to set up a virtual perimeter around buildings. Once someone or something crosses a virtual line the computer sends an alert to an official on-duty.

Chicago Police commander John Lewin runs the information services department. He points to mobile cameras called PODS (police operation devices) which allows officers to watch high crime neighborhoods in real time. Using these PODS, police were able to catch one man as he attempted to burglarize a home.

Moriarty asked, "Are you concerned that officers will rely too much on technology and not do the regular foot work?"

"No," Lewin replied. "As with any technology, none of these things are the magic bullet - pardon the pun. They are just going to be another tool in the toolbox to help officers do their jobs."

The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches. Americans will soon have to decide when this goes too far.

Where America Stands Links
American Debt Threatens Status as World Power
Stem Cell Cures Any Closer?
How Americans can Get Rich by Going Green
Credit Card Nation: Addicted to Debt

Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 52 Comments
by gilsand December 9, 2011 11:33 AM EST
A waist of money, I know of many cases where spray paint made them useless. Same with the Red Light cameras.
Reply to this comment
by barbaram99 May 4, 2011 3:39 PM EDT
I have read 1984. At the time the book made no sense to me and the reason I could not understand what the book was about. I read the book in the 70s on talking books. I do use a computer. I am aware that are cameras every where today. The young can't believe there was a day we did not have cameras every where. We did not.They are in the bank,store,the bus ye name it.It does not stop crime. I hate when they go thru our things. Tool yep your post hits the nail on the head.
I know cops have notebook pcs in their cars. So does most people. Yet I don't keep files on others-I see no need. As blind person I use computer. It is a helpful tool.
Reply to this comment
by brian_norwood March 23, 2011 9:49 AM EDT
But, according to Clarence Thomas, the protection afforded the right to privacy under the 9th Amendment is an "invention."

In other words, in this Supreme Court Justice's opinion, the "right to privacy" does not exist, as it is not explicitly defined in the Constitution.

I'm sure most teabaggers would be suprised to know this.
Reply to this comment
by hhandyman November 18, 2010 4:47 AM EST
in the airport scans Why dont they use the banned sony infrared cameras they show just as much as the x ray units and use body heat for the pictures the camera was hevily reported on before 911 during the Bush years ... http://sonyxray.com/xray_cameras.htm this would eliminate the xray danger of radiation since it uses the heat signature of the body to show below cloth. its just as invasive but not the health hazzard sited by the airport workers it just makes sence.
Reply to this comment
by raozi November 17, 2010 5:21 PM EST
these camaras you R talking about also have heat moving sensors and microwage technology to enter any home or office or you name it, say bye bye ...to your privacy and your health as well.
these camaras and survillance equipment, the US goverment says is to combat crime and crooks and terrorists in the US and abroad and you find these camaras everywhere even in paceful COSTA RICA where I live...and of course they already captured Osama Bin Laden and his hidden place.....this camaras and survillance have nothing to do with spying on ordinary peoples......LOL
Reply to this comment
by jmichael07 November 6, 2010 7:18 PM EDT
Up here in space
I'm looking down on you
My lasers trace
Everything you do
You think you've private lives
Think nothing of the kind
There is no true escape
I'm watching all the time...
Always in focus
You can't feel my stare
I zoom into you
But you don't know I'm there...
I take a pride in probing all your secret moves
My tearless retina takes pictures that can prove
I'm made of metal
My circuits gleam
I am perpetual
I keep the country clean...

-Electric Eye lyrics Judas Priest
Reply to this comment
by D.K.Milgrim-Heath October 5, 2010 8:17 PM EDT
Surveillance Cameras and the Right to Privacy
By D.K. Milgrim-Heath?2010
Surveillance cameras and the right to privacy-
No Facebook, Twitter, Digg or Tweet for me.
If surveillance cameras happen what happens towards every American right?
Everything will be known about us all morning, noon and night.
If our privacies do go down the tubes all the way down-
As Americans we?ll be singing the blues everywhere all over town.
Of course some reasons for monitoring I do understand-
If there are any terrorists hidden in our land.
What freedoms of speech left will we still get?
Since everything might be really monitored yet.
Reply to this comment
by artsPR September 16, 2010 2:12 PM EDT
Facebook shares similar privacy risks, and I don't hear anyone complaining-everyone uses facebook..it's just a matter of knowing that you are innocent and having nothing to hide this will protect your privavcy the most.
Reply to this comment
by presclayiii August 20, 2010 5:17 AM EDT
blocking of my signal
Reply to this comment
by ucnthndlthetruth August 18, 2010 7:06 PM EDT
while your ( out in public ) you dont have the right to privacy, the right to privacy only applies to when your in your home. Not only that but if you are not wanting camera's out in public to see what your doing, then you should'nt be doing it in the first place. Myself personally I have nothing to hide for I am a law abiding citizen.
Reply to this comment
by mecanik-2009 August 27, 2010 10:02 PM EDT
If you have nothing to hide then you have no dignity.
See all 52 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook