August 3, 2010 4:51 PM

Time to Start Demanding Answers From Pakistan

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  Jere Van Dyk is the author of CAPTIVE: My Time As A Prisoner of the Taliban.

From December 2006 until February 2008, I traveled, off and on, along both sides of the Afghan - Pakistani border.

The Wikileaks disclosures are further confirmation that what the Taliban told me is true; that Pakistan is working against the U.S. in Afghanistan. But there is more to this story.

In December 2007, I met at night with an insurgent leader in Chitral, Pakistan. He had been fighting across the border in Kunar, Afghanistan but got sick and had to return to Chitral. "We have camps here and they give us treatment." I asked who "they" were. "Elders, government people, the ISI, the estekhbarat" (intelligence agency).

He was the leader of 40 men. He told me they received $2,000 for every bomb they planted, $2,000 for every Afghan army soldier they killed, $10,000 for every American soldier they killed and $20,000 to the family of suicide bombers.

Pakistan has said for years that it has 90,000 soldiers along the border. A U.S. military expert wrote in the New York Times on March 23 of 821 Pakistani military posts along the border. Where are these outposts? I saw U.S. soldiers everywhere in Afghanistan along the border. I never saw any Pakistani soldiers in the tribal areas, except a few, mostly ISI officials, in civilian clothes, carrying rifles, or the paramilitary Frontier Scouts, at official border crossings.

At Ducalam, a border crossing near Nuristan, with a small shed and a steel bar across the road, a tribal chief said that Pakistani soldiers came to help the Taliban. "Then why are the Taliban killing so many people in Pakistan?" I asked. He smiled.

"Pakistan is killing those people to show how bad things are to get money from America. Pakistan supported us against the Russians. Now it works with the Taliban and al-Qaeda to get America out of this region."

On February 11, 2008, Tariq Uzizuddin, Pakistani ambassador to Afghanistan was kidnapped in the tribal areas. "It's all a drama," Afghans said, even on television. It was the strange game of the ISI, a way for Pakistan to show the U.S. how dangerous it was, all to get more money

In February 2008, I was captured by the Taliban in the tribal areas. I was trying to reach Jalaladin Haqqani and Gulbadeen Hekmatyar, two insurgent leaders, former mujahideen I knew from the 1980s. "The Taliban patrol the border for the Pakistani army," said one of my jailors. How could he prove this? "We found you, didn't we," he responded. "Musharraf is smart and Bush is stupid. Pakistan defeated the Russians in Afghanistan and now it will defeat the Americans." He later told me, just as the Wikileaks documents state, that former ISI head, Ahmed Gul, was involved with the Taliban. He mentioned the names of other well-known former Pakistani army officers.

On June 27, CIA director, Leon Panetta, told ABC News, as Bush Administration officials also said, "the terrain of the tribal areas is probably the most difficult in the world." This is false. The Andes and the Himalayas are far more difficult. I hiked through the tribal areas, through forests and grassland, along dry river beds, dusty tracks, open, rocky terrain and up winding goat trials higher into Afghanistan and back in the 1980s, and again in 2007 and 2008.

Panetta said that bin Laden is hiding along the border. Based upon my reporting, interviews with common Afghans, tribal leaders and the Taliban, from Kunar and Chitral in the north to Paktia and Kurram Agency in the south, living in villages, my knowledge of Pashtun culture, the deadly competition among tribal leaders, even cousins, for land, money and power, how outsiders, even from the same ethnic group, stood out, my experiences as a prisoner and knowing some of what my captors had to go through to hide me, their fear of being exposed, and the power of Pakistani political agents, have convinced me that bin Laden is not hiding along the border. The Taliban told me that he was being kept by the ISI. The Taliban were being used regionally, al-Qaeda was international.

The United States is giving Pakistan over one billion dollars in year. It is very probable that Pakistan is using some of this U.S. taxpayer money to kill U.S. soldiers and Marines in Afghanistan. How can this be? President Obama must demand that Pakistan stop backing the Taliban and truly explain our policy toward that country.






By Jere Van Dyk:
Special to CBSNews.com

Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 11 Comments
by wasadem1 August 5, 2010 11:33 PM EDT
Is it possible that the US is funding both sides of the war? That couldn't be...could it?
Reply to this comment
by mikelpond August 5, 2010 4:04 PM EDT
Answers? I think we know what the answers are: people in the Middle-east are happy being ruled by dictators and theocracies. that's no slander, it's just true.
Reply to this comment
by cyberus-2009 August 4, 2010 1:17 PM EDT
Its just good business for these countries ... if the various radical groups quit planting bombs and killing people then there is no reason for the US to send so much money, so they re-invest some of the cash to keep the $$$ coming.
Reply to this comment
by treshuebos August 4, 2010 10:24 AM EDT
One doesn't have to be a republican or a democrat to realize that it's utterly stupid to send billions of our dollars overseas to ANY OTHER COUNTRY. The President and congress complains about money and the economy, however nobody seems to want to suggest ceasing the flow of cash overseas.. Why is that? Who are our representatives really working for?
Reply to this comment
by jueni August 4, 2010 9:02 AM EDT
Good intelligence can never rely on money, stop the wastage, don't be afraid of Pakistan's political collapse, secure the pakistani nukes (even consider destroying them if need be), use other regional bases (so that Pakistanis realize they're not indispendsable), painstakingly seek,build and rely on FEW BUT COMMITED local operatives, on the ground -- and accept tradeoffs...please stop this technology reliance crap.
Reply to this comment
by lilbear925 August 3, 2010 11:05 PM EDT
Stop funding Pakistan. The only thing we should be sending them is a handfull of unmanned drones overhead to blow terrorists to their final destination.
Reply to this comment
by DidHeSayThat August 3, 2010 10:45 PM EDT
Stop funding our enemies, and quite frankly stop funding our friends.

Welfare is welfare no matter who receives the money.
Reply to this comment
by hologram5 August 4, 2010 12:51 PM EDT
I couldn't have said this better myself. 600mil to Isreal plus what we send to this rathole, no more I say. Let's take care of our own before we push our reality on others.
by sunilsrinivasan August 3, 2010 6:12 PM EDT
Musharaf Smart and Bush stupid....that says it all...Pakistan is squeezing and sucking American blood....Taliban is not the enemy....Pakistan is....Obama wake up...don't follow Bush.
Reply to this comment
by tsigili August 3, 2010 4:44 PM EDT
The US just throws money at other countries, in an attempt to BUY friends.

That does not, and will not work. It simply wastes money, which we can ill afford.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti August 3, 2010 4:12 PM EDT
Well, ALL of our aid to Israel ends up in the hands of right wing terrorists. They use the money for running their programs of genocide and apartheid. Add running a Warsaw Ghetto in Gaza.
Reply to this comment
See all 11 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook