July 29, 2010 3:40 PM

Rangel Says No Plea Deal Yet to Ethics Charges

By
CBSNews
(CBS/AP)  Veteran New York Rep. Charles Rangel said Thursday there's no deal yet to settle his ethics case and avoid an election-season trial on charges of violating House rules.

Shortly before a special panel was scheduled to meet, Rangel told reporters outside his office, "Until someone tells me there's a deal, there isn't."

Rangel's comments came after Harlem friends of the lawmaker told WCBS in New York that Rangel reportedly cut a deal to admit to ethical wrongdoing and avoid a potentially humiliating public trial.

Eight House lawmakers who will determine the former Ways and Means chairman's guilt or innocence put off the start of their meeting due to House votes. Democrats, fearful about the impact on their re-election prospects, will get their first look at the allegations at the session.

In the frantic hours leading up to the meeting, Rangel's lawyer, Leslie Kiernan, talked to attorneys for the panel about how to avoid a trial for the 40-year veteran. That could only happen if Rangel negotiates a plea bargain, admitting to substantial violations, or resigns.

Punishment could range from a report criticizing his conduct to a reprimand or censure by the House, or a vote to expel him — which is highly unlikely. Any agreement would have to be approved by Rangel and ethics committee members.

"Sixty years ago I survived a Chinese attack in North Korea and as a result I haven't had a bad day since," Rangel told reporters. "But today I have to reassess that statement."

Less than two hours before the panel convened, Speaker Nancy Pelosi was asked if she was worried about the potential election-year fallout to Democrats.

"The chips will have to fall where they may politically," she said. Pursuing ethics cases against House members was "a serious responsibility that we have," she added.

"I think everyone is looking forward to getting all the facts out in the open and people will have to react once we know what we're dealing with," said Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Ill.

Rangel is tied for fourth in House seniority. He's still vigorous at 80 years old. He had substantial influence as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, which handles taxes, trade, portions of health care, Medicare and Social Security.

Rangel stepped down from that post in March after the ethics committee criticized him in a separate case, saying he should have known that corporate money paid for two trips to Caribbean conferences.

The four Democrats and four Republicans acting as judges are holding their organizational meeting for an ethics trial that many Democrats hope will go away.

Rangel has repeatedly said he looked forward to a public discussion of the allegations. A four-member investigating panel, with separate members from the judging subcommittee, brought the charges after a two-year investigation.

The investigators looked at Rangel's misuse of his office for fundraising, failure to disclose income, belated payment of taxes and possible help with a tax shelter for a company whose chief executive was a major donor.

The 42-member Congressional Black Caucus has warned Democrats against a rush to judgment, and any lawmaker with a significant African-American constituency must consider whether it's worth asking Rangel to quit.

However, some Democratic House members in close races may think it's more important to distance themselves from Rangel. They don't want to have to answer negative Republican ads about Pelosi's promise to wipe Congress clean of ethical misdeeds.

At least three Democrats didn't wait to hear the charges.

Rep. Betty Sutton of Ohio, a second-term lawmaker who received 65 percent of the vote two years ago, said Rangel needs to resign to preserve the public's trust in Congress.

Rep. Walt Minnick of Idaho, a freshman who got 51 percent of the vote last time, called for resignation if the charges are proven.

If a trial is held, it probably would begin in September. Congress adjourns for its August recess after this week.

"The focus right now is let's get out of here," said Rep. William Delahunt, D-Mass.

Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick, D-Ariz., told CBS News' Jan Crawford that she is calling for Rangel to resign.

"I think as members of Congress we have duty to hold each other to a high standard," she said. "I'm not happy with what's been discovered by the Ethics Committee and I think he should step down."



CBS/AP
Add a Comment
by LIBERALS-lie July 29, 2010 4:54 PM EDT
scream racism like Sherrod
Reply to this comment
by cleric60 July 29, 2010 4:49 PM EDT
If the lawmakers on the committee --- which includes an equal number of Democrats and Republicans -- find Rangel guilty, punishment could range from a report criticizing his conduct to a reprimand or censure by the House to a vote to expel him.
WHY--He didn't know what ethics were all about. What are ethics, while working for the federal government. There are no rights or wrongs...it depends of the situation, doesn't it????
Come on now...he didn't "hurt" anyone.
I bet he will get on a poor report card as his punishment by his fellow Democrats/Socialist. As we all know that this is based on racism--because he is black.
Reply to this comment
by thy-only_king July 29, 2010 2:46 PM EDT
Rangel, Typical Democrat.
Reply to this comment
by Quantrill13 July 29, 2010 2:08 PM EDT
When are you liberal Marxist's going to stop blaming Geroge Bush for everything. NObama is almost into his second year already. Obama is not the Jesus you think he is. And as for Rangel....black or white, yellow or pink, any other person would be doing jail time by now!
Reply to this comment
by charles12346 July 29, 2010 2:08 PM EDT
Like they say, "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely". With crooks like this entrenched in Wa DC why does the far left like Woody Allen and others want Obama to become a dictator for life? Hollywood and the far left will be the first ones hung in the streets when they express any opposition to Obama or his policies once he has abolished the Constitution. (We all realize how close we are to this happening at this moment!) Vote in November and get rid of these criminals. (Oops, I forgot, Obama is trying to abolish the elections in November).
Reply to this comment
by erichsh July 29, 2010 2:02 PM EDT
He cut the deal.

You won't hear a peep from Pelosi about "draining the swamp". CBS and the rest of the media will briefly mention the deal in the context of "sparing the Democratic party from an embarrassing trial" (and saving the media from having to cover it). You'll hear that Rangel is a "good guy" who as "done a lot for America". That'll be it. You won't hear another word about it after tonight.

If Rangel had an "R" next to his name he would have been hounded out of office long ago. The story would be told over and over again, on the morning shows and the evening news.
Reply to this comment
by larry0304 July 29, 2010 1:31 PM EDT
Charlie is the perfect example of what is wrong with our political system. Any sane reasonable person knows there is no doubt about his guilt. Even he realizes he can't lie his way out of this one.

What is even more disturbing is that because he is black, he's getting an even bigger break. A crook is a crook and the color of a man's skin should not afford him any breaks. The congressional Black caucus is "warning" it's members of reacting critically against Charlie cause it will offend black voters.

Ummm, should not black voters already be offended because Charlie is a crook? Is'nt being a crook offense enough? Freakin amazing.........
Reply to this comment
by run2jazz2 July 29, 2010 1:30 PM EDT
Rangel needs to go! He is what is wrong with Washington which is simply that they abide by a different set of rules than others in this country.
Reply to this comment
by dadirt July 29, 2010 1:22 PM EDT
Probably a mock slap on the wrist, and a pay suspension, and he goes right back to work screwsing the country out of money collected for the spread the wealth president. This clown needs to be fined heavily, kicked out of office, and either jailed or made to work doing something free for a community where he is not liked. Not in his own back yard. Maybe a mexican labor camp.
Reply to this comment
by Brokennews July 29, 2010 12:53 PM EDT
Like we were expecting anything different.

But then again, Charlie isn't one of the peasant little people, so he get's to enjoy a system of laws that are reserved for the "special people".
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook