July 29, 2010 1:11 PM

9/11 Health Bill Spurs Partisan Finger-Pointing

Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y. on Face The Nation, Dec. 27, 2009

Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y. on Face The Nation, Dec. 27, 2009 (CBS)

(CBS/AP)  A bill that would pay billions of dollars to people exposed to toxic dust from the World Trade Center will fall short in a House vote, one of its key supporters said Wednesday.

The House is expected Thursday to take up a measure to provide free health care and compensation payments to 9/11 rescue and recovery workers who fell ill after working in the trade center ruins.

U.S. Rep. Peter King, a Long Island Republican, predicted that the bill would fail, and accused Democrats of perpetrating a "cruel hoax."

In 9/11's Wake, Anguish and Anger
Photos: Ground Zero Health Crisis

Democratic leaders opted to consider the bill under a procedure that requires a two-thirds vote for approval rather than a simple majority. Such a move blocks potential GOP amendments to the measure.

Meanwhile, Politico reports that House Republican leadership is advising its members to vote against the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act. According to Republicans, the measure would kill jobs, create a "new entitlement" and waste taxpayer dollars.

The measure would reopen the Victims Compensation Fund until 2031. Politico reports that Republicans are calling the extension "well beyond what is needed to take care of latent claims," according to a GOP policy statement.

The bill, according to Republicans, "creates a massive new entitlement program, exposes taxpayers to increased litigation, and is 'paid for' with tax increases and potential job losses."

Watch: Voices of Sick 9/11 Responders
Watch: Cancer Kills 9/11 Firefighter

King said Democrats are worried about casting votes as the fall elections near on controversial amendments, possibly including one that could ban the bill from covering illegal immigrants who were sickened by World Trade dust.

"They're afraid of taking a tough vote and as a result of that, they're willing to let cops and firefighters die," King, who supports the bill, said in a telephone interview with AP. "They want to protect their members from having to take a tough vote."

King said if Democrats brought it to the floor as a regular bill, it would pass with majority support.

The cost has been estimated at $7.4 billion over 10 years.

The legislation is named for James Zadroga, a police detective who died at age 34.

Photos: NYPD Deaths Linked to 9/11

His case is indicative of some of the uncertainties surrounding the proposal, which would create massive new spending on 9/11-related illnesses that are still something of a scientific mystery.

Doctors have linked trade center dust to a variety of health problems, including breathing ailments with symptoms similar to asthma. Thousands of people have been diagnosed with at least mild respiratory problems, or reduced lung function, and a smaller group has suffered from more serious, life-threatening ailments.

Thousands of the police officers, firefighters and construction workers who spent time on the trade center cleanup have also been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.

Yet, doctors have had a difficult time saying how many of the other health problems being experienced by ground zero workers are actually related to the dust - especially deadly illnesses like cancer.

City medical boards and a coroner in New Jersey initially held that Zadroga had died from a respiratory disease caused by particles from the trade center lodged in his lungs. But New York City's medical examiner later said those particles were the residue of prescription pills that had been improperly ground up and injected.

The debate over whether Zadroga died from a dust-related ailment, or prescription drug abuse, still rages.


© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment
by msjb12 August 1, 2010 11:25 AM EDT
I Know I Know It was Bushes fault I seen him getting helpers with a big megaphone I saw it right on tv It had to be Bush who else would have done such a cruel thing. SOUNDS STUPID DON"T IT
Reply to this comment
by starving1968-3 July 29, 2010 3:12 PM EDT
Of COURSE the republicans oppose it.....

The OPPOSE everything that doesn't garner donations from multi-billion dollar corporations and the extremely wealthy.
Reply to this comment
by skepticalJM July 29, 2010 2:48 PM EDT
No socialized medicine, but medicine for special interests; now everything in this country is only done for special interests, not for ALL. What has happened to the democrats in this country, they use to be the party of the people. Now they have become the party that PRETENDS to be for the people. We are losing the middle class, that is their, and their leader Obama's agenda, destroy the middle class.
Reply to this comment
by dadirt July 29, 2010 2:02 PM EDT
Teh government is not our mommy and daddy. Why did the government pay families for the loss of family members? That shold have come from the countries that sponsored the terrorism. Those injured during the cleanup were police, firemen and others all with health plans and insurance policies. Again, take the money from the muslims wanting to build the mosque at the site and pay the workers with that for a start. Money given by the government is not free, it is a tax payer funded account, and that account is allready being financed by our next generations. Stop the political correctness. I am sure the government is taking money from terrorist supporting accounts. Instead of spending it on useless programs and overpaid whitehouse officials, do something good with it!
Reply to this comment
by hologram5 July 29, 2010 2:33 PM EDT
yes they "DID" have good health plans until they got sick, couldn't work anymore and got canned. Once that happened, they're on their own.
by mac82059 July 30, 2010 11:21 AM EDT
Typical Republican response. Fight my war for me, protect me, but do not come asking for help if you suffer from it.
by jimbom121 July 29, 2010 1:06 PM EDT
Umm, Mr. King...the Dems voted for it, the GOP members voted against it.
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook