July 27, 2010 11:14 AM

Audit: U.S. Can't Account for 95% of Iraqi Funds

(AP)  The U.S. Defense Department is unable to properly account for over 95 percent of $9.1 billion in Iraqi oil money tapped by the U.S. for rebuilding the war ravaged nation, according to an audit released Tuesday.

The report by the U.S. Special Investigator for Iraq Reconstruction offers a compelling look at continued laxness in how such funds are being spent in a country where people complain basic services like electricity and clean water are sharply lacking seven years after the U.S.-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein.

Read the full report (pdf)

The audit found that shoddy record keeping by the Defense Department left the Pentagon unable to fully account for $8.7 billion it withdrew between 2004 and 2007 from a special fund set up by the U.N. Security Council. Of that amount, Pentagon "could not provide documentation to substantiate how it spent $2.6 billion."

The funds are separate from the $53 billion allocated by Congress for rebuilding Iraq.

The report comes at a critical time for Iraq.

Despite security gains made since 2008, bombings remain near a daily occurrence that compound the frustrations and fears of Iraqis increasingly weary of the current political crisis - one many say reflects how the country's politicians are more interested in their own interests than those of the nation.

Politicians have hit an impasse since inconclusive parliamentary elections were held March 7, unable to form a new government as Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, a Shiite, appears determined to stay in office when influential Shiite parties want to see him go.

The audit cited a number of factors that contributed to the inability to account for most of the money withdrawn by the Pentagon from the Development Fund for Iraq. It said most of the Defense Department organizations that received DFI money failed to set up Treasury Department accounts, as required.

In addition, it said no Defense Department organization was designated as the main body to oversee how the funds were accounted for or spent.

"The breakdown in controls left the funds vulnerable to inappropriate uses and undetected loss," the report said.

The audit found that the U.S. continues to hold about $34.3 million of the money even though it was required to return it to the Iraqi government.

The audit did not indicate that investigators believed there were any instances of fraud involved in the spending of these funds.

The DFI includes revenues from Iraq's oil and gas exports, as well as frozen Iraqi assets and surplus funds from the now-defunct, Saddam Hussein-era oil-for-food program. With the establishment of the Coalition Provisional Authority, which ran Iraq shortly after the start of the U.S. invasion in 2003 until mid-2004, about $20 billion was placed into the account.

The Iraqi government had agreed to allow the U.S. continued access to the funds after the CPA was dissolved in 2004, but it revoked that authority in December 2007.


© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 93 Comments
by akramkhalid July 28, 2010 11:36 AM EDT
that why Bush & Chenny love this Iraq War?
Reply to this comment
by nor-one July 28, 2010 10:35 AM EDT
If you want to know where the money went, just check the bank balance sheets of everyone over the rank of 1st looie that has retired since the invasion of Iraq !And I mean EVERYONE, even the media "heros".
Reply to this comment
by MalloryDavis July 28, 2010 7:00 AM EDT
Can you imagine what government mandated health care will be like? How can we continue to allow these people to do this with our money? There's nothing we can do. There's greed on both sides and on every side in-between. What a disgusting display of the financial saavy of congress. Vote these a$$e$ out!
Reply to this comment
by tsigili July 27, 2010 10:01 PM EDT
That's because the US government is totally inept.
Reply to this comment
by euge005 July 27, 2010 8:00 PM EDT
This needs to be another aspect of Bush's war crimes trials. I wonder how much of it was directed to his cronies in various oil companies or to Halliburton? And please note that this is on top of the 60B the oil companies stole during the Bush years of occupation. Offer W a plea bargin, he does not get hung in exchange for the truth for the firdt time in his life. Naturally that would not be binding on the Iraqis.
Reply to this comment
by infantryman1968 July 27, 2010 4:57 PM EDT
by maintain_integrity July 27, 2010 4:54 PM EDT
More of that history revision, huh Mr. LOL!?

The concept behind NAFTA ? promoting economic growth by easing the movement of goods and services between the U.S., Mexico and Canada ? had existed for years before it was born. President Ronald Reagan spoke of a North American agreement in his campaign in 1979, and the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement had existed since 1989. NAFTA, which was launched January 1, 1994 and finally saw the last of its policies implemented on January 1, 2008, stipulates the removal of most tariffs and restrictions on trade between the three nations and codifies a wide range of agreements on agricultural, textile and auto trade, as well as telecommunications, intellectual property, mobility of workers and environmental policies.

LOL!

The facts still remains. Algore cast the deciding vote in the Senate against 50 Democrats and Bill Clinton signed it into law against Amercia's Unions.
Reply to this comment
by infantryman1968 July 27, 2010 4:55 PM EDT
by maintain_integrity July 27, 2010 4:46 PM EDT
Mr. LOL! says, "So now your blaming talk radio on the two biggest landslides in Amercian Election History?"
*********************



No, not at all, and if you republicans knew anything about history -- other than the history revision you continue to do -- is that the raygun FCC abolished the Fairness Doctrine in 1987, the 1987 legislation to revive the Fairness Doctrine was vetoed by raygun, and another attempt to revive the doctrine in 1991 was stopped by poppy bush threatening yet another veto. All of this happened well after your raygun elections, so I have no idea of what you're spewing now, so get a CLUE, Mr. LOL!

It was shortly after the repeal of the Fairness Doctrine in 1987, that druggie rush started spewing his one-sided hatred over the air in Sacramento, and moving to NYC in 1988. It was the 1990's during the Clinton years that rush, coulter and others stated spewing their vitriol and venom, that also saw murdoch begin the one-sided fox republican network in 1996.

LOL!

So you are blaming talk radio on the two biggest landslides in American History!
Reply to this comment
by infantryman1968 July 27, 2010 4:53 PM EDT
by maintain_integrity July 27, 2010 4:49 PM EDT
Hey infant, while you seem to delusionally forget that billions of American taxpayers' dollars have also gone missing in Iraq during bushworld not even mentioning no-bid contracts, this is just more ineptness by the Pentagon, losing Iraqi OIL money too!

LOL!

Are you talking about the No Bid Contracts that you and Obama just renewed with Haliburton for the next two years?
Reply to this comment
by rnrstar July 27, 2010 4:26 PM EDT
More mismanagement of our money by Republicans. And they want the purse strings back in November? No thanks. "Fool me once...can't fool me again".
Reply to this comment
by facelessdrone2005 July 29, 2010 9:29 AM EDT
You are 100% correct.

Here the Republicans were blocking $20B for unemployment benefits for Americans but they approved almost $60B to "rebuild Iraq." What a load of BS! And they think they are fiscally responsible???

A lot of us don't trust the Democrats, but we trust the Republicans even less.
by infantryman1968 July 27, 2010 4:17 PM EDT
by maintain_integrity July 27, 2010 3:16 PM EDT
Actually, raygun had to repeal and then veto the Fairness Doctrine in the 1980's, in order for conservative talk radio and the fox propagandists to thrive with their LIES and DECEPTIONS ever since!

FACTS and HONESTY are something that conservatives are afraid of!

LOL!

So now your blaming talk radio on the two biggest landslides in Amercian Election History?

Your really reaching now lib.
Reply to this comment
See all 93 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook